Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in South Carolina

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in South Carolina

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1.Seabrook Island69.6%24.5%(+45.1)#133.4%(+36.2)#121
2.Union65.3%24.5%(+40.8)#233.4%(+31.9)#325
3.Sullivan S Island64.3%24.5%(+39.8)#333.4%(+30.9)#395
4.Edgefield61.3%24.5%(+36.8)#433.4%(+27.9)#687
5.Southern Shops61.2%24.5%(+36.7)#533.4%(+27.8)#706
6.Dalzell60.5%24.5%(+36.0)#633.4%(+27.1)#773
7.Bluffton57.5%24.5%(+33.0)#733.4%(+24.1)#1,217
8.Arcadia Lakes56.0%24.5%(+31.5)#833.4%(+22.6)#1,498
9.Pageland55.6%24.5%(+31.1)#933.4%(+22.2)#1,543
10.Cheraw55.1%24.5%(+30.6)#1033.4%(+21.7)#1,663
11.Beaufort54.1%24.5%(+29.6)#1133.4%(+20.7)#1,832
12.Welcome53.7%24.5%(+29.2)#1233.4%(+20.3)#1,886
13.Wagener53.1%24.5%(+28.6)#1333.4%(+19.7)#2,017
14.St Matthews52.1%24.5%(+27.6)#1433.4%(+18.7)#2,221
15.Greer52.0%24.5%(+27.5)#1533.4%(+18.6)#2,230
16.Parker52.0%24.5%(+27.5)#1633.4%(+18.6)#2,234
17.Darlington51.5%24.5%(+27.0)#1733.4%(+18.1)#2,296
18.West Columbia48.4%24.5%(+23.9)#1833.4%(+15.0)#2,908
19.Edisto Beach47.6%24.5%(+23.1)#1933.4%(+14.2)#3,063
20.Isle Of Palms47.3%24.5%(+22.8)#2033.4%(+13.9)#3,132
21.Chesnee47.3%24.5%(+22.8)#2133.4%(+13.9)#3,140
22.Summit45.5%24.5%(+21.0)#2233.4%(+12.1)#3,476
23.Florence45.4%24.5%(+20.9)#2333.4%(+12.0)#3,489
24.York45.4%24.5%(+20.9)#2433.4%(+12.0)#3,499
25.Central45.2%24.5%(+20.7)#2533.4%(+11.8)#3,542
26.Hanahan44.9%24.5%(+20.4)#2633.4%(+11.5)#3,596
27.Loris44.6%24.5%(+20.1)#2733.4%(+11.2)#3,657
28.Saluda44.5%24.5%(+20.0)#2833.4%(+11.1)#3,674
29.West Pelzer42.6%24.5%(+18.1)#2933.4%(+9.20)#4,068
30.North Myrtle Beach42.3%24.5%(+17.8)#3033.4%(+8.90)#4,146
31.Clover42.0%24.5%(+17.5)#3133.4%(+8.60)#4,210
32.Hartsville41.5%24.5%(+17.0)#3233.4%(+8.10)#4,330
33.Burton41.0%24.5%(+16.5)#3333.4%(+7.60)#4,452
34.Hickory Grove40.5%24.5%(+16.0)#3433.4%(+7.10)#4,587
35.Myrtle Beach40.4%24.5%(+15.9)#3533.4%(+7.00)#4,602
36.Woodruff39.4%24.5%(+14.9)#3633.4%(+6.00)#4,828
37.Mount Pleasant38.2%24.5%(+13.7)#3733.4%(+4.80)#5,114
38.Mauldin37.2%24.5%(+12.7)#3833.4%(+3.80)#5,360
39.Lake Wylie35.5%24.5%(+11.0)#3933.4%(+2.10)#5,793
40.Hilton Head Island35.4%24.5%(+10.9)#4033.4%(+2.00)#5,829
41.Woodfield35.0%24.5%(+10.5)#4133.4%(+1.60)#5,936
42.Brookdale33.4%24.5%(+8.90)#4233.4%(=0.000)#6,379
43.North33.4%24.5%(+8.90)#4333.4%(=0.000)#6,385
44.Hilltop32.9%24.5%(+8.40)#4433.4%(-0.500)#6,483
45.St George32.9%24.5%(+8.40)#4533.4%(-0.500)#6,487
46.Wade Hampton32.8%24.5%(+8.30)#4633.4%(-0.600)#6,497
47.Newberry32.8%24.5%(+8.30)#4733.4%(-0.600)#6,504
