Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Michigan

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Michigan

City % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. Hazel Park 64.3% 34.1% (+30.2)#1 38.5% (+25.8)#66
2. Manchester 63.9% 34.1% (+29.8)#2 38.5% (+25.4)#74
3. Highland Park 62.3% 34.1% (+28.2)#3 38.5% (+23.8)#96
4. Rochester Hills 60.1% 34.1% (+26.0)#4 38.5% (+21.6)#167
5. Alpena 59.1% 34.1% (+25.0)#5 38.5% (+20.6)#199
6. Cheboygan 59.0% 34.1% (+24.9)#6 38.5% (+20.5)#209
7. Troy 57.9% 34.1% (+23.8)#7 38.5% (+19.4)#261
8. Big Rapids 56.3% 34.1% (+22.2)#8 38.5% (+17.8)#357
9. Traverse City 56.2% 34.1% (+22.1)#9 38.5% (+17.7)#368
10. Manistee 55.7% 34.1% (+21.6)#10 38.5% (+17.2)#399
11. Sault Ste Marie 55.3% 34.1% (+21.2)#11 38.5% (+16.8)#422
12. Hillsdale 54.7% 34.1% (+20.6)#12 38.5% (+16.2)#466
13. Pontiac 54.4% 34.1% (+20.3)#13 38.5% (+15.9)#482
14. Dearborn Heights 53.5% 34.1% (+19.4)#14 38.5% (+15.0)#554
15. Lake Isabella 53.5% 34.1% (+19.4)#15 38.5% (+15.0)#560
16. Holt 52.6% 34.1% (+18.5)#16 38.5% (+14.1)#634
17. Utica 51.6% 34.1% (+17.5)#17 38.5% (+13.1)#709
18. Mount Clemens 50.4% 34.1% (+16.3)#18 38.5% (+11.9)#835
19. Decatur 50.3% 34.1% (+16.2)#19 38.5% (+11.8)#854
20. Inkster 49.6% 34.1% (+15.5)#20 38.5% (+11.1)#930
21. Saginaw 49.5% 34.1% (+15.4)#21 38.5% (+11.0)#949
22. Battle Creek 49.3% 34.1% (+15.2)#22 38.5% (+10.8)#987
23. Alma 49.3% 34.1% (+15.2)#23 38.5% (+10.8)#997
24. New Buffalo 48.4% 34.1% (+14.3)#24 38.5% (+9.90)#1,127
25. Westland 48.2% 34.1% (+14.1)#25 38.5% (+9.70)#1,150
26. Livonia 47.5% 34.1% (+13.4)#26 38.5% (+9.00)#1,244
27. Farmington Hills 46.7% 34.1% (+12.6)#27 38.5% (+8.20)#1,381
28. Owosso 46.7% 34.1% (+12.6)#28 38.5% (+8.20)#1,384
29. Lincoln Park 46.5% 34.1% (+12.4)#29 38.5% (+8.00)#1,411
30. Harper Woods 46.4% 34.1% (+12.3)#30 38.5% (+7.90)#1,441
31. Grosse Pointe 46.3% 34.1% (+12.2)#31 38.5% (+7.80)#1,458
32. Michiana 46.0% 34.1% (+11.9)#32 38.5% (+7.50)#1,505
33. St Clair Shores 45.4% 34.1% (+11.3)#33 38.5% (+6.90)#1,588
34. Bay City 45.4% 34.1% (+11.3)#34 38.5% (+6.90)#1,591
35. Monroe 45.2% 34.1% (+11.1)#35 38.5% (+6.70)#1,634
36. Sterling Heights 45.0% 34.1% (+10.9)#36 38.5% (+6.50)#1,662
37. Grand Blanc 44.9% 34.1% (+10.8)#37 38.5% (+6.40)#1,686
38. Portage 44.4% 34.1% (+10.3)#38 38.5% (+5.90)#1,759
39. Warren 44.0% 34.1% (+9.90)#39 38.5% (+5.50)#1,832
40. Kentwood 43.7% 34.1% (+9.60)#40 38.5% (+5.20)#1,874
41. St Ignace 42.4% 34.1% (+8.30)#41 38.5% (+3.90)#2,136
42. Fraser 41.7% 34.1% (+7.60)#42 38.5% (+3.20)#2,232
43. Coldwater 41.7% 34.1% (+7.60)#43 38.5% (+3.20)#2,233
44. Eastpointe 41.4% 34.1% (+7.30)#44 38.5% (+2.90)#2,280
45. Midland 40.4% 34.1% (+6.30)#45 38.5% (+1.90)#2,462
46. Taylor 40.1% 34.1% (+6.00)#46 38.5% (+1.60)#2,516
47. Royal Oak 39.6% 34.1% (+5.50)#47 38.5% (+1.10)#2,603
48. Grosse Pointe Park 38.7% 34.1% (+4.60)#48 38.5% (+0.200)#2,772
49. Wayne 37.8% 34.1% (+3.70)#49 38.5% (-0.700)#2,894
50. Oak Park 37.4% 34.1% (+3.30)#50 38.5% (-1.10)#2,951
51. Port Huron 37.3% 34.1% (+3.20)#51 38.5% (-1.20)#2,970
52. Detroit 37.1% 34.1% (+3.00)#52 38.5% (-1.40)#2,992
53. Benton Harbor 36.7% 34.1% (+2.60)#53 38.5% (-1.80)#3,069
