Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alaska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alaska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alaska

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alaska Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alaska

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. New Stuyahok 64.2% 40.1% (+24.1)#1 33.4% (+30.8)#409
2. Chevak 63.1% 40.1% (+23.0)#2 33.4% (+29.7)#504
3. Whale Pass 62.0% 40.1% (+21.9)#3 33.4% (+28.6)#614
4. Naknek 61.3% 40.1% (+21.2)#4 33.4% (+27.9)#699
5. Tanacross 60.9% 40.1% (+20.8)#5 33.4% (+27.5)#737
6. Metlakatla 59.5% 40.1% (+19.4)#6 33.4% (+26.1)#917
7. Knik River 59.4% 40.1% (+19.3)#7 33.4% (+26.0)#944
8. Thorne Bay 59.2% 40.1% (+19.1)#8 33.4% (+25.8)#985
9. Cold Bay 57.3% 40.1% (+17.2)#9 33.4% (+23.9)#1,278
10. Big Lake 57.2% 40.1% (+17.1)#10 33.4% (+23.8)#1,291
11. Chignik Lagoon 55.8% 40.1% (+15.7)#11 33.4% (+22.4)#1,521
12. Marshall 55.7% 40.1% (+15.6)#12 33.4% (+22.3)#1,534
13. Beaver 55.5% 40.1% (+15.4)#13 33.4% (+22.1)#1,587
14. Healy 54.4% 40.1% (+14.3)#14 33.4% (+21.0)#1,778
15. Pilot Point 54.3% 40.1% (+14.2)#15 33.4% (+20.9)#1,799
16. Hughes 54.3% 40.1% (+14.2)#16 33.4% (+20.9)#1,801
17. Bear Creek 54.0% 40.1% (+13.9)#17 33.4% (+20.6)#1,850
18. Angoon 53.9% 40.1% (+13.8)#18 33.4% (+20.5)#1,859
19. Fritz Creek 53.8% 40.1% (+13.7)#19 33.4% (+20.4)#1,869
20. Steele Creek 53.5% 40.1% (+13.4)#20 33.4% (+20.1)#1,917
21. Port Lions 53.5% 40.1% (+13.4)#21 33.4% (+20.1)#1,948
22. Gateway 53.3% 40.1% (+13.2)#22 33.4% (+19.9)#1,972
23. Excursion Inlet 53.3% 40.1% (+13.2)#23 33.4% (+19.9)#1,985
24. Manley Hot Springs 53.2% 40.1% (+13.1)#24 33.4% (+19.8)#2,002
25. Sterling 52.9% 40.1% (+12.8)#25 33.4% (+19.5)#2,045
26. Fort Yukon 52.9% 40.1% (+12.8)#26 33.4% (+19.5)#2,052
27. Glennallen 52.8% 40.1% (+12.7)#27 33.4% (+19.4)#2,067
28. Copper Center 52.8% 40.1% (+12.7)#28 33.4% (+19.4)#2,070
29. Healy Lake 52.8% 40.1% (+12.7)#29 33.4% (+19.4)#2,072
30. Tanaina 52.4% 40.1% (+12.3)#30 33.4% (+19.0)#2,147
31. Lazy Mountain 52.4% 40.1% (+12.3)#31 33.4% (+19.0)#2,151
32. Tenakee Springs 52.1% 40.1% (+12.0)#32 33.4% (+18.7)#2,227
33. Mcgrath 51.8% 40.1% (+11.7)#33 33.4% (+18.4)#2,262
34. Eareckson Station 51.6% 40.1% (+11.5)#34 33.4% (+18.2)#2,289
35. Delta Junction 51.5% 40.1% (+11.4)#35 33.4% (+18.1)#2,310
36. Kaltag 51.5% 40.1% (+11.4)#36 33.4% (+18.1)#2,323
37. Alcan Border 51.5% 40.1% (+11.4)#37 33.4% (+18.1)#2,324
38. Juneau City And Borough 51.4% 40.1% (+11.3)#38 33.4% (+18.0)#2,326
39. Soldotna 51.4% 40.1% (+11.3)#39 33.4% (+18.0)#2,331
40. Haines 51.3% 40.1% (+11.2)#40 33.4% (+17.9)#2,354
41. Cordova 51.0% 40.1% (+10.9)#41 33.4% (+17.6)#2,405
42. Kasigluk 50.0% 40.1% (+9.90)#42 33.4% (+16.6)#2,614
43. Minto 50.0% 40.1% (+9.90)#43 33.4% (+16.6)#2,618
44. Manokotak 49.6% 40.1% (+9.50)#44 33.4% (+16.2)#2,677
45. Evansville 49.6% 40.1% (+9.50)#45 33.4% (+16.2)#2,681
46. Klawock 49.5% 40.1% (+9.40)#46 33.4% (+16.1)#2,709
47. Dillingham 49.4% 40.1% (+9.30)#47 33.4% (+16.0)#2,732
48. Tununak 49.4% 40.1% (+9.30)#48 33.4% (+16.0)#2,736
49. Akiachak 49.2% 40.1% (+9.10)#49 33.4% (+15.8)#2,778
50. King Cove 48.9% 40.1% (+8.80)#50 33.4% (+15.5)#2,826
51. Knik Fairview 48.6% 40.1% (+8.50)#51 33.4% (+15.2)#2,856
