Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in California

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
California
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraHaywardHemetHuntington BeachInglewoodIrvineLa JollaLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMalibuMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMontereyMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaReddingRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleThousand OaksTorranceTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in California

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in California Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in California

City % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. Healdsburg 69.1% 38.0% (+31.1)#1 38.5% (+30.6)#17
2. Brawley 64.9% 38.0% (+26.9)#2 38.5% (+26.4)#55
3. Woodacre 64.6% 38.0% (+26.6)#3 38.5% (+26.1)#59
4. Pacific Grove 64.5% 38.0% (+26.5)#4 38.5% (+26.0)#61
5. Acton 64.5% 38.0% (+26.5)#5 38.5% (+26.0)#62
6. Yorba Linda 62.5% 38.0% (+24.5)#6 38.5% (+24.0)#91
7. San Antonio Heights 62.5% 38.0% (+24.5)#7 38.5% (+24.0)#93
8. North Highlands 61.4% 38.0% (+23.4)#8 38.5% (+22.9)#120
9. Sonoma 60.5% 38.0% (+22.5)#9 38.5% (+22.0)#149
10. Seal Beach 60.3% 38.0% (+22.3)#10 38.5% (+21.8)#155
11. Wildomar 60.2% 38.0% (+22.2)#11 38.5% (+21.7)#159
12. Yucca Valley 60.2% 38.0% (+22.2)#12 38.5% (+21.7)#160
13. Windsor 59.4% 38.0% (+21.4)#13 38.5% (+20.9)#186
14. Mead Valley 59.1% 38.0% (+21.1)#14 38.5% (+20.6)#196
15. Del Aire 59.1% 38.0% (+21.1)#15 38.5% (+20.6)#198
16. Woodcrest 59.0% 38.0% (+21.0)#16 38.5% (+20.5)#207
17. La Quinta 58.2% 38.0% (+20.2)#17 38.5% (+19.7)#240
18. Winter Gardens 58.2% 38.0% (+20.2)#18 38.5% (+19.7)#242
19. La Palma 58.1% 38.0% (+20.1)#19 38.5% (+19.6)#251
20. Aptos 58.1% 38.0% (+20.1)#20 38.5% (+19.6)#254
21. Hacienda Heights 57.4% 38.0% (+19.4)#21 38.5% (+18.9)#286
22. Scotts Valley 57.4% 38.0% (+19.4)#22 38.5% (+18.9)#289
23. Rancho Mirage 57.3% 38.0% (+19.3)#23 38.5% (+18.8)#294
24. Castaic 57.2% 38.0% (+19.2)#24 38.5% (+18.7)#302
25. Diamond Springs 56.8% 38.0% (+18.8)#25 38.5% (+18.3)#320
26. Crockett 56.5% 38.0% (+18.5)#26 38.5% (+18.0)#339
27. Walnut 55.5% 38.0% (+17.5)#27 38.5% (+17.0)#405
28. Aliso Viejo 55.4% 38.0% (+17.4)#28 38.5% (+16.9)#416
29. Laguna Hills 55.4% 38.0% (+17.4)#29 38.5% (+16.9)#419
30. Lakeside 55.1% 38.0% (+17.1)#30 38.5% (+16.6)#440
31. Malibu 55.1% 38.0% (+17.1)#31 38.5% (+16.6)#441
32. Commerce 55.0% 38.0% (+17.0)#32 38.5% (+16.5)#450
33. Yountville 54.6% 38.0% (+16.6)#33 38.5% (+16.1)#472
34. Discovery Bay 54.4% 38.0% (+16.4)#34 38.5% (+15.9)#486
35. Diamond Bar 53.6% 38.0% (+15.6)#35 38.5% (+15.1)#547
36. Tamalpais Homestead Valley 53.6% 38.0% (+15.6)#36 38.5% (+15.1)#550
37. Ross 53.6% 38.0% (+15.6)#37 38.5% (+15.1)#552
38. Gold River 53.4% 38.0% (+15.4)#38 38.5% (+14.9)#572
39. Woodland 53.3% 38.0% (+15.3)#39 38.5% (+14.8)#576
40. San Anselmo 53.2% 38.0% (+15.2)#40 38.5% (+14.7)#593
41. Alhambra 53.1% 38.0% (+15.1)#41 38.5% (+14.6)#598
42. Perris 53.1% 38.0% (+15.1)#42 38.5% (+14.6)#599
43. North Richmond 53.1% 38.0% (+15.1)#43 38.5% (+14.6)#607
44. Montclair 52.8% 38.0% (+14.8)#44 38.5% (+14.3)#619
45. Moorpark 52.7% 38.0% (+14.7)#45 38.5% (+14.2)#624
46. Signal Hill 52.6% 38.0% (+14.6)#46 38.5% (+14.1)#637
47. South Monrovia Island 52.6% 38.0% (+14.6)#47 38.5% (+14.1)#638
48. Garnet 52.5% 38.0% (+14.5)#48 38.5% (+14.0)#651
49. Santee 51.8% 38.0% (+13.8)#49 38.5% (+13.3)#699
