Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Wisconsin

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Wisconsin

City % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. Twin Lakes 66.3% 33.2% (+33.1)#1 38.5% (+27.8)#34
2. Fort Atkinson 62.1% 33.2% (+28.9)#2 38.5% (+23.6)#104
3. Ashland 56.8% 33.2% (+23.6)#3 38.5% (+18.3)#321
4. Manitowoc 52.1% 33.2% (+18.9)#4 38.5% (+13.6)#679
5. Monona 51.6% 33.2% (+18.4)#5 38.5% (+13.1)#708
6. Glendale 51.3% 33.2% (+18.1)#6 38.5% (+12.8)#746
7. West Allis 50.3% 33.2% (+17.1)#7 38.5% (+11.8)#842
8. Birch Hill 50.1% 33.2% (+16.9)#8 38.5% (+11.6)#890
9. St Francis 48.3% 33.2% (+15.1)#9 38.5% (+9.80)#1,139
10. Fontana On Geneva Lake 48.2% 33.2% (+15.0)#10 38.5% (+9.70)#1,160
11. West Bend 47.2% 33.2% (+14.0)#11 38.5% (+8.70)#1,309
12. Hales Corners 46.9% 33.2% (+13.7)#12 38.5% (+8.40)#1,362
13. Williams Bay 46.2% 33.2% (+13.0)#13 38.5% (+7.70)#1,478
14. Brookfield 46.1% 33.2% (+12.9)#14 38.5% (+7.60)#1,487
15. Superior 45.8% 33.2% (+12.6)#15 38.5% (+7.30)#1,530
16. Menomonee Falls 45.7% 33.2% (+12.5)#16 38.5% (+7.20)#1,536
17. South Milwaukee 45.5% 33.2% (+12.3)#17 38.5% (+7.00)#1,571
18. Two Rivers 45.5% 33.2% (+12.3)#18 38.5% (+7.00)#1,575
19. Neenah 44.5% 33.2% (+11.3)#19 38.5% (+6.00)#1,736
20. Sheboygan 44.2% 33.2% (+11.0)#20 38.5% (+5.70)#1,797
21. Oak Creek 43.5% 33.2% (+10.3)#21 38.5% (+5.00)#1,904
22. Maple Bluff 43.1% 33.2% (+9.90)#22 38.5% (+4.60)#1,999
23. Whitefish Bay 42.9% 33.2% (+9.70)#23 38.5% (+4.40)#2,025
24. Oshkosh 42.8% 33.2% (+9.60)#24 38.5% (+4.30)#2,039
25. Salem Lakes 42.4% 33.2% (+9.20)#25 38.5% (+3.90)#2,132
26. Appleton 42.2% 33.2% (+9.00)#26 38.5% (+3.70)#2,157
27. Mount Pleasant 42.2% 33.2% (+9.00)#27 38.5% (+3.70)#2,161
28. Kenosha 42.1% 33.2% (+8.90)#28 38.5% (+3.60)#2,174
29. Pleasant Prairie 40.9% 33.2% (+7.70)#29 38.5% (+2.40)#2,363
30. La Crosse 39.3% 33.2% (+6.10)#30 38.5% (+0.800)#2,659
31. Menasha 39.3% 33.2% (+6.10)#31 38.5% (+0.800)#2,665
32. Waukesha 39.2% 33.2% (+6.00)#32 38.5% (+0.700)#2,684
33. Grafton 39.0% 33.2% (+5.80)#33 38.5% (+0.500)#2,710
34. Middleton 37.2% 33.2% (+4.00)#34 38.5% (-1.30)#2,987
35. Janesville 36.6% 33.2% (+3.40)#35 38.5% (-1.90)#3,076
36. Shorewood Hills 36.6% 33.2% (+3.40)#36 38.5% (-1.90)#3,088
37. Green Bay 36.5% 33.2% (+3.30)#37 38.5% (-2.00)#3,093
38. Wausau 35.7% 33.2% (+2.50)#38 38.5% (-2.80)#3,202
39. Wauwatosa 35.2% 33.2% (+2.00)#39 38.5% (-3.30)#3,284
40. Shorewood 34.3% 33.2% (+1.10)#40 38.5% (-4.20)#3,427
41. Milwaukee 33.3% 33.2% (+0.100)#41 38.5% (-5.20)#3,536
42. Greenfield 31.8% 33.2% (-1.40)#42 38.5% (-6.70)#3,715
43. Kaukauna 31.7% 33.2% (-1.50)#43 38.5% (-6.80)#3,722
44. Fond Du Lac 30.6% 33.2% (-2.60)#44 38.5% (-7.90)#3,826
45. Fitchburg 30.0% 33.2% (-3.20)#45 38.5% (-8.50)#3,870
46. Sun Prairie 28.9% 33.2% (-4.30)#46 38.5% (-9.60)#3,972
47. Cudahy 28.9% 33.2% (-4.30)#47 38.5% (-9.60)#3,976
48. Madison 28.8% 33.2% (-4.40)#48 38.5% (-9.70)#3,984
49. Beloit 27.9% 33.2% (-5.30)#49 38.5% (-10.6)#4,063
50. Racine 26.1% 33.2% (-7.10)#50 38.5% (-12.4)#4,179
51. Ashwaubenon 24.9% 33.2% (-8.30)#51 38.5% (-13.6)#4,248
52. Eau Claire 23.5% 33.2% (-9.70)#52 38.5% (-15.0)#4,336
53. Stevens Point 21.8% 33.2% (-11.4)#53 38.5% (-16.7)#4,426
54. Kohler 21.8% 33.2% (-11.4)#54 38.5% (-16.7)#4,431
55. Menomonie 20.9% 33.2% (-12.3)#55 38.5% (-17.6)#4,457
56. Platteville 18.7% 33.2% (-14.5)#56 38.5% (-19.8)#4,533

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Wisconsin are:
#1
66.3%
#2
62.1%
#3
56.8%
#4
52.1%
#5
51.6%
#6
51.3%
#7
50.3%
#8
50.1%
#9
48.3%
#10
48.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Wisconsin?
Twin Lakes has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Wisconsin with 66.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the State of Wisconsin?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Wisconsin is 33.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.