52. Diamond Ridge 48.6% 40.1% (+8.50)#52 33.4% (+15.2)#2,868
53. Nunapitchuk 48.5% 40.1% (+8.40)#53 33.4% (+15.1)#2,888
54. Stebbins 48.5% 40.1% (+8.40)#54 33.4% (+15.1)#2,891
55. Kalifornsky 48.2% 40.1% (+8.10)#55 33.4% (+14.8)#2,962
56. Napakiak 48.0% 40.1% (+7.90)#56 33.4% (+14.6)#3,008
57. Kake 48.0% 40.1% (+7.90)#57 33.4% (+14.6)#3,011
58. Kwigillingok 47.5% 40.1% (+7.40)#58 33.4% (+14.1)#3,090
59. Nenana 47.5% 40.1% (+7.40)#59 33.4% (+14.1)#3,092
60. Wainwright 47.3% 40.1% (+7.20)#60 33.4% (+13.9)#3,139
61. Point Lay 47.3% 40.1% (+7.20)#61 33.4% (+13.9)#3,143
62. Pelican 47.3% 40.1% (+7.20)#62 33.4% (+13.9)#3,145
63. Napaskiak 47.2% 40.1% (+7.10)#63 33.4% (+13.8)#3,166
64. Gulkana 47.1% 40.1% (+7.00)#64 33.4% (+13.7)#3,184
65. Prudhoe Bay 46.9% 40.1% (+6.80)#65 33.4% (+13.5)#3,207
66. Golovin 46.7% 40.1% (+6.60)#66 33.4% (+13.3)#3,230
67. College 46.5% 40.1% (+6.40)#67 33.4% (+13.1)#3,250
68. Butte 46.5% 40.1% (+6.40)#68 33.4% (+13.1)#3,259
69. Craig 46.3% 40.1% (+6.20)#69 33.4% (+12.9)#3,313
70. Sand Point 46.3% 40.1% (+6.20)#70 33.4% (+12.9)#3,314
71. Bethel 46.1% 40.1% (+6.00)#71 33.4% (+12.7)#3,353
72. Unalakleet 45.8% 40.1% (+5.70)#72 33.4% (+12.4)#3,398
73. Mekoryuk 45.5% 40.1% (+5.40)#73 33.4% (+12.1)#3,482
74. Hydaburg 45.3% 40.1% (+5.20)#74 33.4% (+11.9)#3,530
75. Eek 45.2% 40.1% (+5.10)#75 33.4% (+11.8)#3,552
76. Selawik 44.9% 40.1% (+4.80)#76 33.4% (+11.5)#3,609
77. Badger 44.5% 40.1% (+4.40)#77 33.4% (+11.1)#3,665
78. Emmonak 44.5% 40.1% (+4.40)#78 33.4% (+11.1)#3,680
79. Seward 44.4% 40.1% (+4.30)#79 33.4% (+11.0)#3,708
80. St Paul 44.3% 40.1% (+4.20)#80 33.4% (+10.9)#3,738
81. Denali Park 44.0% 40.1% (+3.90)#81 33.4% (+10.6)#3,788
82. Kachemak 44.0% 40.1% (+3.90)#82 33.4% (+10.6)#3,789
83. Newtok 43.9% 40.1% (+3.80)#83 33.4% (+10.5)#3,809
84. Ouzinkie 43.8% 40.1% (+3.70)#84 33.4% (+10.4)#3,836
85. Unalaska 43.3% 40.1% (+3.20)#85 33.4% (+9.90)#3,936
86. Alatna 43.2% 40.1% (+3.10)#86 33.4% (+9.80)#3,963
87. Shishmaref 42.7% 40.1% (+2.60)#87 33.4% (+9.30)#4,047
88. Elim 42.7% 40.1% (+2.60)#88 33.4% (+9.30)#4,048
89. Lower Kalskag 42.7% 40.1% (+2.60)#89 33.4% (+9.30)#4,049
90. Nanwalek 42.5% 40.1% (+2.40)#90 33.4% (+9.10)#4,111
91. Kotzebue 42.3% 40.1% (+2.20)#91 33.4% (+8.90)#4,154
92. Kivalina 42.3% 40.1% (+2.20)#92 33.4% (+8.90)#4,162
93. Egegik 41.8% 40.1% (+1.70)#93 33.4% (+8.40)#4,261
94. Chena Ridge 41.5% 40.1% (+1.40)#94 33.4% (+8.10)#4,333
95. Toksook Bay 41.5% 40.1% (+1.40)#95 33.4% (+8.10)#4,348
96. Whittier 41.4% 40.1% (+1.30)#96 33.4% (+8.00)#4,388
97. Mountain Village 41.3% 40.1% (+1.20)#97 33.4% (+7.90)#4,405
98. Akiak 41.3% 40.1% (+1.20)#98 33.4% (+7.90)#4,415
99. Koliganek 41.0% 40.1% (+0.900)#99 33.4% (+7.60)#4,458
100. Cohoe 40.8% 40.1% (+0.700)#100 33.4% (+7.40)#4,500

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alaska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alaska are:
#1
64.2%
#2
63.1%
#3
62.0%
#4
61.3%
#5
60.9%
#6
59.5%
#7
59.4%
#8
59.2%
#9
57.3%
#10
57.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alaska?
New Stuyahok has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alaska with 64.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Alaska?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Alaska is 40.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.