Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Washington

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Local Government Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Washington
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Washington

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Washington Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Washington

City % Local Government Employees vs State vs National
1. Wheeler 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#1 7.2% (+92.8)#5
2. Oyehut 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#2 7.2% (+92.8)#30
3. Disautel 100.0% 7.1% (+92.9)#3 7.2% (+92.8)#49
4. Bell Hill 76.0% 7.1% (+68.9)#4 7.2% (+68.8)#92
5. Curlew 73.5% 7.1% (+66.4)#5 7.2% (+66.3)#98
6. Moclips 70.5% 7.1% (+63.4)#6 7.2% (+63.3)#110
7. Nespelem Community 62.7% 7.1% (+55.6)#7 7.2% (+55.5)#149
8. Queets 58.3% 7.1% (+51.2)#8 7.2% (+51.1)#179
9. Marblemount 55.3% 7.1% (+48.2)#9 7.2% (+48.1)#206
10. Alder 54.5% 7.1% (+47.5)#10 7.2% (+47.3)#215
11. Sunland Estates 50.0% 7.1% (+42.9)#11 7.2% (+42.8)#278
12. Mansfield 46.3% 7.1% (+39.2)#12 7.2% (+39.1)#353
13. Upper Elochoman 44.4% 7.1% (+37.4)#13 7.2% (+37.2)#380
14. Edison 43.5% 7.1% (+36.4)#14 7.2% (+36.3)#407
15. Neah Bay 43.4% 7.1% (+36.3)#15 7.2% (+36.2)#409
16. Taholah 41.9% 7.1% (+34.8)#16 7.2% (+34.7)#436
17. Cathlamet 37.9% 7.1% (+30.8)#17 7.2% (+30.7)#534
18. Bow 37.0% 7.1% (+29.9)#18 7.2% (+29.7)#565
19. Four Lakes 31.9% 7.1% (+24.8)#19 7.2% (+24.7)#788
20. Schwana 31.4% 7.1% (+24.3)#20 7.2% (+24.2)#815
21. Farmington 30.9% 7.1% (+23.8)#21 7.2% (+23.7)#845
22. Inchelium 30.8% 7.1% (+23.7)#22 7.2% (+23.5)#851
23. Port Gamble Tribal Community 28.9% 7.1% (+21.8)#23 7.2% (+21.7)#962
24. Nespelem 28.9% 7.1% (+21.8)#24 7.2% (+21.7)#963
25. Qui Nai Elt Village 28.6% 7.1% (+21.5)#25 7.2% (+21.3)#987
26. Elmer City 28.4% 7.1% (+21.3)#26 7.2% (+21.2)#998
27. Porter 28.0% 7.1% (+20.9)#27 7.2% (+20.8)#1,022
28. Keller 27.0% 7.1% (+19.9)#28 7.2% (+19.8)#1,107
29. River Road 27.0% 7.1% (+19.9)#29 7.2% (+19.7)#1,114
30. Lamont 26.4% 7.1% (+19.3)#30 7.2% (+19.2)#1,163
31. Clallam Bay 25.7% 7.1% (+18.6)#31 7.2% (+18.4)#1,222
32. Electric City 24.9% 7.1% (+17.8)#32 7.2% (+17.7)#1,317
33. Sunnyslope 24.0% 7.1% (+16.9)#33 7.2% (+16.7)#1,405
34. Ashford 23.8% 7.1% (+16.7)#34 7.2% (+16.6)#1,430
35. Tokeland 23.7% 7.1% (+16.6)#35 7.2% (+16.5)#1,438
36. Oakesdale 23.6% 7.1% (+16.5)#36 7.2% (+16.3)#1,448
37. Hansville 23.5% 7.1% (+16.4)#37 7.2% (+16.3)#1,457
38. Curlew Lake 23.1% 7.1% (+16.0)#38 7.2% (+15.8)#1,509
39. Ephrata 22.9% 7.1% (+15.8)#39 7.2% (+15.7)#1,536
40. Malone 22.5% 7.1% (+15.4)#40 7.2% (+15.3)#1,594
41. Bay View 22.5% 7.1% (+15.4)#41 7.2% (+15.3)#1,600
42. Coulee Dam 22.4% 7.1% (+15.3)#42 7.2% (+15.2)#1,614
43. Centerville 22.2% 7.1% (+15.1)#43 7.2% (+15.0)#1,658
44. White Swan 22.0% 7.1% (+14.9)#44 7.2% (+14.7)#1,693
45. Thorp 22.0% 7.1% (+14.9)#45 7.2% (+14.7)#1,698
46. Metaline Falls 21.7% 7.1% (+14.6)#46 7.2% (+14.5)#1,724
47. Bay Center 21.7% 7.1% (+14.6)#47 7.2% (+14.5)#1,725
48. Machias 21.5% 7.1% (+14.4)#48 7.2% (+14.3)#1,765
49. Erlands Point 21.5% 7.1% (+14.4)#49 7.2% (+14.2)#1,769
50. Grayland 21.4% 7.1% (+14.3)#50 7.2% (+14.2)#1,787
51. Springdale 21.2% 7.1% (+14.1)#51 7.2% (+14.0)#1,805
52. Darrington 20.7% 7.1% (+13.6)#52 7.2% (+13.4)#1,922
