Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Washington

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Washington

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Rockport 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#20
2. Cougar 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#27
3. Hatton 62.5% 7.2% (+55.3)#3 6.9% (+55.6)#117
4. Barstow 58.3% 7.2% (+51.1)#4 6.9% (+51.5)#141
5. Verlot 53.7% 7.2% (+46.5)#5 6.9% (+46.8)#184
6. Chelan Falls 49.2% 7.2% (+42.0)#6 6.9% (+42.3)#232
7. Danville 43.5% 7.2% (+36.3)#7 6.9% (+36.6)#294
8. Lake Ketchum 43.0% 7.2% (+35.8)#8 6.9% (+36.1)#302
9. Chinook 43.0% 7.2% (+35.8)#9 6.9% (+36.1)#303
10. Index 40.4% 7.2% (+33.2)#10 6.9% (+33.5)#348
11. Greenwater 40.0% 7.2% (+32.8)#11 6.9% (+33.1)#358
12. Marine View 39.5% 7.2% (+32.3)#12 6.9% (+32.7)#372
13. Marblemount 37.8% 7.2% (+30.6)#13 6.9% (+31.0)#415
14. Four Lakes 33.2% 7.2% (+26.0)#14 6.9% (+26.3)#595
15. Yacolt 30.9% 7.2% (+23.7)#15 6.9% (+24.1)#694
16. South Creek 30.1% 7.2% (+22.9)#16 6.9% (+23.2)#740
17. Springdale 29.8% 7.2% (+22.6)#17 6.9% (+23.0)#756
18. Moclips 29.5% 7.2% (+22.3)#18 6.9% (+22.6)#775
19. Skamokawa Valley 29.4% 7.2% (+22.2)#19 6.9% (+22.5)#778
20. Lyle 29.2% 7.2% (+22.0)#20 6.9% (+22.3)#791
21. Torboy 29.0% 7.2% (+21.8)#21 6.9% (+22.1)#805
22. Mckenna 28.4% 7.2% (+21.2)#22 6.9% (+21.5)#850
23. Wilkeson 27.7% 7.2% (+20.5)#23 6.9% (+20.8)#905
24. Malott 27.5% 7.2% (+20.3)#24 6.9% (+20.6)#919
25. Grayland 26.2% 7.2% (+19.0)#25 6.9% (+19.3)#1,033
26. Washtucna 25.6% 7.2% (+18.4)#26 6.9% (+18.7)#1,078
27. East Cathlamet 25.5% 7.2% (+18.3)#27 6.9% (+18.6)#1,083
28. Kahlotus 23.7% 7.2% (+16.5)#28 6.9% (+16.9)#1,280
29. Trout Lake 23.6% 7.2% (+16.4)#29 6.9% (+16.8)#1,294
30. Machias 22.7% 7.2% (+15.5)#30 6.9% (+15.9)#1,427
31. Conconully 22.4% 7.2% (+15.2)#31 6.9% (+15.5)#1,483
32. Deer Park 22.2% 7.2% (+15.0)#32 6.9% (+15.3)#1,526
33. Endicott 21.8% 7.2% (+14.6)#33 6.9% (+14.9)#1,577
34. Marietta Alderwood 21.2% 7.2% (+14.0)#34 6.9% (+14.4)#1,661
35. Puget Island 20.5% 7.2% (+13.3)#35 6.9% (+13.6)#1,797
36. Alder 20.5% 7.2% (+13.3)#36 6.9% (+13.6)#1,798
37. Lake Roesiger 20.3% 7.2% (+13.1)#37 6.9% (+13.5)#1,823
38. Union 20.2% 7.2% (+13.0)#38 6.9% (+13.3)#1,858
39. Clinton 20.0% 7.2% (+12.8)#39 6.9% (+13.1)#1,918
40. Lochsloy 19.8% 7.2% (+12.6)#40 6.9% (+12.9)#1,949
41. North Yelm 19.7% 7.2% (+12.5)#41 6.9% (+12.8)#1,972
42. Marrowstone 19.6% 7.2% (+12.4)#42 6.9% (+12.7)#1,995
43. Lake Bosworth 19.6% 7.2% (+12.4)#43 6.9% (+12.7)#1,999
44. Southworth 19.5% 7.2% (+12.3)#44 6.9% (+12.6)#2,010
45. Cathcart 19.5% 7.2% (+12.3)#45 6.9% (+12.6)#2,015
46. Burley 19.4% 7.2% (+12.2)#46 6.9% (+12.5)#2,033
47. Winthrop 19.4% 7.2% (+12.2)#47 6.9% (+12.5)#2,041
48. Cle Elum 19.2% 7.2% (+12.0)#48 6.9% (+12.3)#2,091
49. Marcus 19.1% 7.2% (+12.0)#49 6.9% (+12.3)#2,102
50. Hamilton 19.0% 7.2% (+11.8)#50 6.9% (+12.1)#2,138
51. May Creek 18.7% 7.2% (+11.5)#51 6.9% (+11.8)#2,235
52. Home 18.6% 7.2% (+11.4)#52 6.9% (+11.7)#2,245
53. Riverpoint 18.6% 7.2% (+11.4)#53 6.9% (+11.7)#2,250
