Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kansas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Toronto 76.5% 29.4% (+47.1)#1 33.4% (+43.1)#32
2. Agenda 75.0% 29.4% (+45.6)#2 33.4% (+41.6)#48
3. Kismet 73.3% 29.4% (+43.9)#3 33.4% (+39.9)#59
4. Sabetha 69.4% 29.4% (+40.0)#4 33.4% (+36.0)#126
5. Hugoton 68.5% 29.4% (+39.1)#5 33.4% (+35.1)#158
6. Healy 67.1% 29.4% (+37.7)#6 33.4% (+33.7)#233
7. Severy 66.5% 29.4% (+37.1)#7 33.4% (+33.1)#255
8. Altamont 64.9% 29.4% (+35.5)#8 33.4% (+31.5)#359
9. Macksville 64.2% 29.4% (+34.8)#9 33.4% (+30.8)#410
10. Auburn 64.0% 29.4% (+34.6)#10 33.4% (+30.6)#417
11. Burdett 63.3% 29.4% (+33.9)#11 33.4% (+29.9)#479
12. Vassar 62.7% 29.4% (+33.3)#12 33.4% (+29.3)#527
13. Lincolnville 62.5% 29.4% (+33.1)#13 33.4% (+29.1)#554
14. Kechi 62.3% 29.4% (+32.9)#14 33.4% (+28.9)#572
15. Morland 62.3% 29.4% (+32.9)#15 33.4% (+28.9)#586
16. Tipton 61.7% 29.4% (+32.3)#16 33.4% (+28.3)#639
17. Logan 61.2% 29.4% (+31.8)#17 33.4% (+27.8)#713
18. Haysville 60.6% 29.4% (+31.2)#18 33.4% (+27.2)#759
19. Mayfield 60.5% 29.4% (+31.1)#19 33.4% (+27.1)#796
20. Bird City 60.3% 29.4% (+30.9)#20 33.4% (+26.9)#834
21. Coldwater 60.0% 29.4% (+30.6)#21 33.4% (+26.6)#872
22. Washington 59.8% 29.4% (+30.4)#22 33.4% (+26.4)#889
23. Ransom 59.5% 29.4% (+30.1)#23 33.4% (+26.1)#928
24. Munden 59.5% 29.4% (+30.1)#24 33.4% (+26.1)#931
25. Baxter Springs 59.4% 29.4% (+30.0)#25 33.4% (+26.0)#938
26. Medicine Lodge 59.2% 29.4% (+29.8)#26 33.4% (+25.8)#979
27. Moran 59.0% 29.4% (+29.6)#27 33.4% (+25.6)#1,019
28. Iola 58.7% 29.4% (+29.3)#28 33.4% (+25.3)#1,043
29. Anthony 58.6% 29.4% (+29.2)#29 33.4% (+25.2)#1,058
30. Larned 58.5% 29.4% (+29.1)#30 33.4% (+25.1)#1,072
31. Norwich 58.5% 29.4% (+29.1)#31 33.4% (+25.1)#1,085
32. Maize 58.4% 29.4% (+29.0)#32 33.4% (+25.0)#1,104
33. Minneapolis 58.4% 29.4% (+29.0)#33 33.4% (+25.0)#1,108
34. Mankato 58.3% 29.4% (+28.9)#34 33.4% (+24.9)#1,124
35. Glen Elder 58.3% 29.4% (+28.9)#35 33.4% (+24.9)#1,129
36. Mound Valley 58.3% 29.4% (+28.9)#36 33.4% (+24.9)#1,131
37. Fairway 57.7% 29.4% (+28.3)#37 33.4% (+24.3)#1,194
38. Leawood 57.5% 29.4% (+28.1)#38 33.4% (+24.1)#1,216
39. Frankfort 57.5% 29.4% (+28.1)#39 33.4% (+24.1)#1,233
40. Hudson 57.5% 29.4% (+28.1)#40 33.4% (+24.1)#1,240
41. Riley 57.4% 29.4% (+28.0)#41 33.4% (+24.0)#1,250
42. Fredonia 57.3% 29.4% (+27.9)#42 33.4% (+23.9)#1,261
43. Hiawatha 57.2% 29.4% (+27.8)#43 33.4% (+23.8)#1,290
44. Merriam 56.6% 29.4% (+27.2)#44 33.4% (+23.2)#1,364
45. Jewell 56.5% 29.4% (+27.1)#45 33.4% (+23.1)#1,409
46. Paxico 56.5% 29.4% (+27.1)#46 33.4% (+23.1)#1,417
47. Ashland 56.4% 29.4% (+27.0)#47 33.4% (+23.0)#1,435
48. Weskan 56.3% 29.4% (+26.9)#48 33.4% (+22.9)#1,463
49. Quinter 56.1% 29.4% (+26.7)#49 33.4% (+22.7)#1,486
50. Onaga 56.0% 29.4% (+26.6)#50 33.4% (+22.6)#1,499
51. Alma 55.5% 29.4% (+26.1)#51 33.4% (+22.1)#1,568
52. Howard 55.5% 29.4% (+26.1)#52 33.4% (+22.1)#1,572
53. Agra 55.3% 29.4% (+25.9)#53 33.4% (+21.9)#1,638
54. Osborne 54.6% 29.4% (+25.2)#54 33.4% (+21.2)#1,727
