Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computer, Engineering & Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in South Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in South Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Browntown 100.0% 5.3% (+94.7)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#6
2. Jamestown 31.9% 5.3% (+26.6)#2 6.8% (+25.2)#184
3. Antreville 30.3% 5.3% (+24.9)#3 6.8% (+23.5)#216
4. Clarks Hill 30.0% 5.3% (+24.7)#4 6.8% (+23.2)#222
5. Peak 29.4% 5.3% (+24.1)#5 6.8% (+22.6)#231
6. Riverview 27.5% 5.3% (+22.2)#6 6.8% (+20.7)#272
7. Helena 25.9% 5.3% (+20.6)#7 6.8% (+19.1)#311
8. La France 23.7% 5.3% (+18.3)#8 6.8% (+16.9)#372
9. Fair Play 16.2% 5.3% (+10.9)#9 6.8% (+9.43)#932
10. Lowrys 15.7% 5.3% (+10.4)#10 6.8% (+8.98)#997
11. Lake Secession 15.7% 5.3% (+10.4)#11 6.8% (+8.93)#1,008
12. Mulberry 15.5% 5.3% (+10.1)#12 6.8% (+8.71)#1,041
13. Stateburg 15.5% 5.3% (+10.1)#13 6.8% (+8.71)#1,044
14. Gloverville 15.4% 5.3% (+10.0)#14 6.8% (+8.59)#1,074
15. Sandy Springs 14.1% 5.3% (+8.75)#15 6.8% (+7.33)#1,311
16. Adams Run 13.8% 5.3% (+8.50)#16 6.8% (+7.07)#1,384
17. Sullivan S Island 13.7% 5.3% (+8.39)#17 6.8% (+6.97)#1,411
18. Salem 13.7% 5.3% (+8.38)#18 6.8% (+6.96)#1,414
19. Santee 12.4% 5.3% (+7.09)#19 6.8% (+5.67)#1,797
20. Privateer 11.9% 5.3% (+6.58)#20 6.8% (+5.16)#1,971
21. Hanahan 11.4% 5.3% (+6.08)#21 6.8% (+4.66)#2,155
22. Golden Grove 11.4% 5.3% (+6.07)#22 6.8% (+4.65)#2,158
23. Floydale 11.4% 5.3% (+6.02)#23 6.8% (+4.60)#2,192
24. Chickasaw Point 11.4% 5.3% (+6.01)#24 6.8% (+4.59)#2,202
25. Utica 11.3% 5.3% (+5.95)#25 6.8% (+4.53)#2,221
26. Tega Cay 11.2% 5.3% (+5.84)#26 6.8% (+4.42)#2,276
27. Mount Pleasant 10.9% 5.3% (+5.52)#27 6.8% (+4.10)#2,436
28. Pendleton 10.8% 5.3% (+5.48)#28 6.8% (+4.06)#2,456
29. Neeses 10.7% 5.3% (+5.37)#29 6.8% (+3.95)#2,512
30. Five Forks 10.7% 5.3% (+5.34)#30 6.8% (+3.91)#2,532
31. Clemson 10.6% 5.3% (+5.26)#31 6.8% (+3.83)#2,579
32. Walhalla 10.2% 5.3% (+4.83)#32 6.8% (+3.40)#2,834
33. Moncks Corner 9.8% 5.3% (+4.46)#33 6.8% (+3.04)#3,072
34. Mcclellanville 9.8% 5.3% (+4.41)#34 6.8% (+2.99)#3,104
35. Dalzell 9.6% 5.3% (+4.24)#35 6.8% (+2.82)#3,251
36. Sheldon 9.6% 5.3% (+4.22)#36 6.8% (+2.80)#3,266
37. Awendaw 9.2% 5.3% (+3.83)#37 6.8% (+2.41)#3,563
38. Newport 9.1% 5.3% (+3.78)#38 6.8% (+2.36)#3,601
39. Bucksport 9.1% 5.3% (+3.75)#39 6.8% (+2.33)#3,626
40. Lake Wylie 9.0% 5.3% (+3.62)#40 6.8% (+2.20)#3,747
41. Mayesville 8.9% 5.3% (+3.54)#41 6.8% (+2.12)#3,830
42. Warrenville 8.9% 5.3% (+3.52)#42 6.8% (+2.10)#3,840
43. Baxter 8.7% 5.3% (+3.34)#43 6.8% (+1.91)#3,999
44. Luray 8.7% 5.3% (+3.31)#44 6.8% (+1.89)#4,020
45. Van Wyck 8.7% 5.3% (+3.31)#45 6.8% (+1.89)#4,023
46. Fort Mill 8.6% 5.3% (+3.29)#46 6.8% (+1.87)#4,038
47. Greenville 8.5% 5.3% (+3.20)#47 6.8% (+1.78)#4,127
48. Charleston 8.5% 5.3% (+3.20)#48 6.8% (+1.78)#4,129
49. Aiken 8.5% 5.3% (+3.17)#49 6.8% (+1.75)#4,157
50. Irmo 8.4% 5.3% (+3.03)#50 6.8% (+1.61)#4,290
51. North Augusta 8.3% 5.3% (+2.99)#51 6.8% (+1.57)#4,322
52. Seabrook Island 8.3% 5.3% (+2.97)#52 6.8% (+1.54)#4,363
53. Cameron 8.1% 5.3% (+2.71)#53 6.8% (+1.29)#4,621
