Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Washington

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Washington

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Clayton 57.3% 3.8% (+53.6)#1 4.1% (+53.2)#38
2. Greenwater 41.4% 3.8% (+37.7)#2 4.1% (+37.3)#97
3. Curlew 30.6% 3.8% (+26.8)#3 4.1% (+26.5)#175
4. Methow 25.0% 3.8% (+21.2)#4 4.1% (+20.9)#282
5. Bickleton 25.0% 3.8% (+21.2)#5 4.1% (+20.9)#283
6. Hatton 21.0% 3.8% (+17.2)#6 4.1% (+16.8)#408
7. Amanda Park 20.8% 3.8% (+17.1)#7 4.1% (+16.7)#412
8. Waverly 18.0% 3.8% (+14.2)#8 4.1% (+13.8)#543
9. Purdy 17.4% 3.8% (+13.7)#9 4.1% (+13.3)#581
10. Clear Lake Cdp Pierce County 16.7% 3.8% (+13.0)#10 4.1% (+12.6)#626
11. Humptulips 16.4% 3.8% (+12.7)#11 4.1% (+12.3)#652
12. Wishram 15.6% 3.8% (+11.9)#12 4.1% (+11.5)#717
13. Marblemount 15.3% 3.8% (+11.5)#13 4.1% (+11.2)#762
14. Quilcene 15.1% 3.8% (+11.4)#14 4.1% (+11.0)#778
15. Farmington 14.3% 3.8% (+10.5)#15 4.1% (+10.1)#904
16. Loon Lake 13.7% 3.8% (+9.96)#16 4.1% (+9.58)#987
17. Lewisville 13.2% 3.8% (+9.43)#17 4.1% (+9.05)#1,079
18. Spangle 13.1% 3.8% (+9.34)#18 4.1% (+8.95)#1,099
19. Inchelium 12.8% 3.8% (+9.05)#19 4.1% (+8.67)#1,151
20. Marcus 12.8% 3.8% (+9.00)#20 4.1% (+8.62)#1,165
21. Pataha 12.5% 3.8% (+8.73)#21 4.1% (+8.35)#1,210
22. Tenino 12.3% 3.8% (+8.57)#22 4.1% (+8.18)#1,239
23. Wilderness Rim 11.7% 3.8% (+7.96)#23 4.1% (+7.58)#1,372
24. Vaughn 11.6% 3.8% (+7.88)#24 4.1% (+7.50)#1,393
25. Meadow Glade 11.5% 3.8% (+7.70)#25 4.1% (+7.32)#1,430
26. Mckenna 11.2% 3.8% (+7.40)#26 4.1% (+7.02)#1,500
27. Grapeview 11.1% 3.8% (+7.33)#27 4.1% (+6.94)#1,530
28. Lower Elochoman 10.8% 3.8% (+7.02)#28 4.1% (+6.64)#1,616
29. Whidbey Island Station 10.4% 3.8% (+6.68)#29 4.1% (+6.30)#1,720
30. Skykomish 10.4% 3.8% (+6.65)#30 4.1% (+6.27)#1,734
31. Roosevelt 10.3% 3.8% (+6.58)#31 4.1% (+6.20)#1,762
32. Seatac 10.2% 3.8% (+6.39)#32 4.1% (+6.01)#1,835
33. Easton 10.1% 3.8% (+6.37)#33 4.1% (+5.99)#1,842
34. Ephrata 10.0% 3.8% (+6.22)#34 4.1% (+5.84)#1,923
35. Boulevard Park 10.0% 3.8% (+6.21)#35 4.1% (+5.82)#1,928
36. Thorp 9.8% 3.8% (+5.99)#36 4.1% (+5.61)#2,014
37. Sultan 9.6% 3.8% (+5.81)#37 4.1% (+5.43)#2,086
38. Lamont 9.4% 3.8% (+5.67)#38 4.1% (+5.28)#2,153
39. Friday Harbor 9.4% 3.8% (+5.59)#39 4.1% (+5.20)#2,189
40. Belfair 9.3% 3.8% (+5.55)#40 4.1% (+5.17)#2,204
41. South Wenatchee 9.3% 3.8% (+5.54)#41 4.1% (+5.15)#2,209
42. Rocky Point 9.3% 3.8% (+5.51)#42 4.1% (+5.12)#2,228
43. Northport 9.3% 3.8% (+5.49)#43 4.1% (+5.11)#2,234
44. Lind 9.0% 3.8% (+5.19)#44 4.1% (+4.81)#2,395
45. Grand Mound 9.0% 3.8% (+5.19)#45 4.1% (+4.80)#2,401
46. Rock Island 8.9% 3.8% (+5.17)#46 4.1% (+4.79)#2,410
47. Glenwood 8.8% 3.8% (+5.08)#47 4.1% (+4.70)#2,466
48. Metaline Falls 8.7% 3.8% (+4.93)#48 4.1% (+4.55)#2,554
49. Alger 8.5% 3.8% (+4.77)#49 4.1% (+4.39)#2,660
50. Lake Bosworth 8.5% 3.8% (+4.75)#50 4.1% (+4.36)#2,673
51. Nespelem Community 8.2% 3.8% (+4.42)#51 4.1% (+4.03)#2,880
52. Bucoda 8.1% 3.8% (+4.37)#52 4.1% (+3.98)#2,905
53. Startup 8.0% 3.8% (+4.20)#53 4.1% (+3.82)#3,009
