Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Arizona

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Arizona
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Arizona

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Arizona Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Arizona

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Quartzsite 86.4% 33.4% (+53.0)#1 33.4% (+53.0)#4
2. Parker 76.1% 33.4% (+42.7)#2 33.4% (+42.7)#35
3. Oak Creek Canyon 75.1% 33.4% (+41.7)#3 33.4% (+41.7)#46
4. Tucson Mountains 70.4% 33.4% (+37.0)#4 33.4% (+37.0)#108
5. Greasewood 69.2% 33.4% (+35.8)#5 33.4% (+35.8)#138
6. Patagonia 68.5% 33.4% (+35.1)#6 33.4% (+35.1)#161
7. Clarkdale 68.4% 33.4% (+35.0)#7 33.4% (+35.0)#167
8. Whiteriver 66.5% 33.4% (+33.1)#8 33.4% (+33.1)#249
9. Pinon 64.0% 33.4% (+30.6)#9 33.4% (+30.6)#418
10. Bisbee 63.1% 33.4% (+29.7)#10 33.4% (+29.7)#497
11. Superior 63.0% 33.4% (+29.6)#11 33.4% (+29.6)#509
12. Seligman 60.6% 33.4% (+27.2)#12 33.4% (+27.2)#766
13. Tanque Verde 60.4% 33.4% (+27.0)#13 33.4% (+27.0)#798
14. Paulden 59.9% 33.4% (+26.5)#14 33.4% (+26.5)#879
15. Three Points 59.6% 33.4% (+26.2)#15 33.4% (+26.2)#899
16. Oro Valley 57.7% 33.4% (+24.3)#16 33.4% (+24.3)#1,188
17. Benson 56.0% 33.4% (+22.6)#17 33.4% (+22.6)#1,494
18. Paradise Valley 55.2% 33.4% (+21.8)#18 33.4% (+21.8)#1,642
19. Linden 55.2% 33.4% (+21.8)#19 33.4% (+21.8)#1,648
20. Catalina Foothills 55.0% 33.4% (+21.6)#20 33.4% (+21.6)#1,674
21. Globe 53.0% 33.4% (+19.6)#21 33.4% (+19.6)#2,027
22. Goodyear 52.9% 33.4% (+19.5)#22 33.4% (+19.5)#2,041
23. Prescott Valley 52.5% 33.4% (+19.1)#23 33.4% (+19.1)#2,100
24. Flowing Wells 52.5% 33.4% (+19.1)#24 33.4% (+19.1)#2,105
25. Springerville 52.5% 33.4% (+19.1)#25 33.4% (+19.1)#2,118
26. Bullhead City 52.1% 33.4% (+18.7)#26 33.4% (+18.7)#2,209
27. Ganado 51.5% 33.4% (+18.1)#27 33.4% (+18.1)#2,313
28. Chinle 50.9% 33.4% (+17.5)#28 33.4% (+17.5)#2,419
29. Arizona City 50.4% 33.4% (+17.0)#29 33.4% (+17.0)#2,519
30. Nogales 49.6% 33.4% (+16.2)#30 33.4% (+16.2)#2,666
31. Lake Havasu City 49.4% 33.4% (+16.0)#31 33.4% (+16.0)#2,721
32. Red Mesa 49.2% 33.4% (+15.8)#32 33.4% (+15.8)#2,777
33. Village Of Oak Creek Big Park 48.9% 33.4% (+15.5)#33 33.4% (+15.5)#2,822
34. San Tan Valley 48.6% 33.4% (+15.2)#34 33.4% (+15.2)#2,852
35. Page 48.4% 33.4% (+15.0)#35 33.4% (+15.0)#2,912
36. Kykotsmovi Village 48.3% 33.4% (+14.9)#36 33.4% (+14.9)#2,945
37. Gilbert 47.0% 33.4% (+13.6)#37 33.4% (+13.6)#3,185
38. Grand Canyon Village 46.4% 33.4% (+13.0)#38 33.4% (+13.0)#3,292
39. Many Farms 46.4% 33.4% (+13.0)#39 33.4% (+13.0)#3,297
40. Sedona 46.2% 33.4% (+12.8)#40 33.4% (+12.8)#3,329
41. Thatcher 45.5% 33.4% (+12.1)#41 33.4% (+12.1)#3,455
42. Heber Overgaard 45.1% 33.4% (+11.7)#42 33.4% (+11.7)#3,570
43. Prescott 44.5% 33.4% (+11.1)#43 33.4% (+11.1)#3,663
44. Tombstone 44.4% 33.4% (+11.0)#44 33.4% (+11.0)#3,714
45. Shonto 44.2% 33.4% (+10.8)#45 33.4% (+10.8)#3,762
46. Douglas 44.1% 33.4% (+10.7)#46 33.4% (+10.7)#3,765
47. Buckeye 43.8% 33.4% (+10.4)#47 33.4% (+10.4)#3,811
48. Holbrook 43.6% 33.4% (+10.2)#48 33.4% (+10.2)#3,851
49. Marana 43.4% 33.4% (+10.0)#49 33.4% (+10.0)#3,906
50. Queen Creek 43.2% 33.4% (+9.80)#50 33.4% (+9.80)#3,946
51. Bagdad 42.7% 33.4% (+9.30)#51 33.4% (+9.30)#4,042
52. Kingman 42.5% 33.4% (+9.10)#52 33.4% (+9.10)#4,081
