Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Public Transit
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas

City % Public Transit vs State vs National
1. Duncanville 64.5% 38.9% (+25.6)#1 38.5% (+26.0)#60
2. Galveston 63.1% 38.9% (+24.2)#2 38.5% (+24.6)#83
3. Orange 62.5% 38.9% (+23.6)#3 38.5% (+24.0)#92
4. Desoto 60.6% 38.9% (+21.7)#4 38.5% (+22.1)#141
5. Paris 59.1% 38.9% (+20.2)#5 38.5% (+20.6)#195
6. Midland 58.8% 38.9% (+19.9)#6 38.5% (+20.3)#211
7. Missouri City 58.4% 38.9% (+19.5)#7 38.5% (+19.9)#221
8. Friendswood 58.2% 38.9% (+19.3)#8 38.5% (+19.7)#239
9. Mission 57.0% 38.9% (+18.1)#9 38.5% (+18.5)#309
10. Tyler 55.2% 38.9% (+16.3)#10 38.5% (+16.7)#430
11. Lewisville 55.1% 38.9% (+16.2)#11 38.5% (+16.6)#438
12. Sherman 54.8% 38.9% (+15.9)#12 38.5% (+16.3)#459
13. Katy 54.3% 38.9% (+15.4)#13 38.5% (+15.8)#497
14. Victoria 53.9% 38.9% (+15.0)#14 38.5% (+15.4)#527
15. Atascocita 53.8% 38.9% (+14.9)#15 38.5% (+15.3)#533
16. Port Arthur 53.8% 38.9% (+14.9)#16 38.5% (+15.3)#535
17. Bellaire 53.4% 38.9% (+14.5)#17 38.5% (+14.9)#566
18. Wichita Falls 53.2% 38.9% (+14.3)#18 38.5% (+14.7)#585
19. Farmers Branch 51.4% 38.9% (+12.5)#19 38.5% (+12.9)#730
20. Grand Prairie 51.3% 38.9% (+12.4)#20 38.5% (+12.8)#739
21. Sachse 51.3% 38.9% (+12.4)#21 38.5% (+12.8)#742
22. Balcones Heights 51.2% 38.9% (+12.3)#22 38.5% (+12.7)#763
23. Fulshear 50.9% 38.9% (+12.0)#23 38.5% (+12.4)#784
24. Murphy 50.4% 38.9% (+11.5)#24 38.5% (+11.9)#834
25. Pasadena 50.1% 38.9% (+11.2)#25 38.5% (+11.6)#878
26. Cloverleaf 49.7% 38.9% (+10.8)#26 38.5% (+11.2)#915
27. Jersey Village 49.6% 38.9% (+10.7)#27 38.5% (+11.1)#940
28. Highland Village 49.5% 38.9% (+10.6)#28 38.5% (+11.0)#957
29. Beaumont 49.2% 38.9% (+10.3)#29 38.5% (+10.7)#1,006
30. University Park 49.0% 38.9% (+10.1)#30 38.5% (+10.5)#1,041
31. Sugar Land 48.5% 38.9% (+9.60)#31 38.5% (+10.00)#1,099
32. The Woodlands 48.2% 38.9% (+9.30)#32 38.5% (+9.70)#1,149
33. Frisco 48.1% 38.9% (+9.20)#33 38.5% (+9.60)#1,161
34. Mcallen 48.1% 38.9% (+9.20)#34 38.5% (+9.60)#1,162
35. Euless 48.0% 38.9% (+9.10)#35 38.5% (+9.50)#1,181
36. Mckinney 47.9% 38.9% (+9.00)#36 38.5% (+9.40)#1,187
37. Laredo 47.6% 38.9% (+8.70)#37 38.5% (+9.10)#1,222
38. Odessa 47.4% 38.9% (+8.50)#38 38.5% (+8.90)#1,266
39. Coppell 46.4% 38.9% (+7.50)#39 38.5% (+7.90)#1,434
40. Pflugerville 46.3% 38.9% (+7.40)#40 38.5% (+7.80)#1,449
41. Flower Mound 45.8% 38.9% (+6.90)#41 38.5% (+7.30)#1,517
42. Fort Worth 45.4% 38.9% (+6.50)#42 38.5% (+6.90)#1,584
43. Bedford 45.4% 38.9% (+6.50)#43 38.5% (+6.90)#1,590
44. Watauga 45.0% 38.9% (+6.10)#44 38.5% (+6.50)#1,666
45. Plano 44.6% 38.9% (+5.70)#45 38.5% (+6.10)#1,716
46. Bertram 44.3% 38.9% (+5.40)#46 38.5% (+5.80)#1,790
47. Rowlett 44.2% 38.9% (+5.30)#47 38.5% (+5.70)#1,795
48. Wylie 44.1% 38.9% (+5.20)#48 38.5% (+5.60)#1,815
49. Groves 43.8% 38.9% (+4.90)#49 38.5% (+5.30)#1,863
50. Richland Hills 43.3% 38.9% (+4.40)#50 38.5% (+4.80)#1,953
51. Garland 43.1% 38.9% (+4.20)#51 38.5% (+4.60)#1,980
52. League City 42.8% 38.9% (+3.90)#52 38.5% (+4.30)#2,036
53. Lancaster 42.8% 38.9% (+3.90)#53 38.5% (+4.30)#2,044