53. Ritzville 20.4% 7.1% (+13.4)#53 7.2% (+13.2)#1,968
54. Nisqually Indian Community 19.8% 7.1% (+12.7)#54 7.2% (+12.5)#2,105
55. Onalaska 19.5% 7.1% (+12.4)#55 7.2% (+12.3)#2,155
56. Skokomish 19.1% 7.1% (+12.0)#56 7.2% (+11.9)#2,253
57. Omak 18.9% 7.1% (+11.8)#57 7.2% (+11.6)#2,324
58. Kahlotus 18.6% 7.1% (+11.6)#58 7.2% (+11.4)#2,391
59. Long Beach 18.5% 7.1% (+11.4)#59 7.2% (+11.2)#2,433
60. Trout Lake 18.4% 7.1% (+11.3)#60 7.2% (+11.2)#2,453
61. Baring 18.2% 7.1% (+11.1)#61 7.2% (+11.0)#2,518
62. Goldendale 18.2% 7.1% (+11.1)#62 7.2% (+10.9)#2,536
63. Custer 18.0% 7.1% (+10.9)#63 7.2% (+10.8)#2,561
64. Endicott 17.7% 7.1% (+10.6)#64 7.2% (+10.5)#2,643
65. Dayton 17.5% 7.1% (+10.4)#65 7.2% (+10.2)#2,730
66. Arlington Heights 17.4% 7.1% (+10.4)#66 7.2% (+10.2)#2,744
67. Montesano 17.4% 7.1% (+10.3)#67 7.2% (+10.2)#2,754
68. Bunk Foss 17.0% 7.1% (+9.93)#68 7.2% (+9.80)#2,876
69. Lower Elochoman 17.0% 7.1% (+9.92)#69 7.2% (+9.78)#2,880
70. Davenport 16.7% 7.1% (+9.57)#70 7.2% (+9.44)#2,991
71. Raymond 16.6% 7.1% (+9.51)#71 7.2% (+9.37)#3,066
72. Gorst 16.6% 7.1% (+9.50)#72 7.2% (+9.37)#3,071
73. Venersborg 16.6% 7.1% (+9.46)#73 7.2% (+9.33)#3,089
74. Dixie 16.4% 7.1% (+9.33)#74 7.2% (+9.19)#3,149
75. Odessa 16.3% 7.1% (+9.25)#75 7.2% (+9.11)#3,178
76. Colton 16.3% 7.1% (+9.25)#76 7.2% (+9.11)#3,179
77. La Conner 16.3% 7.1% (+9.24)#77 7.2% (+9.10)#3,182
78. Cherry Grove 16.3% 7.1% (+9.18)#78 7.2% (+9.04)#3,216
79. Clear Lake Cdp Skagit County 16.2% 7.1% (+9.15)#79 7.2% (+9.01)#3,225
80. Burley 15.9% 7.1% (+8.85)#80 7.2% (+8.72)#3,351
81. Satsop 15.9% 7.1% (+8.85)#81 7.2% (+8.71)#3,352
82. Friday Harbor 15.9% 7.1% (+8.81)#82 7.2% (+8.68)#3,375
83. Bryant 15.8% 7.1% (+8.70)#83 7.2% (+8.57)#3,432
84. Carbonado 15.6% 7.1% (+8.54)#84 7.2% (+8.41)#3,537
85. North Bonneville 15.6% 7.1% (+8.53)#85 7.2% (+8.40)#3,539
86. Bickleton 15.6% 7.1% (+8.53)#86 7.2% (+8.40)#3,548
87. Chewelah 15.6% 7.1% (+8.47)#87 7.2% (+8.34)#3,572
88. Rosburg 15.4% 7.1% (+8.34)#88 7.2% (+8.20)#3,632
89. Brady 15.4% 7.1% (+8.32)#89 7.2% (+8.19)#3,639
90. Moses Lake 15.4% 7.1% (+8.29)#90 7.2% (+8.15)#3,671
91. Pomeroy 15.1% 7.1% (+8.01)#91 7.2% (+7.87)#3,824
92. Naselle 15.0% 7.1% (+7.89)#92 7.2% (+7.76)#3,900
93. Union 14.9% 7.1% (+7.82)#93 7.2% (+7.68)#3,943
94. South Bend 14.8% 7.1% (+7.70)#94 7.2% (+7.57)#4,006
95. Forks 14.7% 7.1% (+7.61)#95 7.2% (+7.47)#4,059
96. Green Bluff 14.6% 7.1% (+7.47)#96 7.2% (+7.34)#4,156
97. Lind 14.6% 7.1% (+7.46)#97 7.2% (+7.32)#4,163
98. Cavalero 14.5% 7.1% (+7.43)#98 7.2% (+7.30)#4,180
99. Port Angeles East 14.5% 7.1% (+7.36)#99 7.2% (+7.22)#4,234
100. Naches 14.4% 7.1% (+7.30)#100 7.2% (+7.17)#4,267

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Washington?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Washington are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
76.0%
#4
73.5%
#5
70.5%
#6
62.7%
#7
58.3%
#8
55.3%
#9
54.5%
#10
46.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Washington?
Oyehut has the Highest Percentage of Local Government Employees in Washington with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in the State of Washington?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in Washington is 7.1%.
What is the Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Local Government Employees in the United States is 7.2%.