Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Alone
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Washington

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Washington

City % Drive Alone vs State vs National
1. Ryderwood 66.2% 41.3% (+24.9)#1 42.1% (+24.1)#111
2. Cohassett Beach 64.1% 41.3% (+22.8)#2 42.1% (+22.0)#205
3. Lacrosse 62.6% 41.3% (+21.3)#3 42.1% (+20.5)#302
4. Alger 62.6% 41.3% (+21.3)#4 42.1% (+20.5)#303
5. Maple Falls 62.2% 41.3% (+20.9)#5 42.1% (+20.1)#352
6. Porter 61.0% 41.3% (+19.7)#6 42.1% (+18.9)#490
7. Green Bluff 60.9% 41.3% (+19.6)#7 42.1% (+18.8)#500
8. Purdy 60.5% 41.3% (+19.2)#8 42.1% (+18.4)#532
9. Sunland Estates 60.5% 41.3% (+19.2)#9 42.1% (+18.4)#552
10. Startup 60.4% 41.3% (+19.1)#10 42.1% (+18.3)#564
11. Skamokawa Valley 60.3% 41.3% (+19.0)#11 42.1% (+18.2)#585
12. Langley 59.7% 41.3% (+18.4)#12 42.1% (+17.6)#669
13. Anderson Island 59.6% 41.3% (+18.3)#13 42.1% (+17.5)#683
14. Grapeview 59.6% 41.3% (+18.3)#14 42.1% (+17.5)#685
15. Starbuck 59.6% 41.3% (+18.3)#15 42.1% (+17.5)#690
16. Chelan Falls 59.4% 41.3% (+18.1)#16 42.1% (+17.3)#733
17. Cusick 59.1% 41.3% (+17.8)#17 42.1% (+17.0)#812
18. Ocosta 59.0% 41.3% (+17.7)#18 42.1% (+16.9)#831
19. Conconully 58.7% 41.3% (+17.4)#19 42.1% (+16.6)#873
20. Centerville 58.5% 41.3% (+17.2)#20 42.1% (+16.4)#915
21. Marine View 58.4% 41.3% (+17.1)#21 42.1% (+16.3)#937
22. Twin Lakes 58.3% 41.3% (+17.0)#22 42.1% (+16.2)#980
23. Grayland 58.0% 41.3% (+16.7)#23 42.1% (+15.9)#1,039
24. Metaline Falls 58.0% 41.3% (+16.7)#24 42.1% (+15.9)#1,045
25. Ocean Park 57.8% 41.3% (+16.5)#25 42.1% (+15.7)#1,067
26. Manson 57.3% 41.3% (+16.0)#26 42.1% (+15.2)#1,200
27. Humptulips 57.3% 41.3% (+16.0)#27 42.1% (+15.2)#1,219
28. South Prairie 56.6% 41.3% (+15.3)#28 42.1% (+14.5)#1,377
29. Clear Lake Cdp Skagit County 56.5% 41.3% (+15.2)#29 42.1% (+14.4)#1,398
30. Puget Island 56.3% 41.3% (+15.0)#30 42.1% (+14.2)#1,496
31. Grays River 56.2% 41.3% (+14.9)#31 42.1% (+14.1)#1,553
32. Snoqualmie Pass 55.4% 41.3% (+14.1)#32 42.1% (+13.3)#1,778
33. Walla Walla East 55.2% 41.3% (+13.9)#33 42.1% (+13.1)#1,838
34. White Salmon 55.1% 41.3% (+13.8)#34 42.1% (+13.0)#1,872
35. Hunts Point 55.0% 41.3% (+13.7)#35 42.1% (+12.9)#1,928
36. Keyport 54.8% 41.3% (+13.5)#36 42.1% (+12.7)#1,978
37. Methow 54.8% 41.3% (+13.5)#37 42.1% (+12.7)#1,992
38. Brady 54.7% 41.3% (+13.4)#38 42.1% (+12.6)#2,013
39. Odessa 54.7% 41.3% (+13.4)#39 42.1% (+12.6)#2,018
40. Lebam 54.7% 41.3% (+13.4)#40 42.1% (+12.6)#2,028
41. Marrowstone 54.6% 41.3% (+13.3)#41 42.1% (+12.5)#2,049
42. Cherry Grove 54.3% 41.3% (+13.0)#42 42.1% (+12.2)#2,191
43. Hamilton 54.2% 41.3% (+12.9)#43 42.1% (+12.1)#2,249
44. Shadow Lake 54.1% 41.3% (+12.8)#44 42.1% (+12.0)#2,267
45. East Cathlamet 54.1% 41.3% (+12.8)#45 42.1% (+12.0)#2,280
46. Alder 54.1% 41.3% (+12.8)#46 42.1% (+12.0)#2,300
47. Port Ludlow 54.0% 41.3% (+12.7)#47 42.1% (+11.9)#2,305
48. Glenwood 54.0% 41.3% (+12.7)#48 42.1% (+11.9)#2,332
49. Hansville 53.9% 41.3% (+12.6)#49 42.1% (+11.8)#2,348
50. Beaux Arts Village 53.8% 41.3% (+12.5)#50 42.1% (+11.7)#2,403
51. Ocean City 53.8% 41.3% (+12.5)#51 42.1% (+11.7)#2,412
52. Raft Island 53.6% 41.3% (+12.3)#52 42.1% (+11.5)#2,478