55. Attica 54.6% 29.4% (+25.2)#55 33.4% (+21.2)#1,729
56. Hoyt 54.5% 29.4% (+25.1)#56 33.4% (+21.1)#1,759
57. Axtell 54.5% 29.4% (+25.1)#57 33.4% (+21.1)#1,763
58. Independence 53.7% 29.4% (+24.3)#58 33.4% (+20.3)#1,885
59. Clifton 53.6% 29.4% (+24.2)#59 33.4% (+20.2)#1,910
60. La Crosse 53.5% 29.4% (+24.1)#60 33.4% (+20.1)#1,929
61. Cottonwood Falls 53.5% 29.4% (+24.1)#61 33.4% (+20.1)#1,932
62. Lenexa 53.2% 29.4% (+23.8)#62 33.4% (+19.8)#1,986
63. Pretty Prairie 52.9% 29.4% (+23.5)#63 33.4% (+19.5)#2,051
64. Oswego 52.8% 29.4% (+23.4)#64 33.4% (+19.4)#2,061
65. Hoisington 52.7% 29.4% (+23.3)#65 33.4% (+19.3)#2,084
66. Greenleaf 52.6% 29.4% (+23.2)#66 33.4% (+19.2)#2,099
67. Atwood 52.5% 29.4% (+23.1)#67 33.4% (+19.1)#2,124
68. Elbing 52.5% 29.4% (+23.1)#68 33.4% (+19.1)#2,140
69. Barnes 52.5% 29.4% (+23.1)#69 33.4% (+19.1)#2,144
70. Kinsley 52.4% 29.4% (+23.0)#70 33.4% (+19.0)#2,154
71. Brewster 52.3% 29.4% (+22.9)#71 33.4% (+18.9)#2,185
72. Burrton 52.2% 29.4% (+22.8)#72 33.4% (+18.8)#2,203
73. Wakeeney 51.9% 29.4% (+22.5)#73 33.4% (+18.5)#2,250
74. Rolla 51.7% 29.4% (+22.3)#74 33.4% (+18.3)#2,269
75. Derby 51.6% 29.4% (+22.2)#75 33.4% (+18.2)#2,275
76. St Marys 51.1% 29.4% (+21.7)#76 33.4% (+17.7)#2,386
77. Minneola 50.7% 29.4% (+21.3)#77 33.4% (+17.3)#2,461
78. Gridley 50.5% 29.4% (+21.1)#78 33.4% (+17.1)#2,506
79. Dexter 49.7% 29.4% (+20.3)#79 33.4% (+16.3)#2,663
80. Caldwell 49.5% 29.4% (+20.1)#80 33.4% (+16.1)#2,706
81. Rexford 49.4% 29.4% (+20.0)#81 33.4% (+16.0)#2,740
82. Oakley 48.8% 29.4% (+19.4)#82 33.4% (+15.4)#2,840
83. Copeland 48.5% 29.4% (+19.1)#83 33.4% (+15.1)#2,898
84. Pleasanton 48.3% 29.4% (+18.9)#84 33.4% (+14.9)#2,940
85. Columbus 48.0% 29.4% (+18.6)#85 33.4% (+14.6)#3,000
86. Neodesha 48.0% 29.4% (+18.6)#86 33.4% (+14.6)#3,004
87. Olsburg 48.0% 29.4% (+18.6)#87 33.4% (+14.6)#3,013
88. Whiting 47.5% 29.4% (+18.1)#88 33.4% (+14.1)#3,096
89. Alta Vista 47.3% 29.4% (+17.9)#89 33.4% (+13.9)#3,141
90. Whitewater 46.3% 29.4% (+16.9)#90 33.4% (+12.9)#3,315
91. Natoma 46.3% 29.4% (+16.9)#91 33.4% (+12.9)#3,318
92. Olathe 45.8% 29.4% (+16.4)#92 33.4% (+12.4)#3,386
93. St Francis 45.5% 29.4% (+16.1)#93 33.4% (+12.1)#3,468
94. Greensburg 45.5% 29.4% (+16.1)#94 33.4% (+12.1)#3,475
95. Leavenworth 45.2% 29.4% (+15.8)#95 33.4% (+11.8)#3,535
96. Eureka 45.0% 29.4% (+15.6)#96 33.4% (+11.6)#3,583
97. Chase 45.0% 29.4% (+15.6)#97 33.4% (+11.6)#3,589
98. Fort Scott 44.9% 29.4% (+15.5)#98 33.4% (+11.5)#3,603
99. Blue Rapids 44.5% 29.4% (+15.1)#99 33.4% (+11.1)#3,681
100. Mission Woods 44.5% 29.4% (+15.1)#100 33.4% (+11.1)#3,698

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas are:
#1
76.5%
#2
75.0%
#3
73.3%
#4
69.4%
#5
68.5%
#6
67.1%
#7
66.5%
#8
64.9%
#9
64.2%
#10
64.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas?
Toronto has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas with 76.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Kansas?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Kansas is 29.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.