Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Ohio

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Pickerington 89.2% 30.0% (+59.2)#1 33.4% (+55.8)#2
2. New Riegel 72.1% 30.0% (+42.1)#2 33.4% (+38.7)#74
3. Scio 68.9% 30.0% (+38.9)#3 33.4% (+35.5)#147
4. Spring Valley 68.5% 30.0% (+38.5)#4 33.4% (+35.1)#162
5. Leetonia 68.1% 30.0% (+38.1)#5 33.4% (+34.7)#180
6. Olmsted Falls 67.3% 30.0% (+37.3)#6 33.4% (+33.9)#215
7. Elida 65.8% 30.0% (+35.8)#7 33.4% (+32.4)#299
8. Laura 65.3% 30.0% (+35.3)#8 33.4% (+31.9)#330
9. Metamora 65.1% 30.0% (+35.1)#9 33.4% (+31.7)#349
10. Pomeroy 64.6% 30.0% (+34.6)#10 33.4% (+31.2)#368
11. Holland 63.3% 30.0% (+33.3)#11 33.4% (+29.9)#476
12. Yorkville 62.8% 30.0% (+32.8)#12 33.4% (+29.4)#518
13. Savannah 62.8% 30.0% (+32.8)#13 33.4% (+29.4)#521
14. Niles 61.7% 30.0% (+31.7)#14 33.4% (+28.3)#627
15. Mcarthur 60.5% 30.0% (+30.5)#15 33.4% (+27.1)#778
16. Jackson Center 60.5% 30.0% (+30.5)#16 33.4% (+27.1)#779
17. Glandorf 60.5% 30.0% (+30.5)#17 33.4% (+27.1)#782
18. Waynesville 60.4% 30.0% (+30.4)#18 33.4% (+27.0)#807
19. Washington Court House 59.2% 30.0% (+29.2)#19 33.4% (+25.8)#972
20. Dublin 59.1% 30.0% (+29.1)#20 33.4% (+25.7)#988
21. Brunswick 59.1% 30.0% (+29.1)#21 33.4% (+25.7)#989
22. Riverside 59.1% 30.0% (+29.1)#22 33.4% (+25.7)#991
23. Milford 58.9% 30.0% (+28.9)#23 33.4% (+25.5)#1,022
24. Port Clinton 58.5% 30.0% (+28.5)#24 33.4% (+25.1)#1,069
25. Bucyrus 58.3% 30.0% (+28.3)#25 33.4% (+24.9)#1,117
26. Salineville 58.1% 30.0% (+28.1)#26 33.4% (+24.7)#1,156
27. Lithopolis 57.8% 30.0% (+27.8)#27 33.4% (+24.4)#1,179
28. Finneytown 57.5% 30.0% (+27.5)#28 33.4% (+24.1)#1,219
29. Crooksville 57.5% 30.0% (+27.5)#29 33.4% (+24.1)#1,226
30. Berlin Heights 57.5% 30.0% (+27.5)#30 33.4% (+24.1)#1,231
31. Bratenahl 57.3% 30.0% (+27.3)#31 33.4% (+23.9)#1,264
32. Brecksville 57.2% 30.0% (+27.2)#32 33.4% (+23.8)#1,284
33. Beaverdam 57.2% 30.0% (+27.2)#33 33.4% (+23.8)#1,302
34. Peebles 57.1% 30.0% (+27.1)#34 33.4% (+23.7)#1,310
35. Forest Park 57.0% 30.0% (+27.0)#35 33.4% (+23.6)#1,317
36. Millersburg 57.0% 30.0% (+27.0)#36 33.4% (+23.6)#1,323
37. Ravenna 56.8% 30.0% (+26.8)#37 33.4% (+23.4)#1,336
38. New Madison 56.8% 30.0% (+26.8)#38 33.4% (+23.4)#1,340
39. Wickliffe 56.7% 30.0% (+26.7)#39 33.4% (+23.3)#1,345
40. Bowerston 56.7% 30.0% (+26.7)#40 33.4% (+23.3)#1,359
41. Westfield Center 56.3% 30.0% (+26.3)#41 33.4% (+22.9)#1,453
42. Attica 56.3% 30.0% (+26.3)#42 33.4% (+22.9)#1,457
43. Woodsfield 56.2% 30.0% (+26.2)#43 33.4% (+22.8)#1,473
44. Highland Heights 56.1% 30.0% (+26.1)#44 33.4% (+22.7)#1,482
45. Marblehead 55.8% 30.0% (+25.8)#45 33.4% (+22.4)#1,517
46. Hopedale 55.5% 30.0% (+25.5)#46 33.4% (+22.1)#1,565
47. Peninsula 55.5% 30.0% (+25.5)#47 33.4% (+22.1)#1,570
48. Kelleys Island 55.5% 30.0% (+25.5)#48 33.4% (+22.1)#1,582
49. Newton Falls 55.4% 30.0% (+25.4)#49 33.4% (+22.0)#1,591
50. Stony Prairie 55.4% 30.0% (+25.4)#50 33.4% (+22.0)#1,596
51. Salem 55.3% 30.0% (+25.3)#51 33.4% (+21.9)#1,611
52. Utica 55.3% 30.0% (+25.3)#52 33.4% (+21.9)#1,622
53. West Elkton 55.3% 30.0% (+25.3)#53 33.4% (+21.9)#1,639
