Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New York

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
New York
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New York

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New York Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New York

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Skaneateles 78.1% 38.1% (+40.0)#1 33.4% (+44.7)#16
2. East Northport 75.2% 38.1% (+37.1)#2 33.4% (+41.8)#41
3. Kensington 71.4% 38.1% (+33.3)#3 33.4% (+38.0)#83
4. Springs 71.3% 38.1% (+33.2)#4 33.4% (+37.9)#86
5. Youngstown 70.3% 38.1% (+32.2)#5 33.4% (+36.9)#111
6. New Hartford 69.3% 38.1% (+31.2)#6 33.4% (+35.9)#132
7. Williamsville 69.1% 38.1% (+31.0)#7 33.4% (+35.7)#140
8. Yorktown Heights 69.1% 38.1% (+31.0)#8 33.4% (+35.7)#142
9. Cleveland 68.8% 38.1% (+30.7)#9 33.4% (+35.4)#152
10. Mill Neck 68.1% 38.1% (+30.0)#10 33.4% (+34.7)#182
11. Roslyn Heights 67.9% 38.1% (+29.8)#11 33.4% (+34.5)#186
12. Westfield 67.9% 38.1% (+29.8)#12 33.4% (+34.5)#188
13. Chestnut Ridge 67.2% 38.1% (+29.1)#13 33.4% (+33.8)#225
14. Greenville Cdp Westchester County 66.4% 38.1% (+28.3)#14 33.4% (+33.0)#257
15. Rotterdam 66.1% 38.1% (+28.0)#15 33.4% (+32.7)#280
16. Sayville 66.1% 38.1% (+28.0)#16 33.4% (+32.7)#282
17. Bellmore 66.1% 38.1% (+28.0)#17 33.4% (+32.7)#283
18. Andover 66.1% 38.1% (+28.0)#18 33.4% (+32.7)#286
19. Windsor 64.8% 38.1% (+26.7)#19 33.4% (+31.4)#361
20. North Merrick 64.6% 38.1% (+26.5)#20 33.4% (+31.2)#365
21. Myers Corner 64.4% 38.1% (+26.3)#21 33.4% (+31.0)#385
22. Hartsdale 63.5% 38.1% (+25.4)#22 33.4% (+30.1)#448
23. Broadalbin 63.4% 38.1% (+25.3)#23 33.4% (+30.0)#468
24. Painted Post 63.2% 38.1% (+25.1)#24 33.4% (+29.8)#487
25. Bergen 63.1% 38.1% (+25.0)#25 33.4% (+29.7)#501
26. Larchmont 62.7% 38.1% (+24.6)#26 33.4% (+29.3)#524
27. North Haven 62.5% 38.1% (+24.4)#27 33.4% (+29.1)#544
28. Valley Falls 62.3% 38.1% (+24.2)#28 33.4% (+28.9)#581
29. Peru 62.2% 38.1% (+24.1)#29 33.4% (+28.8)#590
30. Alden 62.1% 38.1% (+24.0)#30 33.4% (+28.7)#604
31. Hancock 61.5% 38.1% (+23.4)#31 33.4% (+28.1)#651
32. Sodus 61.4% 38.1% (+23.3)#32 33.4% (+28.0)#673
33. Chateaugay 61.1% 38.1% (+23.0)#33 33.4% (+27.7)#725
34. Cattaraugus 60.5% 38.1% (+22.4)#34 33.4% (+27.1)#781
35. Setauket 60.4% 38.1% (+22.3)#35 33.4% (+27.0)#806
36. Rushford 60.3% 38.1% (+22.2)#36 33.4% (+26.9)#835
37. Fishkill 59.5% 38.1% (+21.4)#37 33.4% (+26.1)#915
38. Sag Harbor 59.3% 38.1% (+21.2)#38 33.4% (+25.9)#952
39. Cape Vincent 59.3% 38.1% (+21.2)#39 33.4% (+25.9)#959
40. Mount Sinai 59.2% 38.1% (+21.1)#40 33.4% (+25.8)#974
41. Montauk 59.1% 38.1% (+21.0)#41 33.4% (+25.7)#994
42. Palmyra 59.1% 38.1% (+21.0)#42 33.4% (+25.7)#996
43. Jordan 59.1% 38.1% (+21.0)#43 33.4% (+25.7)#1,003
44. Lewiston 59.0% 38.1% (+20.9)#44 33.4% (+25.6)#1,016
