Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computer, Engineering & Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Washington

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Washington

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Wheeler 100.0% 10.2% (+89.8)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#2
2. Malo 100.0% 10.2% (+89.8)#2 6.8% (+93.2)#16
3. Hoodsport 73.0% 10.2% (+62.8)#3 6.8% (+66.2)#31
4. Moclips 70.5% 10.2% (+60.4)#4 6.8% (+63.7)#32
5. Alder 54.5% 10.2% (+44.4)#5 6.8% (+47.8)#55
6. Acme 47.8% 10.2% (+37.6)#6 6.8% (+41.0)#79
7. Keyport 46.0% 10.2% (+35.8)#7 6.8% (+39.2)#86
8. Verlot 45.7% 10.2% (+35.6)#8 6.8% (+38.9)#88
9. Redmond 39.5% 10.2% (+29.4)#9 6.8% (+32.8)#119
10. Keller 38.0% 10.2% (+27.8)#10 6.8% (+31.2)#129
11. Parker 35.5% 10.2% (+25.3)#11 6.8% (+28.7)#151
12. La Grande 32.6% 10.2% (+22.4)#12 6.8% (+25.8)#177
13. Bellevue 29.7% 10.2% (+19.6)#13 6.8% (+23.0)#227
14. Bothell East 29.5% 10.2% (+19.4)#14 6.8% (+22.8)#230
15. Union Hill Novelty Hill 27.4% 10.2% (+17.2)#15 6.8% (+20.6)#275
16. Sammamish 25.0% 10.2% (+14.8)#16 6.8% (+18.2)#335
17. Marietta Alderwood 24.7% 10.2% (+14.6)#17 6.8% (+17.9)#341
18. Ames Lake 24.3% 10.2% (+14.2)#18 6.8% (+17.6)#351
19. Custer 24.0% 10.2% (+13.9)#19 6.8% (+17.3)#361
20. Mill Creek East 23.6% 10.2% (+13.4)#20 6.8% (+16.8)#374
21. Lebam 23.5% 10.2% (+13.4)#21 6.8% (+16.8)#377
22. Issaquah 23.5% 10.2% (+13.3)#22 6.8% (+16.7)#379
23. Duvall 22.6% 10.2% (+12.4)#23 6.8% (+15.8)#421
24. Newcastle 22.4% 10.2% (+12.2)#24 6.8% (+15.6)#427
25. Kirkland 22.3% 10.2% (+12.1)#25 6.8% (+15.5)#429
26. Dollars Corner 21.9% 10.2% (+11.7)#26 6.8% (+15.1)#453
27. Monroe North 21.8% 10.2% (+11.6)#27 6.8% (+15.0)#462
28. Oso 21.2% 10.2% (+11.1)#28 6.8% (+14.4)#489
29. Bothell 21.0% 10.2% (+10.8)#29 6.8% (+14.2)#511
30. Woodinville 20.7% 10.2% (+10.6)#30 6.8% (+14.0)#523
31. West Pasco 20.6% 10.2% (+10.5)#31 6.8% (+13.9)#528
32. Seattle 19.7% 10.2% (+9.59)#32 6.8% (+13.0)#568
33. Cottage Lake 19.7% 10.2% (+9.50)#33 6.8% (+12.9)#574
34. Bothell West 19.6% 10.2% (+9.48)#34 6.8% (+12.9)#578
35. Snoqualmie 19.5% 10.2% (+9.32)#35 6.8% (+12.7)#591
36. Lake Marcel Stillwater 19.3% 10.2% (+9.13)#36 6.8% (+12.5)#605
37. Raft Island 19.0% 10.2% (+8.81)#37 6.8% (+12.2)#638
38. Kenmore 18.9% 10.2% (+8.73)#38 6.8% (+12.1)#651
39. Mill Creek 18.4% 10.2% (+8.28)#39 6.8% (+11.7)#685
40. Richland 17.5% 10.2% (+7.32)#40 6.8% (+10.7)#778
41. Riverbend 17.2% 10.2% (+7.07)#41 6.8% (+10.5)#804
42. Mirrormont 17.1% 10.2% (+6.92)#42 6.8% (+10.3)#822
43. Mercer Island 16.9% 10.2% (+6.77)#43 6.8% (+10.2)#841
44. Lake Forest Park 16.8% 10.2% (+6.68)#44 6.8% (+10.1)#857
45. Silver Firs 16.1% 10.2% (+5.93)#45 6.8% (+9.32)#948
46. Kingston 16.0% 10.2% (+5.86)#46 6.8% (+9.26)#957
47. Clearview 15.7% 10.2% (+5.58)#47 6.8% (+8.98)#996
48. Hunts Point 15.6% 10.2% (+5.41)#48 6.8% (+8.81)#1,024
49. Alderwood Manor 15.4% 10.2% (+5.23)#49 6.8% (+8.62)#1,057
50. Meadowdale 15.3% 10.2% (+5.17)#50 6.8% (+8.57)#1,076
51. Martha Lake 15.3% 10.2% (+5.10)#51 6.8% (+8.50)#1,089
52. North Bend 15.1% 10.2% (+4.89)#52 6.8% (+8.29)#1,128
53. Seabeck 14.9% 10.2% (+4.69)#53 6.8% (+8.09)#1,165
