Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Ohio

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Ohio

City % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. Solon 75.1% 36.7% (+38.4)#1 38.5% (+36.6)#4
2. Silverton 67.4% 36.7% (+30.7)#2 38.5% (+28.9)#22
3. Austintown 64.9% 36.7% (+28.2)#3 38.5% (+26.4)#54
4. Kenwood 64.4% 36.7% (+27.7)#4 38.5% (+25.9)#63
5. Strongsville 63.5% 36.7% (+26.8)#5 38.5% (+25.0)#75
6. Broadview Heights 61.4% 36.7% (+24.7)#6 38.5% (+22.9)#121
7. Xenia 61.1% 36.7% (+24.4)#7 38.5% (+22.6)#128
8. Brunswick 60.7% 36.7% (+24.0)#8 38.5% (+22.2)#140
9. Lithopolis 60.5% 36.7% (+23.8)#9 38.5% (+22.0)#150
10. New Franklin 58.6% 36.7% (+21.9)#10 38.5% (+20.1)#215
11. Centerville 58.3% 36.7% (+21.6)#11 38.5% (+19.8)#226
12. Madison 58.3% 36.7% (+21.6)#12 38.5% (+19.8)#232
13. Terrace Park 58.3% 36.7% (+21.6)#13 38.5% (+19.8)#237
14. Brook Park 57.9% 36.7% (+21.2)#14 38.5% (+19.4)#263
15. Hilliard 57.4% 36.7% (+20.7)#15 38.5% (+18.9)#287
16. Harrison 57.3% 36.7% (+20.6)#16 38.5% (+18.8)#296
17. Avon Lake 57.1% 36.7% (+20.4)#17 38.5% (+18.6)#304
18. North Royalton 57.0% 36.7% (+20.3)#18 38.5% (+18.5)#311
19. Mentor On The Lake 56.7% 36.7% (+20.0)#19 38.5% (+18.2)#328
20. St Bernard 56.5% 36.7% (+19.8)#20 38.5% (+18.0)#337
21. Delaware 55.9% 36.7% (+19.2)#21 38.5% (+17.4)#382
22. London 55.5% 36.7% (+18.8)#22 38.5% (+17.0)#410
23. Bryan 55.3% 36.7% (+18.6)#23 38.5% (+16.8)#425
24. Middleburg Heights 54.4% 36.7% (+17.7)#24 38.5% (+15.9)#485
25. Northbrook 54.4% 36.7% (+17.7)#25 38.5% (+15.9)#487
26. Conneaut 53.7% 36.7% (+17.0)#26 38.5% (+15.2)#542
27. Zanesville 53.4% 36.7% (+16.7)#27 38.5% (+14.9)#565
28. Olmsted Falls 53.2% 36.7% (+16.5)#28 38.5% (+14.7)#594
29. Dry Run 52.4% 36.7% (+15.7)#29 38.5% (+13.9)#661
30. Mentor 52.1% 36.7% (+15.4)#30 38.5% (+13.6)#678
31. Bedford 51.9% 36.7% (+15.2)#31 38.5% (+13.4)#695
32. Parma Heights 51.5% 36.7% (+14.8)#32 38.5% (+13.0)#717
33. Perry Heights 51.5% 36.7% (+14.8)#33 38.5% (+13.0)#721
34. Marietta 51.4% 36.7% (+14.7)#34 38.5% (+12.9)#733
35. Richmond Heights 51.2% 36.7% (+14.5)#35 38.5% (+12.7)#757
36. Cheviot 51.1% 36.7% (+14.4)#36 38.5% (+12.6)#767
37. Steubenville 50.7% 36.7% (+14.0)#37 38.5% (+12.2)#800
38. Sidney 50.2% 36.7% (+13.5)#38 38.5% (+11.7)#863
39. Sylvania 50.2% 36.7% (+13.5)#39 38.5% (+11.7)#865
40. Wickliffe 49.9% 36.7% (+13.2)#40 38.5% (+11.4)#903
41. Beachwood 49.5% 36.7% (+12.8)#41 38.5% (+11.0)#958
42. Reynoldsburg 49.3% 36.7% (+12.6)#42 38.5% (+10.8)#989
43. Bratenahl 49.3% 36.7% (+12.6)#43 38.5% (+10.8)#1,004
44. Norwood 49.1% 36.7% (+12.4)#44 38.5% (+10.6)#1,026
45. Maumee 48.6% 36.7% (+11.9)#45 38.5% (+10.1)#1,090
46. Upper Arlington 48.4% 36.7% (+11.7)#46 38.5% (+9.90)#1,112
47. Mansfield 48.1% 36.7% (+11.4)#47 38.5% (+9.60)#1,165
48. Gahanna 48.1% 36.7% (+11.4)#48 38.5% (+9.60)#1,166
49. Lancaster 46.4% 36.7% (+9.70)#49 38.5% (+7.90)#1,436
50. Kettering 45.7% 36.7% (+9.00)#50 38.5% (+7.20)#1,534
51. Fairview Park 45.7% 36.7% (+9.00)#51 38.5% (+7.20)#1,540
52. Parma 45.5% 36.7% (+8.80)#52 38.5% (+7.00)#1,564
53. Troy 45.1% 36.7% (+8.40)#53 38.5% (+6.60)#1,650
