Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
California
States
California Cities
AlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLompocLong BeachLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Sea Ranch 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#43
2. Doyle 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#60
3. Lebec 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#76
4. Walnut Grove 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#94
5. Rancho Tehama Reserve 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#100
6. Patton Village 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#101
7. Miranda 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#130
8. Stirling City 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#173
9. Edison 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#176
10. Mcarthur 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#10 17.0% (+83.0)#199
11. East Orosi 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#11 17.0% (+83.0)#201
12. Bridgeport 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#12 17.0% (+83.0)#208
13. Grimes 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#13 17.0% (+83.0)#230
14. Twain 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#14 17.0% (+83.0)#242
15. Clipper Mills 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#15 17.0% (+83.0)#247
16. Tonyville 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#16 17.0% (+83.0)#248
17. Honcut 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#17 17.0% (+83.0)#251
18. Mexican Colony 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#18 17.0% (+83.0)#257
19. Yolo 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#19 17.0% (+83.0)#278
20. Bombay Beach 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#20 17.0% (+83.0)#304
21. Burnt Ranch 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#21 17.0% (+83.0)#316
22. Rackerby 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#22 17.0% (+83.0)#323
23. Cherokee 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#23 17.0% (+83.0)#346
24. Guinda 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#24 17.0% (+83.0)#359
25. Cherokee Strip 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#25 17.0% (+83.0)#386
26. Keswick 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#26 17.0% (+83.0)#455
27. Mckittrick 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#27 17.0% (+83.0)#538
28. El Rancho 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#28 17.0% (+83.0)#598
29. Rodriguez Camp 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#29 17.0% (+83.0)#623
30. Nubieber 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#30 17.0% (+83.0)#648
31. Wautec 100.0% 15.8% (+84.2)#31 17.0% (+83.0)#679
32. Bowles 88.9% 15.8% (+73.1)#32 17.0% (+71.9)#785
33. Clearlake Oaks 86.8% 15.8% (+71.0)#33 17.0% (+69.9)#829
34. Lemon Cove 85.6% 15.8% (+69.8)#34 17.0% (+68.6)#864
35. Weitchpec 85.2% 15.8% (+69.4)#35 17.0% (+68.2)#875
36. Oak Run 83.1% 15.8% (+67.2)#36 17.0% (+66.1)#934
37. Berry Creek 82.8% 15.8% (+67.0)#37 17.0% (+65.8)#945
38. Hornbrook 82.8% 15.8% (+67.0)#38 17.0% (+65.8)#946
39. Benton 81.8% 15.8% (+66.0)#39 17.0% (+64.8)#969
40. Strathmore 81.5% 15.8% (+65.7)#40 17.0% (+64.5)#981
41. Mad River 77.1% 15.8% (+61.3)#41 17.0% (+60.2)#1,134
42. Hamilton Branch 76.2% 15.8% (+60.4)#42 17.0% (+59.2)#1,161
43. Riverdale Park 73.8% 15.8% (+58.0)#43 17.0% (+56.9)#1,267
44. Fort Bidwell 73.3% 15.8% (+57.5)#44 17.0% (+56.4)#1,289
