Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Administration
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Washington

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Washington

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Wheeler 100.0% 5.0% (+95.0)#1 4.7% (+95.3)#2
2. Disautel 100.0% 5.0% (+95.0)#2 4.7% (+95.3)#25
3. Hoodsport 73.0% 5.0% (+68.0)#3 4.7% (+68.3)#53
4. Moclips 70.5% 5.0% (+65.5)#4 4.7% (+65.8)#57
5. Tokeland 57.9% 5.0% (+52.9)#5 4.7% (+53.2)#93
6. Alder 54.5% 5.0% (+49.6)#6 4.7% (+49.9)#106
7. Keller 53.0% 5.0% (+48.0)#7 4.7% (+48.3)#116
8. Taholah 44.7% 5.0% (+39.7)#8 4.7% (+40.0)#190
9. Edison 43.5% 5.0% (+38.5)#9 4.7% (+38.8)#212
10. Brady 43.2% 5.0% (+38.3)#10 4.7% (+38.5)#219
11. Nisqually Indian Community 42.3% 5.0% (+37.3)#11 4.7% (+37.6)#231
12. Barstow 41.7% 5.0% (+36.7)#12 4.7% (+37.0)#241
13. Nespelem Community 38.2% 5.0% (+33.2)#13 4.7% (+33.5)#297
14. Coulee Dam 35.5% 5.0% (+30.6)#14 4.7% (+30.8)#336
15. Blyn 32.8% 5.0% (+27.8)#15 4.7% (+28.1)#396
16. Elmer City 31.1% 5.0% (+26.1)#16 4.7% (+26.4)#443
17. Inchelium 30.1% 5.0% (+25.2)#17 4.7% (+25.4)#481
18. Grand Coulee 29.1% 5.0% (+24.2)#18 4.7% (+24.4)#512
19. Cathlamet 28.7% 5.0% (+23.7)#19 4.7% (+24.0)#531
20. Clallam Bay 28.6% 5.0% (+23.7)#20 4.7% (+24.0)#532
21. Grayland 27.6% 5.0% (+22.6)#21 4.7% (+22.9)#584
22. Neah Bay 27.3% 5.0% (+22.3)#22 4.7% (+22.6)#597
23. Skamokawa Valley 26.5% 5.0% (+21.5)#23 4.7% (+21.8)#641
24. Nespelem 26.1% 5.0% (+21.1)#24 4.7% (+21.4)#661
25. Tumwater 24.4% 5.0% (+19.4)#25 4.7% (+19.7)#786
26. Queets 24.1% 5.0% (+19.2)#26 4.7% (+19.5)#804
27. Port Gamble Tribal Community 23.6% 5.0% (+18.7)#27 4.7% (+18.9)#850
28. Lebam 23.5% 5.0% (+18.6)#28 4.7% (+18.8)#857
29. Twin Lakes 23.5% 5.0% (+18.6)#29 4.7% (+18.8)#858
30. Touchet 22.4% 5.0% (+17.4)#30 4.7% (+17.7)#949
31. Metaline 22.0% 5.0% (+17.0)#31 4.7% (+17.3)#976
32. Oakville 21.8% 5.0% (+16.8)#32 4.7% (+17.1)#997
33. Bay Center 21.7% 5.0% (+16.8)#33 4.7% (+17.1)#1,000
34. Qui Nai Elt Village 21.4% 5.0% (+16.5)#34 4.7% (+16.7)#1,024
35. Waitsburg 21.4% 5.0% (+16.4)#35 4.7% (+16.7)#1,030
36. Montesano 21.4% 5.0% (+16.4)#36 4.7% (+16.7)#1,032
37. Tenino 21.0% 5.0% (+16.0)#37 4.7% (+16.3)#1,081
38. Electric City 19.1% 5.0% (+14.1)#38 4.7% (+14.4)#1,322
39. Forks 19.1% 5.0% (+14.1)#39 4.7% (+14.4)#1,323
40. Skokomish 18.8% 5.0% (+13.8)#40 4.7% (+14.1)#1,369
41. Santiago 18.8% 5.0% (+13.8)#41 4.7% (+14.1)#1,372
42. Four Lakes 18.2% 5.0% (+13.3)#42 4.7% (+13.5)#1,439
43. Rochester 18.1% 5.0% (+13.2)#43 4.7% (+13.4)#1,467
44. Dixie 17.9% 5.0% (+12.9)#44 4.7% (+13.2)#1,497
45. Mcchord Afb 17.8% 5.0% (+12.8)#45 4.7% (+13.1)#1,517
46. Satsop 17.7% 5.0% (+12.7)#46 4.7% (+13.0)#1,529
47. Mccleary 17.4% 5.0% (+12.5)#47 4.7% (+12.8)#1,580
48. Connell 17.0% 5.0% (+12.0)#48 4.7% (+12.3)#1,672
49. Buena 16.9% 5.0% (+11.9)#49 4.7% (+12.2)#1,690
50. Burley 16.5% 5.0% (+11.6)#50 4.7% (+11.8)#1,755
51. Olympia 16.4% 5.0% (+11.5)#51 4.7% (+11.8)#1,773
52. Curlew 16.3% 5.0% (+11.4)#52 4.7% (+11.6)#1,796
53. Hansville 16.1% 5.0% (+11.1)#53 4.7% (+11.4)#1,850
