Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Life, Physical & Social Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in Washington

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in Washington

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Wheeler 100.0% 1.3% (+98.7)#1 1.1% (+98.9)#1
2. Hoodsport 73.0% 1.3% (+71.7)#2 1.1% (+71.9)#6
3. Malo 57.1% 1.3% (+55.8)#3 1.1% (+56.1)#9
4. Keller 38.0% 1.3% (+36.7)#4 1.1% (+36.9)#28
5. Parker 35.5% 1.3% (+34.2)#5 1.1% (+34.4)#32
6. Lebam 23.5% 1.3% (+22.2)#6 1.1% (+22.4)#58
7. Inchelium 14.1% 1.3% (+12.8)#7 1.1% (+13.0)#139
8. Latah 12.8% 1.3% (+11.5)#8 1.1% (+11.7)#164
9. Keyport 11.7% 1.3% (+10.4)#9 1.1% (+10.6)#181
10. Centerville 9.0% 1.3% (+7.64)#10 1.1% (+7.86)#285
11. Glenwood 8.8% 1.3% (+7.54)#11 1.1% (+7.76)#290
12. Bay Center 8.7% 1.3% (+7.38)#12 1.1% (+7.60)#294
13. Dallesport 8.3% 1.3% (+6.98)#13 1.1% (+7.20)#323
14. Garfield 8.1% 1.3% (+6.82)#14 1.1% (+7.04)#331
15. Custer 7.1% 1.3% (+5.79)#15 1.1% (+6.01)#421
16. Starbuck 7.0% 1.3% (+5.71)#16 1.1% (+5.93)#433
17. Almira 6.2% 1.3% (+4.94)#17 1.1% (+5.16)#542
18. Richland 6.2% 1.3% (+4.88)#18 1.1% (+5.10)#553
19. Wilbur 5.4% 1.3% (+4.05)#19 1.1% (+4.27)#701
20. Tonasket 4.8% 1.3% (+3.48)#20 1.1% (+3.70)#849
21. Grand Coulee 4.7% 1.3% (+3.36)#21 1.1% (+3.58)#883
22. Pullman 4.6% 1.3% (+3.27)#22 1.1% (+3.49)#915
23. Freeland 4.4% 1.3% (+3.13)#23 1.1% (+3.35)#973
24. Union Gap 4.4% 1.3% (+3.11)#24 1.1% (+3.33)#988
25. Meadowdale 4.3% 1.3% (+2.96)#25 1.1% (+3.18)#1,049
26. Chewelah 4.3% 1.3% (+2.95)#26 1.1% (+3.17)#1,051
27. Steptoe 4.2% 1.3% (+2.86)#27 1.1% (+3.08)#1,092
28. Albion 4.0% 1.3% (+2.70)#28 1.1% (+2.92)#1,155
29. Twisp 4.0% 1.3% (+2.65)#29 1.1% (+2.87)#1,192
30. Touchet 3.9% 1.3% (+2.64)#30 1.1% (+2.86)#1,196
31. Coulee Dam 3.9% 1.3% (+2.56)#31 1.1% (+2.78)#1,241
32. Marrowstone 3.8% 1.3% (+2.49)#32 1.1% (+2.71)#1,274
33. West Richland 3.8% 1.3% (+2.45)#33 1.1% (+2.67)#1,291
34. West Pasco 3.7% 1.3% (+2.39)#34 1.1% (+2.61)#1,319
35. Hockinson 3.7% 1.3% (+2.37)#35 1.1% (+2.59)#1,351
36. Woodway 3.6% 1.3% (+2.28)#36 1.1% (+2.50)#1,402
37. High Bridge 3.6% 1.3% (+2.27)#37 1.1% (+2.49)#1,409
38. Port Townsend 3.6% 1.3% (+2.27)#38 1.1% (+2.49)#1,412
39. White Salmon 3.5% 1.3% (+2.18)#39 1.1% (+2.40)#1,489
40. Palouse 3.3% 1.3% (+2.03)#40 1.1% (+2.25)#1,579
41. Manchester 3.2% 1.3% (+1.92)#41 1.1% (+2.14)#1,672
42. Manson 3.2% 1.3% (+1.91)#42 1.1% (+2.13)#1,674
43. Lake Forest Park 3.2% 1.3% (+1.88)#43 1.1% (+2.10)#1,702
44. Shoreline 3.2% 1.3% (+1.88)#44 1.1% (+2.10)#1,705
45. Cashmere 3.2% 1.3% (+1.84)#45 1.1% (+2.06)#1,733
46. Olympia 3.1% 1.3% (+1.82)#46 1.1% (+2.04)#1,758
47. Dayton 3.1% 1.3% (+1.82)#47 1.1% (+2.04)#1,759
48. Sunnyslope 3.1% 1.3% (+1.80)#48 1.1% (+2.02)#1,785
49. Kittitas 3.1% 1.3% (+1.76)#49 1.1% (+1.98)#1,822
50. College Place 3.0% 1.3% (+1.67)#50 1.1% (+1.89)#1,901
51. Tenino 3.0% 1.3% (+1.65)#51 1.1% (+1.87)#1,918
52. Republic 2.9% 1.3% (+1.55)#52 1.1% (+1.77)#2,004
53. Hartline 2.9% 1.3% (+1.55)#53 1.1% (+1.77)#2,008
54. Issaquah 2.8% 1.3% (+1.53)#54 1.1% (+1.75)#2,022
