Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Beach 77.0% 34.8% (+42.2)#1 33.4% (+43.6)#28
2. Carson 70.5% 34.8% (+35.7)#2 33.4% (+37.1)#106
3. Munich 69.8% 34.8% (+35.0)#3 33.4% (+36.4)#120
4. Stanton 68.5% 34.8% (+33.7)#4 33.4% (+35.1)#163
5. Bowbells 67.7% 34.8% (+32.9)#5 33.4% (+34.3)#194
6. Lakota 66.1% 34.8% (+31.3)#6 33.4% (+32.7)#289
7. Buchanan 65.2% 34.8% (+30.4)#7 33.4% (+31.8)#344
8. Fairmount 64.5% 34.8% (+29.7)#8 33.4% (+31.1)#382
9. Fessenden 64.0% 34.8% (+29.2)#9 33.4% (+30.6)#421
10. Golva 63.1% 34.8% (+28.3)#10 33.4% (+29.7)#505
11. Drayton 62.7% 34.8% (+27.9)#11 33.4% (+29.3)#529
12. Rugby 62.5% 34.8% (+27.7)#12 33.4% (+29.1)#541
13. Richardton 62.5% 34.8% (+27.7)#13 33.4% (+29.1)#546
14. Elgin 61.9% 34.8% (+27.1)#14 33.4% (+28.5)#618
15. Drake 61.6% 34.8% (+26.8)#15 33.4% (+28.2)#643
16. Grandin 61.5% 34.8% (+26.7)#16 33.4% (+28.1)#663
17. Portal 61.5% 34.8% (+26.7)#17 33.4% (+28.1)#664
18. Lehr 61.5% 34.8% (+26.7)#18 33.4% (+28.1)#666
19. Hebron 61.3% 34.8% (+26.5)#19 33.4% (+27.9)#692
20. Hannaford 61.0% 34.8% (+26.2)#20 33.4% (+27.6)#731
21. Ashley 60.5% 34.8% (+25.7)#21 33.4% (+27.1)#785
22. Maddock 60.5% 34.8% (+25.7)#22 33.4% (+27.1)#789
23. Lisbon 60.1% 34.8% (+25.3)#23 33.4% (+26.7)#859
24. Medina 59.5% 34.8% (+24.7)#24 33.4% (+26.1)#930
25. Wyndmere 59.3% 34.8% (+24.5)#25 33.4% (+25.9)#962
26. Flasher 58.5% 34.8% (+23.7)#26 33.4% (+25.1)#1,092
27. Mandaree 58.4% 34.8% (+23.6)#27 33.4% (+25.0)#1,112
28. Sherwood 58.3% 34.8% (+23.5)#28 33.4% (+24.9)#1,132
29. Pick City 58.3% 34.8% (+23.5)#29 33.4% (+24.9)#1,134
30. Berthold 57.8% 34.8% (+23.0)#30 33.4% (+24.4)#1,184
31. Esmond 57.8% 34.8% (+23.0)#31 33.4% (+24.4)#1,187
32. Gilby 57.5% 34.8% (+22.7)#32 33.4% (+24.1)#1,239
33. Edgeley 56.3% 34.8% (+21.5)#33 33.4% (+22.9)#1,458
34. Washburn 56.2% 34.8% (+21.4)#34 33.4% (+22.8)#1,475
35. Gackle 55.7% 34.8% (+20.9)#35 33.4% (+22.3)#1,533
36. Grenora 55.5% 34.8% (+20.7)#36 33.4% (+22.1)#1,578
37. Reynolds 55.2% 34.8% (+20.4)#37 33.4% (+21.8)#1,653
38. Turtle Lake 54.2% 34.8% (+19.4)#38 33.4% (+20.8)#1,825
39. Kindred 53.7% 34.8% (+18.9)#39 33.4% (+20.3)#1,892
40. Strasburg 53.5% 34.8% (+18.7)#40 33.4% (+20.1)#1,939
41. Lansford 53.5% 34.8% (+18.7)#41 33.4% (+20.1)#1,945
42. Streeter 53.3% 34.8% (+18.5)#42 33.4% (+19.9)#1,984
43. Buffalo 52.5% 34.8% (+17.7)#43 33.4% (+19.1)#2,145
44. Cando 51.8% 34.8% (+17.0)#44 33.4% (+18.4)#2,258
45. Anamoose 51.6% 34.8% (+16.8)#45 33.4% (+18.2)#2,287
46. Sykeston 51.1% 34.8% (+16.3)#46 33.4% (+17.7)#2,394
47. Thompson 50.5% 34.8% (+15.7)#47 33.4% (+17.1)#2,499
48. Arthur 50.0% 34.8% (+15.2)#48 33.4% (+16.6)#2,615
49. Lignite 49.8% 34.8% (+15.0)#49 33.4% (+16.4)#2,646
50. Kenmare 49.3% 34.8% (+14.5)#50 33.4% (+15.9)#2,756
51. Glen Ullin 48.3% 34.8% (+13.5)#51 33.4% (+14.9)#2,946
52. Lamoure 48.0% 34.8% (+13.2)#52 33.4% (+14.6)#3,009
53. Langdon 47.4% 34.8% (+12.6)#53 33.4% (+14.0)#3,116
54. Velva 47.2% 34.8% (+12.4)#54 33.4% (+13.8)#3,161