50. Los Gatos 51.8% 38.0% (+13.8)#50 38.5% (+13.3)#700
51. San Martin 51.8% 38.0% (+13.8)#51 38.5% (+13.3)#702
52. Brisbane 51.7% 38.0% (+13.7)#52 38.5% (+13.2)#704
53. Banning 51.6% 38.0% (+13.6)#53 38.5% (+13.1)#706
54. Cerritos 51.5% 38.0% (+13.5)#54 38.5% (+13.0)#713
55. Vineyard 51.3% 38.0% (+13.3)#55 38.5% (+12.8)#740
56. Beverly Hills 51.3% 38.0% (+13.3)#56 38.5% (+12.8)#741
57. Vincent 51.2% 38.0% (+13.2)#57 38.5% (+12.7)#756
58. Baywood Park 50.9% 38.0% (+12.9)#58 38.5% (+12.4)#788
59. Chino Hills 50.7% 38.0% (+12.7)#59 38.5% (+12.2)#795
60. Piedmont 50.7% 38.0% (+12.7)#60 38.5% (+12.2)#803
61. Novato 50.6% 38.0% (+12.6)#61 38.5% (+12.1)#810
62. Larkspur 50.6% 38.0% (+12.6)#62 38.5% (+12.1)#813
63. Monterey Park 50.5% 38.0% (+12.5)#63 38.5% (+12.0)#820
64. Claremont 50.5% 38.0% (+12.5)#64 38.5% (+12.0)#822
65. Carpinteria 50.5% 38.0% (+12.5)#65 38.5% (+12.0)#827
66. Mayflower Village 50.5% 38.0% (+12.5)#66 38.5% (+12.0)#829
67. Arcadia 50.4% 38.0% (+12.4)#67 38.5% (+11.9)#833
68. Apple Valley 50.3% 38.0% (+12.3)#68 38.5% (+11.8)#841
69. Colton 50.3% 38.0% (+12.3)#69 38.5% (+11.8)#843
70. San Gabriel 50.3% 38.0% (+12.3)#70 38.5% (+11.8)#844
71. Vista 50.2% 38.0% (+12.2)#71 38.5% (+11.7)#859
72. Citrus Heights 50.2% 38.0% (+12.2)#72 38.5% (+11.7)#861
73. El Segundo 50.2% 38.0% (+12.2)#73 38.5% (+11.7)#866
74. El Dorado Hills 50.1% 38.0% (+12.1)#74 38.5% (+11.6)#879
75. Hillsborough 50.1% 38.0% (+12.1)#75 38.5% (+11.6)#883
76. Saranap 50.1% 38.0% (+12.1)#76 38.5% (+11.6)#887
77. Carlsbad 50.0% 38.0% (+12.0)#77 38.5% (+11.5)#891
78. Upland 50.0% 38.0% (+12.0)#78 38.5% (+11.5)#892
79. El Paso De Robles Paso Robles 50.0% 38.0% (+12.0)#79 38.5% (+11.5)#894
80. Ben Lomond 50.0% 38.0% (+12.0)#80 38.5% (+11.5)#896
81. Yosemite Valley 50.0% 38.0% (+12.0)#81 38.5% (+11.5)#897
82. Solana Beach 49.9% 38.0% (+11.9)#82 38.5% (+11.4)#902
83. Manhattan Beach 49.7% 38.0% (+11.7)#83 38.5% (+11.2)#914
84. Quartz Hill 49.7% 38.0% (+11.7)#84 38.5% (+11.2)#917
85. Eastvale 49.6% 38.0% (+11.6)#85 38.5% (+11.1)#925
86. Rio Linda 49.6% 38.0% (+11.6)#86 38.5% (+11.1)#933
87. San Dimas 49.5% 38.0% (+11.5)#87 38.5% (+11.0)#950
88. Strawberry Cdp Marin County 49.5% 38.0% (+11.5)#88 38.5% (+11.0)#964
89. Alamo 49.4% 38.0% (+11.4)#89 38.5% (+10.9)#972
90. Guerneville 49.4% 38.0% (+11.4)#90 38.5% (+10.9)#983
91. West Hollywood 49.2% 38.0% (+11.2)#91 38.5% (+10.7)#1,008
92. Rancho Cucamonga 49.1% 38.0% (+11.1)#92 38.5% (+10.6)#1,020
93. South El Monte 49.1% 38.0% (+11.1)#93 38.5% (+10.6)#1,024
94. Orinda 49.1% 38.0% (+11.1)#94 38.5% (+10.6)#1,025
95. Moraga 49.1% 38.0% (+11.1)#95 38.5% (+10.6)#1,028
96. Rohnert Park 49.0% 38.0% (+11.0)#96 38.5% (+10.5)#1,037
97. La Puente 49.0% 38.0% (+11.0)#97 38.5% (+10.5)#1,038
98. View Park Windsor Hills 49.0% 38.0% (+11.0)#98 38.5% (+10.5)#1,044
99. Ladera Ranch 48.9% 38.0% (+10.9)#99 38.5% (+10.4)#1,056
100. Camarillo 48.8% 38.0% (+10.8)#100 38.5% (+10.3)#1,060

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in California?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in California are:
#1
69.1%
#2
64.9%
#3
64.6%
#4
64.5%
#5
64.5%
#6
62.5%
#7
62.5%
#8
61.4%
#9
60.5%
#10
60.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in California?
Healdsburg has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in California with 69.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the State of California?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in California is 38.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.