Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Talmage 71.5% 33.9% (+37.6)#1 33.4% (+38.1)#81
2. Pleasant Dale 70.7% 33.9% (+36.8)#2 33.4% (+37.3)#99
3. Wisner 68.5% 33.9% (+34.6)#3 33.4% (+35.1)#159
4. Deshler 67.8% 33.9% (+33.9)#4 33.4% (+34.4)#191
5. Scribner 67.3% 33.9% (+33.4)#5 33.4% (+33.9)#217
6. Homer 67.3% 33.9% (+33.4)#6 33.4% (+33.9)#218
7. Taylor 67.3% 33.9% (+33.4)#7 33.4% (+33.9)#222
8. Ruskin 66.3% 33.9% (+32.4)#8 33.4% (+32.9)#271
9. Denton 66.2% 33.9% (+32.3)#9 33.4% (+32.8)#279
10. Wallace 65.8% 33.9% (+31.9)#10 33.4% (+32.4)#301
11. Daykin 65.5% 33.9% (+31.6)#11 33.4% (+32.1)#317
12. Dodge 65.3% 33.9% (+31.4)#12 33.4% (+31.9)#332
13. Gurley 65.3% 33.9% (+31.4)#13 33.4% (+31.9)#334
14. Chambers 64.8% 33.9% (+30.9)#14 33.4% (+31.4)#363
15. Bennington 64.5% 33.9% (+30.6)#15 33.4% (+31.1)#374
16. Valentine 64.4% 33.9% (+30.5)#16 33.4% (+31.0)#389
17. Bassett 64.3% 33.9% (+30.4)#17 33.4% (+30.9)#401
18. Elba 63.7% 33.9% (+29.8)#18 33.4% (+30.3)#437
19. Shickley 63.6% 33.9% (+29.7)#19 33.4% (+30.2)#443
20. Loup City 63.5% 33.9% (+29.6)#20 33.4% (+30.1)#451
21. Wolbach 63.2% 33.9% (+29.3)#21 33.4% (+29.8)#491
22. Ponca 62.9% 33.9% (+29.0)#22 33.4% (+29.5)#515
23. Loomis 62.5% 33.9% (+28.6)#23 33.4% (+29.1)#550
24. Madrid 62.5% 33.9% (+28.6)#24 33.4% (+29.1)#552
25. Sumner 62.3% 33.9% (+28.4)#25 33.4% (+28.9)#582
26. Shelby 62.2% 33.9% (+28.3)#26 33.4% (+28.8)#594
27. Valparaiso 61.8% 33.9% (+27.9)#27 33.4% (+28.4)#624
28. Hyannis 61.5% 33.9% (+27.6)#28 33.4% (+28.1)#665
29. Bridgeport 61.0% 33.9% (+27.1)#29 33.4% (+27.6)#727
30. Stuart 60.9% 33.9% (+27.0)#30 33.4% (+27.5)#736
31. Hartington 60.7% 33.9% (+26.8)#31 33.4% (+27.3)#749
32. Spalding 60.5% 33.9% (+26.6)#32 33.4% (+27.1)#788
33. Brewster 60.5% 33.9% (+26.6)#33 33.4% (+27.1)#797
34. Hildreth 60.3% 33.9% (+26.4)#34 33.4% (+26.9)#836
35. Creighton 60.2% 33.9% (+26.3)#35 33.4% (+26.8)#847
36. Eustis 59.8% 33.9% (+25.9)#36 33.4% (+26.4)#891
37. Beaver Crossing 59.8% 33.9% (+25.9)#37 33.4% (+26.4)#892
38. Valley 59.6% 33.9% (+25.7)#38 33.4% (+26.2)#900
39. Fairbury 59.5% 33.9% (+25.6)#39 33.4% (+26.1)#912
40. Murray 59.5% 33.9% (+25.6)#40 33.4% (+26.1)#924
41. Orleans 59.5% 33.9% (+25.6)#41 33.4% (+26.1)#925
42. Stapleton 59.2% 33.9% (+25.3)#42 33.4% (+25.8)#986
43. Tilden 59.1% 33.9% (+25.2)#43 33.4% (+25.7)#1,004
44. Osceola 59.1% 33.9% (+25.2)#44 33.4% (+25.7)#1,008
45. Dorchester 59.1% 33.9% (+25.2)#45 33.4% (+25.7)#1,010
46. Butte 58.8% 33.9% (+24.9)#46 33.4% (+25.4)#1,034
47. Johnson 58.8% 33.9% (+24.9)#47 33.4% (+25.4)#1,036
48. Axtell 58.5% 33.9% (+24.6)#48 33.4% (+25.1)#1,080
49. Orchard 58.5% 33.9% (+24.6)#49 33.4% (+25.1)#1,087
50. Greeley Center 58.4% 33.9% (+24.5)#50 33.4% (+25.0)#1,114
51. Neligh 58.2% 33.9% (+24.3)#51 33.4% (+24.8)#1,140
52. Tryon 58.2% 33.9% (+24.3)#52 33.4% (+24.8)#1,144
53. Broadwater 58.0% 33.9% (+24.1)#53 33.4% (+24.6)#1,167
54. Kenesaw 57.7% 33.9% (+23.8)#54 33.4% (+24.3)#1,199
