Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computer, Engineering & Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in North Carolina

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in North Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Blue Clay Farms 42.9% 6.5% (+36.4)#1 6.8% (+36.1)#99
2. Centerville 34.5% 6.5% (+28.0)#2 6.8% (+27.8)#156
3. Morrisville 31.3% 6.5% (+24.8)#3 6.8% (+24.6)#195
4. Gerton 30.8% 6.5% (+24.3)#4 6.8% (+24.0)#210
5. Cary 22.5% 6.5% (+16.0)#5 6.8% (+15.8)#423
6. Seagrove 21.8% 6.5% (+15.3)#6 6.8% (+15.0)#459
7. Duck 20.4% 6.5% (+13.9)#7 6.8% (+13.7)#538
8. Jackson Springs 20.4% 6.5% (+13.9)#8 6.8% (+13.6)#539
9. Efland 19.4% 6.5% (+12.9)#9 6.8% (+12.6)#601
10. Apex 19.2% 6.5% (+12.7)#10 6.8% (+12.5)#613
11. Spring Hope 19.1% 6.5% (+12.6)#11 6.8% (+12.3)#624
12. Rolesville 18.3% 6.5% (+11.8)#12 6.8% (+11.6)#699
13. St James 18.0% 6.5% (+11.5)#13 6.8% (+11.3)#727
14. Governors 16.8% 6.5% (+10.3)#14 6.8% (+10.0)#862
15. Carrboro 16.5% 6.5% (+9.97)#15 6.8% (+9.71)#894
16. Rougemont 16.2% 6.5% (+9.68)#16 6.8% (+9.42)#936
17. Holden Beach 15.9% 6.5% (+9.38)#17 6.8% (+9.11)#978
18. Lake Junaluska 15.5% 6.5% (+8.97)#18 6.8% (+8.70)#1,045
19. Harrellsville 15.3% 6.5% (+8.79)#19 6.8% (+8.53)#1,087
20. Ashley Heights 14.8% 6.5% (+8.29)#20 6.8% (+8.03)#1,178
21. Holly Springs 14.6% 6.5% (+8.07)#21 6.8% (+7.80)#1,222
22. Cedar Rock 14.1% 6.5% (+7.55)#22 6.8% (+7.29)#1,321
23. Alamance 13.9% 6.5% (+7.38)#23 6.8% (+7.12)#1,366
24. Harrisburg 13.8% 6.5% (+7.32)#24 6.8% (+7.05)#1,392
25. Hoffman 13.7% 6.5% (+7.23)#25 6.8% (+6.97)#1,412
26. Woodlawn 13.1% 6.5% (+6.65)#26 6.8% (+6.38)#1,590
27. Laurel Hill 13.1% 6.5% (+6.60)#27 6.8% (+6.34)#1,599
28. Chapel Hill 13.1% 6.5% (+6.59)#28 6.8% (+6.32)#1,605
29. Askewville 12.2% 6.5% (+5.66)#29 6.8% (+5.40)#1,905
30. Forest Oaks 11.9% 6.5% (+5.43)#30 6.8% (+5.16)#1,967
31. Hillsborough 11.7% 6.5% (+5.22)#31 6.8% (+4.96)#2,036
32. Briar Chapel 11.7% 6.5% (+5.18)#32 6.8% (+4.92)#2,048
33. Micro 11.6% 6.5% (+5.10)#33 6.8% (+4.84)#2,070
34. Elroy 11.6% 6.5% (+5.07)#34 6.8% (+4.81)#2,080
35. Moyock 11.5% 6.5% (+4.99)#35 6.8% (+4.73)#2,121
36. Durham 11.2% 6.5% (+4.73)#36 6.8% (+4.46)#2,259
37. Vann Crossroads 11.2% 6.5% (+4.72)#37 6.8% (+4.45)#2,264
38. Oak Ridge 11.1% 6.5% (+4.61)#38 6.8% (+4.35)#2,306
39. Whitsett 11.1% 6.5% (+4.61)#39 6.8% (+4.35)#2,309
40. Trenton 11.1% 6.5% (+4.61)#40 6.8% (+4.35)#2,315
41. Wake Forest 11.0% 6.5% (+4.51)#41 6.8% (+4.25)#2,371
42. Marvin 10.9% 6.5% (+4.41)#42 6.8% (+4.15)#2,408
43. Raleigh 10.9% 6.5% (+4.39)#43 6.8% (+4.12)#2,427
44. Bethania 10.9% 6.5% (+4.35)#44 6.8% (+4.09)#2,443
45. Hoopers Creek 10.7% 6.5% (+4.23)#45 6.8% (+3.97)#2,499
46. Stokesdale 10.6% 6.5% (+4.09)#46 6.8% (+3.82)#2,589
47. Fearrington Village 10.5% 6.5% (+4.02)#47 6.8% (+3.75)#2,631
48. Lake Park 10.5% 6.5% (+4.00)#48 6.8% (+3.74)#2,637
49. Pinnacle 10.4% 6.5% (+3.94)#49 6.8% (+3.67)#2,669
50. Weddington 10.4% 6.5% (+3.91)#50 6.8% (+3.64)#2,690
51. Angier 10.4% 6.5% (+3.88)#51 6.8% (+3.62)#2,709
52. Hampstead 10.3% 6.5% (+3.78)#52 6.8% (+3.52)#2,768
53. Youngsville 10.2% 6.5% (+3.66)#53 6.8% (+3.39)#2,846
