Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Carpool
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Washington

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Washington

City % Carpool vs State vs National
1. Port Ludlow 73.1% 37.6% (+35.5)#1 38.2% (+34.9)#34
2. Oakesdale 61.3% 37.6% (+23.7)#2 38.2% (+23.1)#385
3. Lochsloy 60.5% 37.6% (+22.9)#3 38.2% (+22.3)#453
4. Tekoa 60.3% 37.6% (+22.7)#4 38.2% (+22.1)#494
5. La Center 60.2% 37.6% (+22.6)#5 38.2% (+22.0)#506
6. Town And Country 60.1% 37.6% (+22.5)#6 38.2% (+21.9)#522
7. Odessa 59.1% 37.6% (+21.5)#7 38.2% (+20.9)#665
8. Normandy Park 59.0% 37.6% (+21.4)#8 38.2% (+20.8)#669
9. Wilderness Rim 58.5% 37.6% (+20.9)#9 38.2% (+20.3)#713
10. Warm Beach 58.4% 37.6% (+20.8)#10 38.2% (+20.2)#733
11. North Puyallup 57.7% 37.6% (+20.1)#11 38.2% (+19.5)#847
12. Bryant 56.8% 37.6% (+19.2)#12 38.2% (+18.6)#984
13. Colfax 56.5% 37.6% (+18.9)#13 38.2% (+18.3)#1,020
14. Roche Harbor 56.4% 37.6% (+18.8)#14 38.2% (+18.2)#1,059
15. Latah 56.3% 37.6% (+18.7)#15 38.2% (+18.1)#1,093
16. Roslyn 56.1% 37.6% (+18.5)#16 38.2% (+17.9)#1,138
17. Toledo 55.8% 37.6% (+18.2)#17 38.2% (+17.6)#1,195
18. Garrett 55.5% 37.6% (+17.9)#18 38.2% (+17.3)#1,233
19. Prescott 55.5% 37.6% (+17.9)#19 38.2% (+17.3)#1,252
20. Burley 55.4% 37.6% (+17.8)#20 38.2% (+17.2)#1,269
21. Sequim 55.1% 37.6% (+17.5)#21 38.2% (+16.9)#1,329
22. Sunday Lake 54.8% 37.6% (+17.2)#22 38.2% (+16.6)#1,401
23. Tanglewilde 54.4% 37.6% (+16.8)#23 38.2% (+16.2)#1,482
24. Longview Heights 54.2% 37.6% (+16.6)#24 38.2% (+16.0)#1,548
25. Tieton 54.1% 37.6% (+16.5)#25 38.2% (+15.9)#1,579
26. Pateros 53.7% 37.6% (+16.1)#26 38.2% (+15.5)#1,652
27. Waterville 53.6% 37.6% (+16.0)#27 38.2% (+15.4)#1,672
28. Waller 53.3% 37.6% (+15.7)#28 38.2% (+15.1)#1,754
29. Raymond 53.3% 37.6% (+15.7)#29 38.2% (+15.1)#1,761
30. Gig Harbor 53.2% 37.6% (+15.6)#30 38.2% (+15.0)#1,787
31. Lake Holm 52.1% 37.6% (+14.5)#31 38.2% (+13.9)#2,061
32. South Bend 52.1% 37.6% (+14.5)#32 38.2% (+13.9)#2,068
33. Carson 51.4% 37.6% (+13.8)#33 38.2% (+13.2)#2,270
34. Buckley 51.2% 37.6% (+13.6)#34 38.2% (+13.0)#2,340
35. Clarkston Heights Vineland 51.1% 37.6% (+13.5)#35 38.2% (+12.9)#2,370
36. Davenport 51.1% 37.6% (+13.5)#36 38.2% (+12.9)#2,390
37. North Bend 51.0% 37.6% (+13.4)#37 38.2% (+12.8)#2,409
38. Rock Island 51.0% 37.6% (+13.4)#38 38.2% (+12.8)#2,419
39. Langley 51.0% 37.6% (+13.4)#39 38.2% (+12.8)#2,424
40. Entiat 51.0% 37.6% (+13.4)#40 38.2% (+12.8)#2,425
41. Chinook 51.0% 37.6% (+13.4)#41 38.2% (+12.8)#2,435
42. Wollochet 50.9% 37.6% (+13.3)#42 38.2% (+12.7)#2,448
43. Clinton 50.9% 37.6% (+13.3)#43 38.2% (+12.7)#2,456
44. Burbank 50.8% 37.6% (+13.2)#44 38.2% (+12.6)#2,475
45. Arlington Heights 50.4% 37.6% (+12.8)#45 38.2% (+12.2)#2,634
46. Waitsburg 50.3% 37.6% (+12.7)#46 38.2% (+12.1)#2,693
47. Machias 50.1% 37.6% (+12.5)#47 38.2% (+11.9)#2,776
48. Palouse 50.0% 37.6% (+12.4)#48 38.2% (+11.8)#2,809
49. Malden 49.7% 37.6% (+12.1)#49 38.2% (+11.5)#2,894
50. Clyde Hill 49.6% 37.6% (+12.0)#50 38.2% (+11.4)#2,906
51. Concrete 49.6% 37.6% (+12.0)#51 38.2% (+11.4)#2,921
52. Warden 49.5% 37.6% (+11.9)#52 38.2% (+11.3)#2,943
53. Point Roberts 49.1% 37.6% (+11.5)#53 38.2% (+10.9)#3,157