55. Hay Springs 57.4% 33.9% (+23.5)#55 33.4% (+24.0)#1,252
56. Wilber 57.2% 33.9% (+23.3)#56 33.4% (+23.8)#1,293
57. Harvard 56.7% 33.9% (+22.8)#57 33.4% (+23.3)#1,357
58. Hershey 56.6% 33.9% (+22.7)#58 33.4% (+23.2)#1,372
59. Ewing 56.5% 33.9% (+22.6)#59 33.4% (+23.1)#1,411
60. Benkelman 56.3% 33.9% (+22.4)#60 33.4% (+22.9)#1,455
61. Lewellen 56.2% 33.9% (+22.3)#61 33.4% (+22.8)#1,476
62. Lexington 55.8% 33.9% (+21.9)#62 33.4% (+22.4)#1,511
63. Scotia 55.8% 33.9% (+21.9)#63 33.4% (+22.4)#1,519
64. Winnebago 55.3% 33.9% (+21.4)#64 33.4% (+21.9)#1,627
65. Potter 55.3% 33.9% (+21.4)#65 33.4% (+21.9)#1,635
66. Pierce 55.0% 33.9% (+21.1)#66 33.4% (+21.6)#1,681
67. Malcolm 54.8% 33.9% (+20.9)#67 33.4% (+21.4)#1,710
68. Palmer 54.5% 33.9% (+20.6)#68 33.4% (+21.1)#1,764
69. Plainview 54.4% 33.9% (+20.5)#69 33.4% (+21.0)#1,776
70. Hebron 54.3% 33.9% (+20.4)#70 33.4% (+20.9)#1,792
71. Shelton 54.2% 33.9% (+20.3)#71 33.4% (+20.8)#1,821
72. Cody 54.0% 33.9% (+20.1)#72 33.4% (+20.6)#1,852
73. Kimball 53.8% 33.9% (+19.9)#73 33.4% (+20.4)#1,870
74. Meadow Grove 53.8% 33.9% (+19.9)#74 33.4% (+20.4)#1,880
75. Arapahoe 53.7% 33.9% (+19.8)#75 33.4% (+20.3)#1,891
76. Brunswick 53.5% 33.9% (+19.6)#76 33.4% (+20.1)#1,947
77. Palmyra 53.4% 33.9% (+19.5)#77 33.4% (+20.0)#1,958
78. Bellevue 53.1% 33.9% (+19.2)#78 33.4% (+19.7)#2,003
79. Cordova 52.9% 33.9% (+19.0)#79 33.4% (+19.5)#2,055
80. Ashland 52.5% 33.9% (+18.6)#80 33.4% (+19.1)#2,112
81. Louisville 52.5% 33.9% (+18.6)#81 33.4% (+19.1)#2,121
82. Arnold 52.5% 33.9% (+18.6)#82 33.4% (+19.1)#2,128
83. Howells 52.5% 33.9% (+18.6)#83 33.4% (+19.1)#2,130
84. Morrill 52.4% 33.9% (+18.5)#84 33.4% (+19.0)#2,156
85. Pender 52.0% 33.9% (+18.1)#85 33.4% (+18.6)#2,239
86. Ogallala 51.9% 33.9% (+18.0)#86 33.4% (+18.5)#2,248
87. Waco 51.6% 33.9% (+17.7)#87 33.4% (+18.2)#2,288
88. Ord 51.5% 33.9% (+17.6)#88 33.4% (+18.1)#2,301
89. Newman Grove 51.5% 33.9% (+17.6)#89 33.4% (+18.1)#2,312
90. Coleridge 51.5% 33.9% (+17.6)#90 33.4% (+18.1)#2,314
91. Snyder 51.5% 33.9% (+17.6)#91 33.4% (+18.1)#2,320
92. Kennard 51.0% 33.9% (+17.1)#92 33.4% (+17.6)#2,415
93. Alma 50.6% 33.9% (+16.7)#93 33.4% (+17.2)#2,471
94. Decatur 50.6% 33.9% (+16.7)#94 33.4% (+17.2)#2,474
95. Bladen 50.5% 33.9% (+16.6)#95 33.4% (+17.1)#2,511
96. Humboldt 50.4% 33.9% (+16.5)#96 33.4% (+17.0)#2,532
97. Clearwater 50.3% 33.9% (+16.4)#97 33.4% (+16.9)#2,560
98. Niobrara 50.2% 33.9% (+16.3)#98 33.4% (+16.8)#2,579
99. Hemingford 50.0% 33.9% (+16.1)#99 33.4% (+16.6)#2,612
100. Beemer 49.9% 33.9% (+16.0)#100 33.4% (+16.5)#2,631

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska are:
#1
71.5%
#2
70.7%
#3
68.5%
#4
67.8%
#5
67.3%
#6
67.3%
#7
67.3%
#8
66.3%
#9
66.2%
#10
65.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska?
Talmage has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska with 71.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska is 33.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.