Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New Jersey

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
New Jersey
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New Jersey

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New Jersey Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New Jersey

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. West Wildwood Borough 81.1% 38.0% (+43.1)#1 33.4% (+47.7)#8
2. Mount Ephraim Borough 75.2% 38.0% (+37.2)#2 33.4% (+41.8)#43
3. Island Heights Borough 74.2% 38.0% (+36.2)#3 33.4% (+40.8)#52
4. Millstone Borough 71.5% 38.0% (+33.5)#4 33.4% (+38.1)#79
5. Butler Borough 71.0% 38.0% (+33.0)#5 33.4% (+37.6)#95
6. Waldwick Borough 68.1% 38.0% (+30.1)#6 33.4% (+34.7)#177
7. Lebanon Borough 67.5% 38.0% (+29.5)#7 33.4% (+34.1)#198
8. Rockaway Borough 66.5% 38.0% (+28.5)#8 33.4% (+33.1)#248
9. Brielle Borough 66.4% 38.0% (+28.4)#9 33.4% (+33.0)#259
10. Bordentown 66.4% 38.0% (+28.4)#10 33.4% (+33.0)#260
11. Saddle River Borough 65.6% 38.0% (+27.6)#11 33.4% (+32.2)#304
12. Mendham Borough 65.5% 38.0% (+27.5)#12 33.4% (+32.1)#308
13. Milford Borough 65.4% 38.0% (+27.4)#13 33.4% (+32.0)#320
14. Sea Girt Borough 65.3% 38.0% (+27.3)#14 33.4% (+31.9)#327
15. North Arlington Borough 64.0% 38.0% (+26.0)#15 33.4% (+30.6)#416
16. Paulsboro Borough 63.6% 38.0% (+25.6)#16 33.4% (+30.2)#439
17. Union 63.4% 38.0% (+25.4)#17 33.4% (+30.0)#467
18. North Wildwood 63.2% 38.0% (+25.2)#18 33.4% (+29.8)#485
19. Belmar Borough 63.1% 38.0% (+25.1)#19 33.4% (+29.7)#495
20. Wood Ridge Borough 62.7% 38.0% (+24.7)#20 33.4% (+29.3)#522
21. Bedminster 62.7% 38.0% (+24.7)#21 33.4% (+29.3)#526
22. Clayton Borough 62.5% 38.0% (+24.5)#22 33.4% (+29.1)#538
23. Eatontown Borough 62.4% 38.0% (+24.4)#23 33.4% (+29.0)#557
24. Salem 62.3% 38.0% (+24.3)#24 33.4% (+28.9)#570
25. Westville Borough 61.6% 38.0% (+23.6)#25 33.4% (+28.2)#640
26. Wildwood Crest Borough 61.5% 38.0% (+23.5)#26 33.4% (+28.1)#648
27. Carneys Point 61.3% 38.0% (+23.3)#27 33.4% (+27.9)#683
28. Lincoln Park Borough 61.2% 38.0% (+23.2)#28 33.4% (+27.8)#704
29. Preakness 60.8% 38.0% (+22.8)#29 33.4% (+27.4)#739
30. Washington Borough 60.8% 38.0% (+22.8)#30 33.4% (+27.4)#740
31. The Hills 60.7% 38.0% (+22.7)#31 33.4% (+27.3)#746
32. Belvidere 60.4% 38.0% (+22.4)#32 33.4% (+27.0)#808
33. Midland Park Borough 60.3% 38.0% (+22.3)#33 33.4% (+26.9)#819
34. Hammonton 59.9% 38.0% (+21.9)#34 33.4% (+26.5)#875
35. Little Ferry Borough 59.9% 38.0% (+21.9)#35 33.4% (+26.5)#877
36. Springdale 59.4% 38.0% (+21.4)#36 33.4% (+26.0)#935
37. National Park Borough 59.1% 38.0% (+21.1)#37 33.4% (+25.7)#999
38. Longport Borough 59.1% 38.0% (+21.1)#38 33.4% (+25.7)#1,009
39. Bernardsville Borough 58.9% 38.0% (+20.9)#39 33.4% (+25.5)#1,020
40. Pompton Plains 58.4% 38.0% (+20.4)#40 33.4% (+25.0)#1,099
41. Swedesboro Borough 58.4% 38.0% (+20.4)#41 33.4% (+25.0)#1,105
42. Vineland 58.3% 38.0% (+20.3)#42 33.4% (+24.9)#1,115
43. Greentree 58.2% 38.0% (+20.2)#43 33.4% (+24.8)#1,136
44. Boonton 57.7% 38.0% (+19.7)#44 33.4% (+24.3)#1,191
45. Dover Beaches North 57.7% 38.0% (+19.7)#45 33.4% (+24.3)#1,197
46. Spring Lake Heights Borough 57.5% 38.0% (+19.5)#46 33.4% (+24.1)#1,222
47. Silver Lake Cdp Essex County 57.3% 38.0% (+19.3)#47 33.4% (+23.9)#1,259
48. Secaucus 56.9% 38.0% (+18.9)#48 33.4% (+23.5)#1,326
49. Fanwood Borough 56.9% 38.0% (+18.9)#49 33.4% (+23.5)#1,329
50. Emerson Borough 56.5% 38.0% (+18.5)#50 33.4% (+23.1)#1,384
51. Alpine Borough 56.5% 38.0% (+18.5)#51 33.4% (+23.1)#1,395
52. White Horse 56.4% 38.0% (+18.4)#52 33.4% (+23.0)#1,421
