Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Professional & Scientific Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Washington

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Washington

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Altoona 56.2% 10.3% (+45.9)#1 7.8% (+48.4)#52
2. Redmond 38.4% 10.3% (+28.1)#2 7.8% (+30.5)#142
3. Lyle 38.2% 10.3% (+27.9)#3 7.8% (+30.4)#144
4. Union Hill Novelty Hill 35.0% 10.3% (+24.6)#4 7.8% (+27.1)#183
5. Lake Marcel Stillwater 33.9% 10.3% (+23.6)#5 7.8% (+26.1)#197
6. Monroe North 33.2% 10.3% (+22.9)#6 7.8% (+25.4)#213
7. Sammamish 30.8% 10.3% (+20.4)#7 7.8% (+22.9)#260
8. Bellevue 28.9% 10.3% (+18.5)#8 7.8% (+21.0)#306
9. Medina 28.1% 10.3% (+17.8)#9 7.8% (+20.2)#335
10. Duvall 27.8% 10.3% (+17.5)#10 7.8% (+20.0)#345
11. La Grande 27.3% 10.3% (+16.9)#11 7.8% (+19.4)#370
12. Sunland Estates 27.3% 10.3% (+16.9)#12 7.8% (+19.4)#372
13. Hunts Point 27.0% 10.3% (+16.7)#13 7.8% (+19.2)#378
14. Ames Lake 26.4% 10.3% (+16.0)#14 7.8% (+18.5)#403
15. Clyde Hill 25.7% 10.3% (+15.4)#15 7.8% (+17.9)#436
16. Beaux Arts Village 24.6% 10.3% (+14.3)#16 7.8% (+16.8)#481
17. Mercer Island 24.4% 10.3% (+14.0)#17 7.8% (+16.5)#504
18. Kirkland 23.5% 10.3% (+13.2)#18 7.8% (+15.7)#547
19. Mckenna 23.4% 10.3% (+13.0)#19 7.8% (+15.5)#561
20. Bainbridge Island 22.9% 10.3% (+12.6)#20 7.8% (+15.1)#592
21. Woodinville 22.9% 10.3% (+12.6)#21 7.8% (+15.0)#594
22. North Bend 22.8% 10.3% (+12.4)#22 7.8% (+14.9)#604
23. Green Bluff 22.6% 10.3% (+12.3)#23 7.8% (+14.8)#612
24. Woodway 22.0% 10.3% (+11.6)#24 7.8% (+14.1)#670
25. Cottage Lake 21.5% 10.3% (+11.1)#25 7.8% (+13.6)#723
26. Issaquah 21.3% 10.3% (+10.9)#26 7.8% (+13.4)#746
27. Mill Creek East 21.2% 10.3% (+10.9)#27 7.8% (+13.4)#749
28. Yarrow Point 20.9% 10.3% (+10.5)#28 7.8% (+13.0)#798
29. Cavalero 20.8% 10.3% (+10.5)#29 7.8% (+13.0)#804
30. Seabeck 20.7% 10.3% (+10.4)#30 7.8% (+12.8)#818
31. Seattle 20.5% 10.3% (+10.1)#31 7.8% (+12.6)#837
32. Dollars Corner 20.3% 10.3% (+9.98)#32 7.8% (+12.5)#849
33. Porter 20.0% 10.3% (+9.67)#33 7.8% (+12.2)#879
34. Bothell East 19.8% 10.3% (+9.43)#34 7.8% (+11.9)#921
35. Thorp 19.5% 10.3% (+9.18)#35 7.8% (+11.7)#952
36. Maple Heights Lake Desire 19.3% 10.3% (+8.99)#36 7.8% (+11.5)#968
37. Bothell 19.1% 10.3% (+8.81)#37 7.8% (+11.3)#997
38. Tokeland 18.4% 10.3% (+8.09)#38 7.8% (+10.6)#1,099
39. Lake Forest Park 17.9% 10.3% (+7.61)#39 7.8% (+10.1)#1,174
40. Snoqualmie 17.9% 10.3% (+7.61)#40 7.8% (+10.1)#1,175
41. Bothell West 17.9% 10.3% (+7.58)#41 7.8% (+10.1)#1,180
42. Kenmore 17.7% 10.3% (+7.33)#42 7.8% (+9.81)#1,237
43. Newcastle 17.6% 10.3% (+7.25)#43 7.8% (+9.74)#1,245
44. Upper Elochoman 17.5% 10.3% (+7.13)#44 7.8% (+9.61)#1,280
45. Fall City 16.9% 10.3% (+6.56)#45 7.8% (+9.04)#1,391
46. Richland 16.8% 10.3% (+6.43)#46 7.8% (+8.91)#1,426
47. Methow 16.7% 10.3% (+6.34)#47 7.8% (+8.82)#1,448
48. Mill Creek 16.5% 10.3% (+6.20)#48 7.8% (+8.68)#1,478
49. Riverpoint 16.3% 10.3% (+5.95)#49 7.8% (+8.44)#1,535
50. Kendall 16.2% 10.3% (+5.87)#50 7.8% (+8.35)#1,556
51. Amboy 15.9% 10.3% (+5.57)#51 7.8% (+8.05)#1,625
52. Alderwood Manor 15.6% 10.3% (+5.31)#52 7.8% (+7.80)#1,698
53. Clearview 15.4% 10.3% (+5.06)#53 7.8% (+7.54)#1,763
