Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Louisiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computer, Engineering & Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Louisiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Louisiana

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Louisiana Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Louisiana

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Moonshine 30.6% 4.6% (+26.0)#1 6.8% (+23.8)#211
2. Pleasure Bend 23.0% 4.6% (+18.4)#2 6.8% (+16.2)#400
3. Morse 20.5% 4.6% (+15.9)#3 6.8% (+13.7)#534
4. Leonville 18.7% 4.6% (+14.1)#4 6.8% (+12.0)#662
5. Hester 17.3% 4.6% (+12.7)#5 6.8% (+10.5)#798
6. Elmwood 17.3% 4.6% (+12.7)#6 6.8% (+10.5)#799
7. Hayes 17.2% 4.6% (+12.6)#7 6.8% (+10.4)#808
8. Morganza 14.8% 4.6% (+10.1)#8 6.8% (+7.99)#1,184
9. Spearsville 14.6% 4.6% (+9.96)#9 6.8% (+7.80)#1,224
10. Forest Hill 13.8% 4.6% (+9.22)#10 6.8% (+7.07)#1,387
11. Columbia 13.8% 4.6% (+9.19)#11 6.8% (+7.03)#1,396
12. Shenandoah 13.4% 4.6% (+8.77)#12 6.8% (+6.61)#1,523
13. Stanley 13.0% 4.6% (+8.44)#13 6.8% (+6.28)#1,620
14. Palmetto 12.3% 4.6% (+7.70)#14 6.8% (+5.54)#1,839
15. Oak Hills Place 12.3% 4.6% (+7.69)#15 6.8% (+5.53)#1,844
16. Grambling 12.2% 4.6% (+7.56)#16 6.8% (+5.40)#1,904
17. Lillie 11.9% 4.6% (+7.33)#17 6.8% (+5.18)#1,961
18. Addis 11.5% 4.6% (+6.88)#18 6.8% (+4.72)#2,129
19. St James 11.5% 4.6% (+6.86)#19 6.8% (+4.70)#2,140
20. Glencoe 11.2% 4.6% (+6.63)#20 6.8% (+4.47)#2,255
21. Des Allemands 11.1% 4.6% (+6.45)#21 6.8% (+4.29)#2,347
22. Fort Polk South 10.8% 4.6% (+6.18)#22 6.8% (+4.02)#2,473
23. Lockport Heights 10.6% 4.6% (+5.97)#23 6.8% (+3.81)#2,593
24. South Vacherie 10.4% 4.6% (+5.84)#24 6.8% (+3.68)#2,663
25. Lisbon 10.4% 4.6% (+5.81)#25 6.8% (+3.65)#2,685
26. Carlyss 10.0% 4.6% (+5.38)#26 6.8% (+3.22)#2,963
27. Mandeville 9.6% 4.6% (+5.00)#27 6.8% (+2.84)#3,229
28. Red Chute 9.5% 4.6% (+4.86)#28 6.8% (+2.70)#3,332
29. Milton 9.4% 4.6% (+4.82)#29 6.8% (+2.66)#3,368
30. Grosse Tete 9.2% 4.6% (+4.63)#30 6.8% (+2.47)#3,520
31. Cecilia 9.1% 4.6% (+4.45)#31 6.8% (+2.29)#3,665
32. Luling 8.7% 4.6% (+4.05)#32 6.8% (+1.89)#4,021
33. Reddell 8.6% 4.6% (+4.01)#33 6.8% (+1.85)#4,052
34. Inniswold 8.5% 4.6% (+3.89)#34 6.8% (+1.73)#4,184
35. Swartz 8.4% 4.6% (+3.77)#35 6.8% (+1.62)#4,288
36. Monticello 8.4% 4.6% (+3.75)#36 6.8% (+1.59)#4,311
37. Reeves 8.3% 4.6% (+3.73)#37 6.8% (+1.57)#4,333
38. Denham Springs 8.3% 4.6% (+3.71)#38 6.8% (+1.55)#4,358
39. Merrydale 8.3% 4.6% (+3.65)#39 6.8% (+1.50)#4,403
40. Moreauville 8.3% 4.6% (+3.65)#40 6.8% (+1.49)#4,405
41. Mangham 8.3% 4.6% (+3.65)#41 6.8% (+1.49)#4,416
42. Tickfaw 8.3% 4.6% (+3.64)#42 6.8% (+1.49)#4,418
43. Maurice 8.2% 4.6% (+3.62)#43 6.8% (+1.46)#4,440
44. Claiborne 8.0% 4.6% (+3.39)#44 6.8% (+1.23)#4,712
45. Vienna 8.0% 4.6% (+3.37)#45 6.8% (+1.21)#4,741
46. Gonzales 7.9% 4.6% (+3.25)#46 6.8% (+1.09)#4,869
47. Georgetown 7.8% 4.6% (+3.17)#47 6.8% (+1.01)#4,967
48. Prairieville 7.8% 4.6% (+3.15)#48 6.8% (+0.996)#4,989
49. Brusly 7.7% 4.6% (+3.11)#49 6.8% (+0.956)#5,046
50. Broussard 7.6% 4.6% (+3.04)#50 6.8% (+0.882)#5,136
51. Centerville 7.6% 4.6% (+2.95)#51 6.8% (+0.793)#5,234
52. Moss Bluff 7.3% 4.6% (+2.68)#52 6.8% (+0.526)#5,547
