Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Minnesota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Minnesota

City % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. Olivia 73.1% 35.8% (+37.3)#1 38.5% (+34.6)#10
2. Lexington 67.2% 35.8% (+31.4)#2 38.5% (+28.7)#28
3. Skyline 66.5% 35.8% (+30.7)#3 38.5% (+28.0)#33
4. Grant 62.3% 35.8% (+26.5)#4 38.5% (+23.8)#98
5. New Ulm 61.3% 35.8% (+25.5)#5 38.5% (+22.8)#124
6. Sherburn 60.8% 35.8% (+25.0)#6 38.5% (+22.3)#139
7. Albertville 60.3% 35.8% (+24.5)#7 38.5% (+21.8)#156
8. White Bear Lake 59.4% 35.8% (+23.6)#8 38.5% (+20.9)#187
9. Vadnais Heights 59.4% 35.8% (+23.6)#9 38.5% (+20.9)#188
10. Dexter 58.5% 35.8% (+22.7)#10 38.5% (+20.0)#220
11. Breckenridge 58.3% 35.8% (+22.5)#11 38.5% (+19.8)#233
12. Lewiston 58.2% 35.8% (+22.4)#12 38.5% (+19.7)#249
13. Albert Lea 57.9% 35.8% (+22.1)#13 38.5% (+19.4)#264
14. Grand Rapids 57.4% 35.8% (+21.6)#14 38.5% (+18.9)#290
15. Cannon Falls 57.0% 35.8% (+21.2)#15 38.5% (+18.5)#312
16. Zumbrota 56.5% 35.8% (+20.7)#16 38.5% (+18.0)#338
17. Credit River 55.8% 35.8% (+20.0)#17 38.5% (+17.3)#391
18. Orono 55.5% 35.8% (+19.7)#18 38.5% (+17.0)#412
19. Chatfield 55.3% 35.8% (+19.5)#19 38.5% (+16.8)#429
20. Mahtomedi 55.1% 35.8% (+19.3)#20 38.5% (+16.6)#442
21. Bemidji 54.6% 35.8% (+18.8)#21 38.5% (+16.1)#468
22. Wanamingo 53.9% 35.8% (+18.1)#22 38.5% (+15.4)#532
23. Long Lake 53.5% 35.8% (+17.7)#23 38.5% (+15.0)#559
24. Spring Valley 53.4% 35.8% (+17.6)#24 38.5% (+14.9)#574
25. Anoka 53.2% 35.8% (+17.4)#25 38.5% (+14.7)#588
26. Maplewood 53.1% 35.8% (+17.3)#26 38.5% (+14.6)#600
27. Mendota Heights 53.0% 35.8% (+17.2)#27 38.5% (+14.5)#611
28. Savage 52.5% 35.8% (+16.7)#28 38.5% (+14.0)#646
29. North Mankato 51.1% 35.8% (+15.3)#29 38.5% (+12.6)#764
30. St Paul Park 50.6% 35.8% (+14.8)#30 38.5% (+12.1)#815
31. Dayton 50.5% 35.8% (+14.7)#31 38.5% (+12.0)#828
32. Maple Grove 50.2% 35.8% (+14.4)#32 38.5% (+11.7)#862
33. Fergus Falls 50.2% 35.8% (+14.4)#33 38.5% (+11.7)#867
34. Wyoming 50.1% 35.8% (+14.3)#34 38.5% (+11.6)#884
35. North St Paul 50.0% 35.8% (+14.2)#35 38.5% (+11.5)#895
36. Goodview 49.6% 35.8% (+13.8)#36 38.5% (+11.1)#944
37. Tonka Bay 49.6% 35.8% (+13.8)#37 38.5% (+11.1)#946
38. Watertown 49.5% 35.8% (+13.7)#38 38.5% (+11.0)#965
39. Minnetrista 49.4% 35.8% (+13.6)#39 38.5% (+10.9)#977
40. Chisago City 49.3% 35.8% (+13.5)#40 38.5% (+10.8)#1,001
41. Hastings 49.1% 35.8% (+13.3)#41 38.5% (+10.6)#1,022
42. Coon Rapids 48.8% 35.8% (+13.0)#42 38.5% (+10.3)#1,061
43. Hutchinson 48.7% 35.8% (+12.9)#43 38.5% (+10.2)#1,078
44. Lino Lakes 48.4% 35.8% (+12.6)#44 38.5% (+9.90)#1,114
45. Ham Lake 48.4% 35.8% (+12.6)#45 38.5% (+9.90)#1,117
46. Rogers 48.1% 35.8% (+12.3)#46 38.5% (+9.60)#1,169
47. Hopkins 47.8% 35.8% (+12.0)#47 38.5% (+9.30)#1,203
48. Plainview 47.6% 35.8% (+11.8)#48 38.5% (+9.10)#1,242
49. Ponemah 47.4% 35.8% (+11.6)#49 38.5% (+8.90)#1,283
50. Shakopee 47.1% 35.8% (+11.3)#50 38.5% (+8.60)#1,321
51. Shoreview 47.1% 35.8% (+11.3)#51 38.5% (+8.60)#1,326
52. Chanhassen 46.5% 35.8% (+10.7)#52 38.5% (+8.00)#1,416
53. Lanesboro 46.5% 35.8% (+10.7)#53 38.5% (+8.00)#1,430