54. Malden 18.6% 7.2% (+11.4)#54 6.9% (+11.7)#2,252
55. Alger 18.3% 7.2% (+11.1)#55 6.9% (+11.4)#2,330
56. Cowiche 17.8% 7.2% (+10.6)#56 6.9% (+10.9)#2,478
57. Ravensdale 17.8% 7.2% (+10.6)#57 6.9% (+10.9)#2,492
58. Gold Bar 17.5% 7.2% (+10.3)#58 6.9% (+10.6)#2,595
59. Rosburg 17.1% 7.2% (+9.95)#59 6.9% (+10.3)#2,685
60. Pateros 17.1% 7.2% (+9.90)#60 6.9% (+10.2)#2,702
61. Markham 17.1% 7.2% (+9.88)#61 6.9% (+10.2)#2,721
62. Thorp 17.1% 7.2% (+9.88)#62 6.9% (+10.2)#2,724
63. Lacrosse 17.0% 7.2% (+9.85)#63 6.9% (+10.2)#2,731
64. Carson 16.8% 7.2% (+9.64)#64 6.9% (+9.96)#2,797
65. West Pasco 16.8% 7.2% (+9.63)#65 6.9% (+9.95)#2,803
66. Pomeroy 16.8% 7.2% (+9.62)#66 6.9% (+9.94)#2,808
67. Clear Lake Cdp Pierce County 16.7% 7.2% (+9.53)#67 6.9% (+9.85)#2,844
68. Oso 16.7% 7.2% (+9.47)#68 6.9% (+9.79)#2,873
69. Nile 16.7% 7.2% (+9.47)#69 6.9% (+9.79)#2,890
70. Lake Morton Berrydale 16.5% 7.2% (+9.27)#70 6.9% (+9.59)#2,972
71. Cusick 16.4% 7.2% (+9.17)#71 6.9% (+9.49)#3,006
72. Creston 16.2% 7.2% (+9.02)#72 6.9% (+9.34)#3,053
73. Davenport 15.9% 7.2% (+8.72)#73 6.9% (+9.04)#3,173
74. Amboy 15.9% 7.2% (+8.70)#74 6.9% (+9.02)#3,184
75. Arlington Heights 15.8% 7.2% (+8.62)#75 6.9% (+8.94)#3,209
76. Connell 15.4% 7.2% (+8.16)#76 6.9% (+8.48)#3,417
77. Custer 15.3% 7.2% (+8.10)#77 6.9% (+8.42)#3,446
78. Port Hadlock Irondale 15.1% 7.2% (+7.92)#78 6.9% (+8.24)#3,538
79. Lyman 15.1% 7.2% (+7.90)#79 6.9% (+8.22)#3,543
80. Venersborg 15.1% 7.2% (+7.86)#80 6.9% (+8.18)#3,567
81. Satsop 15.0% 7.2% (+7.77)#81 6.9% (+8.09)#3,624
82. Meadow Glade 14.9% 7.2% (+7.70)#82 6.9% (+8.02)#3,669
83. Walla Walla East 14.9% 7.2% (+7.67)#83 6.9% (+7.99)#3,691
84. Purdy 14.8% 7.2% (+7.61)#84 6.9% (+7.93)#3,722
85. Summit 14.7% 7.2% (+7.52)#85 6.9% (+7.84)#3,789
86. Concrete 14.7% 7.2% (+7.51)#86 6.9% (+7.83)#3,791
87. Steptoe 14.6% 7.2% (+7.39)#87 6.9% (+7.71)#3,859
88. Woods Creek 14.6% 7.2% (+7.36)#88 6.9% (+7.68)#3,877
89. North Bonneville 14.5% 7.2% (+7.35)#89 6.9% (+7.67)#3,886
90. Baring 14.5% 7.2% (+7.35)#90 6.9% (+7.67)#3,889
91. Sedro Woolley 14.4% 7.2% (+7.19)#91 6.9% (+7.51)#3,978
92. Prairie Heights 14.3% 7.2% (+7.05)#92 6.9% (+7.37)#4,081
93. Clearview 14.2% 7.2% (+6.98)#93 6.9% (+7.30)#4,107
94. South Cle Elum 14.2% 7.2% (+6.97)#94 6.9% (+7.29)#4,116
95. Gleed 14.1% 7.2% (+6.94)#95 6.9% (+7.26)#4,127
96. Edgewood 14.1% 7.2% (+6.88)#96 6.9% (+7.20)#4,164
97. Starbuck 14.0% 7.2% (+6.84)#97 6.9% (+7.16)#4,191
98. Carbonado 14.0% 7.2% (+6.83)#98 6.9% (+7.15)#4,194
99. Bryant 14.0% 7.2% (+6.80)#99 6.9% (+7.12)#4,215
100. Moxee 14.0% 7.2% (+6.76)#100 6.9% (+7.08)#4,239

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Washington are:
#1
100.0%
#2
62.5%
#3
58.3%
#4
53.7%
#5
49.2%
#6
43.5%
#7
43.0%
#8
43.0%
#9
40.4%
#10
40.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Washington?
Rockport has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Washington with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Washington is 7.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States is 6.9%.