Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in California

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
California
States
California Cities
AlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLoma LindaLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in California

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in California Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in California

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Lake Isabella 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#1 14.5% (+85.5)#1
2. Bethel Island 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#2 14.5% (+85.5)#17
3. March Arb 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#3 14.5% (+85.5)#63
4. Douglas City 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#4 14.5% (+85.5)#70
5. Shell Ridge 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#5 14.5% (+85.5)#74
6. Delft Colony 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#6 14.5% (+85.5)#76
7. Upper Lake 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#7 14.5% (+85.5)#90
8. Challenge Brownsville 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#8 14.5% (+85.5)#101
9. Monte Rio 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#9 14.5% (+85.5)#119
10. San Ardo 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#10 14.5% (+85.5)#156
11. Aguanga 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#11 14.5% (+85.5)#160
12. Lemon Cove 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#12 14.5% (+85.5)#190
13. Bridgeport 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#13 14.5% (+85.5)#217
14. Muir Beach 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#14 14.5% (+85.5)#218
15. Benton 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#15 14.5% (+85.5)#224
16. Hornbrook 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#16 14.5% (+85.5)#233
17. Forbestown 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#17 14.5% (+85.5)#239
18. Grimes 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#18 14.5% (+85.5)#251
19. Twain 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#19 14.5% (+85.5)#266
20. Clipper Mills 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#20 14.5% (+85.5)#273
21. June Lake 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#21 14.5% (+85.5)#279
22. Bombay Beach 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#22 14.5% (+85.5)#324
23. Cherokee 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#23 14.5% (+85.5)#360
24. Monmouth 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#24 14.5% (+85.5)#363
25. Salton Sea Beach 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#25 14.5% (+85.5)#383
26. Snelling 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#26 14.5% (+85.5)#395
27. Cherokee Strip 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#27 14.5% (+85.5)#402
28. La Grange 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#28 14.5% (+85.5)#450
29. Big Lagoon 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#29 14.5% (+85.5)#529
30. Mount Laguna 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#30 14.5% (+85.5)#530
31. Mckittrick 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#31 14.5% (+85.5)#555
32. Weitchpec 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#32 14.5% (+85.5)#584
33. El Rancho 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#33 14.5% (+85.5)#618
34. Chinese Camp 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#34 14.5% (+85.5)#628
35. Rodriguez Camp 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#35 14.5% (+85.5)#631
36. Tooleville 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#36 14.5% (+85.5)#632
37. Tulelake 88.6% 12.7% (+75.9)#37 14.5% (+74.1)#755
38. Fairhaven 86.7% 12.7% (+73.9)#38 14.5% (+72.2)#783
39. Meridian 85.7% 12.7% (+73.0)#39 14.5% (+71.2)#796
40. Miranda 83.3% 12.7% (+70.6)#40 14.5% (+68.8)#844
