Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Washington

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Washington

City % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. Woods Creek 69.4% 35.2% (+34.2)#1 38.5% (+30.9)#16
2. Clinton 67.3% 35.2% (+32.1)#2 38.5% (+28.8)#25
3. Duvall 64.2% 35.2% (+29.0)#3 38.5% (+25.7)#68
4. Buckley 62.2% 35.2% (+27.0)#4 38.5% (+23.7)#102
5. Belfair 61.5% 35.2% (+26.3)#5 38.5% (+23.0)#118
6. Langley 60.8% 35.2% (+25.6)#6 38.5% (+22.3)#138
7. Carnation 60.2% 35.2% (+25.0)#7 38.5% (+21.7)#165
8. Summit 59.1% 35.2% (+23.9)#8 38.5% (+20.6)#200
9. Gig Harbor 58.2% 35.2% (+23.0)#9 38.5% (+19.7)#243
10. Fircrest 58.2% 35.2% (+23.0)#10 38.5% (+19.7)#244
11. Manchester 57.6% 35.2% (+22.4)#11 38.5% (+19.1)#276
12. Picnic Point 56.6% 35.2% (+21.4)#12 38.5% (+18.1)#330
13. Sedro Woolley 56.0% 35.2% (+20.8)#13 38.5% (+17.5)#378
14. Maltby 55.9% 35.2% (+20.7)#14 38.5% (+17.4)#383
15. Aberdeen 55.8% 35.2% (+20.6)#15 38.5% (+17.3)#388
16. Prairie Ridge 55.7% 35.2% (+20.5)#16 38.5% (+17.2)#398
17. Prairie Heights 55.3% 35.2% (+20.1)#17 38.5% (+16.8)#428
18. Alderton 55.1% 35.2% (+19.9)#18 38.5% (+16.6)#447
19. Salmon Creek 54.4% 35.2% (+19.2)#19 38.5% (+15.9)#484
20. Hansville 53.9% 35.2% (+18.7)#20 38.5% (+15.4)#531
21. Colfax 52.6% 35.2% (+17.4)#21 38.5% (+14.1)#640
22. Normandy Park 52.3% 35.2% (+17.1)#22 38.5% (+13.8)#663
23. Liberty Lake 51.5% 35.2% (+16.3)#23 38.5% (+13.0)#719
24. Snohomish 51.3% 35.2% (+16.1)#24 38.5% (+12.8)#747
25. Camano 50.7% 35.2% (+15.5)#25 38.5% (+12.2)#802
26. Suquamish 50.5% 35.2% (+15.3)#26 38.5% (+12.0)#830
27. Boulevard Park 50.4% 35.2% (+15.2)#27 38.5% (+11.9)#837
28. Lake Shore 50.2% 35.2% (+15.0)#28 38.5% (+11.7)#872
29. Silverdale 49.9% 35.2% (+14.7)#29 38.5% (+11.4)#899
30. Summit View 49.6% 35.2% (+14.4)#30 38.5% (+11.1)#939
31. Pasco 49.5% 35.2% (+14.3)#31 38.5% (+11.0)#947
32. Beaux Arts Village 49.5% 35.2% (+14.3)#32 38.5% (+11.0)#968
33. Freeland 49.0% 35.2% (+13.8)#33 38.5% (+10.5)#1,055
34. Bainbridge Island 48.8% 35.2% (+13.6)#34 38.5% (+10.3)#1,063
35. Sumner 48.6% 35.2% (+13.4)#35 38.5% (+10.1)#1,092
36. Poulsbo 48.2% 35.2% (+13.0)#36 38.5% (+9.70)#1,158
37. Bethel 47.8% 35.2% (+12.6)#37 38.5% (+9.30)#1,209
38. Steilacoom 47.6% 35.2% (+12.4)#38 38.5% (+9.10)#1,239
39. Enumclaw 47.3% 35.2% (+12.1)#39 38.5% (+8.80)#1,294
40. Lakeland South 47.3% 35.2% (+12.1)#40 38.5% (+8.80)#1,295
41. Orting 47.1% 35.2% (+11.9)#41 38.5% (+8.60)#1,331
42. Vashon 46.9% 35.2% (+11.7)#42 38.5% (+8.40)#1,359
43. Milton 46.8% 35.2% (+11.6)#43 38.5% (+8.30)#1,376
44. Arlington 46.4% 35.2% (+11.2)#44 38.5% (+7.90)#1,440
45. Algona 45.8% 35.2% (+10.6)#45 38.5% (+7.30)#1,525
46. Eastmont 45.5% 35.2% (+10.3)#46 38.5% (+7.00)#1,570
47. Bothell West 45.5% 35.2% (+10.3)#47 38.5% (+7.00)#1,572
48. Mercer Island 45.4% 35.2% (+10.2)#48 38.5% (+6.90)#1,592
49. Washougal 45.1% 35.2% (+9.90)#49 38.5% (+6.60)#1,653
50. Tracyton 44.2% 35.2% (+9.00)#50 38.5% (+5.70)#1,804
51. Puyallup 44.0% 35.2% (+8.80)#51 38.5% (+5.50)#1,837
52. Yakima 43.9% 35.2% (+8.70)#52 38.5% (+5.40)#1,844
53. Clyde Hill 43.8% 35.2% (+8.60)#53 38.5% (+5.30)#1,871
