Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
California
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. California Polytechnic State University 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#1 64.8% (+35.2)#2
2. Lake Riverside 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#2 64.8% (+35.2)#47
3. Norris Canyon 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#3 64.8% (+35.2)#107
4. Kernville 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#4 64.8% (+35.2)#125
5. Diablo 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#5 64.8% (+35.2)#143
6. Millerton 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#6 64.8% (+35.2)#154
7. Elfin Forest 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#7 64.8% (+35.2)#203
8. Lee Vining 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#8 64.8% (+35.2)#204
9. Bodega 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#9 64.8% (+35.2)#230
10. Springville 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#10 64.8% (+35.2)#260
11. Sierra Brooks 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#11 64.8% (+35.2)#263
12. Beckwourth 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#12 64.8% (+35.2)#290
13. Bend 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#13 64.8% (+35.2)#325
14. Cromberg 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#14 64.8% (+35.2)#337
15. Bangor 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#15 64.8% (+35.2)#338
16. Chilcoot Vinton 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#16 64.8% (+35.2)#370
17. Swall Meadows 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#17 64.8% (+35.2)#377
18. Edna 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#18 64.8% (+35.2)#387
19. Nipinnawasee 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#19 64.8% (+35.2)#407
20. Canby 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#20 64.8% (+35.2)#439
21. Bass Lake 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#21 64.8% (+35.2)#449
22. Cowan 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#22 64.8% (+35.2)#542
23. Mountain Meadows 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#23 64.8% (+35.2)#568
24. Spaulding 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#24 64.8% (+35.2)#614
25. Sierra City 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#25 64.8% (+35.2)#644
26. Mabie 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#26 64.8% (+35.2)#678
27. East Shore 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#27 64.8% (+35.2)#686
28. Myers Flat 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#28 64.8% (+35.2)#689
29. Proberta 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#29 64.8% (+35.2)#729
30. Los Berros 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#30 64.8% (+35.2)#775
31. Tomales 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#31 64.8% (+35.2)#788
32. Fort Washington 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#32 64.8% (+35.2)#871
33. Nord 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#33 64.8% (+35.2)#924
34. Moskowite Corner 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#34 64.8% (+35.2)#934
35. Stones Landing 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#35 64.8% (+35.2)#947
36. Hiouchi 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#36 64.8% (+35.2)#964
37. Monterey Park Tract 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#37 64.8% (+35.2)#987
38. Litchfield 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#38 64.8% (+35.2)#1,006
39. Comptche 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#39 64.8% (+35.2)#1,064
40. Old River 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#40 64.8% (+35.2)#1,230
41. Downieville 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#42 64.8% (+35.2)#1,239
42. Lake Davis 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#43 64.8% (+35.2)#1,240
43. Mount Laguna 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#44 64.8% (+35.2)#1,248
44. Adin 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#45 64.8% (+35.2)#1,304
45. Pike 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#46 64.8% (+35.2)#1,305
46. Calpine 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#47 64.8% (+35.2)#1,312
47. Flournoy 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#48 64.8% (+35.2)#1,313
48. Kennedy Meadows 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#49 64.8% (+35.2)#1,323
49. Pajaro Dunes 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#50 64.8% (+35.2)#1,324
50. Alderpoint 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#51 64.8% (+35.2)#1,341
51. Sequoia Crest 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#52 64.8% (+35.2)#1,360
52. Darwin 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#53 64.8% (+35.2)#1,396
53. Kingvale 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#54 64.8% (+35.2)#1,405
54. Pierpoint 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#55 64.8% (+35.2)#1,453
55. New Pine Creek 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#56 64.8% (+35.2)#1,454
56. Foresta 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#57 64.8% (+35.2)#1,500
57. Camp Nelson 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#58 64.8% (+35.2)#1,514
58. Bear Valley Cdp Mariposa County 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#59 64.8% (+35.2)#1,543
59. Hat Creek 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#60 64.8% (+35.2)#1,544
60. Sunny Slopes 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#61 64.8% (+35.2)#1,593
61. Randsburg 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#62 64.8% (+35.2)#1,601
62. Tuttle 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#63 64.8% (+35.2)#1,602
63. Alleghany 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#64 64.8% (+35.2)#1,626
64. Paskenta 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#65 64.8% (+35.2)#1,627
65. El Rancho 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#66 64.8% (+35.2)#1,640
66. Carrick 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#67 64.8% (+35.2)#1,653
67. Whitehawk 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#68 64.8% (+35.2)#1,654
68. Volcano 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#69 64.8% (+35.2)#1,682
69. Ponderosa 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#70 64.8% (+35.2)#1,693
70. Choctaw Valley 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#71 64.8% (+35.2)#1,717
71. Chinese Camp 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#73 64.8% (+35.2)#1,736
72. Soda Springs 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#74 64.8% (+35.2)#1,747
73. Hornitos 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#75 64.8% (+35.2)#1,748
74. Garey 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#76 64.8% (+35.2)#1,769
75. La Porte 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#77 64.8% (+35.2)#1,775
76. Idlewild 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#78 64.8% (+35.2)#1,812
77. Elk Creek 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#79 64.8% (+35.2)#1,868
78. Goodmanville 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#80 64.8% (+35.2)#1,890
79. Valley Ranch 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#81 64.8% (+35.2)#1,936
80. Prattville 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#82 64.8% (+35.2)#1,975
81. Paynes Creek 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#83 64.8% (+35.2)#2,013
82. Robinson Mill 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#84 64.8% (+35.2)#2,014
83. Williams Canyon 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#85 64.8% (+35.2)#2,021
84. Crescent Mills 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#86 64.8% (+35.2)#2,079
85. Madeline 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#87 64.8% (+35.2)#2,112
86. Yosemite West 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#88 64.8% (+35.2)#2,141
87. Mohawk Vista 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#89 64.8% (+35.2)#2,158
88. Ono 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#90 64.8% (+35.2)#2,177
89. Sattley 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#91 64.8% (+35.2)#2,178
90. Wilsonia 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#92 64.8% (+35.2)#2,195
91. Floriston 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#93 64.8% (+35.2)#2,251
92. California Hot Springs 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#94 64.8% (+35.2)#2,311
93. Mcclenney Tract 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#95 64.8% (+35.2)#2,312
94. Bucks Lake 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#96 64.8% (+35.2)#2,333
95. Cold Springs Cdp Tuolumne County 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#97 64.8% (+35.2)#2,402
96. Jenner 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#98 64.8% (+35.2)#2,403
97. Graniteville 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#99 64.8% (+35.2)#2,490
98. Little Valley 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#100 64.8% (+35.2)#2,518
99. Cuyama 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#101 64.8% (+35.2)#2,522
100. Moss Landing 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#102 64.8% (+35.2)#2,543

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California?
Lake Riverside has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of California?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California is 55.6%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.