53. Clifton 42.5% 33.4% (+9.10)#53 33.4% (+9.10)#4,089
54. Scottsdale 41.6% 33.4% (+8.20)#54 33.4% (+8.20)#4,285
55. Fort Defiance 41.4% 33.4% (+8.00)#55 33.4% (+8.00)#4,380
56. Williams 41.3% 33.4% (+7.90)#56 33.4% (+7.90)#4,402
57. Maricopa 41.0% 33.4% (+7.60)#57 33.4% (+7.60)#4,449
58. Tolani Lake 40.5% 33.4% (+7.10)#58 33.4% (+7.10)#4,589
59. Rock Point 40.2% 33.4% (+6.80)#59 33.4% (+6.80)#4,674
60. Winslow 39.9% 33.4% (+6.50)#60 33.4% (+6.50)#4,718
61. Tuba City 39.4% 33.4% (+6.00)#61 33.4% (+6.00)#4,827
62. Jeddito 39.4% 33.4% (+6.00)#62 33.4% (+6.00)#4,836
63. Surprise 38.4% 33.4% (+5.00)#63 33.4% (+5.00)#5,065
64. Avondale 37.0% 33.4% (+3.60)#64 33.4% (+3.60)#5,400
65. Cottonwood 36.5% 33.4% (+3.10)#65 33.4% (+3.10)#5,527
66. Moenkopi 36.0% 33.4% (+2.60)#66 33.4% (+2.60)#5,670
67. Gila Bend 35.8% 33.4% (+2.40)#67 33.4% (+2.40)#5,721
68. Fortuna Foothills 35.7% 33.4% (+2.30)#68 33.4% (+2.30)#5,736
69. Cameron 35.5% 33.4% (+2.10)#69 33.4% (+2.10)#5,814
70. Peoria 35.1% 33.4% (+1.70)#70 33.4% (+1.70)#5,903
71. El Mirage 34.9% 33.4% (+1.50)#71 33.4% (+1.50)#5,950
72. Glendale 34.2% 33.4% (+0.800)#72 33.4% (+0.800)#6,152
73. Coolidge 34.1% 33.4% (+0.700)#73 33.4% (+0.700)#6,173
74. Sacaton 34.0% 33.4% (+0.600)#74 33.4% (+0.600)#6,198
75. Ak Chin Village 33.9% 33.4% (+0.500)#75 33.4% (+0.500)#6,234
76. Chandler 33.4% 33.4% (=0.000)#76 33.4% (=0.000)#6,361
77. New River 33.3% 33.4% (-0.100)#77 33.4% (-0.100)#6,393
78. First Mesa 33.1% 33.4% (-0.300)#78 33.4% (-0.300)#6,435
79. North Fork 33.0% 33.4% (-0.400)#79 33.4% (-0.400)#6,459
80. Wickenburg 32.6% 33.4% (-0.800)#80 33.4% (-0.800)#6,563
81. South Tucson 32.0% 33.4% (-1.40)#81 33.4% (-1.40)#6,690
82. Apache Junction 31.9% 33.4% (-1.50)#82 33.4% (-1.50)#6,700
83. Phoenix 31.8% 33.4% (-1.60)#83 33.4% (-1.60)#6,720
84. Catalina 31.4% 33.4% (-2.00)#84 33.4% (-2.00)#6,856
85. Peach Springs 31.0% 33.4% (-2.40)#85 33.4% (-2.40)#6,929
86. Chino Valley 30.8% 33.4% (-2.60)#86 33.4% (-2.60)#6,973
87. Mesa 30.1% 33.4% (-3.30)#87 33.4% (-3.30)#7,166
88. Eloy 29.8% 33.4% (-3.60)#88 33.4% (-3.60)#7,247
89. Drexel Heights 29.2% 33.4% (-4.20)#89 33.4% (-4.20)#7,406
90. Casas Adobes 28.6% 33.4% (-4.80)#90 33.4% (-4.80)#7,543
91. Show Low 27.8% 33.4% (-5.60)#91 33.4% (-5.60)#7,736
92. Yuma 27.7% 33.4% (-5.70)#92 33.4% (-5.70)#7,763
93. Tsaile 27.5% 33.4% (-5.90)#93 33.4% (-5.90)#7,841
94. Guadalupe 26.9% 33.4% (-6.50)#94 33.4% (-6.50)#7,930
95. Tucson 26.7% 33.4% (-6.70)#95 33.4% (-6.70)#7,974
96. Casa Grande 26.6% 33.4% (-6.80)#96 33.4% (-6.80)#8,007
97. San Luis 25.9% 33.4% (-7.50)#97 33.4% (-7.50)#8,128
98. Sahuarita 25.9% 33.4% (-7.50)#98 33.4% (-7.50)#8,129
99. Fort Mohave 25.7% 33.4% (-7.70)#99 33.4% (-7.70)#8,172
100. Tempe 25.6% 33.4% (-7.80)#100 33.4% (-7.80)#8,188

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Arizona?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Arizona are:
#1
86.4%
#2
76.1%
#3
69.2%
#4
68.5%
#5
68.4%
#6
66.5%
#7
64.0%
#8
63.1%
#9
63.0%
#10
60.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Arizona?
Quartzsite has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Arizona with 86.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Arizona?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Arizona is 33.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.