Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Spring Valley Village 73.1% 32.0% (+41.1)#1 33.4% (+39.7)#63
2. Rockport 72.2% 32.0% (+40.2)#2 33.4% (+38.8)#70
3. Alton 69.3% 32.0% (+37.3)#3 33.4% (+35.9)#128
4. Rotan 69.3% 32.0% (+37.3)#4 33.4% (+35.9)#133
5. Hedwig Village 68.8% 32.0% (+36.8)#5 33.4% (+35.4)#151
6. Timberwood Park 68.7% 32.0% (+36.7)#6 33.4% (+35.3)#153
7. Marfa 68.2% 32.0% (+36.2)#7 33.4% (+34.8)#176
8. Port Aransas 67.9% 32.0% (+35.9)#8 33.4% (+34.5)#187
9. Jersey Village 67.7% 32.0% (+35.7)#9 33.4% (+34.3)#193
10. Godley 67.5% 32.0% (+35.5)#10 33.4% (+34.1)#200
11. Atascocita 67.3% 32.0% (+35.3)#11 33.4% (+33.9)#213
12. Alice 66.3% 32.0% (+34.3)#12 33.4% (+32.9)#263
13. Rio Grande City 66.2% 32.0% (+34.2)#13 33.4% (+32.8)#272
14. Hill Country Village 65.3% 32.0% (+33.3)#14 33.4% (+31.9)#329
15. Greenville 65.0% 32.0% (+33.0)#15 33.4% (+31.6)#352
16. Stamford 64.3% 32.0% (+32.3)#16 33.4% (+30.9)#394
17. Duncanville 63.7% 32.0% (+31.7)#17 33.4% (+30.3)#434
18. Groves 63.5% 32.0% (+31.5)#18 33.4% (+30.1)#444
19. Timpson 63.4% 32.0% (+31.4)#19 33.4% (+30.0)#470
20. Pittsburg 63.3% 32.0% (+31.3)#20 33.4% (+29.9)#474
21. Copper Canyon 63.2% 32.0% (+31.2)#21 33.4% (+29.8)#486
22. White Deer 63.1% 32.0% (+31.1)#22 33.4% (+29.7)#502
23. Heath 62.4% 32.0% (+30.4)#23 33.4% (+29.0)#558
24. Snyder 62.3% 32.0% (+30.3)#24 33.4% (+28.9)#567
25. Lorena 62.3% 32.0% (+30.3)#25 33.4% (+28.9)#576
26. Hillsboro 62.1% 32.0% (+30.1)#26 33.4% (+28.7)#601
27. Lost Creek 61.4% 32.0% (+29.4)#27 33.4% (+28.0)#675
28. Milford 60.7% 32.0% (+28.7)#28 33.4% (+27.3)#750
29. Alpine 60.5% 32.0% (+28.5)#29 33.4% (+27.1)#770
30. Bridgeport 60.3% 32.0% (+28.3)#30 33.4% (+26.9)#821
31. Graham 60.1% 32.0% (+28.1)#31 33.4% (+26.7)#858
32. The Hills 59.8% 32.0% (+27.8)#32 33.4% (+26.4)#883
33. Anderson 59.1% 32.0% (+27.1)#33 33.4% (+25.7)#1,011
34. Roanoke 58.4% 32.0% (+26.4)#34 33.4% (+25.0)#1,101
35. South Padre Island 58.4% 32.0% (+26.4)#35 33.4% (+25.0)#1,107
36. Richmond 58.3% 32.0% (+26.3)#36 33.4% (+24.9)#1,116
37. Spur 58.3% 32.0% (+26.3)#37 33.4% (+24.9)#1,125
38. Sulphur Springs 58.1% 32.0% (+26.1)#38 33.4% (+24.7)#1,145
39. Alamo 57.8% 32.0% (+25.8)#39 33.4% (+24.4)#1,175
40. Lockney 57.6% 32.0% (+25.6)#40 33.4% (+24.2)#1,211
41. Grapevine 56.5% 32.0% (+24.5)#41 33.4% (+23.1)#1,376
42. Troup 56.4% 32.0% (+24.4)#42 33.4% (+23.0)#1,431
43. Rollingwood 56.2% 32.0% (+24.2)#43 33.4% (+22.8)#1,474
44. South Houston 55.8% 32.0% (+23.8)#44 33.4% (+22.4)#1,509
45. Crosbyton 55.8% 32.0% (+23.8)#45 33.4% (+22.4)#1,515
46. Royse City 55.7% 32.0% (+23.7)#46 33.4% (+22.3)#1,525
47. Lockhart 55.7% 32.0% (+23.7)#47 33.4% (+22.3)#1,526
48. Hudson Bend 55.7% 32.0% (+23.7)#48 33.4% (+22.3)#1,530
49. Amherst 55.6% 32.0% (+23.6)#49 33.4% (+22.2)#1,545
50. Comfort 55.4% 32.0% (+23.4)#50 33.4% (+22.0)#1,597
51. Mexia 55.3% 32.0% (+23.3)#51 33.4% (+21.9)#1,614
52. Lindale 54.9% 32.0% (+22.9)#52 33.4% (+21.5)#1,694
53. Friendswood 54.8% 32.0% (+22.8)#53 33.4% (+21.4)#1,699
54. Coppell 54.2% 32.0% (+22.2)#54 33.4% (+20.8)#1,803
