Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in West Virginia

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computer, Engineering & Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
West Virginia
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in West Virginia

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in West Virginia Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in West Virginia

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Huntersville 63.6% 4.4% (+59.2)#1 6.8% (+56.9)#36
2. Garten 55.8% 4.4% (+51.4)#2 6.8% (+49.0)#51
3. Century 54.2% 4.4% (+49.7)#3 6.8% (+47.4)#56
4. Hepzibah 35.4% 4.4% (+31.0)#4 6.8% (+28.7)#152
5. Mount Gay Shamrock 22.9% 4.4% (+18.5)#5 6.8% (+16.2)#402
6. Hedgesville 18.1% 4.4% (+13.7)#6 6.8% (+11.4)#717
7. Justice 17.5% 4.4% (+13.1)#7 6.8% (+10.7)#774
8. Crooked Creek 15.1% 4.4% (+10.7)#8 6.8% (+8.35)#1,119
9. Brandonville 13.9% 4.4% (+9.43)#9 6.8% (+7.10)#1,372
10. Bridgeport 13.6% 4.4% (+9.16)#10 6.8% (+6.82)#1,458
11. Bluewell 13.4% 4.4% (+8.95)#11 6.8% (+6.61)#1,524
12. Gary 12.2% 4.4% (+7.79)#12 6.8% (+5.46)#1,874
13. North Hills 12.2% 4.4% (+7.77)#13 6.8% (+5.43)#1,891
14. East View 11.9% 4.4% (+7.49)#14 6.8% (+5.15)#1,974
15. Gilbert 11.6% 4.4% (+7.20)#15 6.8% (+4.86)#2,061
16. Shannondale 11.3% 4.4% (+6.84)#16 6.8% (+4.50)#2,232
17. Elkview 10.9% 4.4% (+6.45)#17 6.8% (+4.12)#2,429
18. Barrackville 10.8% 4.4% (+6.41)#18 6.8% (+4.07)#2,450
19. Washington 10.7% 4.4% (+6.29)#19 6.8% (+3.95)#2,509
20. Star City 10.3% 4.4% (+5.87)#20 6.8% (+3.53)#2,754
21. Cassville 10.1% 4.4% (+5.65)#21 6.8% (+3.31)#2,898
22. Crab Orchard 9.6% 4.4% (+5.18)#22 6.8% (+2.84)#3,227
23. Fort Ashby 9.5% 4.4% (+5.12)#23 6.8% (+2.78)#3,276
24. Kermit 9.5% 4.4% (+5.10)#24 6.8% (+2.76)#3,294
25. Gallipolis Ferry 9.3% 4.4% (+4.87)#25 6.8% (+2.54)#3,463
26. Ravenswood 9.2% 4.4% (+4.76)#26 6.8% (+2.42)#3,557
27. Newell 9.1% 4.4% (+4.64)#27 6.8% (+2.30)#3,657
28. Reedsville 9.0% 4.4% (+4.53)#28 6.8% (+2.20)#3,744
29. Rand 8.9% 4.4% (+4.51)#29 6.8% (+2.17)#3,765
30. Williamstown 8.7% 4.4% (+4.29)#30 6.8% (+1.96)#3,959
31. Cheat Lake 8.7% 4.4% (+4.27)#31 6.8% (+1.94)#3,976
32. Ripley 8.5% 4.4% (+4.06)#32 6.8% (+1.72)#4,189
33. Lashmeet 8.1% 4.4% (+3.71)#33 6.8% (+1.37)#4,546
34. Bolivar 8.0% 4.4% (+3.61)#34 6.8% (+1.28)#4,650
35. Daniels 8.0% 4.4% (+3.58)#35 6.8% (+1.25)#4,685
36. Pea Ridge 8.0% 4.4% (+3.53)#36 6.8% (+1.19)#4,758
37. Fairmont 7.9% 4.4% (+3.46)#37 6.8% (+1.12)#4,840
38. Philippi 7.8% 4.4% (+3.35)#38 6.8% (+1.01)#4,970
39. Pleasant Valley 7.7% 4.4% (+3.26)#39 6.8% (+0.928)#5,065
40. Huttonsville 7.7% 4.4% (+3.26)#40 6.8% (+0.928)#5,079
41. Westover 7.5% 4.4% (+3.05)#41 6.8% (+0.715)#5,321
42. Craigsville 7.3% 4.4% (+2.87)#42 6.8% (+0.535)#5,535
43. Charles Town 7.3% 4.4% (+2.84)#43 6.8% (+0.504)#5,575
44. Ranson Corporation 7.0% 4.4% (+2.60)#44 6.8% (+0.259)#5,922
45. White Hall 7.0% 4.4% (+2.56)#45 6.8% (+0.226)#5,969
46. Morgantown 7.0% 4.4% (+2.53)#46 6.8% (+0.198)#6,006
47. South Charleston 7.0% 4.4% (+2.53)#47 6.8% (+0.190)#6,016
48. Great Cacapon 6.9% 4.4% (+2.50)#48 6.8% (+0.166)#6,054
49. Institute 6.9% 4.4% (+2.50)#49 6.8% (+0.162)#6,065
50. Teays Valley 6.7% 4.4% (+2.27)#50 6.8% (-0.063)#6,399
51. Lavalette 6.7% 4.4% (+2.24)#51 6.8% (-0.098)#6,446
52. Danville 6.6% 4.4% (+2.16)#52 6.8% (-0.171)#6,561