54. Banner Elk 10.1% 6.5% (+3.64)#54 6.8% (+3.38)#2,856
55. Huntersville 10.1% 6.5% (+3.58)#55 6.8% (+3.32)#2,892
56. Black Mountain 10.1% 6.5% (+3.56)#56 6.8% (+3.30)#2,910
57. Sea Breeze 10.0% 6.5% (+3.53)#57 6.8% (+3.27)#2,926
58. Weaverville 10.0% 6.5% (+3.50)#58 6.8% (+3.24)#2,938
59. Milton 9.8% 6.5% (+3.34)#59 6.8% (+3.07)#3,051
60. James City 9.8% 6.5% (+3.29)#60 6.8% (+3.03)#3,080
61. Danbury 9.8% 6.5% (+3.29)#61 6.8% (+3.03)#3,082
62. Mooresville 9.7% 6.5% (+3.24)#62 6.8% (+2.97)#3,119
63. Pine Knoll Shores 9.7% 6.5% (+3.19)#63 6.8% (+2.92)#3,165
64. Grifton 9.6% 6.5% (+3.13)#64 6.8% (+2.87)#3,209
65. Garner 9.6% 6.5% (+3.12)#65 6.8% (+2.85)#3,218
66. Minnesott Beach 9.6% 6.5% (+3.12)#66 6.8% (+2.85)#3,221
67. Carolina Shores 9.6% 6.5% (+3.09)#67 6.8% (+2.82)#3,246
68. Cherry Branch 9.6% 6.5% (+3.08)#68 6.8% (+2.82)#3,250
69. Summerfield 9.5% 6.5% (+2.97)#69 6.8% (+2.71)#3,331
70. Godwin 9.4% 6.5% (+2.88)#70 6.8% (+2.61)#3,416
71. Walnut Creek 9.3% 6.5% (+2.83)#71 6.8% (+2.56)#3,443
72. Swansboro 9.3% 6.5% (+2.82)#72 6.8% (+2.55)#3,453
73. Belville 9.3% 6.5% (+2.78)#73 6.8% (+2.52)#3,482
74. Newport 9.3% 6.5% (+2.78)#74 6.8% (+2.51)#3,484
75. Lowesville 9.3% 6.5% (+2.75)#75 6.8% (+2.49)#3,510
76. Rutherford College 9.2% 6.5% (+2.71)#76 6.8% (+2.45)#3,537
77. Saluda 9.2% 6.5% (+2.71)#77 6.8% (+2.44)#3,539
78. Stem 9.2% 6.5% (+2.67)#78 6.8% (+2.41)#3,564
79. Bolivia 9.1% 6.5% (+2.59)#79 6.8% (+2.33)#3,635
80. Marshall 9.1% 6.5% (+2.56)#80 6.8% (+2.29)#3,662
81. Riegelwood 9.0% 6.5% (+2.47)#81 6.8% (+2.21)#3,736
82. Cypress Landing 8.9% 6.5% (+2.40)#82 6.8% (+2.14)#3,804
83. Oriental 8.9% 6.5% (+2.36)#83 6.8% (+2.10)#3,846
84. Gatesville 8.8% 6.5% (+2.35)#84 6.8% (+2.08)#3,860
85. Altamahaw 8.8% 6.5% (+2.27)#85 6.8% (+2.00)#3,931
86. Bent Creek 8.7% 6.5% (+2.24)#86 6.8% (+1.98)#3,947
87. Franklinton 8.7% 6.5% (+2.22)#87 6.8% (+1.95)#3,964
88. Northchase 8.7% 6.5% (+2.16)#88 6.8% (+1.89)#4,016
89. Clayton 8.6% 6.5% (+2.15)#89 6.8% (+1.88)#4,027
90. Elrod 8.6% 6.5% (+2.14)#90 6.8% (+1.88)#4,028
91. Fuquay Varina 8.6% 6.5% (+2.12)#91 6.8% (+1.86)#4,041
92. Ayden 8.6% 6.5% (+2.07)#92 6.8% (+1.81)#4,093
93. Murraysville 8.6% 6.5% (+2.06)#93 6.8% (+1.79)#4,120
94. Belmont 8.5% 6.5% (+2.04)#94 6.8% (+1.78)#4,130
95. Kenansville 8.4% 6.5% (+1.89)#95 6.8% (+1.63)#4,281
96. Windsor 8.3% 6.5% (+1.85)#96 6.8% (+1.58)#4,316
97. Tobaccoville 8.3% 6.5% (+1.80)#97 6.8% (+1.54)#4,368
98. Brices Creek 8.3% 6.5% (+1.80)#98 6.8% (+1.53)#4,372
99. Ruffin 8.3% 6.5% (+1.77)#99 6.8% (+1.50)#4,395
100. Beech Mountain 8.2% 6.5% (+1.75)#100 6.8% (+1.48)#4,422

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in North Carolina are:
#1
42.9%
#2
34.5%
#3
31.3%
#4
30.8%
#5
22.5%
#6
21.8%
#7
20.4%
#8
19.4%
#9
19.2%
#10
19.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in North Carolina?
Blue Clay Farms has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in North Carolina with 42.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the State of North Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in North Carolina is 6.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States is 6.8%.