Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computer, Engineering & Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. White Water 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#1 6.8% (+93.2)#13
2. Jefferson 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#2 6.8% (+93.2)#22
3. Loveland 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#3 6.8% (+93.2)#23
4. Platter 52.9% 4.9% (+48.0)#4 6.8% (+46.2)#63
5. Lawtonka Acres 28.9% 4.9% (+24.0)#5 6.8% (+22.2)#239
6. Agra 28.4% 4.9% (+23.5)#6 6.8% (+21.7)#254
7. Vera 28.0% 4.9% (+23.0)#7 6.8% (+21.2)#263
8. Murphy 27.7% 4.9% (+22.7)#8 6.8% (+20.9)#269
9. Lawrence Creek 23.1% 4.9% (+18.2)#9 6.8% (+16.3)#395
10. Hochatown 22.5% 4.9% (+17.6)#10 6.8% (+15.8)#422
11. Ashland 21.1% 4.9% (+16.1)#11 6.8% (+14.3)#502
12. Sportmans Shores 16.7% 4.9% (+11.7)#12 6.8% (+9.90)#874
13. Chester 16.7% 4.9% (+11.7)#13 6.8% (+9.90)#876
14. Middleberg 15.2% 4.9% (+10.2)#14 6.8% (+8.39)#1,109
15. Rose 14.3% 4.9% (+9.36)#15 6.8% (+7.52)#1,268
16. Spaulding 13.7% 4.9% (+8.80)#16 6.8% (+6.96)#1,415
17. Zion 13.3% 4.9% (+8.41)#17 6.8% (+6.57)#1,541
18. Notchietown 12.9% 4.9% (+7.95)#18 6.8% (+6.11)#1,668
19. Little Ponderosa 12.8% 4.9% (+7.92)#19 6.8% (+6.08)#1,678
20. Piedmont 12.5% 4.9% (+7.55)#20 6.8% (+5.71)#1,784
21. Tiawah 12.0% 4.9% (+7.03)#21 6.8% (+5.19)#1,953
22. Francis 11.8% 4.9% (+6.88)#22 6.8% (+5.04)#2,004
23. Shidler 11.6% 4.9% (+6.72)#23 6.8% (+4.88)#2,058
24. Copan 11.3% 4.9% (+6.40)#24 6.8% (+4.56)#2,209
25. Limestone 11.3% 4.9% (+6.39)#25 6.8% (+4.55)#2,212
26. Watts 10.5% 4.9% (+5.60)#26 6.8% (+3.76)#2,623
27. Bartlesville 9.7% 4.9% (+4.80)#27 6.8% (+2.96)#3,134
28. Bradley 9.7% 4.9% (+4.75)#28 6.8% (+2.91)#3,174
29. Greenville 9.6% 4.9% (+4.69)#29 6.8% (+2.85)#3,224
30. Woodlawn Park 9.4% 4.9% (+4.51)#30 6.8% (+2.67)#3,363
31. Earlsboro 9.4% 4.9% (+4.45)#31 6.8% (+2.61)#3,411
32. Moore 9.2% 4.9% (+4.27)#32 6.8% (+2.43)#3,549
33. Elgin 8.8% 4.9% (+3.85)#33 6.8% (+2.01)#3,921
34. Slick 8.8% 4.9% (+3.85)#34 6.8% (+2.01)#3,925
35. Rocky Point 8.6% 4.9% (+3.66)#35 6.8% (+1.82)#4,084
36. Oakwood 8.6% 4.9% (+3.65)#36 6.8% (+1.81)#4,107
37. Cashion 8.4% 4.9% (+3.50)#37 6.8% (+1.66)#4,238
38. Burbank 8.3% 4.9% (+3.41)#38 6.8% (+1.57)#4,334
39. Edmond 8.3% 4.9% (+3.37)#39 6.8% (+1.53)#4,377
40. Choctaw 8.3% 4.9% (+3.33)#40 6.8% (+1.49)#4,412
41. Deer Creek 8.1% 4.9% (+3.18)#41 6.8% (+1.34)#4,575
42. Pawnee 8.0% 4.9% (+3.06)#42 6.8% (+1.22)#4,724
43. Sportsmen Acres 7.8% 4.9% (+2.92)#43 6.8% (+1.08)#4,890
44. Collinsville 7.8% 4.9% (+2.89)#44 6.8% (+1.05)#4,921
45. Norman 7.8% 4.9% (+2.83)#45 6.8% (+0.987)#5,003
46. Bixby 7.7% 4.9% (+2.78)#46 6.8% (+0.943)#5,055
47. Milburn 7.6% 4.9% (+2.69)#47 6.8% (+0.854)#5,171
48. The Village 7.3% 4.9% (+2.38)#48 6.8% (+0.536)#5,533
49. Harrah 7.2% 4.9% (+2.26)#49 6.8% (+0.425)#5,668
50. Willow 7.1% 4.9% (+2.22)#50 6.8% (+0.378)#5,749
51. Skedee 7.1% 4.9% (+2.22)#51 6.8% (+0.378)#5,758
52. Eagletown 7.1% 4.9% (+2.18)#52 6.8% (+0.336)#5,812