54. Lakeland South 48.9% 37.6% (+11.3)#54 38.2% (+10.7)#3,210
55. Swede Heaven 48.8% 37.6% (+11.2)#55 38.2% (+10.6)#3,266
56. George 48.8% 37.6% (+11.2)#56 38.2% (+10.6)#3,269
57. High Bridge 48.6% 37.6% (+11.0)#57 38.2% (+10.4)#3,334
58. Medina 48.5% 37.6% (+10.9)#58 38.2% (+10.3)#3,364
59. Bingen 48.5% 37.6% (+10.9)#59 38.2% (+10.3)#3,390
60. Darrington 48.4% 37.6% (+10.8)#60 38.2% (+10.2)#3,442
61. Bridgeport 48.3% 37.6% (+10.7)#61 38.2% (+10.1)#3,477
62. Ocean Shores 48.1% 37.6% (+10.5)#62 38.2% (+9.90)#3,558
63. Longbranch 48.0% 37.6% (+10.4)#63 38.2% (+9.80)#3,610
64. Fife Heights 47.8% 37.6% (+10.2)#64 38.2% (+9.60)#3,690
65. Colton 47.7% 37.6% (+10.1)#65 38.2% (+9.50)#3,742
66. Chico 47.5% 37.6% (+9.90)#66 38.2% (+9.30)#3,811
67. Lacrosse 47.5% 37.6% (+9.90)#67 38.2% (+9.30)#3,860
68. Silver Firs 47.4% 37.6% (+9.80)#68 38.2% (+9.20)#3,884
69. Three Lakes 47.3% 37.6% (+9.70)#69 38.2% (+9.10)#3,953
70. Kitsap Lake 47.3% 37.6% (+9.70)#70 38.2% (+9.10)#3,962
71. Fairfield 47.3% 37.6% (+9.70)#71 38.2% (+9.10)#3,983
72. Lake Morton Berrydale 47.2% 37.6% (+9.60)#72 38.2% (+9.00)#4,008
73. Lake Shore 47.2% 37.6% (+9.60)#73 38.2% (+9.00)#4,013
74. Maltby 47.0% 37.6% (+9.40)#74 38.2% (+8.80)#4,108
75. Canterwood 46.8% 37.6% (+9.20)#75 38.2% (+8.60)#4,197
76. Trout Lake 46.6% 37.6% (+9.00)#76 38.2% (+8.40)#4,281
77. Touchet 46.5% 37.6% (+8.90)#77 38.2% (+8.30)#4,342
78. Lakeland North 46.3% 37.6% (+8.70)#78 38.2% (+8.10)#4,408
79. Fircrest 46.3% 37.6% (+8.70)#79 38.2% (+8.10)#4,418
80. Winthrop 46.3% 37.6% (+8.70)#80 38.2% (+8.10)#4,459
81. Chelan 46.2% 37.6% (+8.60)#81 38.2% (+8.00)#4,481
82. Ferndale 46.1% 37.6% (+8.50)#82 38.2% (+7.90)#4,519
83. Riverbend 46.1% 37.6% (+8.50)#83 38.2% (+7.90)#4,547
84. Finley 46.0% 37.6% (+8.40)#84 38.2% (+7.80)#4,587
85. Grapeview 46.0% 37.6% (+8.40)#85 38.2% (+7.80)#4,607
86. Nespelem Community 45.9% 37.6% (+8.30)#86 38.2% (+7.70)#4,661
87. Lake Tapps 45.8% 37.6% (+8.20)#87 38.2% (+7.60)#4,667
88. Cascade Valley 45.8% 37.6% (+8.20)#88 38.2% (+7.60)#4,675
89. Woods Creek 45.7% 37.6% (+8.10)#89 38.2% (+7.50)#4,720
90. Fords Prairie 45.5% 37.6% (+7.90)#90 38.2% (+7.30)#4,824
91. Rockford 45.5% 37.6% (+7.90)#91 38.2% (+7.30)#4,871
92. Chain Lake 45.4% 37.6% (+7.80)#92 38.2% (+7.20)#4,927
93. Ocean Park 45.4% 37.6% (+7.80)#93 38.2% (+7.20)#4,938
94. Marietta Alderwood 45.3% 37.6% (+7.70)#94 38.2% (+7.10)#4,984
95. Royal City 45.3% 37.6% (+7.70)#95 38.2% (+7.10)#4,992
96. Edmonds 45.1% 37.6% (+7.50)#96 38.2% (+6.90)#5,088
97. Camas 45.1% 37.6% (+7.50)#97 38.2% (+6.90)#5,091
98. Felida 45.1% 37.6% (+7.50)#98 38.2% (+6.90)#5,097
99. Port Angeles East 44.7% 37.6% (+7.10)#99 38.2% (+6.50)#5,296
100. Vashon 44.5% 37.6% (+6.90)#100 38.2% (+6.30)#5,396

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Washington are:
#1
73.1%
#2
61.3%
#3
60.5%
#4
60.3%
#5
60.2%
#6
60.1%
#7
59.1%
#8
59.0%
#9
58.5%
#10
58.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Washington?
Port Ludlow has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Washington with 73.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Washington is 37.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States is 38.2%.