54. Girard 55.2% 30.0% (+25.2)#54 33.4% (+21.8)#1,643
55. Pioneer 55.1% 30.0% (+25.1)#55 33.4% (+21.7)#1,668
56. Springdale 55.0% 30.0% (+25.0)#56 33.4% (+21.6)#1,676
57. Williamsburg 55.0% 30.0% (+25.0)#57 33.4% (+21.6)#1,680
58. Put In Bay 55.0% 30.0% (+25.0)#58 33.4% (+21.6)#1,687
59. Roseville 54.9% 30.0% (+24.9)#59 33.4% (+21.5)#1,696
60. Reynoldsburg 54.6% 30.0% (+24.6)#60 33.4% (+21.2)#1,720
61. Conneaut 54.6% 30.0% (+24.6)#61 33.4% (+21.2)#1,722
62. Chesapeake 54.5% 30.0% (+24.5)#62 33.4% (+21.1)#1,754
63. West Liberty 54.2% 30.0% (+24.2)#63 33.4% (+20.8)#1,818
64. Elmore 53.6% 30.0% (+23.6)#64 33.4% (+20.2)#1,909
65. Minerva 53.5% 30.0% (+23.5)#65 33.4% (+20.1)#1,919
66. Mcconnelsville 53.5% 30.0% (+23.5)#66 33.4% (+20.1)#1,924
67. Gettysburg 53.5% 30.0% (+23.5)#67 33.4% (+20.1)#1,937
68. Stratton 53.5% 30.0% (+23.5)#68 33.4% (+20.1)#1,941
69. New Philadelphia 53.4% 30.0% (+23.4)#69 33.4% (+20.0)#1,950
70. Xenia 53.3% 30.0% (+23.3)#70 33.4% (+19.9)#1,965
71. Pandora 53.1% 30.0% (+23.1)#71 33.4% (+19.7)#2,015
72. Medina 53.0% 30.0% (+23.0)#72 33.4% (+19.6)#2,022
73. Norton 52.9% 30.0% (+22.9)#73 33.4% (+19.5)#2,044
74. Wyoming 52.7% 30.0% (+22.7)#74 33.4% (+19.3)#2,080
75. Seaman 52.5% 30.0% (+22.5)#75 33.4% (+19.1)#2,125
76. Bridgetown 52.3% 30.0% (+22.3)#76 33.4% (+18.9)#2,162
77. Rittman 52.3% 30.0% (+22.3)#77 33.4% (+18.9)#2,164
78. Wayne 52.2% 30.0% (+22.2)#78 33.4% (+18.8)#2,202
79. Seven Hills 52.1% 30.0% (+22.1)#79 33.4% (+18.7)#2,216
80. Bradner 52.1% 30.0% (+22.1)#80 33.4% (+18.7)#2,223
81. Willowick 52.0% 30.0% (+22.0)#81 33.4% (+18.6)#2,233
82. West Lafayette 51.9% 30.0% (+21.9)#82 33.4% (+18.5)#2,249
83. Maumee 51.6% 30.0% (+21.6)#83 33.4% (+18.2)#2,281
84. Loveland 51.5% 30.0% (+21.5)#84 33.4% (+18.1)#2,293
85. Geneva On The Lake 51.5% 30.0% (+21.5)#85 33.4% (+18.1)#2,311
86. Alexandria 51.5% 30.0% (+21.5)#86 33.4% (+18.1)#2,315
87. Fredericksburg 51.5% 30.0% (+21.5)#87 33.4% (+18.1)#2,319
88. Hudson 51.3% 30.0% (+21.3)#88 33.4% (+17.9)#2,339
89. Glendale 51.3% 30.0% (+21.3)#89 33.4% (+17.9)#2,352
90. Mount Healthy 51.1% 30.0% (+21.1)#90 33.4% (+17.7)#2,383
91. Elyria 50.8% 30.0% (+20.8)#91 33.4% (+17.4)#2,423
92. Mccomb 50.8% 30.0% (+20.8)#92 33.4% (+17.4)#2,430
93. Rushsylvania 50.5% 30.0% (+20.5)#93 33.4% (+17.1)#2,505
94. Sugar Grove 50.5% 30.0% (+20.5)#94 33.4% (+17.1)#2,508
95. Chickasaw 50.5% 30.0% (+20.5)#95 33.4% (+17.1)#2,509
96. Perry 50.3% 30.0% (+20.3)#96 33.4% (+16.9)#2,550
97. Celina 50.0% 30.0% (+20.0)#97 33.4% (+16.6)#2,604
98. Beachwood 49.9% 30.0% (+19.9)#98 33.4% (+16.5)#2,623
99. Sharonville 49.6% 30.0% (+19.6)#99 33.4% (+16.2)#2,667
100. Ironton 49.6% 30.0% (+19.6)#100 33.4% (+16.2)#2,668

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Ohio are:
#1
89.2%
#2
72.1%
#3
68.9%
#4
68.5%
#5
68.1%
#6
67.3%
#7
65.8%
#8
65.3%
#9
65.1%
#10
64.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Ohio?
Pickerington has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Ohio with 89.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Ohio is 30.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.