53. Iowa 7.2% 4.6% (+2.58)#53 6.8% (+0.421)#5,672
54. Edgefield 7.2% 4.6% (+2.58)#54 6.8% (+0.418)#5,677
55. Pearl River 7.2% 4.6% (+2.57)#55 6.8% (+0.415)#5,683
56. Lafourche Crossing 7.0% 4.6% (+2.44)#56 6.8% (+0.278)#5,898
57. Grand Isle 6.9% 4.6% (+2.33)#57 6.8% (+0.169)#6,048
58. Provencal 6.9% 4.6% (+2.29)#58 6.8% (+0.132)#6,107
59. Poydras 6.9% 4.6% (+2.28)#59 6.8% (+0.118)#6,138
60. Union 6.9% 4.6% (+2.26)#60 6.8% (+0.098)#6,158
61. Choctaw 6.8% 4.6% (+2.22)#61 6.8% (+0.061)#6,217
62. Harahan 6.6% 4.6% (+2.02)#62 6.8% (-0.137)#6,501
63. Kenner 6.5% 4.6% (+1.92)#63 6.8% (-0.236)#6,659
64. Deville 6.5% 4.6% (+1.92)#64 6.8% (-0.243)#6,667
65. Baton Rouge 6.4% 4.6% (+1.83)#65 6.8% (-0.330)#6,807
66. Zachary 6.3% 4.6% (+1.69)#66 6.8% (-0.469)#7,049
67. Start 6.3% 4.6% (+1.68)#67 6.8% (-0.483)#7,078
68. Rayne 6.1% 4.6% (+1.54)#68 6.8% (-0.621)#7,318
69. New Orleans 6.0% 4.6% (+1.44)#69 6.8% (-0.717)#7,502
70. Lutcher 6.0% 4.6% (+1.44)#70 6.8% (-0.721)#7,512
71. Richmond 6.0% 4.6% (+1.43)#71 6.8% (-0.724)#7,517
72. Youngsville 6.0% 4.6% (+1.42)#72 6.8% (-0.738)#7,540
73. Mathews 6.0% 4.6% (+1.40)#73 6.8% (-0.759)#7,577
74. Madisonville 6.0% 4.6% (+1.39)#74 6.8% (-0.773)#7,607
75. Village St George 6.0% 4.6% (+1.36)#75 6.8% (-0.796)#7,653
76. Metairie 5.9% 4.6% (+1.29)#76 6.8% (-0.872)#7,791
77. St Gabriel 5.8% 4.6% (+1.23)#77 6.8% (-0.933)#7,935
78. Benton 5.8% 4.6% (+1.19)#78 6.8% (-0.964)#7,990
79. Midway 5.7% 4.6% (+1.13)#79 6.8% (-1.03)#8,110
80. Ida 5.7% 4.6% (+1.11)#80 6.8% (-1.05)#8,151
81. Greenwood 5.7% 4.6% (+1.07)#81 6.8% (-1.08)#8,204
82. Deridder 5.6% 4.6% (+1.04)#82 6.8% (-1.12)#8,269
83. Slidell 5.5% 4.6% (+0.933)#83 6.8% (-1.23)#8,451
84. Stonewall 5.5% 4.6% (+0.888)#84 6.8% (-1.27)#8,535
85. Lafayette 5.5% 4.6% (+0.845)#85 6.8% (-1.31)#8,634
86. Central 5.4% 4.6% (+0.814)#86 6.8% (-1.34)#8,687
87. Buras 5.4% 4.6% (+0.799)#87 6.8% (-1.36)#8,725
88. Jonesboro 5.3% 4.6% (+0.726)#88 6.8% (-1.43)#8,876
89. Timberlane 5.3% 4.6% (+0.660)#89 6.8% (-1.50)#8,993
90. Simpson 5.2% 4.6% (+0.626)#90 6.8% (-1.53)#9,068
91. Eden Isle 5.2% 4.6% (+0.614)#91 6.8% (-1.54)#9,088
92. Oberlin 5.2% 4.6% (+0.611)#92 6.8% (-1.55)#9,096
93. Ruston 5.2% 4.6% (+0.611)#93 6.8% (-1.55)#9,100
94. Terrytown 5.2% 4.6% (+0.592)#94 6.8% (-1.57)#9,137
95. River Ridge 5.2% 4.6% (+0.563)#95 6.8% (-1.60)#9,195
96. Belle Rose 5.2% 4.6% (+0.554)#96 6.8% (-1.60)#9,213
97. Covington 5.1% 4.6% (+0.514)#97 6.8% (-1.64)#9,298
98. Center Point 5.1% 4.6% (+0.503)#98 6.8% (-1.66)#9,319
99. Prien 5.1% 4.6% (+0.484)#99 6.8% (-1.67)#9,365
100. Gretna 5.0% 4.6% (+0.442)#100 6.8% (-1.72)#9,466

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Louisiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Louisiana are:
#1
30.6%
#2
23.0%
#3
20.5%
#4
18.7%
#5
17.3%
#6
17.3%
#7
17.2%
#8
14.8%
#9
14.6%
#10
13.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Louisiana?
Moonshine has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Louisiana with 30.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the State of Louisiana?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Louisiana is 4.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States is 6.8%.