48.Carolina Forest32.5%24.5%(+8.00)#4833.4%(-0.900)#6,585
49.Easley32.1%24.5%(+7.60)#4933.4%(-1.30)#6,668
50.Swansea31.7%24.5%(+7.20)#5033.4%(-1.70)#6,778
51.Fort Mill31.2%24.5%(+6.70)#5133.4%(-2.20)#6,886
52.Socastee31.1%24.5%(+6.60)#5233.4%(-2.30)#6,900
53.Anderson29.5%24.5%(+5.00)#5333.4%(-3.90)#7,329
54.Summerville28.4%24.5%(+3.90)#5433.4%(-5.00)#7,612
55.Gaffney28.4%24.5%(+3.90)#5533.4%(-5.00)#7,622
56.Charleston27.9%24.5%(+3.40)#5633.4%(-5.50)#7,694
57.Clemson26.4%24.5%(+1.90)#5733.4%(-7.00)#8,055
58.Lancaster25.6%24.5%(+1.10)#5833.4%(-7.80)#8,198
59.St Andrews25.1%24.5%(+0.600)#5933.4%(-8.30)#8,289
60.Due West25.1%24.5%(+0.600)#6033.4%(-8.30)#8,299
61.North Augusta23.9%24.5%(-0.600)#6133.4%(-9.50)#8,530
62.Cayce23.8%24.5%(-0.700)#6233.4%(-9.60)#8,555
63.Aiken23.7%24.5%(-0.800)#6333.4%(-9.70)#8,589
64.Rock Hill23.4%24.5%(-1.10)#6433.4%(-10.00)#8,661
65.Sumter22.8%24.5%(-1.70)#6533.4%(-10.6)#8,785
66.North Charleston22.4%24.5%(-2.10)#6633.4%(-11.0)#8,901
67.Port Royal22.4%24.5%(-2.10)#6733.4%(-11.0)#8,909
68.Spartanburg22.0%24.5%(-2.50)#6833.4%(-11.4)#8,973
69.Seven Oaks21.9%24.5%(-2.60)#6933.4%(-11.5)#9,008
70.Greenwood21.7%24.5%(-2.80)#7033.4%(-11.7)#9,087
71.Greenville21.3%24.5%(-3.20)#7133.4%(-12.1)#9,229
72.Travelers Rest21.1%24.5%(-3.40)#7233.4%(-12.3)#9,306
73.Williamston21.1%24.5%(-3.40)#7333.4%(-12.3)#9,315
74.Clinton20.9%24.5%(-3.60)#7433.4%(-12.5)#9,355
75.Valley Falls20.9%24.5%(-3.60)#7533.4%(-12.5)#9,356
76.Saxon20.8%24.5%(-3.70)#7633.4%(-12.6)#9,436
77.Columbia20.7%24.5%(-3.80)#7733.4%(-12.7)#9,457
78.Goose Creek20.6%24.5%(-3.90)#7833.4%(-12.8)#9,501
79.Denmark20.6%24.5%(-3.90)#7933.4%(-12.8)#9,526
80.Orangeburg20.4%24.5%(-4.10)#8033.4%(-13.0)#9,564
81.Clemson University20.4%24.5%(-4.10)#8133.4%(-13.0)#9,571
82.Tigerville20.4%24.5%(-4.10)#8233.4%(-13.0)#9,577
83.Fountain Inn19.9%24.5%(-4.60)#8333.4%(-13.5)#9,668
84.Lexington19.6%24.5%(-4.90)#8433.4%(-13.8)#9,747
85.Conway19.3%24.5%(-5.20)#8533.4%(-14.1)#9,789
86.Five Forks18.0%24.5%(-6.50)#8633.4%(-15.4)#9,881

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in South Carolina are:
#1
69.6%
#2
65.3%
#3
64.3%
#4
61.3%
#5
61.2%
#6
60.5%
#7
57.5%
#8
56.0%
#9
55.6%
#10
55.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in South Carolina?
Seabrook Island has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in South Carolina with 69.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of South Carolina?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in South Carolina is 24.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.