Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Illinois

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Illinois
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Illinois

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Illinois Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Illinois

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Westchester 76.6% 32.8% (+43.8)#1 33.4% (+43.2)#31
2. Forest View 75.0% 32.8% (+42.2)#2 33.4% (+41.6)#47
3. Plainville 73.5% 32.8% (+40.7)#3 33.4% (+40.1)#54
4. Bushnell 71.2% 32.8% (+38.4)#4 33.4% (+37.8)#89
5. Spring Valley 71.1% 32.8% (+38.3)#5 33.4% (+37.7)#91
6. Burr Ridge 70.7% 32.8% (+37.9)#6 33.4% (+37.3)#98
7. Tallula 70.2% 32.8% (+37.4)#7 33.4% (+36.8)#116
8. Oregon 70.0% 32.8% (+37.2)#8 33.4% (+36.6)#119
9. Lincolnshire 69.3% 32.8% (+36.5)#9 33.4% (+35.9)#129
10. Lily Lake 67.8% 32.8% (+35.0)#10 33.4% (+34.4)#190
11. Virginia 67.4% 32.8% (+34.6)#11 33.4% (+34.0)#211
12. Irwin 67.3% 32.8% (+34.5)#12 33.4% (+33.9)#223
13. Beecher City 66.5% 32.8% (+33.7)#13 33.4% (+33.1)#252
14. Royal 66.5% 32.8% (+33.7)#14 33.4% (+33.1)#254
15. Patoka 66.2% 32.8% (+33.4)#15 33.4% (+32.8)#278
16. Elizabeth 66.1% 32.8% (+33.3)#16 33.4% (+32.7)#288
17. Percy 65.5% 32.8% (+32.7)#17 33.4% (+32.1)#311
18. St Rose 65.3% 32.8% (+32.5)#18 33.4% (+31.9)#331
19. Augusta 64.3% 32.8% (+31.5)#19 33.4% (+30.9)#399
20. Ashland 63.8% 32.8% (+31.0)#20 33.4% (+30.4)#429
21. Roberts 63.5% 32.8% (+30.7)#21 33.4% (+30.1)#454
22. Sigel 63.5% 32.8% (+30.7)#22 33.4% (+30.1)#455
23. Mccook 63.5% 32.8% (+30.7)#23 33.4% (+30.1)#459
24. Alsey 63.5% 32.8% (+30.7)#24 33.4% (+30.1)#461
25. Winchester 63.1% 32.8% (+30.3)#25 33.4% (+29.7)#499
26. Marengo 63.0% 32.8% (+30.2)#26 33.4% (+29.6)#508
27. Waverly 62.5% 32.8% (+29.7)#27 33.4% (+29.1)#542
28. Bartelso 62.3% 32.8% (+29.5)#28 33.4% (+28.9)#580
29. Northlake 62.1% 32.8% (+29.3)#29 33.4% (+28.7)#600
30. Earlville 61.8% 32.8% (+29.0)#30 33.4% (+28.4)#621
31. Prospect Heights 61.4% 32.8% (+28.6)#31 33.4% (+28.0)#670
32. Norridge 61.1% 32.8% (+28.3)#32 33.4% (+27.7)#716
33. West Dundee 61.1% 32.8% (+28.3)#33 33.4% (+27.7)#718
34. Farmer City 61.1% 32.8% (+28.3)#34 33.4% (+27.7)#723
35. Bishop Hill 61.0% 32.8% (+28.2)#35 33.4% (+27.6)#730
36. Tremont 60.8% 32.8% (+28.0)#36 33.4% (+27.4)#743
37. Hazel Crest 60.6% 32.8% (+27.8)#37 33.4% (+27.2)#756
38. Campton Hills 60.6% 32.8% (+27.8)#38 33.4% (+27.2)#760
39. Long Grove 60.6% 32.8% (+27.8)#39 33.4% (+27.2)#762
40. Congerville 60.5% 32.8% (+27.7)#40 33.4% (+27.1)#784
41. Winthrop Harbor 60.4% 32.8% (+27.6)#41 33.4% (+27.0)#802
42. Morton 60.3% 32.8% (+27.5)#42 33.4% (+26.9)#814
43. Kenilworth 60.3% 32.8% (+27.5)#43 33.4% (+26.9)#824
44. Moweaqua 60.3% 32.8% (+27.5)#44 33.4% (+26.9)#825
45. Mackinaw 59.8% 32.8% (+27.0)#45 33.4% (+26.4)#885
46. Roodhouse 59.8% 32.8% (+27.0)#46 33.4% (+26.4)#886
47. Toluca 59.8% 32.8% (+27.0)#47 33.4% (+26.4)#887
48. Oak Brook 59.5% 32.8% (+26.7)#48 33.4% (+26.1)#909
49. Lemont 59.4% 32.8% (+26.6)#49 33.4% (+26.0)#933
50. Northbrook 59.2% 32.8% (+26.4)#50 33.4% (+25.8)#971
51. Bement 59.2% 32.8% (+26.4)#51 33.4% (+25.8)#978
52. Gurnee 58.8% 32.8% (+26.0)#52 33.4% (+25.4)#1,023
53. Merrionette Park 58.8% 32.8% (+26.0)#53 33.4% (+25.4)#1,029