45. Alpaugh 72.9% 15.8% (+57.1)#45 17.0% (+55.9)#1,310
46. Westwood 71.9% 15.8% (+56.1)#46 17.0% (+55.0)#1,366
47. Lower Lake 71.4% 15.8% (+55.6)#47 17.0% (+54.5)#1,384
48. Rio Vista 71.4% 15.8% (+55.6)#48 17.0% (+54.4)#1,400
49. Fairmead 70.9% 15.8% (+55.0)#49 17.0% (+53.9)#1,427
50. Weldon 70.3% 15.8% (+54.5)#50 17.0% (+53.3)#1,446
51. Zayante 70.0% 15.8% (+54.2)#51 17.0% (+53.0)#1,456
52. Weedpatch 69.5% 15.8% (+53.7)#52 17.0% (+52.5)#1,487
53. Lagunitas Forest Knolls 69.4% 15.8% (+53.6)#53 17.0% (+52.4)#1,490
54. Plumas Eureka 68.2% 15.8% (+52.4)#54 17.0% (+51.2)#1,550
55. Blue Lake 67.4% 15.8% (+51.6)#55 17.0% (+50.4)#1,584
56. Mountain Gate 67.2% 15.8% (+51.4)#56 17.0% (+50.2)#1,593
57. Tahoma 65.7% 15.8% (+49.9)#57 17.0% (+48.7)#1,713
58. Baker 64.4% 15.8% (+48.6)#58 17.0% (+47.4)#1,771
59. Calwa 64.2% 15.8% (+48.4)#59 17.0% (+47.2)#1,792
60. Oasis 64.1% 15.8% (+48.3)#60 17.0% (+47.1)#1,802
61. Firebaugh 63.3% 15.8% (+47.5)#61 17.0% (+46.3)#1,851
62. Bodfish 63.0% 15.8% (+47.2)#62 17.0% (+46.1)#1,866
63. Westmorland 62.8% 15.8% (+47.0)#63 17.0% (+45.9)#1,879
64. Fulton 62.5% 15.8% (+46.7)#64 17.0% (+45.5)#1,900
65. Orange Cove 62.2% 15.8% (+46.4)#65 17.0% (+45.3)#1,929
66. Pine Flat 61.9% 15.8% (+46.1)#66 17.0% (+44.9)#1,955
67. Campo 60.0% 15.8% (+44.2)#67 17.0% (+43.1)#2,078
68. Tarpey Village 59.1% 15.8% (+43.3)#68 17.0% (+42.1)#2,151
69. Huron 58.9% 15.8% (+43.1)#69 17.0% (+41.9)#2,179
70. Inyokern 58.8% 15.8% (+43.0)#70 17.0% (+41.8)#2,185
71. London 57.8% 15.8% (+42.0)#71 17.0% (+40.9)#2,272
72. Covelo 57.3% 15.8% (+41.5)#72 17.0% (+40.3)#2,303
73. Allensworth 57.1% 15.8% (+41.3)#73 17.0% (+40.2)#2,313
74. Avery 56.8% 15.8% (+40.9)#74 17.0% (+39.8)#2,360
75. Biola 56.7% 15.8% (+40.9)#75 17.0% (+39.7)#2,365
76. Mojave 56.7% 15.8% (+40.9)#76 17.0% (+39.7)#2,366
77. San Ardo 56.6% 15.8% (+40.8)#77 17.0% (+39.6)#2,374
78. Graton 55.9% 15.8% (+40.1)#78 17.0% (+38.9)#2,434
79. Chualar 55.3% 15.8% (+39.5)#79 17.0% (+38.4)#2,496
80. Lucerne Valley 55.3% 15.8% (+39.5)#80 17.0% (+38.3)#2,499
81. South Taft 55.1% 15.8% (+39.3)#81 17.0% (+38.2)#2,513
82. Thornton 55.0% 15.8% (+39.2)#82 17.0% (+38.0)#2,519
83. Trinidad 55.0% 15.8% (+39.2)#83 17.0% (+38.0)#2,521
84. Rexland Acres 54.9% 15.8% (+39.1)#84 17.0% (+37.9)#2,528
85. French Camp 54.9% 15.8% (+39.0)#85 17.0% (+37.9)#2,531
86. Tulelake 54.5% 15.8% (+38.7)#86 17.0% (+37.6)#2,555
87. Ripley 53.8% 15.8% (+38.0)#87 17.0% (+36.9)#2,631
88. Vina 53.8% 15.8% (+38.0)#88 17.0% (+36.9)#2,637
89. Warm Springs 53.8% 15.8% (+37.9)#89 17.0% (+36.8)#2,651
90. Good Hope 53.5% 15.8% (+37.7)#90 17.0% (+36.5)#2,675
91. West Park 53.1% 15.8% (+37.3)#91 17.0% (+36.1)#2,715
92. Talmage 52.9% 15.8% (+37.1)#92 17.0% (+35.9)#2,746
93. East Bakersfield 52.3% 15.8% (+36.5)#93 17.0% (+35.3)#2,807
94. San Miguel Cdp San Luis Obispo County 52.0% 15.8% (+36.2)#94 17.0% (+35.0)#2,837
95. Morongo Valley 51.9% 15.8% (+36.1)#95 17.0% (+34.9)#2,841
96. Woodville 51.7% 15.8% (+35.9)#96 17.0% (+34.7)#2,859
97. Indianola 51.6% 15.8% (+35.8)#97 17.0% (+34.6)#2,867
98. Fuller Acres 51.6% 15.8% (+35.8)#98 17.0% (+34.6)#2,870
99. Mendota 50.4% 15.8% (+34.6)#99 17.0% (+33.4)#2,963
100. Bret Harte 50.3% 15.8% (+34.5)#100 17.0% (+33.3)#2,973

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California?
Sea Ranch has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of California?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California is 15.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.