Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computer, Engineering & Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Michigan

0.0%
30.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Boon 26.1% 7.2% (+18.9)#1 6.8% (+19.3)#307
2. Bergland 25.5% 7.2% (+18.4)#2 6.8% (+18.8)#320
3. Farmington 22.9% 7.2% (+15.7)#3 6.8% (+16.1)#405
4. Auburn Hills 22.3% 7.2% (+15.1)#4 6.8% (+15.6)#428
5. Troy 21.2% 7.2% (+14.0)#5 6.8% (+14.4)#495
6. Bay Shore 20.9% 7.2% (+13.7)#6 6.8% (+14.1)#516
7. Cambria 19.3% 7.2% (+12.1)#7 6.8% (+12.5)#609
8. Lake Gogebic 19.0% 7.2% (+11.9)#8 6.8% (+12.3)#629
9. Novi 18.2% 7.2% (+11.0)#9 6.8% (+11.4)#706
10. Farmington Hills 17.2% 7.2% (+10.0)#10 6.8% (+10.5)#805
11. Chassell 17.0% 7.2% (+9.81)#11 6.8% (+10.2)#833
12. Rochester Hills 16.5% 7.2% (+9.34)#12 6.8% (+9.75)#891
13. Ann Arbor 16.3% 7.2% (+9.10)#13 6.8% (+9.51)#922
14. St Joseph 15.7% 7.2% (+8.53)#14 6.8% (+8.94)#1,004
15. Royal Oak 15.5% 7.2% (+8.30)#15 6.8% (+8.72)#1,040
16. Clawson 15.5% 7.2% (+8.29)#16 6.8% (+8.70)#1,046
17. Auburn 15.2% 7.2% (+7.98)#17 6.8% (+8.40)#1,106
18. Dimondale 14.8% 7.2% (+7.66)#18 6.8% (+8.07)#1,168
19. Pleasant Ridge 14.8% 7.2% (+7.62)#19 6.8% (+8.03)#1,177
20. Winn 14.8% 7.2% (+7.58)#20 6.8% (+7.99)#1,186
21. Ferndale 14.2% 7.2% (+6.98)#21 6.8% (+7.39)#1,297
22. Delton 14.1% 7.2% (+6.89)#22 6.8% (+7.30)#1,317
23. Lake Victoria 13.6% 7.2% (+6.42)#23 6.8% (+6.83)#1,454
24. Plymouth 13.5% 7.2% (+6.31)#24 6.8% (+6.72)#1,484
25. Rochester 13.4% 7.2% (+6.25)#25 6.8% (+6.66)#1,515
26. Chums Corner 13.2% 7.2% (+5.98)#26 6.8% (+6.39)#1,586
27. Northville 12.9% 7.2% (+5.76)#27 6.8% (+6.18)#1,646
28. Wolverine Lake 12.5% 7.2% (+5.31)#28 6.8% (+5.73)#1,779
29. Comstock Northwest 12.3% 7.2% (+5.16)#29 6.8% (+5.57)#1,831
30. Okemos 12.3% 7.2% (+5.11)#30 6.8% (+5.52)#1,846
31. Whitmore Lake 12.2% 7.2% (+5.01)#31 6.8% (+5.42)#1,897
32. Berkley 12.2% 7.2% (+4.99)#32 6.8% (+5.41)#1,902
33. Dexter 12.0% 7.2% (+4.79)#33 6.8% (+5.21)#1,946
34. Michiana 11.9% 7.2% (+4.74)#34 6.8% (+5.16)#1,973
35. Wixom 11.8% 7.2% (+4.64)#35 6.8% (+5.06)#2,001
36. Waverly 11.7% 7.2% (+4.54)#36 6.8% (+4.95)#2,041
37. Millburg 11.5% 7.2% (+4.35)#37 6.8% (+4.76)#2,105
38. Pewamo 11.4% 7.2% (+4.25)#38 6.8% (+4.66)#2,152
39. Lake Michigan Beach 11.3% 7.2% (+4.09)#39 6.8% (+4.51)#2,229
40. Grosse Pointe Woods 11.2% 7.2% (+3.99)#40 6.8% (+4.41)#2,281
41. Twin Lake 11.1% 7.2% (+3.95)#41 6.8% (+4.36)#2,301
42. Norwood 11.1% 7.2% (+3.93)#42 6.8% (+4.35)#2,317
43. Reese 11.1% 7.2% (+3.90)#43 6.8% (+4.31)#2,340
44. Oxford 11.0% 7.2% (+3.85)#44 6.8% (+4.26)#2,363
45. Fennville 10.9% 7.2% (+3.74)#45 6.8% (+4.15)#2,409
46. Lake Orion 10.9% 7.2% (+3.69)#46 6.8% (+4.11)#2,433
47. Livonia 10.8% 7.2% (+3.67)#47 6.8% (+4.08)#2,445
48. Keego Harbor 10.8% 7.2% (+3.63)#48 6.8% (+4.04)#2,465
49. Dundee 10.8% 7.2% (+3.63)#49 6.8% (+4.04)#2,467
50. Lathrup Village 10.8% 7.2% (+3.61)#50 6.8% (+4.02)#2,472
51. Saline 10.7% 7.2% (+3.57)#51 6.8% (+3.99)#2,494
52. Milford 10.7% 7.2% (+3.56)#52 6.8% (+3.98)#2,496
53. Wacousta 10.7% 7.2% (+3.56)#53 6.8% (+3.98)#2,497