54. Brownsville 42.7% 38.9% (+3.80)#54 38.5% (+4.20)#2,064
55. Temple 42.6% 38.9% (+3.70)#55 38.5% (+4.10)#2,085
56. Addison 42.4% 38.9% (+3.50)#56 38.5% (+3.90)#2,130
57. Robstown 42.4% 38.9% (+3.50)#57 38.5% (+3.90)#2,133
58. Arlington 41.6% 38.9% (+2.70)#58 38.5% (+3.10)#2,238
59. Lufkin 41.6% 38.9% (+2.70)#59 38.5% (+3.10)#2,246
60. Mesquite 41.4% 38.9% (+2.50)#60 38.5% (+2.90)#2,291
61. Rockwall 41.0% 38.9% (+2.10)#61 38.5% (+2.50)#2,337
62. New Braunfels 40.3% 38.9% (+1.40)#62 38.5% (+1.80)#2,481
63. Baytown 40.2% 38.9% (+1.30)#63 38.5% (+1.70)#2,498
64. Spring 40.2% 38.9% (+1.30)#64 38.5% (+1.70)#2,501
65. Carrollton 40.0% 38.9% (+1.10)#65 38.5% (+1.50)#2,532
66. Allen 39.9% 38.9% (+1.000)#66 38.5% (+1.40)#2,549
67. El Paso 39.6% 38.9% (+0.700)#67 38.5% (+1.10)#2,599
68. San Antonio 39.4% 38.9% (+0.500)#68 38.5% (+0.900)#2,644
69. Dallas 39.3% 38.9% (+0.400)#69 38.5% (+0.800)#2,655
70. Cedar Park 39.3% 38.9% (+0.400)#70 38.5% (+0.800)#2,657
71. Irving 38.8% 38.9% (-0.100)#71 38.5% (+0.300)#2,731
72. Cinco Ranch 38.8% 38.9% (-0.100)#72 38.5% (+0.300)#2,742
73. Lubbock 38.5% 38.9% (-0.400)#73 38.5% (=0.000)#2,790
74. Houston 38.3% 38.9% (-0.600)#74 38.5% (-0.200)#2,828
75. Pecan Grove 37.9% 38.9% (-1.00)#75 38.5% (-0.600)#2,876
76. Hurst 37.4% 38.9% (-1.50)#76 38.5% (-1.10)#2,950
77. Leon Valley 37.4% 38.9% (-1.50)#77 38.5% (-1.10)#2,958
78. San Benito 37.2% 38.9% (-1.70)#78 38.5% (-1.30)#2,984
79. Longview 36.4% 38.9% (-2.50)#79 38.5% (-2.10)#3,110
80. Abilene 35.8% 38.9% (-3.10)#80 38.5% (-2.70)#3,181
81. Humble 35.8% 38.9% (-3.10)#81 38.5% (-2.70)#3,187
82. Cedar Hill 35.7% 38.9% (-3.20)#82 38.5% (-2.80)#3,201
83. Bryan 34.8% 38.9% (-4.10)#83 38.5% (-3.70)#3,340
84. Richardson 34.7% 38.9% (-4.20)#84 38.5% (-3.80)#3,358
85. Round Rock 34.5% 38.9% (-4.40)#85 38.5% (-4.00)#3,388
86. Amarillo 33.7% 38.9% (-5.20)#86 38.5% (-4.80)#3,489
87. Corpus Christi 32.9% 38.9% (-6.00)#87 38.5% (-5.60)#3,578
88. Denison 32.9% 38.9% (-6.00)#88 38.5% (-5.60)#3,582
89. Conroe 32.8% 38.9% (-6.10)#89 38.5% (-5.70)#3,589
90. Austin 32.4% 38.9% (-6.50)#90 38.5% (-6.10)#3,643
91. Pearland 31.9% 38.9% (-7.00)#91 38.5% (-6.60)#3,694
92. Corrigan 31.9% 38.9% (-7.00)#92 38.5% (-6.60)#3,708
93. Highlands 31.5% 38.9% (-7.40)#93 38.5% (-7.00)#3,742
94. Waco 31.3% 38.9% (-7.60)#94 38.5% (-7.20)#3,753
95. Leander 30.9% 38.9% (-8.00)#95 38.5% (-7.60)#3,786
96. Mineral Wells 30.1% 38.9% (-8.80)#96 38.5% (-8.40)#3,865
97. Sulphur Springs 30.0% 38.9% (-8.90)#97 38.5% (-8.50)#3,871
98. North Richland Hills 29.8% 38.9% (-9.10)#98 38.5% (-8.70)#3,891
99. Port Neches 29.1% 38.9% (-9.80)#99 38.5% (-9.40)#3,952
100. Webster 28.6% 38.9% (-10.3)#100 38.5% (-9.90)#4,012

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas are:
#1
64.5%
#2
63.1%
#3
62.5%
#4
60.6%
#5
59.1%
#6
58.8%
#7
58.4%
#8
58.2%
#9
57.0%
#10
55.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas?
Duncanville has the Highest Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas with 64.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in Texas is 38.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Taking Public Transit to Work in the United States is 38.5%.