54. West Richland 14.9% 10.2% (+4.69)#54 6.8% (+8.09)#1,166
55. Canterwood 14.8% 10.2% (+4.66)#55 6.8% (+8.06)#1,170
56. Inchelium 14.1% 10.2% (+3.94)#56 6.8% (+7.34)#1,308
57. May Creek 14.1% 10.2% (+3.94)#57 6.8% (+7.34)#1,309
58. Larch Way 14.0% 10.2% (+3.86)#58 6.8% (+7.26)#1,330
59. Lake Stickney 13.9% 10.2% (+3.77)#59 6.8% (+7.17)#1,348
60. Normandy Park 13.8% 10.2% (+3.63)#60 6.8% (+7.03)#1,395
61. Fairwood Cdp King County 13.8% 10.2% (+3.60)#61 6.8% (+7.00)#1,404
62. Picnic Point 13.6% 10.2% (+3.47)#62 6.8% (+6.87)#1,446
63. Wilderness Rim 13.6% 10.2% (+3.45)#63 6.8% (+6.85)#1,452
64. Dash Point 13.5% 10.2% (+3.31)#64 6.8% (+6.71)#1,488
65. Yarrow Point 13.5% 10.2% (+3.30)#65 6.8% (+6.70)#1,494
66. Lake Goodwin 13.4% 10.2% (+3.25)#66 6.8% (+6.65)#1,518
67. Medina 13.4% 10.2% (+3.23)#67 6.8% (+6.62)#1,520
68. Maltby 13.4% 10.2% (+3.19)#68 6.8% (+6.59)#1,527
69. Erlands Point 13.3% 10.2% (+3.17)#69 6.8% (+6.57)#1,532
70. Bainbridge Island 13.3% 10.2% (+3.09)#70 6.8% (+6.49)#1,564
71. North Fort Lewis 13.1% 10.2% (+2.96)#71 6.8% (+6.35)#1,594
72. Southworth 13.1% 10.2% (+2.95)#72 6.8% (+6.35)#1,597
73. Carnation 13.1% 10.2% (+2.94)#73 6.8% (+6.33)#1,601
74. Shoreline 12.9% 10.2% (+2.77)#74 6.8% (+6.16)#1,650
75. Cherry Grove 12.9% 10.2% (+2.76)#75 6.8% (+6.15)#1,655
76. Maple Valley 12.9% 10.2% (+2.73)#76 6.8% (+6.13)#1,665
77. Stansberry Lake 12.8% 10.2% (+2.62)#77 6.8% (+6.01)#1,703
78. Enetai 12.8% 10.2% (+2.61)#78 6.8% (+6.01)#1,705
79. Latah 12.8% 10.2% (+2.61)#79 6.8% (+6.00)#1,706
80. Upper Elochoman 12.7% 10.2% (+2.54)#80 6.8% (+5.93)#1,727
81. Mckenna 12.7% 10.2% (+2.53)#81 6.8% (+5.93)#1,728
82. Kalama 12.6% 10.2% (+2.47)#82 6.8% (+5.86)#1,744
83. Garfield 12.6% 10.2% (+2.44)#83 6.8% (+5.84)#1,753
84. Clyde Hill 12.6% 10.2% (+2.43)#84 6.8% (+5.83)#1,754
85. Buckley 12.5% 10.2% (+2.29)#85 6.8% (+5.69)#1,792
86. Mukilteo 12.4% 10.2% (+2.26)#86 6.8% (+5.66)#1,802
87. Woods Creek 12.1% 10.2% (+1.93)#87 6.8% (+5.32)#1,917
88. Pullman 12.0% 10.2% (+1.79)#88 6.8% (+5.19)#1,954
89. Amboy 11.8% 10.2% (+1.67)#89 6.8% (+5.06)#1,998
90. Brier 11.8% 10.2% (+1.64)#90 6.8% (+5.04)#2,008
91. Marrowstone 11.7% 10.2% (+1.54)#91 6.8% (+4.93)#2,044
92. Point Roberts 11.7% 10.2% (+1.53)#92 6.8% (+4.93)#2,046
93. Wilbur 11.5% 10.2% (+1.33)#93 6.8% (+4.73)#2,120
94. Manchester 11.4% 10.2% (+1.24)#94 6.8% (+4.64)#2,163
95. Renton 11.4% 10.2% (+1.23)#95 6.8% (+4.62)#2,174
96. Shadow Lake 11.4% 10.2% (+1.20)#96 6.8% (+4.59)#2,196
97. Uniontown 11.3% 10.2% (+1.15)#97 6.8% (+4.54)#2,216
98. Black Diamond 11.2% 10.2% (+1.08)#98 6.8% (+4.47)#2,252
99. Dallesport 11.1% 10.2% (+0.951)#99 6.8% (+4.35)#2,307
100. Pomeroy 11.1% 10.2% (+0.902)#100 6.8% (+4.30)#2,346

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Washington are:
#1
100.0%
#2
73.0%
#3
70.5%
#4
54.5%
#5
47.8%
#6
46.0%
#7
45.7%
#8
39.5%
#9
38.0%
#10
35.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Washington?
Malo has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Washington with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Washington is 10.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States is 6.8%.