53. Newcastle 7.0% 4.9% (+2.10)#53 6.8% (+0.257)#5,928
54. Waynoka 7.0% 4.9% (+2.09)#54 6.8% (+0.253)#5,931
55. Garber 7.0% 4.9% (+2.08)#55 6.8% (+0.238)#5,949
56. Lost City 6.9% 4.9% (+1.97)#56 6.8% (+0.132)#6,103
57. Broken Arrow 6.9% 4.9% (+1.95)#57 6.8% (+0.106)#6,153
58. Jenks 6.8% 4.9% (+1.91)#58 6.8% (+0.066)#6,211
59. Elmore City 6.8% 4.9% (+1.83)#59 6.8% (-0.014)#6,333
60. Oklahoma City 6.7% 4.9% (+1.76)#60 6.8% (-0.083)#6,423
61. Owasso 6.7% 4.9% (+1.73)#61 6.8% (-0.107)#6,472
62. Peavine 6.6% 4.9% (+1.64)#62 6.8% (-0.195)#6,590
63. Welty 6.4% 4.9% (+1.46)#63 6.8% (-0.382)#6,887
64. Taloga 6.3% 4.9% (+1.42)#64 6.8% (-0.416)#6,949
65. Stillwater 6.3% 4.9% (+1.37)#65 6.8% (-0.473)#7,055
66. Breckenridge 6.2% 4.9% (+1.33)#66 6.8% (-0.515)#7,131
67. Mustang 6.2% 4.9% (+1.28)#67 6.8% (-0.564)#7,210
68. Cedar Valley 6.1% 4.9% (+1.15)#68 6.8% (-0.687)#7,430
69. Cleo Springs 6.0% 4.9% (+1.06)#69 6.8% (-0.782)#7,622
70. Fort Gibson 5.9% 4.9% (+1.02)#70 6.8% (-0.819)#7,694
71. Kaw City 5.9% 4.9% (+1.02)#71 6.8% (-0.824)#7,706
72. Midwest City 5.9% 4.9% (+1.01)#72 6.8% (-0.830)#7,713
73. Rentiesville 5.9% 4.9% (+0.958)#73 6.8% (-0.882)#7,830
74. Long 5.8% 4.9% (+0.844)#74 6.8% (-0.995)#8,043
75. Chandler 5.6% 4.9% (+0.711)#75 6.8% (-1.13)#8,276
76. West Peavine 5.6% 4.9% (+0.709)#76 6.8% (-1.13)#8,281
77. Geary 5.6% 4.9% (+0.700)#77 6.8% (-1.14)#8,295
78. Randlett 5.6% 4.9% (+0.662)#78 6.8% (-1.18)#8,363
79. White Eagle 5.6% 4.9% (+0.631)#79 6.8% (-1.21)#8,406
80. Soper 5.6% 4.9% (+0.631)#80 6.8% (-1.21)#8,413
81. Red Oak 5.5% 4.9% (+0.563)#81 6.8% (-1.28)#8,550
82. Medford 5.5% 4.9% (+0.551)#82 6.8% (-1.29)#8,570
83. Martha 5.5% 4.9% (+0.530)#83 6.8% (-1.31)#8,624
84. Clinton 5.4% 4.9% (+0.486)#84 6.8% (-1.35)#8,711
85. Bethel Acres 5.4% 4.9% (+0.481)#85 6.8% (-1.36)#8,723
86. Hillsdale 5.4% 4.9% (+0.481)#86 6.8% (-1.36)#8,732
87. Winchester 5.4% 4.9% (+0.467)#87 6.8% (-1.37)#8,752
88. Nichols Hills 5.4% 4.9% (+0.458)#88 6.8% (-1.38)#8,776
89. Blanchard 5.4% 4.9% (+0.438)#89 6.8% (-1.40)#8,829
90. Apache 5.4% 4.9% (+0.437)#90 6.8% (-1.40)#8,832
91. Burns Flat 5.4% 4.9% (+0.430)#91 6.8% (-1.41)#8,848
92. Bentley 5.3% 4.9% (+0.338)#92 6.8% (-1.50)#9,021
93. Tulsa 5.2% 4.9% (+0.301)#93 6.8% (-1.54)#9,077
94. Talala 5.2% 4.9% (+0.299)#94 6.8% (-1.54)#9,082
95. Byars 5.2% 4.9% (+0.248)#95 6.8% (-1.59)#9,188
96. Noble 5.2% 4.9% (+0.236)#96 6.8% (-1.60)#9,212
97. Wickliffe 5.1% 4.9% (+0.217)#97 6.8% (-1.62)#9,255
98. Fort Cobb 5.1% 4.9% (+0.215)#98 6.8% (-1.62)#9,258
99. Keefton 5.1% 4.9% (+0.212)#99 6.8% (-1.63)#9,266
100. Park Hill 5.1% 4.9% (+0.192)#100 6.8% (-1.65)#9,302

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
52.9%
#5
28.4%
#6
28.0%
#7
27.7%
#8
23.1%
#9
21.1%
#10
16.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Oklahoma?
White Water has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Oklahoma is 4.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States is 6.8%.