Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Cedar Valley 83.5% 33.5% (+50.0)#1 33.4% (+50.1)#5
2. Talihina 70.2% 33.5% (+36.7)#2 33.4% (+36.8)#115
3. Comanche 69.0% 33.5% (+35.5)#3 33.4% (+35.6)#144
4. Hillsdale 68.5% 33.5% (+35.0)#4 33.4% (+35.1)#165
5. Verdigris 68.1% 33.5% (+34.6)#5 33.4% (+34.7)#178
6. Pawhuska 63.8% 33.5% (+30.3)#6 33.4% (+30.4)#427
7. Grove 62.7% 33.5% (+29.2)#7 33.4% (+29.3)#523
8. Inola 62.3% 33.5% (+28.8)#8 33.4% (+28.9)#575
9. Hinton 61.4% 33.5% (+27.9)#9 33.4% (+28.0)#672
10. Stilwell 61.3% 33.5% (+27.8)#10 33.4% (+27.9)#686
11. Sharon 59.6% 33.5% (+26.1)#11 33.4% (+26.2)#905
12. Boley 59.0% 33.5% (+25.5)#12 33.4% (+25.6)#1,017
13. Mooreland 57.4% 33.5% (+23.9)#13 33.4% (+24.0)#1,249
14. The Village 55.6% 33.5% (+22.1)#14 33.4% (+22.2)#1,537
15. Cherokee 55.4% 33.5% (+21.9)#15 33.4% (+22.0)#1,598
16. Erick 55.3% 33.5% (+21.8)#16 33.4% (+21.9)#1,629
17. Mcloud 55.2% 33.5% (+21.7)#17 33.4% (+21.8)#1,646
18. Chelsea 55.1% 33.5% (+21.6)#18 33.4% (+21.7)#1,666
19. Bray 54.8% 33.5% (+21.3)#19 33.4% (+21.4)#1,708
20. Jay 54.5% 33.5% (+21.0)#20 33.4% (+21.1)#1,743
21. Okeene 54.5% 33.5% (+21.0)#21 33.4% (+21.1)#1,755
22. Elk City 54.2% 33.5% (+20.7)#22 33.4% (+20.8)#1,809
23. Wewoka 53.7% 33.5% (+20.2)#23 33.4% (+20.3)#1,888
24. Hydro 53.5% 33.5% (+20.0)#24 33.4% (+20.1)#1,930
25. Caddo 52.8% 33.5% (+19.3)#25 33.4% (+19.4)#2,064
26. Wellston 52.2% 33.5% (+18.7)#26 33.4% (+18.8)#2,204
27. Adair 52.2% 33.5% (+18.7)#27 33.4% (+18.8)#2,205
28. Sentinel 50.7% 33.5% (+17.2)#28 33.4% (+17.3)#2,458
29. Atoka 49.1% 33.5% (+15.6)#29 33.4% (+15.7)#2,786
30. Empire City 49.0% 33.5% (+15.5)#30 33.4% (+15.6)#2,810
31. Waurika 48.6% 33.5% (+15.1)#31 33.4% (+15.2)#2,866
32. Coalgate 48.4% 33.5% (+14.9)#32 33.4% (+15.0)#2,916
33. Tribbey 48.2% 33.5% (+14.7)#33 33.4% (+14.8)#2,970
34. Vinita 46.2% 33.5% (+12.7)#34 33.4% (+12.8)#3,334
35. Heavener 45.8% 33.5% (+12.3)#35 33.4% (+12.4)#3,391
36. White Eagle 45.5% 33.5% (+12.0)#36 33.4% (+12.1)#3,479
37. Fitzhugh 45.5% 33.5% (+12.0)#37 33.4% (+12.1)#3,483
38. Clayton 45.2% 33.5% (+11.7)#38 33.4% (+11.8)#3,551
39. Sweetwater 45.2% 33.5% (+11.7)#39 33.4% (+11.8)#3,553
40. Guthrie 44.2% 33.5% (+10.7)#40 33.4% (+10.8)#3,748
41. Amber 44.0% 33.5% (+10.5)#41 33.4% (+10.6)#3,791
42. Lone Grove 43.8% 33.5% (+10.3)#42 33.4% (+10.4)#3,825
43. Hugo 43.5% 33.5% (+10.00)#43 33.4% (+10.1)#3,876
44. Stonewall 43.5% 33.5% (+10.00)#44 33.4% (+10.1)#3,892
45. Welling 43.3% 33.5% (+9.80)#45 33.4% (+9.90)#3,943
46. Carnegie 42.8% 33.5% (+9.30)#46 33.4% (+9.40)#4,026
47. Muskogee 42.3% 33.5% (+8.80)#47 33.4% (+8.90)#4,142
48. Tyrone 42.3% 33.5% (+8.80)#48 33.4% (+8.90)#4,158
49. Valliant 42.1% 33.5% (+8.60)#49 33.4% (+8.70)#4,201
50. Allen 42.0% 33.5% (+8.50)#50 33.4% (+8.60)#4,217
51. Ada 41.8% 33.5% (+8.30)#51 33.4% (+8.40)#4,240
52. Woodward 41.7% 33.5% (+8.20)#52 33.4% (+8.30)#4,269
53. Helena 41.6% 33.5% (+8.10)#53 33.4% (+8.20)#4,312
54. Custer City 41.5% 33.5% (+8.00)#54 33.4% (+8.10)#4,352