54. Landrum 8.0% 5.3% (+2.66)#54 6.8% (+1.24)#4,692
55. Hollywood 7.9% 5.3% (+2.59)#55 6.8% (+1.17)#4,781
56. Mauldin 7.8% 5.3% (+2.44)#56 6.8% (+1.02)#4,958
57. Lugoff 7.8% 5.3% (+2.42)#57 6.8% (+0.993)#4,996
58. Isle Of Palms 7.6% 5.3% (+2.23)#58 6.8% (+0.806)#5,219
59. Reidville 7.5% 5.3% (+2.18)#59 6.8% (+0.762)#5,268
60. Goose Creek 7.5% 5.3% (+2.15)#60 6.8% (+0.723)#5,311
61. North Hartsville 7.4% 5.3% (+2.05)#61 6.8% (+0.627)#5,420
62. Fountain Inn 7.3% 5.3% (+1.99)#62 6.8% (+0.571)#5,500
63. Briarcliffe Acres 7.3% 5.3% (+1.95)#63 6.8% (+0.531)#5,540
64. Blackville 7.3% 5.3% (+1.94)#64 6.8% (+0.516)#5,559
65. Kingstree 7.2% 5.3% (+1.84)#65 6.8% (+0.413)#5,688
66. Springdale 7.1% 5.3% (+1.78)#66 6.8% (+0.362)#5,784
67. Winnsboro Mills 7.1% 5.3% (+1.77)#67 6.8% (+0.345)#5,802
68. Taylors 7.1% 5.3% (+1.76)#68 6.8% (+0.334)#5,814
69. Chesterfield 7.1% 5.3% (+1.72)#69 6.8% (+0.296)#5,870
70. Dunean 7.1% 5.3% (+1.71)#70 6.8% (+0.290)#5,879
71. New Ellenton 6.9% 5.3% (+1.54)#71 6.8% (+0.118)#6,137
72. Central 6.8% 5.3% (+1.48)#72 6.8% (+0.056)#6,224
73. Summerville 6.8% 5.3% (+1.46)#73 6.8% (+0.041)#6,259
74. Silverstreet 6.8% 5.3% (+1.44)#74 6.8% (+0.015)#6,299
75. Hardeeville 6.6% 5.3% (+1.30)#75 6.8% (-0.119)#6,483
76. Little River 6.6% 5.3% (+1.29)#76 6.8% (-0.129)#6,492
77. Powdersville 6.6% 5.3% (+1.22)#77 6.8% (-0.199)#6,593
78. Lyman 6.5% 5.3% (+1.18)#78 6.8% (-0.247)#6,688
79. Ladson 6.5% 5.3% (+1.13)#79 6.8% (-0.292)#6,751
80. Gilbert 6.5% 5.3% (+1.11)#80 6.8% (-0.313)#6,778
81. Forest Acres 6.4% 5.3% (+1.09)#81 6.8% (-0.337)#6,814
82. Oak Grove 6.3% 5.3% (+0.998)#82 6.8% (-0.425)#6,976
83. Camden 6.3% 5.3% (+0.934)#83 6.8% (-0.488)#7,087
84. Harbor Island 6.2% 5.3% (+0.908)#84 6.8% (-0.515)#7,128
85. Joanna 6.2% 5.3% (+0.878)#85 6.8% (-0.545)#7,171
86. Tigerville 6.2% 5.3% (+0.864)#86 6.8% (-0.559)#7,198
87. Liberty 6.2% 5.3% (+0.863)#87 6.8% (-0.560)#7,203
88. Hamer 6.2% 5.3% (+0.834)#88 6.8% (-0.588)#7,255
89. Heath Springs 6.1% 5.3% (+0.793)#89 6.8% (-0.630)#7,332
90. Columbia 6.1% 5.3% (+0.777)#90 6.8% (-0.645)#7,352
91. Greer 6.1% 5.3% (+0.717)#91 6.8% (-0.705)#7,481
92. Clover 6.0% 5.3% (+0.682)#92 6.8% (-0.740)#7,543
93. Anderson 6.0% 5.3% (+0.647)#93 6.8% (-0.775)#7,615
94. Campobello 6.0% 5.3% (+0.635)#94 6.8% (-0.788)#7,632
95. Cordova 6.0% 5.3% (+0.610)#95 6.8% (-0.812)#7,686
96. Clearwater 5.9% 5.3% (+0.604)#96 6.8% (-0.819)#7,695
97. Lexington 5.9% 5.3% (+0.603)#97 6.8% (-0.819)#7,697
98. Murphys Estates 5.9% 5.3% (+0.603)#98 6.8% (-0.820)#7,698
99. Arcadia 5.9% 5.3% (+0.581)#99 6.8% (-0.842)#7,740
100. Meggett 5.9% 5.3% (+0.532)#100 6.8% (-0.891)#7,845

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in South Carolina are:
#1
31.9%
#2
30.3%
#3
30.0%
#4
29.4%
#5
27.5%
#6
16.2%
#7
15.7%
#8
15.7%
#9
15.5%
#10
15.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in South Carolina?
Jamestown has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in South Carolina with 31.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the State of South Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in South Carolina is 5.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States is 6.8%.