Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computer, Engineering & Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Ohio

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Ohio

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Sandyville 51.3% 6.1% (+45.2)#1 6.8% (+44.5)#65
2. Plainville 39.3% 6.1% (+33.2)#2 6.8% (+32.5)#121
3. Parkman 30.0% 6.1% (+23.9)#3 6.8% (+23.2)#221
4. Bentonville 27.4% 6.1% (+21.3)#4 6.8% (+20.6)#277
5. Walton Hills 25.2% 6.1% (+19.2)#5 6.8% (+18.5)#328
6. Sixteen Mile Stand 22.8% 6.1% (+16.7)#6 6.8% (+16.0)#413
7. Melmore 22.6% 6.1% (+16.5)#7 6.8% (+15.8)#420
8. New Pittsburg 22.5% 6.1% (+16.4)#8 6.8% (+15.7)#424
9. Waterford 22.1% 6.1% (+16.1)#9 6.8% (+15.4)#437
10. Graysville 21.7% 6.1% (+15.7)#10 6.8% (+15.0)#463
11. New Haven Cdp Hamilton County 21.3% 6.1% (+15.2)#11 6.8% (+14.5)#484
12. Austinburg 21.1% 6.1% (+15.0)#12 6.8% (+14.3)#501
13. Lake Buckhorn 18.6% 6.1% (+12.6)#13 6.8% (+11.9)#671
14. Twinsburg Heights 18.5% 6.1% (+12.5)#14 6.8% (+11.8)#673
15. Valley City 18.0% 6.1% (+11.9)#15 6.8% (+11.2)#734
16. Andersonville 17.4% 6.1% (+11.3)#16 6.8% (+10.6)#785
17. St Johns 17.2% 6.1% (+11.1)#17 6.8% (+10.4)#811
18. Brandt 16.7% 6.1% (+10.6)#18 6.8% (+9.90)#873
19. Howard 16.2% 6.1% (+10.1)#19 6.8% (+9.42)#937
20. Oakwood 16.0% 6.1% (+9.95)#20 6.8% (+9.25)#958
21. Blue Ash 15.9% 6.1% (+9.80)#21 6.8% (+9.10)#982
22. Beavercreek 15.8% 6.1% (+9.71)#22 6.8% (+9.01)#993
23. Glenwillow 15.7% 6.1% (+9.66)#23 6.8% (+8.96)#1,001
24. Amberley 15.5% 6.1% (+9.47)#24 6.8% (+8.77)#1,028
25. Dublin 15.4% 6.1% (+9.30)#25 6.8% (+8.60)#1,071
26. Fort Seneca 15.0% 6.1% (+8.94)#26 6.8% (+8.24)#1,138
27. Mason 15.0% 6.1% (+8.89)#27 6.8% (+8.19)#1,151
28. Minerva Park 14.9% 6.1% (+8.83)#28 6.8% (+8.13)#1,159
29. South Lebanon 14.8% 6.1% (+8.70)#29 6.8% (+8.00)#1,182
30. Dunlap 14.5% 6.1% (+8.43)#30 6.8% (+7.73)#1,239
31. Jenera 14.4% 6.1% (+8.30)#31 6.8% (+7.60)#1,251
32. Mckinley Heights 14.3% 6.1% (+8.22)#32 6.8% (+7.52)#1,266
33. Stafford 14.3% 6.1% (+8.22)#33 6.8% (+7.52)#1,273
34. Bellbrook 13.9% 6.1% (+7.84)#34 6.8% (+7.14)#1,357
35. Sherwood 13.9% 6.1% (+7.82)#35 6.8% (+7.12)#1,359
36. Yellow Springs 13.9% 6.1% (+7.80)#36 6.8% (+7.10)#1,370
37. Five Points 13.6% 6.1% (+7.58)#37 6.8% (+6.88)#1,436
38. Montezuma 13.6% 6.1% (+7.57)#38 6.8% (+6.87)#1,443
39. Hilliard 13.6% 6.1% (+7.56)#39 6.8% (+6.86)#1,447
40. New California 13.6% 6.1% (+7.51)#40 6.8% (+6.81)#1,462
41. Wyoming 13.6% 6.1% (+7.50)#41 6.8% (+6.80)#1,464
42. Beckett Ridge 13.4% 6.1% (+7.37)#42 6.8% (+6.67)#1,505
43. Wright Patterson Afb 13.4% 6.1% (+7.37)#43 6.8% (+6.67)#1,506
44. Landen 13.4% 6.1% (+7.37)#44 6.8% (+6.67)#1,509
45. Mariemont 13.3% 6.1% (+7.23)#45 6.8% (+6.53)#1,550
46. Madison 13.2% 6.1% (+7.10)#46 6.8% (+6.40)#1,583
47. Reminderville 12.9% 6.1% (+6.82)#47 6.8% (+6.12)#1,667
48. Pleasant Run Farm 12.8% 6.1% (+6.76)#48 6.8% (+6.06)#1,686
49. Lake Seneca 12.7% 6.1% (+6.68)#49 6.8% (+5.98)#1,711
50. Avon 12.6% 6.1% (+6.57)#50 6.8% (+5.87)#1,742
51. Clifton 12.6% 6.1% (+6.56)#51 6.8% (+5.86)#1,746
