Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Wollochet 76.9% 31.9% (+45.0)#1 33.4% (+43.5)#29
2. Midland 72.5% 31.9% (+40.6)#2 33.4% (+39.1)#67
3. Taholah 72.1% 31.9% (+40.2)#3 33.4% (+38.7)#73
4. East Renton Highlands 72.0% 31.9% (+40.1)#4 33.4% (+38.6)#75
5. Coupeville 71.6% 31.9% (+39.7)#5 33.4% (+38.2)#78
6. Prescott 70.5% 31.9% (+38.6)#6 33.4% (+37.1)#105
7. Pe Ell 69.5% 31.9% (+37.6)#7 33.4% (+36.1)#122
8. Harrah 69.3% 31.9% (+37.4)#8 33.4% (+35.9)#134
9. Mckenna 67.9% 31.9% (+36.0)#9 33.4% (+34.5)#189
10. Enumclaw 67.2% 31.9% (+35.3)#10 33.4% (+33.8)#224
11. Inchelium 67.2% 31.9% (+35.3)#11 33.4% (+33.8)#230
12. Tehaleh 66.7% 31.9% (+34.8)#12 33.4% (+33.3)#239
13. Oakesdale 66.5% 31.9% (+34.6)#13 33.4% (+33.1)#253
14. Burbank 65.3% 31.9% (+33.4)#14 33.4% (+31.9)#326
15. Roche Harbor 64.8% 31.9% (+32.9)#15 33.4% (+31.4)#362
16. Springdale 64.5% 31.9% (+32.6)#16 33.4% (+31.1)#379
17. Humptulips 64.1% 31.9% (+32.2)#17 33.4% (+30.7)#414
18. Bothell West 63.2% 31.9% (+31.3)#18 33.4% (+29.8)#483
19. Nisqually Indian Community 62.5% 31.9% (+30.6)#19 33.4% (+29.1)#548
20. Port Orchard 62.4% 31.9% (+30.5)#20 33.4% (+29.0)#556
21. Winlock 62.1% 31.9% (+30.2)#21 33.4% (+28.7)#606
22. St John 60.5% 31.9% (+28.6)#22 33.4% (+27.1)#786
23. Steptoe 60.5% 31.9% (+28.6)#23 33.4% (+27.1)#795
24. Lake Morton Berrydale 60.4% 31.9% (+28.5)#24 33.4% (+27.0)#799
25. Glenwood 60.1% 31.9% (+28.2)#25 33.4% (+26.7)#866
26. Meadow Glade 59.5% 31.9% (+27.6)#26 33.4% (+26.1)#914
27. Beaux Arts Village 59.5% 31.9% (+27.6)#27 33.4% (+26.1)#929
28. La Conner 59.3% 31.9% (+27.4)#28 33.4% (+25.9)#958
29. Bothell East 59.2% 31.9% (+27.3)#29 33.4% (+25.8)#973
30. Suquamish 59.0% 31.9% (+27.1)#30 33.4% (+25.6)#1,015
31. Covington 58.8% 31.9% (+26.9)#31 33.4% (+25.4)#1,025
32. Hunts Point 58.8% 31.9% (+26.9)#32 33.4% (+25.4)#1,035
33. Indianola 58.5% 31.9% (+26.6)#33 33.4% (+25.1)#1,071
34. Metaline 58.3% 31.9% (+26.4)#34 33.4% (+24.9)#1,133
35. Mansfield 57.8% 31.9% (+25.9)#35 33.4% (+24.4)#1,185
36. Colton 57.4% 31.9% (+25.5)#36 33.4% (+24.0)#1,255
37. Washougal 57.2% 31.9% (+25.3)#37 33.4% (+23.8)#1,283
38. Poulsbo 57.0% 31.9% (+25.1)#38 33.4% (+23.6)#1,320
39. Brewster 56.4% 31.9% (+24.5)#39 33.4% (+23.0)#1,428
40. Ephrata 56.2% 31.9% (+24.3)#40 33.4% (+22.8)#1,468
41. Skokomish 55.5% 31.9% (+23.6)#41 33.4% (+22.1)#1,569
42. Hartline 55.5% 31.9% (+23.6)#42 33.4% (+22.1)#1,583
43. Vashon 55.3% 31.9% (+23.4)#43 33.4% (+21.9)#1,612
44. Tenino 55.0% 31.9% (+23.1)#44 33.4% (+21.6)#1,682
45. Lake Shore 53.9% 31.9% (+22.0)#45 33.4% (+20.5)#1,854
46. Rosalia 53.5% 31.9% (+21.6)#46 33.4% (+20.1)#1,936
47. Spangle 53.4% 31.9% (+21.5)#47 33.4% (+20.0)#1,960
48. Lake Stevens 53.1% 31.9% (+21.2)#48 33.4% (+19.7)#2,005
49. Hoquiam 53.0% 31.9% (+21.1)#49 33.4% (+19.6)#2,025
50. Maple Valley 52.8% 31.9% (+20.9)#50 33.4% (+19.4)#2,056
51. Odessa 52.8% 31.9% (+20.9)#51 33.4% (+19.4)#2,066
52. Felida 52.7% 31.9% (+20.8)#52 33.4% (+19.3)#2,079
53. Artondale 52.5% 31.9% (+20.6)#53 33.4% (+19.1)#2,106
54. Cle Elum 52.5% 31.9% (+20.6)#54 33.4% (+19.1)#2,117