54. North Muskegon 10.6% 7.2% (+3.46)#54 6.8% (+3.87)#2,562
55. Henderson 10.6% 7.2% (+3.38)#55 6.8% (+3.79)#2,602
56. Almont 10.6% 7.2% (+3.38)#56 6.8% (+3.79)#2,605
57. Midland 10.6% 7.2% (+3.38)#57 6.8% (+3.79)#2,607
58. Dearborn 10.5% 7.2% (+3.31)#58 6.8% (+3.72)#2,643
59. Minden City 10.4% 7.2% (+3.24)#59 6.8% (+3.65)#2,686
60. Sylvan Lake 10.4% 7.2% (+3.20)#60 6.8% (+3.62)#2,705
61. Haslett 10.4% 7.2% (+3.19)#61 6.8% (+3.60)#2,720
62. Prescott 10.3% 7.2% (+3.17)#62 6.8% (+3.58)#2,731
63. Ortonville 10.3% 7.2% (+3.16)#63 6.8% (+3.57)#2,740
64. Leonard 10.3% 7.2% (+3.12)#64 6.8% (+3.53)#2,759
65. Huntington Woods 10.2% 7.2% (+2.99)#65 6.8% (+3.40)#2,842
66. Sterling Heights 10.1% 7.2% (+2.95)#66 6.8% (+3.36)#2,865
67. Boyne City 10.1% 7.2% (+2.95)#67 6.8% (+3.36)#2,866
68. Howell 10.0% 7.2% (+2.86)#68 6.8% (+3.27)#2,920
69. Madison Heights 10.0% 7.2% (+2.85)#69 6.8% (+3.26)#2,930
70. St James 10.0% 7.2% (+2.82)#70 6.8% (+3.24)#2,947
71. Portland 10.0% 7.2% (+2.78)#71 6.8% (+3.19)#2,976
72. Beverly Hills 9.9% 7.2% (+2.74)#72 6.8% (+3.16)#2,991
73. Level Park Oak Park 9.9% 7.2% (+2.71)#73 6.8% (+3.12)#3,016
74. St Charles 9.8% 7.2% (+2.60)#74 6.8% (+3.01)#3,095
75. Rockford 9.7% 7.2% (+2.49)#75 6.8% (+2.90)#3,178
76. Ypsilanti 9.6% 7.2% (+2.43)#76 6.8% (+2.84)#3,228
77. South Lyon 9.6% 7.2% (+2.43)#77 6.8% (+2.84)#3,231
78. Nashville 9.6% 7.2% (+2.40)#78 6.8% (+2.81)#3,252
79. Westwood 9.5% 7.2% (+2.32)#79 6.8% (+2.73)#3,319
80. Manchester 9.5% 7.2% (+2.29)#80 6.8% (+2.70)#3,337
81. Vicksburg 9.4% 7.2% (+2.24)#81 6.8% (+2.65)#3,375
82. Milan 9.4% 7.2% (+2.19)#82 6.8% (+2.60)#3,421
83. Brighton 9.3% 7.2% (+2.14)#83 6.8% (+2.55)#3,456
84. Middleville 9.1% 7.2% (+1.96)#84 6.8% (+2.37)#3,594
85. Stevensville 9.1% 7.2% (+1.93)#85 6.8% (+2.34)#3,613
86. Village Of Grosse Pointe Shores 9.1% 7.2% (+1.92)#86 6.8% (+2.33)#3,618
87. Shoreham 9.1% 7.2% (+1.91)#87 6.8% (+2.33)#3,625
88. Franklin 9.1% 7.2% (+1.89)#88 6.8% (+2.30)#3,658
89. Beal City 9.0% 7.2% (+1.86)#89 6.8% (+2.27)#3,678
90. Frankenmuth 9.0% 7.2% (+1.82)#90 6.8% (+2.23)#3,713
91. Oak Park 9.0% 7.2% (+1.79)#91 6.8% (+2.20)#3,739
92. Perry 8.9% 7.2% (+1.77)#92 6.8% (+2.18)#3,761
93. Benton Heights 8.9% 7.2% (+1.77)#93 6.8% (+2.18)#3,763
94. Gwinn 8.9% 7.2% (+1.68)#94 6.8% (+2.09)#3,852
95. Portage 8.8% 7.2% (+1.63)#95 6.8% (+2.04)#3,900
96. Southfield 8.8% 7.2% (+1.62)#96 6.8% (+2.03)#3,907
97. Bloomfield Hills 8.8% 7.2% (+1.58)#97 6.8% (+1.99)#3,939
98. Goodrich 8.8% 7.2% (+1.58)#98 6.8% (+1.99)#3,940
99. Walled Lake 8.7% 7.2% (+1.54)#99 6.8% (+1.95)#3,962
100. Dewitt 8.7% 7.2% (+1.49)#100 6.8% (+1.90)#4,010

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Michigan are:
#1
26.1%
#2
22.9%
#3
22.3%
#4
21.2%
#5
20.9%
#6
18.2%
#7
17.2%
#8
16.5%
#9
16.3%
#10
15.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Michigan?
Boon has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Michigan with 26.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Michigan is 7.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States is 6.8%.