Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kentucky

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kentucky
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kentucky

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kentucky Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kentucky

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Bloomfield 78.4% 28.4% (+50.0)#1 33.4% (+45.0)#12
2. Franklin 77.3% 28.4% (+48.9)#2 33.4% (+43.9)#22
3. Villa Hills 74.6% 28.4% (+46.2)#3 33.4% (+41.2)#50
4. Olive Hill 71.4% 28.4% (+43.0)#4 33.4% (+38.0)#82
5. Meadowview Estates 70.3% 28.4% (+41.9)#5 33.4% (+36.9)#112
6. Raceland 67.6% 28.4% (+39.2)#6 33.4% (+34.2)#195
7. Pioneer Village 62.4% 28.4% (+34.0)#7 33.4% (+29.0)#562
8. Tompkinsville 62.3% 28.4% (+33.9)#8 33.4% (+28.9)#573
9. Stanford 62.0% 28.4% (+33.6)#9 33.4% (+28.6)#610
10. Vanceburg 61.8% 28.4% (+33.4)#10 33.4% (+28.4)#622
11. Willisburg 61.3% 28.4% (+32.9)#11 33.4% (+27.9)#697
12. Versailles 60.6% 28.4% (+32.2)#12 33.4% (+27.2)#761
13. Eddyville 59.1% 28.4% (+30.7)#13 33.4% (+25.7)#1,000
14. Simpsonville 58.1% 28.4% (+29.7)#14 33.4% (+24.7)#1,151
15. Pewee Valley 55.5% 28.4% (+27.1)#15 33.4% (+22.1)#1,563
16. Salt Lick 54.8% 28.4% (+26.4)#16 33.4% (+21.4)#1,712
17. Glasgow 54.1% 28.4% (+25.7)#17 33.4% (+20.7)#1,831
18. Henderson 53.6% 28.4% (+25.2)#18 33.4% (+20.2)#1,898
19. Grand Rivers 53.3% 28.4% (+24.9)#19 33.4% (+19.9)#1,981
20. La Center 52.8% 28.4% (+24.4)#20 33.4% (+19.4)#2,065
21. Hartford 51.5% 28.4% (+23.1)#21 33.4% (+18.1)#2,300
22. Springfield 51.1% 28.4% (+22.7)#22 33.4% (+17.7)#2,385
23. Junction City 49.8% 28.4% (+21.4)#23 33.4% (+16.4)#2,638
24. Fulton 49.5% 28.4% (+21.1)#24 33.4% (+16.1)#2,694
25. Silver Grove 49.5% 28.4% (+21.1)#25 33.4% (+16.1)#2,703
26. Evarts 49.4% 28.4% (+21.0)#26 33.4% (+16.0)#2,734
27. Calhoun 49.3% 28.4% (+20.9)#27 33.4% (+15.9)#2,758
28. Erlanger 48.6% 28.4% (+20.2)#28 33.4% (+15.2)#2,855
29. Somerset 48.3% 28.4% (+19.9)#29 33.4% (+14.9)#2,930
30. Marion 48.3% 28.4% (+19.9)#30 33.4% (+14.9)#2,937
31. Mckee 46.9% 28.4% (+18.5)#31 33.4% (+13.5)#3,208
32. Walton 46.5% 28.4% (+18.1)#32 33.4% (+13.1)#3,256
33. Hopkinsville 46.2% 28.4% (+17.8)#33 33.4% (+12.8)#3,325
34. Greensburg 46.2% 28.4% (+17.8)#34 33.4% (+12.8)#3,336
35. Dry Ridge 46.2% 28.4% (+17.8)#35 33.4% (+12.8)#3,337
36. Shelbyville 45.5% 28.4% (+17.1)#36 33.4% (+12.1)#3,450
37. Campbellsburg 45.2% 28.4% (+16.8)#37 33.4% (+11.8)#3,549
38. Warsaw 44.6% 28.4% (+16.2)#38 33.4% (+11.2)#3,658
39. Owingsville 44.6% 28.4% (+16.2)#39 33.4% (+11.2)#3,659
40. Central City 44.1% 28.4% (+15.7)#40 33.4% (+10.7)#3,771
41. Carlisle 42.7% 28.4% (+14.3)#41 33.4% (+9.30)#4,043
42. Jackson 42.2% 28.4% (+13.8)#42 33.4% (+8.80)#4,181
43. Norbourne Estates 42.1% 28.4% (+13.7)#43 33.4% (+8.70)#4,202
44. Cold Spring 41.3% 28.4% (+12.9)#44 33.4% (+7.90)#4,400
45. Brandenburg 41.3% 28.4% (+12.9)#45 33.4% (+7.90)#4,403
46. Owensboro 40.7% 28.4% (+12.3)#46 33.4% (+7.30)#4,507
47. Independence 40.4% 28.4% (+12.0)#47 33.4% (+7.00)#4,603
48. Dayton 39.9% 28.4% (+11.5)#48 33.4% (+6.50)#4,719
49. Brownsville 38.9% 28.4% (+10.5)#49 33.4% (+5.50)#4,949
50. Winchester 38.2% 28.4% (+9.80)#50 33.4% (+4.80)#5,120
51. Stanton 37.8% 28.4% (+9.40)#51 33.4% (+4.40)#5,202