54. Lansing 36.6% 34.1% (+2.50)#54 38.5% (-1.90)#3,073
55. Flint 36.2% 34.1% (+2.10)#55 38.5% (-2.30)#3,136
56. Forest Hills 36.2% 34.1% (+2.10)#56 38.5% (-2.30)#3,138
57. Garden City 35.7% 34.1% (+1.60)#57 38.5% (-2.80)#3,206
58. Grand Haven 35.7% 34.1% (+1.60)#58 38.5% (-2.80)#3,214
59. Albion 35.5% 34.1% (+1.40)#59 38.5% (-3.00)#3,245
60. Grosse Pointe Woods 35.2% 34.1% (+1.10)#60 38.5% (-3.30)#3,289
61. Southfield 35.1% 34.1% (+1.00)#61 38.5% (-3.40)#3,300
62. Escanaba 34.3% 34.1% (+0.200)#62 38.5% (-4.20)#3,428
63. East Grand Rapids 34.1% 34.1% (=0.000)#63 38.5% (-4.40)#3,442
64. Zeeland 33.9% 34.1% (-0.200)#64 38.5% (-4.60)#3,469
65. Ionia 33.8% 34.1% (-0.300)#65 38.5% (-4.70)#3,481
66. Burton 33.3% 34.1% (-0.800)#66 38.5% (-5.20)#3,539
67. Dearborn 33.2% 34.1% (-0.900)#67 38.5% (-5.30)#3,550
68. Roseville 32.6% 34.1% (-1.50)#68 38.5% (-5.90)#3,616
69. Harbor Beach 32.4% 34.1% (-1.70)#69 38.5% (-6.10)#3,653
70. Haslett 32.3% 34.1% (-1.80)#70 38.5% (-6.20)#3,659
71. Kalamazoo 31.6% 34.1% (-2.50)#71 38.5% (-6.90)#3,729
72. Grand Rapids 31.3% 34.1% (-2.80)#72 38.5% (-7.20)#3,752
73. Walker 31.3% 34.1% (-2.80)#73 38.5% (-7.20)#3,754
74. Okemos 30.8% 34.1% (-3.30)#74 38.5% (-7.70)#3,807
75. Norton Shores 30.8% 34.1% (-3.30)#75 38.5% (-7.70)#3,808
76. Beecher 30.6% 34.1% (-3.50)#76 38.5% (-7.90)#3,831
77. Lapeer 30.5% 34.1% (-3.60)#77 38.5% (-8.00)#3,835
78. Wyoming 29.9% 34.1% (-4.20)#78 38.5% (-8.60)#3,877
79. Houghton 29.2% 34.1% (-4.90)#79 38.5% (-9.30)#3,946
80. Cutlerville 28.9% 34.1% (-5.20)#80 38.5% (-9.60)#3,975
81. Muskegon 28.7% 34.1% (-5.40)#81 38.5% (-9.80)#3,998
82. Ferndale 28.7% 34.1% (-5.40)#82 38.5% (-9.80)#4,001
83. Waverly 28.3% 34.1% (-5.80)#83 38.5% (-10.2)#4,038
84. Ypsilanti 28.0% 34.1% (-6.10)#84 38.5% (-10.5)#4,055
85. K I Sawyer 28.0% 34.1% (-6.10)#85 38.5% (-10.5)#4,059
86. Dansville 28.0% 34.1% (-6.10)#86 38.5% (-10.5)#4,060
87. Marquette 27.3% 34.1% (-6.80)#87 38.5% (-11.2)#4,113
88. Ann Arbor 27.1% 34.1% (-7.00)#88 38.5% (-11.4)#4,122
89. Ecorse 27.1% 34.1% (-7.00)#89 38.5% (-11.4)#4,124
90. Holland 26.3% 34.1% (-7.80)#90 38.5% (-12.2)#4,175
91. Port Austin 25.7% 34.1% (-8.40)#91 38.5% (-12.8)#4,210
92. Mount Pleasant 25.6% 34.1% (-8.50)#92 38.5% (-12.9)#4,215
93. Hamtramck 24.5% 34.1% (-9.60)#93 38.5% (-14.0)#4,282
94. Southgate 23.8% 34.1% (-10.3)#94 38.5% (-14.7)#4,316
95. Westwood 22.3% 34.1% (-11.8)#95 38.5% (-16.2)#4,410
96. East Lansing 21.4% 34.1% (-12.7)#96 38.5% (-17.1)#4,440
97. Allendale 21.0% 34.1% (-13.1)#97 38.5% (-17.5)#4,451
98. Parchment 20.9% 34.1% (-13.2)#98 38.5% (-17.6)#4,467
99. Jackson 20.8% 34.1% (-13.3)#99 38.5% (-17.7)#4,470
100. Petoskey 20.7% 34.1% (-13.4)#100 38.5% (-17.8)#4,476

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Michigan are:
#1
64.3%
#2
63.9%
#3
62.3%
#4
60.1%
#5
59.1%
#6
59.0%
#7
57.9%
#8
56.3%
#9
56.2%
#10
55.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Michigan?
Hazel Park has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Michigan with 64.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Michigan is 34.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.