Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Cloverdale 74.3% 30.2% (+44.1)#1 33.4% (+40.9)#51
2. Winamac 70.2% 30.2% (+40.0)#2 33.4% (+36.8)#114
3. Center Point 68.5% 30.2% (+38.3)#3 33.4% (+35.1)#164
4. Bristol 67.5% 30.2% (+37.3)#4 33.4% (+34.1)#199
5. Spring Hill 66.8% 30.2% (+36.6)#5 33.4% (+33.4)#238
6. Grabill 66.6% 30.2% (+36.4)#6 33.4% (+33.2)#241
7. New Paris 65.0% 30.2% (+34.8)#7 33.4% (+31.6)#353
8. Wakarusa 64.4% 30.2% (+34.2)#8 33.4% (+31.0)#390
9. Sellersburg 62.8% 30.2% (+32.6)#9 33.4% (+29.4)#516
10. Flora 62.3% 30.2% (+32.1)#10 33.4% (+28.9)#574
11. Shipshewana 62.3% 30.2% (+32.1)#11 33.4% (+28.9)#579
12. Cedar Grove 61.9% 30.2% (+31.7)#12 33.4% (+28.5)#619
13. Cromwell 61.3% 30.2% (+31.1)#13 33.4% (+27.9)#693
14. Patriot 60.5% 30.2% (+30.3)#14 33.4% (+27.1)#791
15. Mount Vernon 60.2% 30.2% (+30.0)#15 33.4% (+26.8)#842
16. Remington 59.9% 30.2% (+29.7)#16 33.4% (+26.5)#880
17. Clay City 59.8% 30.2% (+29.6)#17 33.4% (+26.4)#888
18. Brookville 59.2% 30.2% (+29.0)#18 33.4% (+25.8)#977
19. Akron 59.2% 30.2% (+29.0)#19 33.4% (+25.8)#980
20. Noblesville 58.7% 30.2% (+28.5)#20 33.4% (+25.3)#1,037
21. Bloomfield 57.7% 30.2% (+27.5)#21 33.4% (+24.3)#1,196
22. Albion 57.6% 30.2% (+27.4)#22 33.4% (+24.2)#1,208
23. Edinburgh 57.5% 30.2% (+27.3)#23 33.4% (+24.1)#1,224
24. Trafalgar 57.5% 30.2% (+27.3)#24 33.4% (+24.1)#1,229
25. Oldenburg 57.5% 30.2% (+27.3)#25 33.4% (+24.1)#1,232
26. Denver 57.5% 30.2% (+27.3)#26 33.4% (+24.1)#1,235
27. Zanesville 57.5% 30.2% (+27.3)#27 33.4% (+24.1)#1,236
28. Mooresville 57.4% 30.2% (+27.2)#28 33.4% (+24.0)#1,244
29. Thorntown 57.3% 30.2% (+27.1)#29 33.4% (+23.9)#1,266
30. Kendallville 57.2% 30.2% (+27.0)#30 33.4% (+23.8)#1,286
31. Advance 56.6% 30.2% (+26.4)#31 33.4% (+23.2)#1,374
32. Odon 56.0% 30.2% (+25.8)#32 33.4% (+22.6)#1,496
33. Warren 55.7% 30.2% (+25.5)#33 33.4% (+22.3)#1,532
34. Knox 55.4% 30.2% (+25.2)#34 33.4% (+22.0)#1,592
35. Milford 55.4% 30.2% (+25.2)#35 33.4% (+22.0)#1,595
36. Lapel 55.2% 30.2% (+25.0)#36 33.4% (+21.8)#1,647
37. Montpelier 54.2% 30.2% (+24.0)#37 33.4% (+20.8)#1,819
38. Beech Grove 54.1% 30.2% (+23.9)#38 33.4% (+20.7)#1,830
39. Lawrenceburg 54.0% 30.2% (+23.8)#39 33.4% (+20.6)#1,847
40. Rensselaer 53.6% 30.2% (+23.4)#40 33.4% (+20.2)#1,905
41. Chesterfield 53.5% 30.2% (+23.3)#41 33.4% (+20.1)#1,921
42. Nashville 52.8% 30.2% (+22.6)#42 33.4% (+19.4)#2,062
43. Ferdinand 52.7% 30.2% (+22.5)#43 33.4% (+19.3)#2,085
44. Oaktown 52.7% 30.2% (+22.5)#44 33.4% (+19.3)#2,088
45. New Castle 52.2% 30.2% (+22.0)#45 33.4% (+18.8)#2,191
46. Bremen 52.2% 30.2% (+22.0)#46 33.4% (+18.8)#2,198
47. Connersville 51.5% 30.2% (+21.3)#47 33.4% (+18.1)#2,292
48. Lebanon 51.3% 30.2% (+21.1)#48 33.4% (+17.9)#2,340
49. Tipton 50.5% 30.2% (+20.3)#49 33.4% (+17.1)#2,490
50. Monon 50.5% 30.2% (+20.3)#50 33.4% (+17.1)#2,494
51. Lynn 50.5% 30.2% (+20.3)#51 33.4% (+17.1)#2,498
52. Danville 50.1% 30.2% (+19.9)#52 33.4% (+16.7)#2,588
53. Carthage 49.8% 30.2% (+19.6)#53 33.4% (+16.4)#2,644
54. Sulphur Springs 49.6% 30.2% (+19.4)#54 33.4% (+16.2)#2,679