54. Felida 15.3% 10.3% (+5.02)#54 7.8% (+7.50)#1,783
55. Harrington 15.1% 10.3% (+4.80)#55 7.8% (+7.28)#1,830
56. Shadow Lake 15.1% 10.3% (+4.75)#56 7.8% (+7.24)#1,841
57. Vashon 15.0% 10.3% (+4.64)#57 7.8% (+7.13)#1,865
58. Latah 14.9% 10.3% (+4.56)#58 7.8% (+7.05)#1,900
59. Mountlake Terrace 14.7% 10.3% (+4.33)#59 7.8% (+6.81)#1,967
60. Brush Prairie 14.4% 10.3% (+4.12)#60 7.8% (+6.60)#2,036
61. Cohassett Beach 14.4% 10.3% (+4.04)#61 7.8% (+6.52)#2,050
62. Hansville 14.3% 10.3% (+3.98)#62 7.8% (+6.47)#2,067
63. Canterwood 14.3% 10.3% (+3.97)#63 7.8% (+6.45)#2,069
64. Shoreline 14.2% 10.3% (+3.86)#64 7.8% (+6.34)#2,115
65. Concrete 14.1% 10.3% (+3.72)#65 7.8% (+6.20)#2,161
66. Brier 14.0% 10.3% (+3.66)#66 7.8% (+6.14)#2,184
67. West Richland 13.6% 10.3% (+3.26)#67 7.8% (+5.74)#2,304
68. High Bridge 13.5% 10.3% (+3.16)#68 7.8% (+5.64)#2,348
69. Southworth 13.4% 10.3% (+3.08)#69 7.8% (+5.57)#2,382
70. Edmonds 13.4% 10.3% (+3.02)#70 7.8% (+5.51)#2,402
71. Manchester 13.3% 10.3% (+2.96)#71 7.8% (+5.45)#2,428
72. Martha Lake 13.3% 10.3% (+2.96)#72 7.8% (+5.44)#2,430
73. Bryant 13.2% 10.3% (+2.84)#73 7.8% (+5.33)#2,475
74. Cherry Grove 12.9% 10.3% (+2.59)#74 7.8% (+5.07)#2,582
75. Kalama 12.8% 10.3% (+2.45)#75 7.8% (+4.94)#2,624
76. Normandy Park 12.6% 10.3% (+2.26)#76 7.8% (+4.75)#2,712
77. Port Ludlow 12.6% 10.3% (+2.26)#77 7.8% (+4.75)#2,713
78. Mirrormont 12.6% 10.3% (+2.25)#78 7.8% (+4.74)#2,718
79. Bryn Mawr Skyway 12.4% 10.3% (+2.07)#79 7.8% (+4.56)#2,806
80. Carnation 12.4% 10.3% (+2.05)#80 7.8% (+4.54)#2,811
81. Rosedale 12.4% 10.3% (+2.02)#81 7.8% (+4.50)#2,827
82. Meadowdale 12.3% 10.3% (+2.00)#82 7.8% (+4.48)#2,836
83. Terrace Heights 12.3% 10.3% (+1.99)#83 7.8% (+4.47)#2,840
84. Camas 12.3% 10.3% (+1.92)#84 7.8% (+4.41)#2,876
85. Fern Prairie 12.2% 10.3% (+1.89)#85 7.8% (+4.37)#2,889
86. Maltby 12.2% 10.3% (+1.88)#86 7.8% (+4.37)#2,894
87. Silver Firs 12.0% 10.3% (+1.67)#87 7.8% (+4.15)#3,003
88. Marrowstone 12.0% 10.3% (+1.66)#88 7.8% (+4.14)#3,007
89. Tehaleh 12.0% 10.3% (+1.63)#89 7.8% (+4.11)#3,022
90. Raft Island 11.9% 10.3% (+1.53)#90 7.8% (+4.01)#3,081
91. Woods Creek 11.8% 10.3% (+1.50)#91 7.8% (+3.99)#3,096
92. Vaughn 11.6% 10.3% (+1.32)#92 7.8% (+3.80)#3,181
93. Maple Valley 11.6% 10.3% (+1.25)#93 7.8% (+3.74)#3,211
94. Lake Stickney 11.5% 10.3% (+1.20)#94 7.8% (+3.69)#3,236
95. Allyn 11.5% 10.3% (+1.16)#95 7.8% (+3.65)#3,263
96. Lake Shore 11.5% 10.3% (+1.14)#96 7.8% (+3.62)#3,274
97. Ravensdale 11.5% 10.3% (+1.13)#97 7.8% (+3.61)#3,276
98. Port Townsend 11.4% 10.3% (+1.10)#98 7.8% (+3.59)#3,289
99. Langley 11.4% 10.3% (+1.10)#99 7.8% (+3.58)#3,291
100. Barberton 11.4% 10.3% (+1.07)#100 7.8% (+3.55)#3,304

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Washington are:
#1
56.2%
#2
38.4%
#3
38.2%
#4
35.0%
#5
33.9%
#6
33.2%
#7
30.8%
#8
28.9%
#9
28.1%
#10
27.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Washington?
Altoona has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Washington with 56.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in Washington is 10.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Professional & Scientific Services in the United States is 7.8%.