54. Bowen 58.8% 32.8% (+26.0)#54 33.4% (+25.4)#1,031
55. Flossmoor 58.7% 32.8% (+25.9)#55 33.4% (+25.3)#1,039
56. Staunton 58.7% 32.8% (+25.9)#56 33.4% (+25.3)#1,044
57. Villa Grove 58.5% 32.8% (+25.7)#57 33.4% (+25.1)#1,075
58. Roxana 58.5% 32.8% (+25.7)#58 33.4% (+25.1)#1,076
59. St Libory 58.5% 32.8% (+25.7)#59 33.4% (+25.1)#1,083
60. Ellis Grove 58.5% 32.8% (+25.7)#60 33.4% (+25.1)#1,088
61. Arthur 58.4% 32.8% (+25.6)#61 33.4% (+25.0)#1,109
62. Dolton 58.2% 32.8% (+25.4)#62 33.4% (+24.8)#1,135
63. Hennepin 57.5% 32.8% (+24.7)#63 33.4% (+24.1)#1,230
64. Naplate 57.5% 32.8% (+24.7)#64 33.4% (+24.1)#1,238
65. Dalzell 57.3% 32.8% (+24.5)#65 33.4% (+23.9)#1,272
66. Du Bois 57.3% 32.8% (+24.5)#66 33.4% (+23.9)#1,277
67. Avon 57.2% 32.8% (+24.4)#67 33.4% (+23.8)#1,301
68. Seneca 57.1% 32.8% (+24.3)#68 33.4% (+23.7)#1,308
69. Streamwood 56.5% 32.8% (+23.7)#69 33.4% (+23.1)#1,378
70. Ruma 56.5% 32.8% (+23.7)#70 33.4% (+23.1)#1,406
71. Nokomis 56.4% 32.8% (+23.6)#71 33.4% (+23.0)#1,429
72. University Park 56.3% 32.8% (+23.5)#72 33.4% (+22.9)#1,446
73. Chatham 56.2% 32.8% (+23.4)#73 33.4% (+22.8)#1,464
74. Sugar Grove 56.2% 32.8% (+23.4)#74 33.4% (+22.8)#1,467
75. Palos Heights 56.1% 32.8% (+23.3)#75 33.4% (+22.7)#1,481
76. Flora 55.6% 32.8% (+22.8)#76 33.4% (+22.2)#1,540
77. Damiansville 55.6% 32.8% (+22.8)#77 33.4% (+22.2)#1,546
78. Peotone 55.5% 32.8% (+22.7)#78 33.4% (+22.1)#1,556
79. Scales Mound 55.5% 32.8% (+22.7)#79 33.4% (+22.1)#1,577
80. Loda 55.5% 32.8% (+22.7)#80 33.4% (+22.1)#1,580
81. Plainfield 54.9% 32.8% (+22.1)#81 33.4% (+21.5)#1,689
82. Hinsdale 54.7% 32.8% (+21.9)#82 33.4% (+21.3)#1,714
83. Freeburg 54.7% 32.8% (+21.9)#83 33.4% (+21.3)#1,717
84. Palatine 54.5% 32.8% (+21.7)#84 33.4% (+21.1)#1,731
85. Wilmette 54.5% 32.8% (+21.7)#85 33.4% (+21.1)#1,734
86. Arenzville 54.5% 32.8% (+21.7)#86 33.4% (+21.1)#1,765
87. Woodhull 54.3% 32.8% (+21.5)#87 33.4% (+20.9)#1,796
88. Herrin 54.2% 32.8% (+21.4)#88 33.4% (+20.8)#1,808
89. Rosemont 54.2% 32.8% (+21.4)#89 33.4% (+20.8)#1,813
90. Kingston 54.2% 32.8% (+21.4)#90 33.4% (+20.8)#1,820
91. Waterloo 54.1% 32.8% (+21.3)#91 33.4% (+20.7)#1,833
92. Warsaw 54.0% 32.8% (+21.2)#92 33.4% (+20.6)#1,849
93. Sheffield 54.0% 32.8% (+21.2)#93 33.4% (+20.6)#1,851
94. Libertyville 53.6% 32.8% (+20.8)#94 33.4% (+20.2)#1,900
95. Collinsville 53.5% 32.8% (+20.7)#95 33.4% (+20.1)#1,912
96. Harrisburg 53.5% 32.8% (+20.7)#96 33.4% (+20.1)#1,915
97. Western Springs 53.4% 32.8% (+20.6)#97 33.4% (+20.0)#1,952
98. Polo 53.3% 32.8% (+20.5)#98 33.4% (+19.9)#1,974
99. Batavia 53.1% 32.8% (+20.3)#99 33.4% (+19.7)#2,006
100. Gages Lake 53.1% 32.8% (+20.3)#100 33.4% (+19.7)#2,009

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Illinois?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Illinois are:
#1
76.6%
#2
75.0%
#3
73.5%
#4
71.2%
#5
71.1%
#6
70.7%
#7
70.2%
#8
70.0%
#9
69.3%
#10
67.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Illinois?
Westchester has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Illinois with 76.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Illinois?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Illinois is 32.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.