55. Kentland 48.9% 30.2% (+18.7)#55 33.4% (+15.5)#2,824
56. Cedar Lake 48.7% 30.2% (+18.5)#56 33.4% (+15.3)#2,848
57. Jonesboro 48.4% 30.2% (+18.2)#57 33.4% (+15.0)#2,919
58. Rushville 48.2% 30.2% (+18.0)#58 33.4% (+14.8)#2,963
59. St Paul 48.0% 30.2% (+17.8)#59 33.4% (+14.6)#3,007
60. Carmel 47.6% 30.2% (+17.4)#60 33.4% (+14.2)#3,053
61. Rockville 47.5% 30.2% (+17.3)#61 33.4% (+14.1)#3,079
62. Culver 47.5% 30.2% (+17.3)#62 33.4% (+14.1)#3,085
63. Brook 47.5% 30.2% (+17.3)#63 33.4% (+14.1)#3,087
64. Amboy 47.2% 30.2% (+17.0)#64 33.4% (+13.8)#3,167
65. Crown Point 46.6% 30.2% (+16.4)#65 33.4% (+13.2)#3,231
66. Seymour 46.3% 30.2% (+16.1)#66 33.4% (+12.9)#3,300
67. Granger 46.1% 30.2% (+15.9)#67 33.4% (+12.7)#3,346
68. Vevay 45.9% 30.2% (+15.7)#68 33.4% (+12.5)#3,383
69. Attica 45.5% 30.2% (+15.3)#69 33.4% (+12.1)#3,457
70. Ashley 45.5% 30.2% (+15.3)#70 33.4% (+12.1)#3,469
71. Peru 45.4% 30.2% (+15.2)#71 33.4% (+12.0)#3,497
72. Ardmore 45.4% 30.2% (+15.2)#72 33.4% (+12.0)#3,505
73. Portage 45.2% 30.2% (+15.0)#73 33.4% (+11.8)#3,534
74. Martinsville 45.2% 30.2% (+15.0)#74 33.4% (+11.8)#3,540
75. Markle 45.1% 30.2% (+14.9)#75 33.4% (+11.7)#3,572
76. Dillsboro 45.0% 30.2% (+14.8)#76 33.4% (+11.6)#3,584
77. Poseyville 45.0% 30.2% (+14.8)#77 33.4% (+11.6)#3,585
78. New Pekin 44.9% 30.2% (+14.7)#78 33.4% (+11.5)#3,606
79. Madison 44.5% 30.2% (+14.3)#79 33.4% (+11.1)#3,667
80. Fort Branch 44.4% 30.2% (+14.2)#80 33.4% (+11.0)#3,707
81. Southport 43.9% 30.2% (+13.7)#81 33.4% (+10.5)#3,801
82. Haubstadt 43.5% 30.2% (+13.3)#82 33.4% (+10.1)#3,880
83. Montgomery 43.5% 30.2% (+13.3)#83 33.4% (+10.1)#3,886
84. New Point 43.5% 30.2% (+13.3)#84 33.4% (+10.1)#3,897
85. Meridian Hills 43.2% 30.2% (+13.0)#85 33.4% (+9.80)#3,958
86. Fishers 43.0% 30.2% (+12.8)#86 33.4% (+9.60)#3,976
87. Fountain City 42.7% 30.2% (+12.5)#87 33.4% (+9.30)#4,046
88. Munster 42.6% 30.2% (+12.4)#88 33.4% (+9.20)#4,056
89. Covington 42.4% 30.2% (+12.2)#89 33.4% (+9.00)#4,128
90. Lynnville 42.4% 30.2% (+12.2)#90 33.4% (+9.00)#4,133
91. Russellville 42.4% 30.2% (+12.2)#91 33.4% (+9.00)#4,138
92. North Liberty 41.9% 30.2% (+11.7)#92 33.4% (+8.50)#4,233
93. Nappanee 41.8% 30.2% (+11.6)#93 33.4% (+8.40)#4,245
94. Sunman 41.8% 30.2% (+11.6)#94 33.4% (+8.40)#4,253
95. Bunker Hill 41.8% 30.2% (+11.6)#95 33.4% (+8.40)#4,256
96. Princeton 41.7% 30.2% (+11.5)#96 33.4% (+8.30)#4,271
97. Swayzee 41.5% 30.2% (+11.3)#97 33.4% (+8.10)#4,347
98. Plymouth 41.4% 30.2% (+11.2)#98 33.4% (+8.00)#4,373
99. Batesville 41.3% 30.2% (+11.1)#99 33.4% (+7.90)#4,398
100. Greenfield 41.1% 30.2% (+10.9)#100 33.4% (+7.70)#4,439

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana are:
#1
74.3%
#2
70.2%
#3
68.5%
#4
67.5%
#5
66.8%
#6
66.6%
#7
65.0%
#8
64.4%
#9
62.8%
#10
62.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana?
Cloverdale has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana with 74.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Indiana?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Indiana is 30.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.