Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Vermont

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Computer, Engineering & Science
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Vermont
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Vermont

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Vermont Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Vermont

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Huntington Center 57.0% 6.0% (+51.0)#1 6.8% (+50.2)#46
2. Hartland 38.6% 6.0% (+32.7)#2 6.8% (+31.9)#123
3. Waterbury Center 36.9% 6.0% (+31.0)#3 6.8% (+30.2)#136
4. Dorset 30.2% 6.0% (+24.2)#4 6.8% (+23.5)#217
5. Hanksville 29.2% 6.0% (+23.2)#5 6.8% (+22.4)#236
6. Websterville 28.8% 6.0% (+22.8)#6 6.8% (+22.0)#241
7. Old Bennington 22.9% 6.0% (+16.9)#7 6.8% (+16.1)#404
8. Richmond 22.7% 6.0% (+16.7)#8 6.8% (+16.0)#415
9. Pawlet 22.7% 6.0% (+16.7)#9 6.8% (+15.9)#418
10. Westminster 19.0% 6.0% (+13.0)#10 6.8% (+12.2)#640
11. South Lincoln 17.8% 6.0% (+11.8)#11 6.8% (+11.0)#750
12. Westford 16.1% 6.0% (+10.1)#12 6.8% (+9.36)#944
13. Waitsfield 15.5% 6.0% (+9.53)#13 6.8% (+8.75)#1,033
14. Albany 15.3% 6.0% (+9.32)#14 6.8% (+8.54)#1,085
15. North Hartland 15.2% 6.0% (+9.20)#15 6.8% (+8.42)#1,103
16. Greensboro 14.3% 6.0% (+8.30)#16 6.8% (+7.52)#1,272
17. East Charlotte 13.8% 6.0% (+7.84)#17 6.8% (+7.06)#1,390
18. Algiers 13.5% 6.0% (+7.49)#18 6.8% (+6.71)#1,489
19. Fairfax 13.2% 6.0% (+7.22)#19 6.8% (+6.44)#1,574
20. East Poultney 13.0% 6.0% (+7.06)#20 6.8% (+6.28)#1,616
21. Hinesburg 12.7% 6.0% (+6.74)#21 6.8% (+5.96)#1,717
22. Woodstock 12.1% 6.0% (+6.12)#22 6.8% (+5.34)#1,916
23. St. George 11.5% 6.0% (+5.50)#23 6.8% (+4.72)#2,130
24. Waterbury 11.4% 6.0% (+5.40)#24 6.8% (+4.62)#2,177
25. Weston 11.1% 6.0% (+5.13)#25 6.8% (+4.35)#2,324
26. Cabot 11.0% 6.0% (+5.03)#26 6.8% (+4.24)#2,374
27. Worcester 10.8% 6.0% (+4.83)#27 6.8% (+4.05)#2,459
28. Huntington 9.8% 6.0% (+3.77)#28 6.8% (+2.99)#3,105
29. Essex Junction 9.7% 6.0% (+3.72)#29 6.8% (+2.94)#3,151
30. Poultney 9.7% 6.0% (+3.67)#30 6.8% (+2.89)#3,190
31. South Barre 9.3% 6.0% (+3.31)#31 6.8% (+2.53)#3,474
32. Vergennes 9.3% 6.0% (+3.29)#32 6.8% (+2.50)#3,493
33. Newbury 9.2% 6.0% (+3.21)#33 6.8% (+2.42)#3,554
34. Killington 9.0% 6.0% (+3.03)#34 6.8% (+2.25)#3,691
35. Hyde Park 8.5% 6.0% (+2.47)#35 6.8% (+1.69)#4,220
36. Montpelier 8.2% 6.0% (+2.26)#36 6.8% (+1.48)#4,419
37. Manchester 8.2% 6.0% (+2.20)#37 6.8% (+1.42)#4,494
38. Burlington 8.1% 6.0% (+2.14)#38 6.8% (+1.36)#4,554
39. South Burlington 8.1% 6.0% (+2.09)#39 6.8% (+1.31)#4,609
40. Randolph 8.0% 6.0% (+2.06)#40 6.8% (+1.28)#4,635
41. Middlebury 8.0% 6.0% (+2.03)#41 6.8% (+1.25)#4,679
42. Milton 7.9% 6.0% (+1.90)#42 6.8% (+1.12)#4,847
43. Hartford 7.8% 6.0% (+1.83)#43 6.8% (+1.05)#4,916
44. Richford 7.5% 6.0% (+1.50)#44 6.8% (+0.723)#5,310
45. Winooski 7.4% 6.0% (+1.39)#45 6.8% (+0.605)#5,448
46. Plainfield 7.1% 6.0% (+1.16)#46 6.8% (+0.378)#5,742
47. Fairlee 6.9% 6.0% (+0.913)#47 6.8% (+0.132)#6,114
48. Pittsford 6.6% 6.0% (+0.628)#48 6.8% (-0.153)#6,532
49. Middletown Springs 6.6% 6.0% (+0.595)#49 6.8% (-0.186)#6,584
50. Barre 6.5% 6.0% (+0.469)#50 6.8% (-0.311)#6,770
51. Springfield 6.4% 6.0% (+0.435)#51 6.8% (-0.346)#6,832
52. Glover 6.2% 6.0% (+0.170)#52 6.8% (-0.611)#7,299