53. Ames Lake 53.4% 41.3% (+12.1)#53 42.1% (+11.3)#2,596
54. Gorst 53.4% 41.3% (+12.1)#54 42.1% (+11.3)#2,609
55. Easton 53.4% 41.3% (+12.1)#55 42.1% (+11.3)#2,616
56. Bay Center 53.4% 41.3% (+12.1)#56 42.1% (+11.3)#2,631
57. Deep River 52.9% 41.3% (+11.6)#57 42.1% (+10.8)#2,875
58. Point Roberts 52.8% 41.3% (+11.5)#58 42.1% (+10.7)#2,892
59. Coupeville 52.7% 41.3% (+11.4)#59 42.1% (+10.6)#2,937
60. Qui Nai Elt Village 52.6% 41.3% (+11.3)#60 42.1% (+10.5)#3,016
61. Bay View 52.5% 41.3% (+11.2)#61 42.1% (+10.4)#3,041
62. Eschbach 52.3% 41.3% (+11.0)#62 42.1% (+10.2)#3,212
63. Carlsborg 52.2% 41.3% (+10.9)#63 42.1% (+10.1)#3,260
64. Mckenna 52.2% 41.3% (+10.9)#64 42.1% (+10.1)#3,267
65. Lake Ketchum 52.1% 41.3% (+10.8)#65 42.1% (+10.00)#3,315
66. La Conner 52.1% 41.3% (+10.8)#66 42.1% (+10.00)#3,321
67. Oakville 52.1% 41.3% (+10.8)#67 42.1% (+10.00)#3,324
68. Washtucna 52.1% 41.3% (+10.8)#68 42.1% (+10.00)#3,348
69. Farmington 52.0% 41.3% (+10.7)#69 42.1% (+9.90)#3,402
70. Ahtanum 51.9% 41.3% (+10.6)#70 42.1% (+9.80)#3,420
71. High Bridge 51.9% 41.3% (+10.6)#71 42.1% (+9.80)#3,422
72. Clyde Hill 51.5% 41.3% (+10.2)#72 42.1% (+9.40)#3,642
73. Oroville 51.5% 41.3% (+10.2)#73 42.1% (+9.40)#3,649
74. Duluth 51.4% 41.3% (+10.1)#74 42.1% (+9.30)#3,730
75. Malone 51.4% 41.3% (+10.1)#75 42.1% (+9.30)#3,764
76. Brush Prairie 51.3% 41.3% (+10.0)#76 42.1% (+9.20)#3,796
77. St John 51.3% 41.3% (+10.0)#77 42.1% (+9.20)#3,821
78. Keller 51.2% 41.3% (+9.90)#78 42.1% (+9.10)#3,925
79. Mcmillin 51.1% 41.3% (+9.80)#79 42.1% (+9.00)#3,966
80. Ocean Shores 51.0% 41.3% (+9.70)#80 42.1% (+8.90)#4,023
81. Kahlotus 51.0% 41.3% (+9.70)#81 42.1% (+8.90)#4,087
82. North Omak 50.8% 41.3% (+9.50)#82 42.1% (+8.70)#4,198
83. Southworth 50.6% 41.3% (+9.30)#83 42.1% (+8.50)#4,292
84. Brinnon 50.5% 41.3% (+9.20)#84 42.1% (+8.40)#4,385
85. Sprague 50.5% 41.3% (+9.20)#85 42.1% (+8.40)#4,390
86. Wilson Creek 50.5% 41.3% (+9.20)#86 42.1% (+8.40)#4,426
87. Lake Goodwin 50.4% 41.3% (+9.10)#87 42.1% (+8.30)#4,456
88. May Creek 50.4% 41.3% (+9.10)#88 42.1% (+8.30)#4,488
89. Crocker 50.3% 41.3% (+9.00)#89 42.1% (+8.20)#4,563
90. Camano 50.2% 41.3% (+8.90)#90 42.1% (+8.10)#4,640
91. Vaughn 50.2% 41.3% (+8.90)#91 42.1% (+8.10)#4,661
92. Yarrow Point 50.2% 41.3% (+8.90)#92 42.1% (+8.10)#4,663
93. Curlew Lake 50.2% 41.3% (+8.90)#93 42.1% (+8.10)#4,680
94. Rockford 50.1% 41.3% (+8.80)#94 42.1% (+8.00)#4,780
95. Normandy Park 50.0% 41.3% (+8.70)#95 42.1% (+7.90)#4,818
96. South Creek 50.0% 41.3% (+8.70)#96 42.1% (+7.90)#4,837
97. Waterville 49.9% 41.3% (+8.60)#97 42.1% (+7.80)#4,939
98. Port Townsend 49.7% 41.3% (+8.40)#98 42.1% (+7.60)#5,087
99. Canterwood 49.7% 41.3% (+8.40)#99 42.1% (+7.60)#5,104
100. Freeland 49.7% 41.3% (+8.40)#100 42.1% (+7.60)#5,108

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Washington are:
#1
66.2%
#2
64.1%
#3
62.6%
#4
62.6%
#5
62.2%
#6
61.0%
#7
60.9%
#8
60.5%
#9
60.4%
#10
60.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Washington?
Ryderwood has the Highest Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Washington with 66.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in Washington is 41.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Driving Alone to Work in the United States is 42.1%.