54. Republic 16.0% 5.0% (+11.0)#54 4.7% (+11.3)#1,860
55. Lofall 15.9% 5.0% (+11.0)#55 4.7% (+11.2)#1,878
56. Alger 15.9% 5.0% (+10.9)#56 4.7% (+11.2)#1,890
57. Dupont 15.4% 5.0% (+10.4)#57 4.7% (+10.7)#2,027
58. Grand Mound 15.0% 5.0% (+10.1)#58 4.7% (+10.3)#2,113
59. South Bend 15.0% 5.0% (+10.0)#59 4.7% (+10.3)#2,129
60. Silverdale 15.0% 5.0% (+10.0)#60 4.7% (+10.3)#2,131
61. Schwana 14.8% 5.0% (+9.80)#61 4.7% (+10.1)#2,191
62. Aberdeen Gardens 14.7% 5.0% (+9.74)#62 4.7% (+10.0)#2,213
63. Port Ludlow 14.6% 5.0% (+9.67)#63 4.7% (+9.95)#2,234
64. Thorp 14.6% 5.0% (+9.67)#64 4.7% (+9.95)#2,237
65. Cusick 14.5% 5.0% (+9.58)#65 4.7% (+9.86)#2,261
66. Bucoda 14.4% 5.0% (+9.39)#66 4.7% (+9.67)#2,328
67. Lind 14.2% 5.0% (+9.21)#67 4.7% (+9.49)#2,415
68. Lacey 14.2% 5.0% (+9.21)#68 4.7% (+9.49)#2,417
69. Okanogan 14.1% 5.0% (+9.11)#69 4.7% (+9.39)#2,450
70. Sprague 13.9% 5.0% (+8.95)#70 4.7% (+9.23)#2,494
71. Harrah 13.7% 5.0% (+8.76)#71 4.7% (+9.04)#2,566
72. Erlands Point 13.7% 5.0% (+8.72)#72 4.7% (+9.00)#2,582
73. Rainier 13.7% 5.0% (+8.70)#73 4.7% (+8.98)#2,590
74. North Fort Lewis 13.6% 5.0% (+8.66)#74 4.7% (+8.94)#2,613
75. Naselle 13.5% 5.0% (+8.49)#75 4.7% (+8.77)#2,681
76. Bay View 13.4% 5.0% (+8.47)#76 4.7% (+8.75)#2,690
77. Raymond 13.3% 5.0% (+8.34)#77 4.7% (+8.62)#2,748
78. Poulsbo 13.2% 5.0% (+8.27)#78 4.7% (+8.55)#2,768
79. Fort Lewis 13.2% 5.0% (+8.27)#79 4.7% (+8.55)#2,771
80. Dallesport 13.2% 5.0% (+8.22)#80 4.7% (+8.50)#2,782
81. Bangor Base 13.2% 5.0% (+8.19)#81 4.7% (+8.47)#2,801
82. North Sultan 13.1% 5.0% (+8.13)#82 4.7% (+8.41)#2,820
83. Yelm 12.5% 5.0% (+7.58)#83 4.7% (+7.86)#2,992
84. Steptoe 12.5% 5.0% (+7.54)#84 4.7% (+7.81)#3,034
85. Allyn 12.5% 5.0% (+7.49)#85 4.7% (+7.77)#3,048
86. Riverside 12.4% 5.0% (+7.46)#86 4.7% (+7.74)#3,056
87. Starbuck 12.3% 5.0% (+7.32)#87 4.7% (+7.60)#3,118
88. Parkwood 12.1% 5.0% (+7.11)#88 4.7% (+7.39)#3,238
89. Mckenna 11.7% 5.0% (+6.71)#89 4.7% (+6.99)#3,426
90. Tanglewilde 11.6% 5.0% (+6.61)#90 4.7% (+6.89)#3,486
91. Elma 11.6% 5.0% (+6.60)#91 4.7% (+6.88)#3,495
92. Bethel 11.5% 5.0% (+6.54)#92 4.7% (+6.82)#3,534
93. Summitview 11.5% 5.0% (+6.49)#93 4.7% (+6.77)#3,559
94. Garfield 11.4% 5.0% (+6.42)#94 4.7% (+6.70)#3,593
95. Steilacoom 11.4% 5.0% (+6.39)#95 4.7% (+6.67)#3,610
96. Reardan 11.3% 5.0% (+6.29)#96 4.7% (+6.57)#3,660
97. Maplewood 11.1% 5.0% (+6.14)#97 4.7% (+6.42)#3,759
98. Enetai 11.0% 5.0% (+6.04)#98 4.7% (+6.32)#3,802
99. Clear Lake Cdp Pierce County 10.9% 5.0% (+5.94)#99 4.7% (+6.22)#3,851
100. Roy 10.8% 5.0% (+5.88)#100 4.7% (+6.15)#3,903

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Washington are:
#1
100.0%
#2
73.0%
#3
70.5%
#4
57.9%
#5
54.5%
#6
53.0%
#7
44.7%
#8
43.5%
#9
43.2%
#10
42.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Washington?
Disautel has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Washington with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in Washington is 5.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Public Administration in the United States is 4.7%.