55. Mossyrock 2.8% 1.3% (+1.51)#55 1.1% (+1.73)#2,050
56. Fall City 2.7% 1.3% (+1.44)#56 1.1% (+1.66)#2,160
57. Seattle 2.7% 1.3% (+1.42)#57 1.1% (+1.64)#2,182
58. Colville 2.7% 1.3% (+1.42)#58 1.1% (+1.64)#2,190
59. Fife Heights 2.7% 1.3% (+1.39)#59 1.1% (+1.61)#2,218
60. Montesano 2.7% 1.3% (+1.35)#60 1.1% (+1.57)#2,270
61. Pomeroy 2.7% 1.3% (+1.34)#61 1.1% (+1.56)#2,274
62. Hansville 2.6% 1.3% (+1.34)#62 1.1% (+1.56)#2,288
63. Bothell West 2.6% 1.3% (+1.24)#63 1.1% (+1.46)#2,427
64. Canterwood 2.5% 1.3% (+1.23)#64 1.1% (+1.45)#2,449
65. Tumwater 2.5% 1.3% (+1.22)#65 1.1% (+1.44)#2,467
66. Port Angeles East 2.5% 1.3% (+1.21)#66 1.1% (+1.43)#2,497
67. Stevenson 2.5% 1.3% (+1.19)#67 1.1% (+1.41)#2,520
68. Benton City 2.5% 1.3% (+1.16)#68 1.1% (+1.38)#2,570
69. Oakville 2.4% 1.3% (+1.11)#69 1.1% (+1.33)#2,654
70. Ruston 2.4% 1.3% (+1.05)#70 1.1% (+1.27)#2,751
71. Lake Stickney 2.4% 1.3% (+1.05)#71 1.1% (+1.27)#2,762
72. Pasco 2.3% 1.3% (+1.03)#72 1.1% (+1.25)#2,791
73. Kenmore 2.3% 1.3% (+1.02)#73 1.1% (+1.24)#2,807
74. Washtucna 2.3% 1.3% (+1.01)#74 1.1% (+1.23)#2,822
75. Edmonds 2.3% 1.3% (+0.946)#75 1.1% (+1.17)#2,933
76. Burlington 2.2% 1.3% (+0.922)#76 1.1% (+1.14)#2,978
77. Sudden Valley 2.2% 1.3% (+0.912)#77 1.1% (+1.13)#2,993
78. Elmer City 2.2% 1.3% (+0.911)#78 1.1% (+1.13)#3,000
79. Felida 2.2% 1.3% (+0.873)#79 1.1% (+1.09)#3,066
80. Maple Heights Lake Desire 2.2% 1.3% (+0.863)#80 1.1% (+1.08)#3,084
81. Nespelem 2.2% 1.3% (+0.863)#81 1.1% (+1.08)#3,090
82. Friday Harbor 2.2% 1.3% (+0.852)#82 1.1% (+1.07)#3,117
83. Moses Lake 2.1% 1.3% (+0.837)#83 1.1% (+1.06)#3,135
84. Sequim 2.1% 1.3% (+0.836)#84 1.1% (+1.06)#3,137
85. Bremerton 2.1% 1.3% (+0.835)#85 1.1% (+1.05)#3,139
86. Sumas 2.1% 1.3% (+0.817)#86 1.1% (+1.04)#3,171
87. Seabeck 2.1% 1.3% (+0.811)#87 1.1% (+1.03)#3,181
88. Bainbridge Island 2.1% 1.3% (+0.783)#88 1.1% (+1.00)#3,238
89. Waitsburg 2.1% 1.3% (+0.778)#89 1.1% (+0.998)#3,247
90. Wilderness Rim 2.1% 1.3% (+0.744)#90 1.1% (+0.964)#3,305
91. Aberdeen 2.1% 1.3% (+0.743)#91 1.1% (+0.963)#3,308
92. Kennewick 2.0% 1.3% (+0.666)#92 1.1% (+0.887)#3,479
93. Kingston 2.0% 1.3% (+0.660)#93 1.1% (+0.880)#3,494
94. Boulevard Park 1.9% 1.3% (+0.634)#94 1.1% (+0.855)#3,552
95. Lynden 1.9% 1.3% (+0.607)#95 1.1% (+0.827)#3,611
96. Everson 1.9% 1.3% (+0.604)#96 1.1% (+0.824)#3,619
97. Lake Marcel Stillwater 1.9% 1.3% (+0.580)#97 1.1% (+0.801)#3,682
98. Martha Lake 1.8% 1.3% (+0.532)#98 1.1% (+0.752)#3,819
99. Mercer Island 1.8% 1.3% (+0.522)#99 1.1% (+0.742)#3,838
100. Maplewood 1.8% 1.3% (+0.507)#100 1.1% (+0.727)#3,873

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in Washington are:
#1
73.0%
#2
57.1%
#3
38.0%
#4
35.5%
#5
23.5%
#6
14.1%
#7
12.8%
#8
11.7%
#9
9.0%
#10
8.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in Washington?
Hoodsport has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in Washington with 73.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in Washington is 1.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Life, Physical & Social Science in the United States is 1.1%.