53. Fieldsboro Borough 56.4% 38.0% (+18.4)#53 33.4% (+23.0)#1,436
54. Elmwood Park Borough 56.1% 38.0% (+18.1)#54 33.4% (+22.7)#1,480
55. Allendale Borough 55.6% 38.0% (+17.6)#55 33.4% (+22.2)#1,539
56. Chatham Borough 55.5% 38.0% (+17.5)#56 33.4% (+22.1)#1,553
57. Menlo Park Terrace 55.5% 38.0% (+17.5)#57 33.4% (+22.1)#1,558
58. West Freehold 55.1% 38.0% (+17.1)#58 33.4% (+21.7)#1,658
59. Oaklyn Borough 55.0% 38.0% (+17.0)#59 33.4% (+21.6)#1,679
60. Allentown Borough 55.0% 38.0% (+17.0)#60 33.4% (+21.6)#1,683
61. Avalon Borough 54.5% 38.0% (+16.5)#61 33.4% (+21.1)#1,750
62. Kinnelon Borough 54.4% 38.0% (+16.4)#62 33.4% (+21.0)#1,769
63. Beach Haven Borough 54.3% 38.0% (+16.3)#63 33.4% (+20.9)#1,795
64. Parsippany 54.2% 38.0% (+16.2)#64 33.4% (+20.8)#1,805
65. Peapack And Gladstone Borough 54.2% 38.0% (+16.2)#65 33.4% (+20.8)#1,816
66. Lodi Borough 54.1% 38.0% (+16.1)#66 33.4% (+20.7)#1,827
67. Carlstadt Borough 54.1% 38.0% (+16.1)#67 33.4% (+20.7)#1,834
68. Princeton Meadows 54.0% 38.0% (+16.0)#68 33.4% (+20.6)#1,843
69. Flanders 54.0% 38.0% (+16.0)#69 33.4% (+20.6)#1,845
70. Franklin Lakes Borough 53.7% 38.0% (+15.7)#70 33.4% (+20.3)#1,883
71. Glen Rock Borough 53.3% 38.0% (+15.3)#71 33.4% (+19.9)#1,969
72. Avon By The Sea Borough 52.9% 38.0% (+14.9)#72 33.4% (+19.5)#2,049
73. Linwood 52.7% 38.0% (+14.7)#73 33.4% (+19.3)#2,081
74. Pine Brook 52.5% 38.0% (+14.5)#74 33.4% (+19.1)#2,109
75. Ocean City 52.3% 38.0% (+14.3)#75 33.4% (+18.9)#2,163
76. Westfield 52.1% 38.0% (+14.1)#76 33.4% (+18.7)#2,210
77. Pompton Lakes Borough 52.0% 38.0% (+14.0)#77 33.4% (+18.6)#2,237
78. Sicklerville 51.6% 38.0% (+13.6)#78 33.4% (+18.2)#2,274
79. Paramus Borough 51.5% 38.0% (+13.5)#79 33.4% (+18.1)#2,290
80. Harrington Park Borough 51.3% 38.0% (+13.3)#80 33.4% (+17.9)#2,348
81. East Newark Borough 51.3% 38.0% (+13.3)#81 33.4% (+17.9)#2,350
82. Westwood Borough 51.0% 38.0% (+13.0)#82 33.4% (+17.6)#2,400
83. Brooklawn Borough 51.0% 38.0% (+13.0)#83 33.4% (+17.6)#2,406
84. Fairview Borough 50.5% 38.0% (+12.5)#84 33.4% (+17.1)#2,484
85. Wanaque Borough 50.4% 38.0% (+12.4)#85 33.4% (+17.0)#2,517
86. Northfield 50.4% 38.0% (+12.4)#86 33.4% (+17.0)#2,520
87. Ellisburg 50.4% 38.0% (+12.4)#87 33.4% (+17.0)#2,524
88. Maywood Borough 50.3% 38.0% (+12.3)#88 33.4% (+16.9)#2,544
89. Frenchtown Borough 50.1% 38.0% (+12.1)#89 33.4% (+16.7)#2,592
90. Blairstown 50.1% 38.0% (+12.1)#90 33.4% (+16.7)#2,599
91. Ashland 50.0% 38.0% (+12.0)#91 33.4% (+16.6)#2,605
92. Lawnside Borough 49.9% 38.0% (+11.9)#92 33.4% (+16.5)#2,626
93. Kenilworth Borough 49.5% 38.0% (+11.5)#93 33.4% (+16.1)#2,688
94. Laurel Springs Borough 49.5% 38.0% (+11.5)#94 33.4% (+16.1)#2,699
95. Leonia Borough 49.4% 38.0% (+11.4)#95 33.4% (+16.0)#2,727
96. Madison Park 49.3% 38.0% (+11.3)#96 33.4% (+15.9)#2,743
97. Toms River 48.2% 38.0% (+10.2)#97 33.4% (+14.8)#2,950
98. Rio Grande 48.2% 38.0% (+10.2)#98 33.4% (+14.8)#2,966
99. East Orange 47.7% 38.0% (+9.70)#99 33.4% (+14.3)#3,035
100. Woodland Park Borough 47.6% 38.0% (+9.60)#100 33.4% (+14.2)#3,058

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New Jersey?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New Jersey are:
#1
66.4%
#2
63.2%
#3
62.3%
#4
61.3%
#5
60.4%
#6
59.9%
#7
59.4%
#8
58.3%
#9
58.2%
#10
57.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New Jersey?
Bordentown has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New Jersey with 66.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of New Jersey?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New Jersey is 38.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.