55. La Feria 54.2% 32.0% (+22.2)#55 33.4% (+20.8)#1,811
56. San Isidro 54.2% 32.0% (+22.2)#56 33.4% (+20.8)#1,826
57. Rowlett 53.7% 32.0% (+21.7)#57 33.4% (+20.3)#1,882
58. Dilley 53.7% 32.0% (+21.7)#58 33.4% (+20.3)#1,887
59. Bay City 53.6% 32.0% (+21.6)#59 33.4% (+20.2)#1,902
60. Denison 53.3% 32.0% (+21.3)#60 33.4% (+19.9)#1,966
61. Combes 53.1% 32.0% (+21.1)#61 33.4% (+19.7)#2,014
62. Big Spring 52.9% 32.0% (+20.9)#62 33.4% (+19.5)#2,042
63. Bullard 52.3% 32.0% (+20.3)#63 33.4% (+18.9)#2,169
64. Spring 52.0% 32.0% (+20.0)#64 33.4% (+18.6)#2,228
65. Pharr 51.7% 32.0% (+19.7)#65 33.4% (+18.3)#2,263
66. Corrigan 51.5% 32.0% (+19.5)#66 33.4% (+18.1)#2,302
67. Montgomery 51.5% 32.0% (+19.5)#67 33.4% (+18.1)#2,305
68. Rogers 51.3% 32.0% (+19.3)#68 33.4% (+17.9)#2,355
69. Vega 50.8% 32.0% (+18.8)#69 33.4% (+17.4)#2,433
70. Shady Shores 50.7% 32.0% (+18.7)#70 33.4% (+17.3)#2,451
71. San Benito 50.6% 32.0% (+18.6)#71 33.4% (+17.2)#2,463
72. Johnson City 50.6% 32.0% (+18.6)#72 33.4% (+17.2)#2,469
73. Missouri City 50.5% 32.0% (+18.5)#73 33.4% (+17.1)#2,477
74. Texas City 50.5% 32.0% (+18.5)#74 33.4% (+17.1)#2,480
75. Big Sandy 50.5% 32.0% (+18.5)#75 33.4% (+17.1)#2,497
76. West University Place 50.1% 32.0% (+18.1)#76 33.4% (+16.7)#2,586
77. Hallettsville 50.1% 32.0% (+18.1)#77 33.4% (+16.7)#2,591
78. Balch Springs 50.0% 32.0% (+18.0)#78 33.4% (+16.6)#2,601
79. Gainesville 49.9% 32.0% (+17.9)#79 33.4% (+16.5)#2,622
80. Brushy Creek 49.8% 32.0% (+17.8)#80 33.4% (+16.4)#2,634
81. Normangee 49.6% 32.0% (+17.6)#81 33.4% (+16.2)#2,676
82. Del Rio 49.5% 32.0% (+17.5)#82 33.4% (+16.1)#2,683
83. Nederland 49.4% 32.0% (+17.4)#83 33.4% (+16.0)#2,722
84. Breckenridge 49.3% 32.0% (+17.3)#84 33.4% (+15.9)#2,746
85. Encinal 49.3% 32.0% (+17.3)#85 33.4% (+15.9)#2,753
86. Desoto 49.2% 32.0% (+17.2)#86 33.4% (+15.8)#2,762
87. Sugar Land 48.8% 32.0% (+16.8)#87 33.4% (+15.4)#2,827
88. Pearland 48.7% 32.0% (+16.7)#88 33.4% (+15.3)#2,846
89. San Augustine 48.6% 32.0% (+16.6)#89 33.4% (+15.2)#2,865
90. Winnie 48.5% 32.0% (+16.5)#90 33.4% (+15.1)#2,882
91. Albany 48.4% 32.0% (+16.4)#91 33.4% (+15.0)#2,917
92. Mission 48.3% 32.0% (+16.3)#92 33.4% (+14.9)#2,924
93. Santa Fe 48.1% 32.0% (+16.1)#93 33.4% (+14.7)#2,977
94. Creedmoor 48.1% 32.0% (+16.1)#94 33.4% (+14.7)#2,990
95. Wolfe City 48.0% 32.0% (+16.0)#95 33.4% (+14.6)#3,005
96. Granbury 47.8% 32.0% (+15.8)#96 33.4% (+14.4)#3,027
97. Homestead Meadows North 47.6% 32.0% (+15.6)#97 33.4% (+14.2)#3,061
98. Nordheim 47.6% 32.0% (+15.6)#98 33.4% (+14.2)#3,065
99. Schertz 47.3% 32.0% (+15.3)#99 33.4% (+13.9)#3,121
100. Brownfield 47.1% 32.0% (+15.1)#100 33.4% (+13.7)#3,177

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas are:
#1
73.1%
#2
72.2%
#3
69.3%
#4
69.3%
#5
68.8%
#6
68.7%
#7
68.2%
#8
67.9%
#9
67.7%
#10
67.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas?
Spring Valley Village has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas with 73.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Texas is 32.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.