55. Manvel 47.0% 34.8% (+12.2)#55 33.4% (+13.6)#3,200
56. Bowman 46.8% 34.8% (+12.0)#56 33.4% (+13.4)#3,219
57. Forman 46.8% 34.8% (+12.0)#57 33.4% (+13.4)#3,221
58. Minto 46.4% 34.8% (+11.6)#58 33.4% (+13.0)#3,298
59. Hettinger 45.6% 34.8% (+10.8)#59 33.4% (+12.2)#3,441
60. Hatton 45.6% 34.8% (+10.8)#60 33.4% (+12.2)#3,442
61. Stanley 44.7% 34.8% (+9.90)#61 33.4% (+11.3)#3,636
62. Garrison 44.5% 34.8% (+9.70)#62 33.4% (+11.1)#3,678
63. Casselton 43.5% 34.8% (+8.70)#63 33.4% (+10.1)#3,877
64. Rolla 43.2% 34.8% (+8.40)#64 33.4% (+9.80)#3,959
65. Hazen 42.6% 34.8% (+7.80)#65 33.4% (+9.20)#4,064
66. Gwinner 42.5% 34.8% (+7.70)#66 33.4% (+9.10)#4,101
67. New Town 42.3% 34.8% (+7.50)#67 33.4% (+8.90)#4,155
68. Northwood 42.3% 34.8% (+7.50)#68 33.4% (+8.90)#4,161
69. Killdeer 42.3% 34.8% (+7.50)#69 33.4% (+8.90)#4,163
70. Williston 41.5% 34.8% (+6.70)#70 33.4% (+8.10)#4,322
71. Dickinson 41.3% 34.8% (+6.50)#71 33.4% (+7.90)#4,393
72. Hazelton 41.3% 34.8% (+6.50)#72 33.4% (+7.90)#4,417
73. Grafton 40.6% 34.8% (+5.80)#73 33.4% (+7.20)#4,546
74. Hankinson 40.5% 34.8% (+5.70)#74 33.4% (+7.10)#4,585
75. Crosby 40.4% 34.8% (+5.60)#75 33.4% (+7.00)#4,621
76. Harvey 39.8% 34.8% (+5.00)#76 33.4% (+6.40)#4,738
77. Lidgerwood 38.8% 34.8% (+4.00)#77 33.4% (+5.40)#4,975
78. Linton 38.6% 34.8% (+3.80)#78 33.4% (+5.20)#5,025
79. White Shield 38.5% 34.8% (+3.70)#79 33.4% (+5.10)#5,060
80. Dunseith 38.4% 34.8% (+3.60)#80 33.4% (+5.00)#5,092
81. Wishek 37.8% 34.8% (+3.00)#81 33.4% (+4.40)#5,210
82. Napoleon 37.8% 34.8% (+3.00)#82 33.4% (+4.40)#5,211
83. Sheyenne 37.7% 34.8% (+2.90)#83 33.4% (+4.30)#5,243
84. Mott 36.8% 34.8% (+2.00)#84 33.4% (+3.40)#5,458
85. Westhope 36.8% 34.8% (+2.00)#85 33.4% (+3.40)#5,463
86. Mcville 36.8% 34.8% (+2.00)#86 33.4% (+3.40)#5,464
87. New Leipzig 36.8% 34.8% (+2.00)#87 33.4% (+3.40)#5,466
88. Carrington 36.0% 34.8% (+1.20)#88 33.4% (+2.60)#5,664
89. Ellendale 36.0% 34.8% (+1.20)#89 33.4% (+2.60)#5,671
90. Aneta 35.8% 34.8% (+1.00)#90 33.4% (+2.40)#5,730
91. Minnewaukan 35.5% 34.8% (+0.700)#91 33.4% (+2.10)#5,821
92. Abercrombie 34.9% 34.8% (+0.100)#92 33.4% (+1.50)#5,970
93. Wing 34.9% 34.8% (+0.100)#93 33.4% (+1.50)#5,972
94. Parshall 33.8% 34.8% (-1.00)#94 33.4% (+0.400)#6,260
95. Oakes 33.6% 34.8% (-1.20)#95 33.4% (+0.200)#6,309
96. Mcclusky 33.5% 34.8% (-1.30)#96 33.4% (+0.100)#6,359
97. Page 33.1% 34.8% (-1.70)#97 33.4% (-0.300)#6,441
98. Mandan 33.0% 34.8% (-1.80)#98 33.4% (-0.400)#6,447
99. Bismarck 32.3% 34.8% (-2.50)#99 33.4% (-1.10)#6,628
100. Hunter 31.5% 34.8% (-3.30)#100 33.4% (-1.90)#6,837

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota are:
#1
77.0%
#2
70.5%
#3
69.8%
#4
68.5%
#5
67.7%
#6
66.1%
#7
65.2%
#8
64.5%
#9
64.0%
#10
63.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota?
Beach has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota with 77.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in North Dakota is 34.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.