54. Indianola 43.6% 35.2% (+8.40)#54 38.5% (+5.10)#1,895
55. Snoqualmie 43.5% 35.2% (+8.30)#55 38.5% (+5.00)#1,912
56. Hoquiam 43.5% 35.2% (+8.30)#56 38.5% (+5.00)#1,915
57. Parkwood 43.5% 35.2% (+8.30)#57 38.5% (+5.00)#1,917
58. Orchards 43.4% 35.2% (+8.20)#58 38.5% (+4.90)#1,922
59. Pacific 43.4% 35.2% (+8.20)#59 38.5% (+4.90)#1,928
60. Airway Heights 43.3% 35.2% (+8.10)#60 38.5% (+4.80)#1,951
61. Des Moines 43.1% 35.2% (+7.90)#61 38.5% (+4.60)#1,984
62. Bonney Lake 43.0% 35.2% (+7.80)#62 38.5% (+4.50)#2,004
63. Sammamish 42.9% 35.2% (+7.70)#63 38.5% (+4.40)#2,019
64. Camas 42.8% 35.2% (+7.60)#64 38.5% (+4.30)#2,048
65. Graham 42.7% 35.2% (+7.50)#65 38.5% (+4.20)#2,068
66. Woodinville 42.6% 35.2% (+7.40)#66 38.5% (+4.10)#2,092
67. Southworth 42.5% 35.2% (+7.30)#67 38.5% (+4.00)#2,118
68. Ruston 42.5% 35.2% (+7.30)#68 38.5% (+4.00)#2,119
69. Mukilteo 42.3% 35.2% (+7.10)#69 38.5% (+3.80)#2,148
70. Mill Creek 42.3% 35.2% (+7.10)#70 38.5% (+3.80)#2,149
71. Bothell 42.2% 35.2% (+7.00)#71 38.5% (+3.70)#2,160
72. Bunk Foss 42.2% 35.2% (+7.00)#72 38.5% (+3.70)#2,168
73. Midland 42.0% 35.2% (+6.80)#73 38.5% (+3.50)#2,197
74. Issaquah 41.7% 35.2% (+6.50)#74 38.5% (+3.20)#2,225
75. Federal Way 41.3% 35.2% (+6.10)#75 38.5% (+2.80)#2,292
76. Fairwood Cdp Spokane County 41.2% 35.2% (+6.00)#76 38.5% (+2.70)#2,312
77. Brier 41.1% 35.2% (+5.90)#77 38.5% (+2.60)#2,329
78. Shoreline 40.8% 35.2% (+5.60)#78 38.5% (+2.30)#2,371
79. High Bridge 40.8% 35.2% (+5.60)#79 38.5% (+2.30)#2,384
80. Maple Valley 40.7% 35.2% (+5.50)#80 38.5% (+2.20)#2,393
81. Kent 40.5% 35.2% (+5.30)#81 38.5% (+2.00)#2,426
82. South Hill 40.5% 35.2% (+5.30)#82 38.5% (+2.00)#2,431
83. Battle Ground 40.5% 35.2% (+5.30)#83 38.5% (+2.00)#2,439
84. Lakeland North 40.4% 35.2% (+5.20)#84 38.5% (+1.90)#2,468
85. Artondale 40.3% 35.2% (+5.10)#85 38.5% (+1.80)#2,491
86. Waller 40.3% 35.2% (+5.10)#86 38.5% (+1.80)#2,494
87. Spanaway 40.1% 35.2% (+4.90)#87 38.5% (+1.60)#2,518
88. Medina 40.1% 35.2% (+4.90)#88 38.5% (+1.60)#2,528
89. Union Hill Novelty Hill 40.0% 35.2% (+4.80)#89 38.5% (+1.50)#2,538
90. Navy Yard City 39.9% 35.2% (+4.70)#90 38.5% (+1.40)#2,566
91. Mountlake Terrace 39.8% 35.2% (+4.60)#91 38.5% (+1.30)#2,575
92. Tacoma 39.6% 35.2% (+4.40)#92 38.5% (+1.10)#2,601
93. Oak Harbor 39.6% 35.2% (+4.40)#93 38.5% (+1.10)#2,609
94. Edmonds 39.3% 35.2% (+4.10)#94 38.5% (+0.800)#2,660
95. Mill Creek East 39.3% 35.2% (+4.10)#95 38.5% (+0.800)#2,663
96. Enetai 38.9% 35.2% (+3.70)#96 38.5% (+0.400)#2,730
97. Lake Stevens 38.8% 35.2% (+3.60)#97 38.5% (+0.300)#2,738
98. Bryn Mawr Skyway 38.7% 35.2% (+3.50)#98 38.5% (+0.200)#2,769
99. Parkland 38.5% 35.2% (+3.30)#99 38.5% (=0.000)#2,798
100. Esperance 38.5% 35.2% (+3.30)#100 38.5% (=0.000)#2,810

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Washington are:
#1
69.4%
#2
67.3%
#3
64.2%
#4
62.2%
#5
61.5%
#6
60.8%
#7
60.2%
#8
59.1%
#9
58.2%
#10
58.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Washington?
Woods Creek has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Washington with 69.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Washington is 35.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.