Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alabama

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alabama

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Rockford 76.3% 33.9% (+42.4)#1 33.4% (+42.9)#33
2. Vestavia Hills 69.4% 33.9% (+35.5)#2 33.4% (+36.0)#125
3. Oxford 68.4% 33.9% (+34.5)#3 33.4% (+35.0)#166
4. Henagar 66.9% 33.9% (+33.0)#4 33.4% (+33.5)#235
5. Pleasant Grove 66.2% 33.9% (+32.3)#5 33.4% (+32.8)#273
6. Tillmans Corner 65.4% 33.9% (+31.5)#6 33.4% (+32.0)#318
7. Summerdale 64.6% 33.9% (+30.7)#7 33.4% (+31.2)#369
8. Eutaw 64.4% 33.9% (+30.5)#8 33.4% (+31.0)#388
9. Mountain Brook 63.1% 33.9% (+29.2)#9 33.4% (+29.7)#492
10. Helena 63.0% 33.9% (+29.1)#10 33.4% (+29.6)#507
11. Monroeville 60.4% 33.9% (+26.5)#11 33.4% (+27.0)#804
12. Albertville 59.0% 33.9% (+25.1)#12 33.4% (+25.6)#1,013
13. Irondale 58.6% 33.9% (+24.7)#13 33.4% (+25.2)#1,049
14. Orange Beach 58.3% 33.9% (+24.4)#14 33.4% (+24.9)#1,118
15. Samson 57.5% 33.9% (+23.6)#15 33.4% (+24.1)#1,228
16. Cullman 57.0% 33.9% (+23.1)#16 33.4% (+23.6)#1,318
17. Eufaula 56.2% 33.9% (+22.3)#17 33.4% (+22.8)#1,465
18. Scottsboro 55.7% 33.9% (+21.8)#18 33.4% (+22.3)#1,524
19. Prattville 53.6% 33.9% (+19.7)#19 33.4% (+20.2)#1,896
20. Talladega 52.7% 33.9% (+18.8)#20 33.4% (+19.3)#2,077
21. Opp 51.6% 33.9% (+17.7)#21 33.4% (+18.2)#2,282
22. Bessemer 51.1% 33.9% (+17.2)#22 33.4% (+17.7)#2,376
23. Marbury 50.7% 33.9% (+16.8)#23 33.4% (+17.3)#2,452
24. Eclectic 50.3% 33.9% (+16.4)#24 33.4% (+16.9)#2,552
25. Grant 49.8% 33.9% (+15.9)#25 33.4% (+16.4)#2,639
26. Columbia 49.8% 33.9% (+15.9)#26 33.4% (+16.4)#2,642
27. Hoover 49.5% 33.9% (+15.6)#27 33.4% (+16.1)#2,682
28. Fairfield 49.4% 33.9% (+15.5)#28 33.4% (+16.0)#2,726
29. Madison 47.4% 33.9% (+13.5)#29 33.4% (+14.0)#3,099
30. Trussville 47.4% 33.9% (+13.5)#30 33.4% (+14.0)#3,102
31. Enterprise 47.2% 33.9% (+13.3)#31 33.4% (+13.8)#3,150
32. Decatur 45.2% 33.9% (+11.3)#32 33.4% (+11.8)#3,533
33. Grove Hill 44.5% 33.9% (+10.6)#33 33.4% (+11.1)#3,677
34. Dothan 42.6% 33.9% (+8.70)#34 33.4% (+9.20)#4,050
35. Anniston 42.2% 33.9% (+8.30)#35 33.4% (+8.80)#4,175
36. Waverly 41.8% 33.9% (+7.90)#36 33.4% (+8.40)#4,259
37. Selma 40.8% 33.9% (+6.90)#37 33.4% (+7.40)#4,486
38. Hartford 40.7% 33.9% (+6.80)#38 33.4% (+7.30)#4,524
39. Arab 40.5% 33.9% (+6.60)#39 33.4% (+7.10)#4,570
40. Chickasaw 40.5% 33.9% (+6.60)#40 33.4% (+7.10)#4,572
41. Guntersville 40.0% 33.9% (+6.10)#41 33.4% (+6.60)#4,697
