Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Erhard 75.3% 33.4% (+41.9)#1 33.4% (+41.9)#40
2. Vergas 73.2% 33.4% (+39.8)#2 33.4% (+39.8)#62
3. Spring Hill 72.3% 33.4% (+38.9)#3 33.4% (+38.9)#69
4. Starbuck 72.0% 33.4% (+38.6)#4 33.4% (+38.6)#76
5. Swanville 71.0% 33.4% (+37.6)#5 33.4% (+37.6)#97
6. Northome 70.5% 33.4% (+37.1)#6 33.4% (+37.1)#107
7. Madison Lake 70.1% 33.4% (+36.7)#7 33.4% (+36.7)#117
8. Blue Earth 69.1% 33.4% (+35.7)#8 33.4% (+35.7)#141
9. Beaver Bay 67.5% 33.4% (+34.1)#9 33.4% (+34.1)#205
10. Adams 66.8% 33.4% (+33.4)#10 33.4% (+33.4)#237
11. North St Paul 66.5% 33.4% (+33.1)#11 33.4% (+33.1)#247
12. Henning 66.3% 33.4% (+32.9)#12 33.4% (+32.9)#269
13. Climax 65.3% 33.4% (+31.9)#13 33.4% (+31.9)#336
14. Porter 65.0% 33.4% (+31.6)#14 33.4% (+31.6)#358
15. Brownsville 64.5% 33.4% (+31.1)#15 33.4% (+31.1)#377
16. East Gull Lake 64.3% 33.4% (+30.9)#16 33.4% (+30.9)#397
17. Stephen 64.3% 33.4% (+30.9)#17 33.4% (+30.9)#402
18. Elmore 64.2% 33.4% (+30.8)#18 33.4% (+30.8)#411
19. Walnut Grove 64.0% 33.4% (+30.6)#19 33.4% (+30.6)#419
20. La Salle 63.8% 33.4% (+30.4)#20 33.4% (+30.4)#432
21. Bird Island 63.7% 33.4% (+30.3)#21 33.4% (+30.3)#435
22. Jasper 63.5% 33.4% (+30.1)#22 33.4% (+30.1)#453
23. Lismore 63.5% 33.4% (+30.1)#23 33.4% (+30.1)#460
24. Kelliher 63.4% 33.4% (+30.0)#24 33.4% (+30.0)#471
25. Hinckley 63.1% 33.4% (+29.7)#25 33.4% (+29.7)#498
26. Rice 62.8% 33.4% (+29.4)#26 33.4% (+29.4)#517
27. Welcome 62.8% 33.4% (+29.4)#27 33.4% (+29.4)#519
28. Hugo 62.4% 33.4% (+29.0)#28 33.4% (+29.0)#555
29. Darwin 62.3% 33.4% (+28.9)#29 33.4% (+28.9)#583
30. Maynard 62.2% 33.4% (+28.8)#30 33.4% (+28.8)#596
31. Russell 62.0% 33.4% (+28.6)#31 33.4% (+28.6)#613
32. Mentor 61.8% 33.4% (+28.4)#32 33.4% (+28.4)#625
33. Westbrook 61.5% 33.4% (+28.1)#33 33.4% (+28.1)#652
34. Comfrey 61.5% 33.4% (+28.1)#34 33.4% (+28.1)#656
35. Kensington 61.5% 33.4% (+28.1)#35 33.4% (+28.1)#661
36. Brewster 61.3% 33.4% (+27.9)#36 33.4% (+27.9)#694
37. Mcgregor 61.3% 33.4% (+27.9)#37 33.4% (+27.9)#696
38. Morgan 60.5% 33.4% (+27.1)#38 33.4% (+27.1)#783
39. Federal Dam 60.5% 33.4% (+27.1)#39 33.4% (+27.1)#794
40. Freeborn 60.4% 33.4% (+27.0)#40 33.4% (+27.0)#813
41. Ham Lake 60.3% 33.4% (+26.9)#41 33.4% (+26.9)#816
42. Dexter 60.3% 33.4% (+26.9)#42 33.4% (+26.9)#838
43. Oakdale 60.0% 33.4% (+26.6)#43 33.4% (+26.6)#868
44. La Prairie 59.9% 33.4% (+26.5)#44 33.4% (+26.5)#881
45. Pelican Rapids 59.6% 33.4% (+26.2)#45 33.4% (+26.2)#901
46. Sherburn 59.5% 33.4% (+26.1)#46 33.4% (+26.1)#920
47. Kenyon 59.4% 33.4% (+26.0)#47 33.4% (+26.0)#942
48. Gem Lake 59.3% 33.4% (+25.9)#48 33.4% (+25.9)#963
49. Naytahwaush 59.3% 33.4% (+25.9)#49 33.4% (+25.9)#964
50. Ogilvie 59.3% 33.4% (+25.9)#50 33.4% (+25.9)#965
51. Meadowlands 59.3% 33.4% (+25.9)#51 33.4% (+25.9)#969
52. Pipestone 59.1% 33.4% (+25.7)#52 33.4% (+25.7)#995
53. Cottonwood 58.6% 33.4% (+25.2)#53 33.4% (+25.2)#1,059
54. Frost 58.5% 33.4% (+25.1)#54 33.4% (+25.1)#1,090