54. Ramsey 46.2% 35.8% (+10.4)#54 38.5% (+7.70)#1,469
55. Redwood Falls 45.6% 35.8% (+9.80)#55 38.5% (+7.10)#1,558
56. Cottage Grove 45.5% 35.8% (+9.70)#56 38.5% (+7.00)#1,568
57. Little Canada 45.5% 35.8% (+9.70)#57 38.5% (+7.00)#1,576
58. Northfield 45.2% 35.8% (+9.40)#58 38.5% (+6.70)#1,633
59. Deephaven 45.0% 35.8% (+9.20)#59 38.5% (+6.50)#1,671
60. Detroit Lakes 44.8% 35.8% (+9.00)#60 38.5% (+6.30)#1,695
61. Chaska 44.1% 35.8% (+8.30)#61 38.5% (+5.60)#1,821
62. Otsego 43.7% 35.8% (+7.90)#62 38.5% (+5.20)#1,877
63. Faribault 43.5% 35.8% (+7.70)#63 38.5% (+5.00)#1,907
64. Plymouth 43.3% 35.8% (+7.50)#64 38.5% (+4.80)#1,934
65. Cokato 43.1% 35.8% (+7.30)#65 38.5% (+4.60)#1,997
66. Morris 42.9% 35.8% (+7.10)#66 38.5% (+4.40)#2,033
67. Lake Elmo 42.8% 35.8% (+7.00)#67 38.5% (+4.30)#2,053
68. Champlin 42.7% 35.8% (+6.90)#68 38.5% (+4.20)#2,073
69. Victoria 42.7% 35.8% (+6.90)#69 38.5% (+4.20)#2,079
70. Arden Hills 42.7% 35.8% (+6.90)#70 38.5% (+4.20)#2,080
71. Eagan 42.3% 35.8% (+6.50)#71 38.5% (+3.80)#2,142
72. Hanover 42.2% 35.8% (+6.40)#72 38.5% (+3.70)#2,169
73. Crookston 41.8% 35.8% (+6.00)#73 38.5% (+3.30)#2,220
74. Glencoe 41.6% 35.8% (+5.80)#74 38.5% (+3.10)#2,254
75. Willmar 41.0% 35.8% (+5.20)#75 38.5% (+2.50)#2,341
76. Andover 40.8% 35.8% (+5.00)#76 38.5% (+2.30)#2,373
77. Owatonna 40.7% 35.8% (+4.90)#77 38.5% (+2.20)#2,394
78. Bloomington 40.5% 35.8% (+4.70)#78 38.5% (+2.00)#2,427
79. Lakeville 40.5% 35.8% (+4.70)#79 38.5% (+2.00)#2,429
80. Blaine 40.5% 35.8% (+4.70)#80 38.5% (+2.00)#2,430
81. Austin 40.5% 35.8% (+4.70)#81 38.5% (+2.00)#2,437
82. Cambridge 40.5% 35.8% (+4.70)#82 38.5% (+2.00)#2,447
83. Little Falls 40.4% 35.8% (+4.60)#83 38.5% (+1.90)#2,472
84. Oak Grove 40.4% 35.8% (+4.60)#84 38.5% (+1.90)#2,473
85. Ortonville 40.4% 35.8% (+4.60)#85 38.5% (+1.90)#2,478
86. Eden Prairie 40.0% 35.8% (+4.20)#86 38.5% (+1.50)#2,533
87. Oakdale 39.8% 35.8% (+4.00)#87 38.5% (+1.30)#2,573
88. Woodbury 39.6% 35.8% (+3.80)#88 38.5% (+1.10)#2,602
89. Minnetonka 39.6% 35.8% (+3.80)#89 38.5% (+1.10)#2,604
90. Brooklyn Center 38.8% 35.8% (+3.00)#90 38.5% (+0.300)#2,740
91. Pine Point 38.8% 35.8% (+3.00)#91 38.5% (+0.300)#2,755
92. Golden Valley 38.7% 35.8% (+2.90)#92 38.5% (+0.200)#2,768
93. St Anthony City Hennepin And Ramsey Counties 38.6% 35.8% (+2.80)#93 38.5% (+0.100)#2,784
94. Richfield 38.4% 35.8% (+2.60)#94 38.5% (-0.100)#2,816
95. Mora 38.3% 35.8% (+2.50)#95 38.5% (-0.200)#2,839
96. Apple Valley 38.0% 35.8% (+2.20)#96 38.5% (-0.500)#2,865
97. Edina 37.9% 35.8% (+2.10)#97 38.5% (-0.600)#2,873
98. Fridley 37.8% 35.8% (+2.00)#98 38.5% (-0.700)#2,890
99. Rosemount 37.7% 35.8% (+1.90)#99 38.5% (-0.800)#2,905
100. Wadena 37.5% 35.8% (+1.70)#100 38.5% (-1.00)#2,941

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Minnesota are:
#1
73.1%
#2
67.2%
#3
66.5%
#4
62.3%
#5
61.3%
#6
60.8%
#7
60.3%
#8
59.4%
#9
59.4%
#10
58.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Minnesota?
Olivia has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Minnesota with 73.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Minnesota is 35.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.