55. Bristow 40.5% 33.5% (+7.00)#55 33.4% (+7.10)#4,575
56. Ripley 40.5% 33.5% (+7.00)#56 33.4% (+7.10)#4,590
57. Skiatook 40.4% 33.5% (+6.90)#57 33.4% (+7.00)#4,611
58. Calvin 40.2% 33.5% (+6.70)#58 33.4% (+6.80)#4,675
59. Holdenville 39.6% 33.5% (+6.10)#59 33.4% (+6.20)#4,772
60. Bethel Acres 39.6% 33.5% (+6.10)#60 33.4% (+6.20)#4,774
61. Wynnewood 39.5% 33.5% (+6.00)#61 33.4% (+6.10)#4,799
62. Weleetka 39.5% 33.5% (+6.00)#62 33.4% (+6.10)#4,801
63. Medford 39.5% 33.5% (+6.00)#63 33.4% (+6.10)#4,803
64. Jenks 38.5% 33.5% (+5.00)#64 33.4% (+5.10)#5,037
65. Choctaw 38.4% 33.5% (+4.90)#65 33.4% (+5.00)#5,078
66. Cleveland 37.8% 33.5% (+4.30)#66 33.4% (+4.40)#5,203
67. Hardesty 37.8% 33.5% (+4.30)#67 33.4% (+4.40)#5,219
68. Cheyenne 37.5% 33.5% (+4.00)#68 33.4% (+4.10)#5,300
69. Catoosa 37.1% 33.5% (+3.60)#69 33.4% (+3.70)#5,384
70. Oklahoma City 36.7% 33.5% (+3.20)#70 33.4% (+3.30)#5,469
71. Tonkawa 36.7% 33.5% (+3.20)#71 33.4% (+3.30)#5,487
72. Hartshorne 36.6% 33.5% (+3.10)#72 33.4% (+3.20)#5,510
73. Duncan 36.4% 33.5% (+2.90)#73 33.4% (+3.00)#5,559
74. Prague 36.4% 33.5% (+2.90)#74 33.4% (+3.00)#5,570
75. Salina 36.4% 33.5% (+2.90)#75 33.4% (+3.00)#5,571
76. El Reno 36.2% 33.5% (+2.70)#76 33.4% (+2.80)#5,607
77. Tonkawa Tribal Housing 36.0% 33.5% (+2.50)#77 33.4% (+2.60)#5,675
78. Shawnee 35.6% 33.5% (+2.10)#78 33.4% (+2.20)#5,753
79. Ardmore 35.4% 33.5% (+1.90)#79 33.4% (+2.00)#5,835
80. Kenwood 34.5% 33.5% (+1.000)#80 33.4% (+1.10)#6,093
81. Stringtown 34.5% 33.5% (+1.000)#81 33.4% (+1.10)#6,102
82. Poteau 34.4% 33.5% (+0.900)#82 33.4% (+1.00)#6,119
83. Jones 34.4% 33.5% (+0.900)#83 33.4% (+1.00)#6,122
84. Claremore 34.3% 33.5% (+0.800)#84 33.4% (+0.900)#6,133
85. Ponca City 33.9% 33.5% (+0.400)#85 33.4% (+0.500)#6,217
86. Sallisaw 33.8% 33.5% (+0.300)#86 33.4% (+0.400)#6,251
87. Maud 33.7% 33.5% (+0.200)#87 33.4% (+0.300)#6,282
88. Springer 33.7% 33.5% (+0.200)#88 33.4% (+0.300)#6,283
89. Lawton 33.6% 33.5% (+0.100)#89 33.4% (+0.200)#6,284
90. Shattuck 33.4% 33.5% (-0.100)#90 33.4% (=0.000)#6,382
91. Mcalester 33.0% 33.5% (-0.500)#91 33.4% (-0.400)#6,449
92. Locust Grove 32.8% 33.5% (-0.700)#92 33.4% (-0.600)#6,513
93. Vian 32.7% 33.5% (-0.800)#93 33.4% (-0.700)#6,541
94. Calera 32.6% 33.5% (-0.900)#94 33.4% (-0.800)#6,568
95. Konawa 32.3% 33.5% (-1.20)#95 33.4% (-1.10)#6,639
96. Henryetta 31.8% 33.5% (-1.70)#96 33.4% (-1.60)#6,738
97. Tulsa 31.6% 33.5% (-1.90)#97 33.4% (-1.80)#6,783
98. Sand Springs 30.7% 33.5% (-2.80)#98 33.4% (-2.70)#7,008
99. Kingston 30.7% 33.5% (-2.80)#99 33.4% (-2.70)#7,017
100. Alva 30.6% 33.5% (-2.90)#100 33.4% (-2.80)#7,034

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma are:
#1
83.5%
#2
70.2%
#3
69.0%
#4
68.5%
#5
68.1%
#6
63.8%
#7
62.7%
#8
62.3%
#9
61.4%
#10
61.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma?
Cedar Valley has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma with 83.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma is 33.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.