55. Wahkon 58.5% 33.4% (+25.1)#55 33.4% (+25.1)#1,091
56. Isle 58.3% 33.4% (+24.9)#56 33.4% (+24.9)#1,127
57. Fairfax 58.2% 33.4% (+24.8)#57 33.4% (+24.8)#1,142
58. East Grand Forks 58.1% 33.4% (+24.7)#58 33.4% (+24.7)#1,146
59. Warroad 58.0% 33.4% (+24.6)#59 33.4% (+24.6)#1,163
60. Belview 58.0% 33.4% (+24.6)#60 33.4% (+24.6)#1,166
61. Parkers Prairie 57.7% 33.4% (+24.3)#61 33.4% (+24.3)#1,198
62. Watertown 57.6% 33.4% (+24.2)#62 33.4% (+24.2)#1,204
63. Granite Falls 57.6% 33.4% (+24.2)#63 33.4% (+24.2)#1,210
64. Mapleton 57.6% 33.4% (+24.2)#64 33.4% (+24.2)#1,212
65. Racine 57.5% 33.4% (+24.1)#65 33.4% (+24.1)#1,237
66. Littlefork 57.4% 33.4% (+24.0)#66 33.4% (+24.0)#1,254
67. Eagle Bend 57.3% 33.4% (+23.9)#67 33.4% (+23.9)#1,274
68. Nerstrand 57.3% 33.4% (+23.9)#68 33.4% (+23.9)#1,276
69. Hayfield 57.2% 33.4% (+23.8)#69 33.4% (+23.8)#1,294
70. Shakopee 57.1% 33.4% (+23.7)#70 33.4% (+23.7)#1,303
71. Hills 56.9% 33.4% (+23.5)#71 33.4% (+23.5)#1,334
72. Mountain Lake 56.8% 33.4% (+23.4)#72 33.4% (+23.4)#1,338
73. Wrenshall 56.8% 33.4% (+23.4)#73 33.4% (+23.4)#1,343
74. Breckenridge 56.7% 33.4% (+23.3)#74 33.4% (+23.3)#1,351
75. Lake Lillian 56.7% 33.4% (+23.3)#75 33.4% (+23.3)#1,360
76. Ellsworth 56.5% 33.4% (+23.1)#76 33.4% (+23.1)#1,408
77. Hanska 56.5% 33.4% (+23.1)#77 33.4% (+23.1)#1,412
78. Rushmore 56.5% 33.4% (+23.1)#78 33.4% (+23.1)#1,413
79. Waite Park 56.4% 33.4% (+23.0)#79 33.4% (+23.0)#1,422
80. Wabasso 56.4% 33.4% (+23.0)#80 33.4% (+23.0)#1,437
81. Rice Lake 56.2% 33.4% (+22.8)#81 33.4% (+22.8)#1,471
82. Cosmos 56.1% 33.4% (+22.7)#82 33.4% (+22.7)#1,488
83. Belgrade 55.8% 33.4% (+22.4)#83 33.4% (+22.4)#1,518
84. Chisholm 55.7% 33.4% (+22.3)#84 33.4% (+22.3)#1,529
85. Good Thunder 55.6% 33.4% (+22.2)#85 33.4% (+22.2)#1,547
86. Bowlus 55.5% 33.4% (+22.1)#86 33.4% (+22.1)#1,581
87. Borup 55.5% 33.4% (+22.1)#87 33.4% (+22.1)#1,586
88. Stewartville 55.3% 33.4% (+21.9)#88 33.4% (+21.9)#1,615
89. Milaca 55.3% 33.4% (+21.9)#89 33.4% (+21.9)#1,619
90. New London 55.2% 33.4% (+21.8)#90 33.4% (+21.8)#1,650
91. Braham 55.0% 33.4% (+21.6)#91 33.4% (+21.6)#1,684
92. Urbank 55.0% 33.4% (+21.6)#92 33.4% (+21.6)#1,688
93. Gilman 54.9% 33.4% (+21.5)#93 33.4% (+21.5)#1,698
94. Chanhassen 54.5% 33.4% (+21.1)#94 33.4% (+21.1)#1,736
95. Willmar 54.2% 33.4% (+20.8)#95 33.4% (+20.8)#1,806
96. Atwater 54.1% 33.4% (+20.7)#96 33.4% (+20.7)#1,840
97. Pierz 53.8% 33.4% (+20.4)#97 33.4% (+20.4)#1,871
98. Wykoff 53.8% 33.4% (+20.4)#98 33.4% (+20.4)#1,877
99. Ortonville 53.7% 33.4% (+20.3)#99 33.4% (+20.3)#1,889
100. Chandler 53.5% 33.4% (+20.1)#100 33.4% (+20.1)#1,940

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota are:
#1
75.3%
#2
73.2%
#3
72.3%
#4
72.0%
#5
71.0%
#6
70.5%
#7
70.1%
#8
69.1%
#9
67.5%
#10
66.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota?
Erhard has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota with 75.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota is 33.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.