41. Strathmore 81.9% 12.7% (+69.2)#41 14.5% (+67.4)#881
42. Mountain Gate 80.9% 12.7% (+68.1)#42 14.5% (+66.4)#903
43. Thornton 80.8% 12.7% (+68.1)#43 14.5% (+66.3)#904
44. Fort Bidwell 78.9% 12.7% (+66.2)#44 14.5% (+64.5)#959
45. Ivanhoe 76.9% 12.7% (+64.2)#45 14.5% (+62.4)#1,010
46. Big Bend 76.9% 12.7% (+64.2)#46 14.5% (+62.4)#1,021
47. Greeley Hill 73.0% 12.7% (+60.3)#47 14.5% (+58.5)#1,116
48. Shingletown 72.7% 12.7% (+60.0)#48 14.5% (+58.2)#1,120
49. Honcut 71.1% 12.7% (+58.3)#49 14.5% (+56.6)#1,184
50. La Vina 70.1% 12.7% (+57.4)#50 14.5% (+55.6)#1,216
51. Weaverville 68.0% 12.7% (+55.2)#51 14.5% (+53.5)#1,302
52. Willow Creek 67.5% 12.7% (+54.8)#52 14.5% (+53.0)#1,314
53. Lower Lake 66.9% 12.7% (+54.2)#53 14.5% (+52.4)#1,336
54. Lagunitas Forest Knolls 66.7% 12.7% (+53.9)#54 14.5% (+52.2)#1,341
55. Plainview 66.7% 12.7% (+53.9)#55 14.5% (+52.2)#1,363
56. Tupman 66.7% 12.7% (+53.9)#56 14.5% (+52.2)#1,398
57. Bayview Cdp Humboldt County 66.2% 12.7% (+53.5)#57 14.5% (+51.7)#1,433
58. Malaga 66.0% 12.7% (+53.2)#58 14.5% (+51.5)#1,441
59. Ford City 65.3% 12.7% (+52.6)#59 14.5% (+50.8)#1,469
60. Chalfant 61.5% 12.7% (+48.8)#60 14.5% (+47.0)#1,628
61. Berry Creek 60.0% 12.7% (+47.3)#61 14.5% (+45.5)#1,684
62. Yermo 59.3% 12.7% (+46.6)#62 14.5% (+44.8)#1,751
63. Burney 59.3% 12.7% (+46.6)#63 14.5% (+44.8)#1,752
64. Crows Landing 59.3% 12.7% (+46.5)#64 14.5% (+44.8)#1,757
65. Terra Bella 59.2% 12.7% (+46.5)#65 14.5% (+44.7)#1,758
66. Lucerne Valley 58.7% 12.7% (+46.0)#66 14.5% (+44.2)#1,792
67. Fuller Acres 58.7% 12.7% (+46.0)#67 14.5% (+44.2)#1,795
68. Weedpatch 57.9% 12.7% (+45.2)#68 14.5% (+43.4)#1,846
69. Groveland 57.6% 12.7% (+44.9)#69 14.5% (+43.1)#1,867
70. Kettleman City 56.8% 12.7% (+44.1)#70 14.5% (+42.3)#1,925
71. Ripley 55.8% 12.7% (+43.1)#71 14.5% (+41.3)#1,983
72. Clio 55.8% 12.7% (+43.1)#72 14.5% (+41.3)#1,984
73. Kennedy 55.0% 12.7% (+42.2)#73 14.5% (+40.5)#2,061
74. Graton 54.9% 12.7% (+42.2)#74 14.5% (+40.4)#2,063
75. Camanche North Shore 54.4% 12.7% (+41.6)#75 14.5% (+39.9)#2,109
76. Westwood 53.7% 12.7% (+40.9)#76 14.5% (+39.2)#2,162
77. Etna 53.6% 12.7% (+40.9)#77 14.5% (+39.1)#2,168
78. Poplar Cotton Center 53.2% 12.7% (+40.4)#78 14.5% (+38.7)#2,210
79. Alpaugh 52.6% 12.7% (+39.9)#79 14.5% (+38.1)#2,247
80. Occidental 52.3% 12.7% (+39.6)#80 14.5% (+37.8)#2,274
81. Hopland 51.2% 12.7% (+38.5)#81 14.5% (+36.8)#2,344
82. Calipatria 50.5% 12.7% (+37.8)#82 14.5% (+36.0)#2,382
83. Descanso 50.0% 12.7% (+37.3)#83 14.5% (+35.5)#2,412
84. Patton Village 50.0% 12.7% (+37.3)#84 14.5% (+35.5)#2,434
85. Bret Harte 49.9% 12.7% (+37.2)#85 14.5% (+35.4)#2,592
86. Linnell Camp 49.0% 12.7% (+36.3)#86 14.5% (+34.5)#2,637
87. Kelseyville 48.2% 12.7% (+35.4)#87 14.5% (+33.7)#2,695
88. Portola 48.1% 12.7% (+35.4)#88 14.5% (+33.7)#2,696
89. Newcastle 47.5% 12.7% (+34.8)#89 14.5% (+33.0)#2,759
90. Holtville 46.8% 12.7% (+34.1)#90 14.5% (+32.3)#2,829
91. Boyes Hot Springs 46.8% 12.7% (+34.0)#91 14.5% (+32.3)#2,840
92. Richgrove 46.7% 12.7% (+34.0)#92 14.5% (+32.2)#2,842
93. Casa Loma 46.4% 12.7% (+33.7)#93 14.5% (+31.9)#2,877
94. Hoopa 46.4% 12.7% (+33.7)#94 14.5% (+31.9)#2,883
95. Westmorland 45.7% 12.7% (+33.0)#95 14.5% (+31.3)#2,956
96. San Joaquin 45.7% 12.7% (+33.0)#96 14.5% (+31.2)#2,961
97. Dorris 45.3% 12.7% (+32.6)#97 14.5% (+30.8)#3,006
98. West Point 45.0% 12.7% (+32.3)#98 14.5% (+30.5)#3,029
99. Loleta 45.0% 12.7% (+32.3)#99 14.5% (+30.5)#3,033
100. Goshen 45.0% 12.7% (+32.3)#100 14.5% (+30.5)#3,040

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in California?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in California are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in California?
Lake Isabella has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in California with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the State of California?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in California is 12.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.