54. Bay Village 44.6% 36.7% (+7.90)#54 38.5% (+6.10)#1,724
55. Sandusky 44.3% 36.7% (+7.60)#55 38.5% (+5.80)#1,777
56. North Ridgeville 43.3% 36.7% (+6.60)#56 38.5% (+4.80)#1,941
57. Riverside 43.3% 36.7% (+6.60)#57 38.5% (+4.80)#1,946
58. University Heights 43.2% 36.7% (+6.50)#58 38.5% (+4.70)#1,975
59. Newark 42.9% 36.7% (+6.20)#59 38.5% (+4.40)#2,021
60. Chillicothe 42.8% 36.7% (+6.10)#60 38.5% (+4.30)#2,049
61. Dublin 42.5% 36.7% (+5.80)#61 38.5% (+4.00)#2,104
62. Bedford Heights 42.1% 36.7% (+5.40)#62 38.5% (+3.60)#2,182
63. Grove City 41.9% 36.7% (+5.20)#63 38.5% (+3.40)#2,201
64. Massillon 41.7% 36.7% (+5.00)#64 38.5% (+3.20)#2,226
65. Elyria 41.6% 36.7% (+4.90)#65 38.5% (+3.10)#2,243
66. Maple Heights 41.5% 36.7% (+4.80)#66 38.5% (+3.00)#2,265
67. Marion 41.0% 36.7% (+4.30)#67 38.5% (+2.50)#2,338
68. Wilmington 40.8% 36.7% (+4.10)#68 38.5% (+2.30)#2,378
69. Lakewood 40.5% 36.7% (+3.80)#69 38.5% (+2.00)#2,433
70. Fremont 40.4% 36.7% (+3.70)#70 38.5% (+1.90)#2,467
71. Canton 40.3% 36.7% (+3.60)#71 38.5% (+1.80)#2,482
72. Painesville 39.9% 36.7% (+3.20)#72 38.5% (+1.40)#2,558
73. Dayton 39.7% 36.7% (+3.00)#73 38.5% (+1.20)#2,589
74. Twinsburg 39.5% 36.7% (+2.80)#74 38.5% (+1.00)#2,630
75. Groesbeck 39.3% 36.7% (+2.60)#75 38.5% (+0.800)#2,667
76. Stow 38.8% 36.7% (+2.10)#76 38.5% (+0.300)#2,739
77. Highland Hills 38.2% 36.7% (+1.50)#77 38.5% (-0.300)#2,847
78. Middletown 38.0% 36.7% (+1.30)#78 38.5% (-0.500)#2,866
79. Garfield Heights 37.7% 36.7% (+1.000)#79 38.5% (-0.800)#2,904
80. Cleveland 37.6% 36.7% (+0.900)#80 38.5% (-0.900)#2,914
81. Whitehall 37.4% 36.7% (+0.700)#81 38.5% (-1.10)#2,957
82. Trotwood 37.2% 36.7% (+0.500)#82 38.5% (-1.30)#2,985
83. Cleveland Heights 37.0% 36.7% (+0.300)#83 38.5% (-1.50)#3,006
84. Lorain 36.9% 36.7% (+0.200)#84 38.5% (-1.60)#3,022
85. Springfield 36.8% 36.7% (+0.100)#85 38.5% (-1.70)#3,041
86. Brecksville 36.8% 36.7% (+0.100)#86 38.5% (-1.70)#3,045
87. Blue Ash 36.8% 36.7% (+0.100)#87 38.5% (-1.70)#3,046
88. Alliance 36.7% 36.7% (=0.000)#88 38.5% (-1.80)#3,063
89. Forestville 36.5% 36.7% (-0.200)#89 38.5% (-2.00)#3,102
90. Cuyahoga Falls 36.4% 36.7% (-0.300)#90 38.5% (-2.10)#3,115
91. Mount Healthy 36.0% 36.7% (-0.700)#91 38.5% (-2.50)#3,161
92. North Randall 35.7% 36.7% (-1.00)#92 38.5% (-2.80)#3,219
93. East Cleveland 35.6% 36.7% (-1.10)#93 38.5% (-2.90)#3,226
94. Mayfield Heights 35.5% 36.7% (-1.20)#94 38.5% (-3.00)#3,239
95. Lincoln Village 35.5% 36.7% (-1.20)#95 38.5% (-3.00)#3,244
96. Akron 35.3% 36.7% (-1.40)#96 38.5% (-3.20)#3,262
97. Union City 35.3% 36.7% (-1.40)#97 38.5% (-3.20)#3,280
98. Cincinnati 35.1% 36.7% (-1.60)#98 38.5% (-3.40)#3,296
99. Shaker Heights 35.1% 36.7% (-1.60)#99 38.5% (-3.40)#3,306
100. Warrensville Heights 35.1% 36.7% (-1.60)#100 38.5% (-3.40)#3,309

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Ohio are:
#1
75.1%
#2
67.4%
#3
64.9%
#4
64.4%
#5
63.5%
#6
61.4%
#7
61.1%
#8
60.7%
#9
60.5%
#10
58.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Ohio?
Solon has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Ohio with 75.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Ohio is 36.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.