52. Paducah 37.2% 28.4% (+8.80)#52 33.4% (+3.80)#5,359
53. Ludlow 37.2% 28.4% (+8.80)#53 33.4% (+3.80)#5,368
54. Fort Thomas 36.8% 28.4% (+8.40)#54 33.4% (+3.40)#5,448
55. Paris 36.6% 28.4% (+8.20)#55 33.4% (+3.20)#5,504
56. Brooksville 36.5% 28.4% (+8.10)#56 33.4% (+3.10)#5,546
57. Bardstown 36.0% 28.4% (+7.60)#57 33.4% (+2.60)#5,657
58. Newport 35.7% 28.4% (+7.30)#58 33.4% (+2.30)#5,737
59. Elizabethtown 35.3% 28.4% (+6.90)#59 33.4% (+1.90)#5,856
60. St Matthews 35.3% 28.4% (+6.90)#60 33.4% (+1.90)#5,860
61. Covington 34.7% 28.4% (+6.30)#61 33.4% (+1.30)#6,006
62. Williamsburg 34.5% 28.4% (+6.10)#62 33.4% (+1.10)#6,080
63. Owenton 33.9% 28.4% (+5.50)#63 33.4% (+0.500)#6,230
64. Lyndon 33.0% 28.4% (+4.60)#64 33.4% (-0.400)#6,452
65. Nicholasville 32.9% 28.4% (+4.50)#65 33.4% (-0.500)#6,470
66. Elsmere 32.9% 28.4% (+4.50)#66 33.4% (-0.500)#6,480
67. Edgewood 32.5% 28.4% (+4.10)#67 33.4% (-0.900)#6,591
68. Georgetown 31.9% 28.4% (+3.50)#68 33.4% (-1.50)#6,701
69. Corbin 31.5% 28.4% (+3.10)#69 33.4% (-1.90)#6,819
70. Harlan 31.3% 28.4% (+2.90)#70 33.4% (-2.10)#6,874
71. Taylorsville 30.8% 28.4% (+2.40)#71 33.4% (-2.60)#6,989
72. Clarkson 30.6% 28.4% (+2.20)#72 33.4% (-2.80)#7,043
73. Ashland 30.4% 28.4% (+2.00)#73 33.4% (-3.00)#7,092
74. Guthrie 30.3% 28.4% (+1.90)#74 33.4% (-3.10)#7,133
75. Cumberland 29.8% 28.4% (+1.40)#75 33.4% (-3.60)#7,258
76. Maysville 29.5% 28.4% (+1.10)#76 33.4% (-3.90)#7,339
77. Radcliff 29.4% 28.4% (+1.00)#77 33.4% (-4.00)#7,365
78. Louisville 29.2% 28.4% (+0.800)#78 33.4% (-4.20)#7,401
79. Grayson 29.0% 28.4% (+0.600)#79 33.4% (-4.40)#7,439
80. West Buechel 28.9% 28.4% (+0.500)#80 33.4% (-4.50)#7,464
81. Augusta 28.7% 28.4% (+0.300)#81 33.4% (-4.70)#7,535
82. Falmouth 28.6% 28.4% (+0.200)#82 33.4% (-4.80)#7,564
83. Manchester 27.5% 28.4% (-0.900)#83 33.4% (-5.90)#7,839
84. Midway 27.0% 28.4% (-1.40)#84 33.4% (-6.40)#7,917
85. Hustonville 26.8% 28.4% (-1.60)#85 33.4% (-6.60)#7,972
86. Madisonville 26.6% 28.4% (-1.80)#86 33.4% (-6.80)#8,012
87. Pikeville 26.0% 28.4% (-2.40)#87 33.4% (-7.40)#8,119
88. Barbourville 25.8% 28.4% (-2.60)#88 33.4% (-7.60)#8,157
89. Pembroke 25.8% 28.4% (-2.60)#89 33.4% (-7.60)#8,163
90. Middletown 25.6% 28.4% (-2.80)#90 33.4% (-7.80)#8,197
91. Whitesburg 25.6% 28.4% (-2.80)#91 33.4% (-7.80)#8,202
92. Lexington 25.2% 28.4% (-3.20)#92 33.4% (-8.20)#8,266
93. Jeffersontown 24.9% 28.4% (-3.50)#93 33.4% (-8.50)#8,321
94. Bellevue 24.3% 28.4% (-4.10)#94 33.4% (-9.10)#8,473
95. Cave City 23.6% 28.4% (-4.80)#95 33.4% (-9.80)#8,624
96. Sharpsburg 23.6% 28.4% (-4.80)#96 33.4% (-9.80)#8,632
97. Lynnview 23.3% 28.4% (-5.10)#97 33.4% (-10.1)#8,694
98. Southgate 22.6% 28.4% (-5.80)#98 33.4% (-10.8)#8,866
99. Frankfort 22.4% 28.4% (-6.00)#99 33.4% (-11.0)#8,905
100. Bowling Green 21.9% 28.4% (-6.50)#100 33.4% (-11.5)#8,998

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kentucky?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kentucky are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kentucky?
Bloomfield has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kentucky with 78.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Kentucky?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kentucky is 28.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.