42. Opelika 37.9% 33.9% (+4.00)#42 33.4% (+4.50)#5,167
43. Leeds 37.8% 33.9% (+3.90)#43 33.4% (+4.40)#5,194
44. Gadsden 36.7% 33.9% (+2.80)#44 33.4% (+3.30)#5,476
45. Montgomery 36.1% 33.9% (+2.20)#45 33.4% (+2.70)#5,623
46. Mobile 35.5% 33.9% (+1.60)#46 33.4% (+2.10)#5,776
47. Lanett 35.2% 33.9% (+1.30)#47 33.4% (+1.80)#5,891
48. Fairhope 33.9% 33.9% (=0.000)#48 33.4% (+0.500)#6,218
49. Bay Minette 33.5% 33.9% (-0.400)#49 33.4% (+0.100)#6,336
50. Athens 33.4% 33.9% (-0.500)#50 33.4% (=0.000)#6,369
51. Louisville 32.6% 33.9% (-1.30)#51 33.4% (-0.800)#6,574
52. Collinsville 31.4% 33.9% (-2.50)#52 33.4% (-2.00)#6,862
53. Tallassee 30.0% 33.9% (-3.90)#53 33.4% (-3.40)#7,191
54. Birmingham 29.8% 33.9% (-4.10)#54 33.4% (-3.60)#7,232
55. Foley 29.3% 33.9% (-4.60)#55 33.4% (-4.10)#7,388
56. Florence 29.1% 33.9% (-4.80)#56 33.4% (-4.30)#7,413
57. Sumiton 29.1% 33.9% (-4.80)#57 33.4% (-4.30)#7,427
58. Fort Payne 27.7% 33.9% (-6.20)#58 33.4% (-5.70)#7,766
59. Phenix City 25.6% 33.9% (-8.30)#59 33.4% (-7.80)#8,191
60. Huntsville 22.8% 33.9% (-11.1)#60 33.4% (-10.6)#8,780
61. Auburn 22.8% 33.9% (-11.1)#61 33.4% (-10.6)#8,781
62. Prichard 22.5% 33.9% (-11.4)#62 33.4% (-10.9)#8,878
63. Tuscaloosa 22.4% 33.9% (-11.5)#63 33.4% (-11.0)#8,902
64. Fort Rucker 22.4% 33.9% (-11.5)#64 33.4% (-11.0)#8,912
65. Livingston 22.0% 33.9% (-11.9)#65 33.4% (-11.4)#8,988
66. Redstone Arsenal 21.9% 33.9% (-12.0)#66 33.4% (-11.5)#9,032
67. Troy 21.8% 33.9% (-12.1)#67 33.4% (-11.6)#9,050
68. Marion 21.2% 33.9% (-12.7)#68 33.4% (-12.2)#9,275
69. Homewood 20.8% 33.9% (-13.1)#69 33.4% (-12.6)#9,405
70. Montevallo 20.3% 33.9% (-13.6)#70 33.4% (-13.1)#9,597
71. Jacksonville 19.8% 33.9% (-14.1)#71 33.4% (-13.6)#9,702
72. Tuskegee 19.7% 33.9% (-14.2)#72 33.4% (-13.7)#9,728
73. Hanceville 19.7% 33.9% (-14.2)#73 33.4% (-13.7)#9,736
74. Wadley 19.1% 33.9% (-14.8)#74 33.4% (-14.3)#9,796
75. Daphne 17.5% 33.9% (-16.4)#75 33.4% (-15.9)#9,925
76. Jasper 16.9% 33.9% (-17.0)#76 33.4% (-16.5)#9,936

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alabama are:
#1
76.3%
#2
69.4%
#3
68.4%
#4
66.9%
#5
66.2%
#6
65.4%
#7
64.6%
#8
64.4%
#9
63.1%
#10
63.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alabama?
Rockford has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alabama with 76.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alabama is 33.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.