54. Geneva 7.9% 3.8% (+4.18)#54 4.1% (+3.79)#3,031
55. Clinton 7.9% 3.8% (+4.17)#55 4.1% (+3.79)#3,037
56. Benton City 7.7% 3.8% (+3.97)#56 4.1% (+3.59)#3,195
57. Oakville 7.6% 3.8% (+3.79)#57 4.1% (+3.40)#3,335
58. Bryn Mawr Skyway 7.5% 3.8% (+3.77)#58 4.1% (+3.39)#3,354
59. Duluth 7.5% 3.8% (+3.73)#59 4.1% (+3.35)#3,403
60. Ocean Park 7.5% 3.8% (+3.71)#60 4.1% (+3.33)#3,419
61. Burbank 7.5% 3.8% (+3.70)#61 4.1% (+3.32)#3,432
62. Conconully 7.5% 3.8% (+3.70)#62 4.1% (+3.31)#3,435
63. River Road 7.4% 3.8% (+3.68)#63 4.1% (+3.30)#3,455
64. Ilwaco 7.3% 3.8% (+3.57)#64 4.1% (+3.19)#3,552
65. Warm Beach 7.3% 3.8% (+3.52)#65 4.1% (+3.14)#3,598
66. Midland 7.3% 3.8% (+3.48)#66 4.1% (+3.10)#3,635
67. Fern Prairie 7.2% 3.8% (+3.46)#67 4.1% (+3.07)#3,663
68. Millwood 7.2% 3.8% (+3.38)#68 4.1% (+3.00)#3,732
69. Malden 7.1% 3.8% (+3.38)#69 4.1% (+2.99)#3,752
70. Peaceful Valley 7.1% 3.8% (+3.35)#70 4.1% (+2.97)#3,779
71. Fairfield 7.1% 3.8% (+3.35)#71 4.1% (+2.96)#3,787
72. Shelton 7.0% 3.8% (+3.24)#72 4.1% (+2.86)#3,902
73. Eschbach 6.9% 3.8% (+3.16)#73 4.1% (+2.77)#3,970
74. Lake Morton Berrydale 6.9% 3.8% (+3.15)#74 4.1% (+2.77)#3,975
75. Soap Lake 6.9% 3.8% (+3.09)#75 4.1% (+2.71)#4,042
76. Chewelah 6.8% 3.8% (+3.04)#76 4.1% (+2.65)#4,095
77. Kahlotus 6.8% 3.8% (+3.01)#77 4.1% (+2.63)#4,118
78. Fords Prairie 6.7% 3.8% (+2.90)#78 4.1% (+2.52)#4,216
79. South Cle Elum 6.7% 3.8% (+2.90)#79 4.1% (+2.52)#4,222
80. Hartline 6.7% 3.8% (+2.90)#80 4.1% (+2.52)#4,235
81. Winthrop 6.6% 3.8% (+2.87)#81 4.1% (+2.48)#4,281
82. West Richland 6.6% 3.8% (+2.86)#82 4.1% (+2.47)#4,292
83. Lakeland North 6.6% 3.8% (+2.83)#83 4.1% (+2.44)#4,331
84. Des Moines 6.6% 3.8% (+2.82)#84 4.1% (+2.44)#4,333
85. White Center 6.5% 3.8% (+2.76)#85 4.1% (+2.37)#4,406
86. Bonney Lake 6.5% 3.8% (+2.75)#86 4.1% (+2.36)#4,429
87. Prairie Ridge 6.5% 3.8% (+2.75)#87 4.1% (+2.36)#4,431
88. Lake Marcel Stillwater 6.4% 3.8% (+2.67)#88 4.1% (+2.28)#4,526
89. North Lynnwood 6.4% 3.8% (+2.66)#89 4.1% (+2.28)#4,533
90. Southworth 6.4% 3.8% (+2.64)#90 4.1% (+2.25)#4,567
91. Kelso 6.4% 3.8% (+2.63)#91 4.1% (+2.25)#4,570
92. Lake Shore 6.2% 3.8% (+2.48)#92 4.1% (+2.09)#4,783
93. Sedro Woolley 6.2% 3.8% (+2.43)#93 4.1% (+2.05)#4,845
94. Seabeck 6.1% 3.8% (+2.34)#94 4.1% (+1.95)#4,977
95. Oroville 6.1% 3.8% (+2.31)#95 4.1% (+1.93)#5,007
96. Sumas 6.1% 3.8% (+2.31)#96 4.1% (+1.93)#5,010
97. Kendall 6.1% 3.8% (+2.31)#97 4.1% (+1.93)#5,015
98. North Puyallup 6.1% 3.8% (+2.30)#98 4.1% (+1.92)#5,030
99. Sunnyside 6.0% 3.8% (+2.27)#99 4.1% (+1.88)#5,085
100. Mount Vernon 6.0% 3.8% (+2.25)#100 4.1% (+1.86)#5,127

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Washington are:
#1
57.3%
#2
41.4%
#3
30.6%
#4
25.0%
#5
25.0%
#6
21.0%
#7
20.8%
#8
18.0%
#9
17.4%
#10
16.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Washington?
Clayton has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Washington with 57.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Washington is 3.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.