53. Womelsdorf Coalton 6.6% 4.4% (+2.13)#53 6.8% (-0.207)#6,606
54. Capon Bridge 6.6% 4.4% (+2.12)#54 6.8% (-0.214)#6,619
55. Tornado 6.5% 4.4% (+2.09)#55 6.8% (-0.243)#6,668
56. Glasgow 6.5% 4.4% (+2.08)#56 6.8% (-0.251)#6,693
57. Winfield 6.4% 4.4% (+1.93)#57 6.8% (-0.404)#6,927
58. Cross Lanes 6.3% 4.4% (+1.90)#58 6.8% (-0.437)#6,998
59. St Albans 6.3% 4.4% (+1.86)#59 6.8% (-0.471)#7,052
60. Sophia 6.2% 4.4% (+1.82)#60 6.8% (-0.515)#7,114
61. Green Bank 6.2% 4.4% (+1.82)#61 6.8% (-0.515)#7,137
62. Blennerhassett 6.1% 4.4% (+1.72)#62 6.8% (-0.617)#7,308
63. Reedy 6.1% 4.4% (+1.63)#63 6.8% (-0.704)#7,471
64. Spencer 6.0% 4.4% (+1.57)#64 6.8% (-0.765)#7,585
65. Clearview 6.0% 4.4% (+1.57)#65 6.8% (-0.765)#7,590
66. Grant Town 5.9% 4.4% (+1.45)#66 6.8% (-0.882)#7,818
67. New Cumberland 5.8% 4.4% (+1.41)#67 6.8% (-0.927)#7,924
68. Nutter Fort 5.8% 4.4% (+1.36)#68 6.8% (-0.975)#8,005
69. Enterprise 5.8% 4.4% (+1.35)#69 6.8% (-0.983)#8,020
70. Charleston 5.7% 4.4% (+1.30)#70 6.8% (-1.03)#8,125
71. Shenandoah Junction 5.6% 4.4% (+1.18)#71 6.8% (-1.15)#8,319
72. Hurricane 5.5% 4.4% (+1.04)#72 6.8% (-1.29)#8,583
73. West Milford 5.4% 4.4% (+0.987)#73 6.8% (-1.35)#8,702
74. Stonewood 5.4% 4.4% (+0.943)#74 6.8% (-1.39)#8,799
75. Ceredo 5.3% 4.4% (+0.915)#75 6.8% (-1.42)#8,861
76. New Haven 5.1% 4.4% (+0.677)#76 6.8% (-1.66)#9,327
77. Bethlehem 5.1% 4.4% (+0.675)#77 6.8% (-1.66)#9,333
78. Montrose 5.1% 4.4% (+0.656)#78 6.8% (-1.68)#9,376
79. Belmont 5.1% 4.4% (+0.642)#79 6.8% (-1.69)#9,409
80. Man 5.0% 4.4% (+0.599)#80 6.8% (-1.74)#9,500
81. Monongah 4.9% 4.4% (+0.468)#81 6.8% (-1.87)#9,793
82. Rivesville 4.8% 4.4% (+0.401)#82 6.8% (-1.94)#9,948
83. Bath Berkeley Springs 4.8% 4.4% (+0.333)#83 6.8% (-2.00)#10,097
84. Keyser 4.7% 4.4% (+0.227)#84 6.8% (-2.11)#10,340
85. Milton 4.6% 4.4% (+0.164)#85 6.8% (-2.17)#10,480
86. Durbin 4.6% 4.4% (+0.152)#86 6.8% (-2.18)#10,508
87. Ellenboro 4.5% 4.4% (+0.117)#87 6.8% (-2.22)#10,595
88. Brookhaven 4.5% 4.4% (+0.108)#88 6.8% (-2.23)#10,632
89. Inwood 4.5% 4.4% (+0.078)#89 6.8% (-2.26)#10,688
90. Dunbar 4.5% 4.4% (+0.035)#90 6.8% (-2.30)#10,782
91. Beverly 4.3% 4.4% (-0.104)#91 6.8% (-2.44)#11,113
92. Flemington 4.3% 4.4% (-0.128)#92 6.8% (-2.46)#11,174
93. Montcalm 4.3% 4.4% (-0.148)#93 6.8% (-2.48)#11,225
94. Culloden 4.2% 4.4% (-0.215)#94 6.8% (-2.55)#11,415
95. Booth 4.2% 4.4% (-0.218)#95 6.8% (-2.55)#11,421
96. Masontown 4.1% 4.4% (-0.335)#96 6.8% (-2.67)#11,725
97. Martinsburg 4.0% 4.4% (-0.417)#97 6.8% (-2.75)#11,934
98. Cairo 4.0% 4.4% (-0.429)#98 6.8% (-2.76)#11,974
99. West Logan 4.0% 4.4% (-0.455)#99 6.8% (-2.79)#12,044
100. St Marys 3.9% 4.4% (-0.549)#100 6.8% (-2.88)#12,306

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in West Virginia?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in West Virginia are:
#1
63.6%
#2
54.2%
#3
35.4%
#4
22.9%
#5
18.1%
#6
17.5%
#7
13.9%
#8
13.6%
#9
13.4%
#10
12.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in West Virginia?
Huntersville has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in West Virginia with 63.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the State of West Virginia?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in West Virginia is 4.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States is 6.8%.