55. Lyman 52.5% 31.9% (+20.6)#55 33.4% (+19.1)#2,137
56. Palouse 52.3% 31.9% (+20.4)#56 33.4% (+18.9)#2,177
57. Camas 52.2% 31.9% (+20.3)#57 33.4% (+18.8)#2,189
58. Sumner 52.2% 31.9% (+20.3)#58 33.4% (+18.8)#2,193
59. Ocean Shores 51.2% 31.9% (+19.3)#59 33.4% (+17.8)#2,367
60. Toledo 51.1% 31.9% (+19.2)#60 33.4% (+17.7)#2,393
61. White Center 51.0% 31.9% (+19.1)#61 33.4% (+17.6)#2,398
62. Langley 50.7% 31.9% (+18.8)#62 33.4% (+17.3)#2,457
63. Lake Stickney 50.5% 31.9% (+18.6)#63 33.4% (+17.1)#2,485
64. Hazel Dell 50.4% 31.9% (+18.5)#64 33.4% (+17.0)#2,514
65. Kalama 50.4% 31.9% (+18.5)#65 33.4% (+17.0)#2,526
66. Reardan 50.3% 31.9% (+18.4)#66 33.4% (+16.9)#2,554
67. Tonasket 50.2% 31.9% (+18.3)#67 33.4% (+16.8)#2,575
68. Conconully 49.8% 31.9% (+17.9)#68 33.4% (+16.4)#2,647
69. Des Moines 49.6% 31.9% (+17.7)#69 33.4% (+16.2)#2,665
70. Fircrest 49.3% 31.9% (+17.4)#70 33.4% (+15.9)#2,744
71. Oroville 49.2% 31.9% (+17.3)#71 33.4% (+15.8)#2,772
72. Okanogan 49.1% 31.9% (+17.2)#72 33.4% (+15.7)#2,787
73. Yakima 48.8% 31.9% (+16.9)#73 33.4% (+15.4)#2,828
74. Terrace Heights 48.8% 31.9% (+16.9)#74 33.4% (+15.4)#2,834
75. Five Corners 48.6% 31.9% (+16.7)#75 33.4% (+15.2)#2,854
76. Lacrosse 48.6% 31.9% (+16.7)#76 33.4% (+15.2)#2,870
77. Woods Creek 48.5% 31.9% (+16.6)#77 33.4% (+15.1)#2,877
78. Moses Lake 48.2% 31.9% (+16.3)#78 33.4% (+14.8)#2,956
79. Lakeland North 48.2% 31.9% (+16.3)#79 33.4% (+14.8)#2,960
80. Graham 48.1% 31.9% (+16.2)#80 33.4% (+14.7)#2,975
81. Union Hill Novelty Hill 47.9% 31.9% (+16.0)#81 33.4% (+14.5)#3,015
82. Bainbridge Island 47.7% 31.9% (+15.8)#82 33.4% (+14.3)#3,040
83. Esperance 47.5% 31.9% (+15.6)#83 33.4% (+14.1)#3,076
84. Tumwater 47.4% 31.9% (+15.5)#84 33.4% (+14.0)#3,103
85. Chewelah 47.4% 31.9% (+15.5)#85 33.4% (+14.0)#3,115
86. Harrington 47.3% 31.9% (+15.4)#86 33.4% (+13.9)#3,142
87. Lynnwood 46.8% 31.9% (+14.9)#87 33.4% (+13.4)#3,212
88. Blaine 46.4% 31.9% (+14.5)#88 33.4% (+13.0)#3,286
89. Colville 45.7% 31.9% (+13.8)#89 33.4% (+12.3)#3,416
90. Mercer Island 45.6% 31.9% (+13.7)#90 33.4% (+12.2)#3,424
91. Kelso 45.5% 31.9% (+13.6)#91 33.4% (+12.1)#3,451
92. Toppenish 45.5% 31.9% (+13.6)#92 33.4% (+12.1)#3,452
93. Montesano 45.4% 31.9% (+13.5)#93 33.4% (+12.0)#3,502
94. Edgewood 45.1% 31.9% (+13.2)#94 33.4% (+11.7)#3,561
95. Seatac 44.9% 31.9% (+13.0)#95 33.4% (+11.5)#3,593
96. Lynden 44.8% 31.9% (+12.9)#96 33.4% (+11.4)#3,615
97. Clarkston 44.7% 31.9% (+12.8)#97 33.4% (+11.3)#3,632
98. Union Gap 44.7% 31.9% (+12.8)#98 33.4% (+11.3)#3,633
99. Barberton 44.3% 31.9% (+12.4)#99 33.4% (+10.9)#3,723
100. Maltby 43.5% 31.9% (+11.6)#100 33.4% (+10.1)#3,870

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington are:
#1
76.9%
#2
72.5%
#3
72.1%
#4
72.0%
#5
71.6%
#6
70.5%
#7
69.5%
#8
69.3%
#9
67.9%
#10
67.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington?
Wollochet has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington with 76.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Washington is 31.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.