53. South Shaftsbury 6.1% 6.0% (+0.100)#53 6.8% (-0.681)#7,413
54. Wilder 6.0% 6.0% (+0.042)#54 6.8% (-0.739)#7,541
55. Bolton Valley 6.0% 6.0% (+0.031)#55 6.8% (-0.750)#7,563
56. Chelsea 5.9% 6.0% (-0.101)#56 6.8% (-0.882)#7,815
57. Stowe 5.8% 6.0% (-0.164)#57 6.8% (-0.945)#7,953
58. Shelburne 5.8% 6.0% (-0.210)#58 6.8% (-0.991)#8,031
59. Windsor 5.8% 6.0% (-0.232)#59 6.8% (-1.01)#8,079
60. West Brattleboro 5.7% 6.0% (-0.244)#60 6.8% (-1.02)#8,105
61. Brattleboro 5.7% 6.0% (-0.270)#61 6.8% (-1.05)#8,140
62. North Springfield 5.5% 6.0% (-0.462)#62 6.8% (-1.24)#8,485
63. Stamford 5.5% 6.0% (-0.475)#63 6.8% (-1.26)#8,510
64. Graniteville 5.4% 6.0% (-0.549)#64 6.8% (-1.33)#8,661
65. Bristol 5.4% 6.0% (-0.565)#65 6.8% (-1.35)#8,693
66. Bellows Falls 5.3% 6.0% (-0.692)#66 6.8% (-1.47)#8,940
67. North Bennington 5.1% 6.0% (-0.838)#67 6.8% (-1.62)#9,245
68. Hardwick 5.1% 6.0% (-0.888)#68 6.8% (-1.67)#9,352
69. St Albans 5.1% 6.0% (-0.930)#69 6.8% (-1.71)#9,446
70. Proctor 5.0% 6.0% (-1.03)#70 6.8% (-1.81)#9,669
71. Bethel 5.0% 6.0% (-1.03)#71 6.8% (-1.81)#9,671
72. Proctorsville 4.9% 6.0% (-1.13)#72 6.8% (-1.91)#9,892
73. Bakersfield 4.7% 6.0% (-1.24)#73 6.8% (-2.02)#10,151
74. Danville 4.7% 6.0% (-1.30)#74 6.8% (-2.08)#10,268
75. South Hero 4.4% 6.0% (-1.59)#75 6.8% (-2.37)#10,949
76. Jericho 4.3% 6.0% (-1.69)#76 6.8% (-2.47)#11,187
77. Pownal Center 4.2% 6.0% (-1.76)#77 6.8% (-2.54)#11,395
78. Underhill Flats 4.2% 6.0% (-1.77)#78 6.8% (-2.55)#11,398
79. Lincoln 4.1% 6.0% (-1.92)#79 6.8% (-2.70)#11,802
80. Danby 4.0% 6.0% (-1.94)#80 6.8% (-2.72)#11,869
81. Jeffersonville 4.0% 6.0% (-2.03)#81 6.8% (-2.81)#12,099
82. Newport 3.9% 6.0% (-2.07)#82 6.8% (-2.85)#12,220
83. Rochester 3.9% 6.0% (-2.10)#83 6.8% (-2.88)#12,294
84. Brandon 3.8% 6.0% (-2.16)#84 6.8% (-2.94)#12,453
85. Island Pond 3.8% 6.0% (-2.19)#85 6.8% (-2.97)#12,539
86. Marshfield 3.8% 6.0% (-2.20)#86 6.8% (-2.98)#12,581
87. Grafton 3.7% 6.0% (-2.28)#87 6.8% (-3.06)#12,820
88. Johnson 3.7% 6.0% (-2.29)#88 6.8% (-3.07)#12,837
89. Norwich 3.7% 6.0% (-2.31)#89 6.8% (-3.09)#12,883
90. Newfane 3.5% 6.0% (-2.48)#90 6.8% (-3.26)#13,374
91. West Rutland 3.5% 6.0% (-2.49)#91 6.8% (-3.27)#13,406
92. Enosburg Falls 3.4% 6.0% (-2.54)#92 6.8% (-3.32)#13,575
93. Peacham 3.2% 6.0% (-2.81)#93 6.8% (-3.59)#14,406
94. Manchester Center 3.1% 6.0% (-2.92)#94 6.8% (-3.71)#14,761
95. New Haven 3.1% 6.0% (-2.93)#95 6.8% (-3.71)#14,779
96. Williamstown 3.0% 6.0% (-3.01)#96 6.8% (-3.79)#14,997
97. Rutland 2.8% 6.0% (-3.17)#97 6.8% (-3.95)#15,476
98. East Middlebury 2.8% 6.0% (-3.19)#98 6.8% (-3.97)#15,518
99. Morrisville 2.7% 6.0% (-3.29)#99 6.8% (-4.07)#15,870
100. Lunenburg 2.4% 6.0% (-3.62)#100 6.8% (-4.40)#16,906

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Vermont?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Vermont are:
#1
38.6%
#2
30.2%
#3
28.8%
#4
22.9%
#5
22.7%
#6
19.0%
#7
15.5%
#8
15.3%
#9
15.2%
#10
14.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Vermont?
Hartland has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Vermont with 38.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the State of Vermont?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in Vermont is 6.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Computer, Engineering & Science in the United States is 6.8%.