52. Alexandria 12.5% 6.1% (+6.48)#52 6.8% (+5.78)#1,764
53. Cloverdale 12.5% 6.1% (+6.44)#53 6.8% (+5.74)#1,769
54. Evendale 12.5% 6.1% (+6.39)#54 6.8% (+5.69)#1,790
55. Gomer 12.4% 6.1% (+6.32)#55 6.8% (+5.62)#1,814
56. West Logan 11.9% 6.1% (+5.88)#56 6.8% (+5.18)#1,957
57. Shawnee Hills 11.9% 6.1% (+5.83)#57 6.8% (+5.13)#1,980
58. Flat Rock 11.9% 6.1% (+5.81)#58 6.8% (+5.11)#1,986
59. Blaine 11.8% 6.1% (+5.70)#59 6.8% (+5.00)#2,020
60. Thornville 11.7% 6.1% (+5.67)#60 6.8% (+4.97)#2,031
61. Lyndhurst 11.7% 6.1% (+5.60)#61 6.8% (+4.90)#2,051
62. Sharonville 11.6% 6.1% (+5.52)#62 6.8% (+4.82)#2,074
63. Portage 11.5% 6.1% (+5.47)#63 6.8% (+4.77)#2,099
64. Somerset 11.5% 6.1% (+5.44)#64 6.8% (+4.74)#2,111
65. Willoughby Hills 11.5% 6.1% (+5.44)#65 6.8% (+4.74)#2,114
66. Stony Ridge 11.5% 6.1% (+5.42)#66 6.8% (+4.72)#2,132
67. Springboro 11.4% 6.1% (+5.38)#67 6.8% (+4.68)#2,145
68. Upper Arlington 11.4% 6.1% (+5.32)#68 6.8% (+4.62)#2,173
69. Middleburg Heights 11.4% 6.1% (+5.30)#69 6.8% (+4.60)#2,189
70. Worthington 11.4% 6.1% (+5.29)#70 6.8% (+4.59)#2,203
71. Pemberville 11.2% 6.1% (+5.17)#71 6.8% (+4.47)#2,253
72. Riverlea 11.2% 6.1% (+5.12)#72 6.8% (+4.42)#2,273
73. Hide A Way Hills 11.2% 6.1% (+5.11)#73 6.8% (+4.41)#2,284
74. Glendale 11.2% 6.1% (+5.10)#74 6.8% (+4.40)#2,287
75. Proctorville 11.1% 6.1% (+4.99)#75 6.8% (+4.29)#2,351
76. St Bernard 11.0% 6.1% (+4.94)#76 6.8% (+4.24)#2,376
77. North Hampton 10.9% 6.1% (+4.83)#77 6.8% (+4.13)#2,422
78. Silver Lake 10.8% 6.1% (+4.72)#78 6.8% (+4.02)#2,476
79. Four Bridges 10.8% 6.1% (+4.72)#79 6.8% (+4.02)#2,477
80. Woodworth 10.7% 6.1% (+4.61)#80 6.8% (+3.91)#2,535
81. Powell 10.5% 6.1% (+4.46)#81 6.8% (+3.76)#2,628
82. Kirtland Hills 10.4% 6.1% (+4.36)#82 6.8% (+3.66)#2,672
83. Sheffield 10.4% 6.1% (+4.36)#83 6.8% (+3.66)#2,677
84. Brecksville 10.4% 6.1% (+4.36)#84 6.8% (+3.66)#2,680
85. Haskins 10.4% 6.1% (+4.33)#85 6.8% (+3.63)#2,701
86. Choctaw Lake 10.4% 6.1% (+4.32)#86 6.8% (+3.62)#2,704
87. Aurora 10.4% 6.1% (+4.29)#87 6.8% (+3.59)#2,724
88. Granville 10.3% 6.1% (+4.22)#88 6.8% (+3.52)#2,764
89. Bainbridge 10.2% 6.1% (+4.15)#89 6.8% (+3.45)#2,805
90. Dry Ridge 10.1% 6.1% (+4.05)#90 6.8% (+3.35)#2,870
91. Pickerington 10.1% 6.1% (+4.04)#91 6.8% (+3.34)#2,879
92. Granville South 10.1% 6.1% (+4.02)#92 6.8% (+3.32)#2,885
93. Kenwood 10.1% 6.1% (+4.01)#93 6.8% (+3.31)#2,897
94. Centerville 10.0% 6.1% (+3.98)#94 6.8% (+3.28)#2,915
95. Camp Dennison 9.9% 6.1% (+3.88)#95 6.8% (+3.18)#2,979
96. Mount Repose 9.9% 6.1% (+3.86)#96 6.8% (+3.16)#2,994
97. Peninsula 9.9% 6.1% (+3.83)#97 6.8% (+3.13)#3,012
98. Maineville 9.9% 6.1% (+3.81)#98 6.8% (+3.11)#3,023
99. Northfield 9.9% 6.1% (+3.79)#99 6.8% (+3.09)#3,038
100. Grandview Heights 9.8% 6.1% (+3.78)#100 6.8% (+3.08)#3,045

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Ohio are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Ohio?
Sandyville has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Ohio with 51.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Ohio is 6.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States is 6.8%.