45. Fort Plain 58.8% 38.1% (+20.7)#45 33.4% (+25.4)#1,028
46. Asharoken 58.8% 38.1% (+20.7)#46 33.4% (+25.4)#1,032
47. Canaseraga 58.8% 38.1% (+20.7)#47 33.4% (+25.4)#1,033
48. Horseheads 58.7% 38.1% (+20.6)#48 33.4% (+25.3)#1,041
49. New Windsor 58.6% 38.1% (+20.5)#49 33.4% (+25.2)#1,053
50. South Huntington 58.5% 38.1% (+20.4)#50 33.4% (+25.1)#1,064
51. Voorheesville 58.5% 38.1% (+20.4)#51 33.4% (+25.1)#1,074
52. Montour Falls 58.3% 38.1% (+20.2)#52 33.4% (+24.9)#1,122
53. Otisville 58.2% 38.1% (+20.1)#53 33.4% (+24.8)#1,141
54. Great Neck Plaza 58.1% 38.1% (+20.0)#54 33.4% (+24.7)#1,147
55. Hammondsport 58.0% 38.1% (+19.9)#55 33.4% (+24.6)#1,164
56. Westhampton Beach 57.9% 38.1% (+19.8)#56 33.4% (+24.5)#1,170
57. Menands 57.7% 38.1% (+19.6)#57 33.4% (+24.3)#1,193
58. Commack 57.6% 38.1% (+19.5)#58 33.4% (+24.2)#1,201
59. Islandia 57.6% 38.1% (+19.5)#59 33.4% (+24.2)#1,206
60. Oxford 57.6% 38.1% (+19.5)#60 33.4% (+24.2)#1,213
61. Port Leyden 57.5% 38.1% (+19.4)#61 33.4% (+24.1)#1,234
62. Chatham 57.4% 38.1% (+19.3)#62 33.4% (+24.0)#1,248
63. Clayton 57.3% 38.1% (+19.2)#63 33.4% (+23.9)#1,263
64. Naples 57.3% 38.1% (+19.2)#64 33.4% (+23.9)#1,267
65. Newark Valley 57.2% 38.1% (+19.1)#65 33.4% (+23.8)#1,297
66. Southampton 57.1% 38.1% (+19.0)#66 33.4% (+23.7)#1,307
67. East Hampton North 56.7% 38.1% (+18.6)#67 33.4% (+23.3)#1,349
68. Thornwood 56.5% 38.1% (+18.4)#68 33.4% (+23.1)#1,389
69. Warrensburg 56.4% 38.1% (+18.3)#69 33.4% (+23.0)#1,426
70. Shirley 56.3% 38.1% (+18.2)#70 33.4% (+22.9)#1,441
71. Akron 56.3% 38.1% (+18.2)#71 33.4% (+22.9)#1,448
72. Thiells 56.2% 38.1% (+18.1)#72 33.4% (+22.8)#1,470
73. Chestertown 55.9% 38.1% (+17.8)#73 33.4% (+22.5)#1,508
74. Brocton 55.8% 38.1% (+17.7)#74 33.4% (+22.4)#1,516
75. Oyster Bay Cove 55.6% 38.1% (+17.5)#75 33.4% (+22.2)#1,544
76. Sunset Bay 55.6% 38.1% (+17.5)#76 33.4% (+22.2)#1,548
77. Hudson Falls 55.4% 38.1% (+17.3)#77 33.4% (+22.0)#1,589
78. Plandome Manor 55.4% 38.1% (+17.3)#78 33.4% (+22.0)#1,605
79. Lloyd Harbor 55.3% 38.1% (+17.2)#79 33.4% (+21.9)#1,618
80. Millbrook 55.3% 38.1% (+17.2)#80 33.4% (+21.9)#1,624
81. Firthcliffe 55.2% 38.1% (+17.1)#81 33.4% (+21.8)#1,645
82. Hobart 55.2% 38.1% (+17.1)#82 33.4% (+21.8)#1,652
83. Woodstock 55.1% 38.1% (+17.0)#83 33.4% (+21.7)#1,665
84. Milford 55.1% 38.1% (+17.0)#84 33.4% (+21.7)#1,672
85. Dannemora 54.8% 38.1% (+16.7)#85 33.4% (+21.4)#1,705
86. Lindenhurst 54.5% 38.1% (+16.4)#86 33.4% (+21.1)#1,735
87. Selden 54.5% 38.1% (+16.4)#87 33.4% (+21.1)#1,737
88. Eastchester 54.5% 38.1% (+16.4)#88 33.4% (+21.1)#1,738
89. Frankfort 54.5% 38.1% (+16.4)#89 33.4% (+21.1)#1,745
90. Earlville 54.5% 38.1% (+16.4)#90 33.4% (+21.1)#1,760
91. East Hills 54.3% 38.1% (+16.2)#91 33.4% (+20.9)#1,783
92. Saugerties 54.3% 38.1% (+16.2)#92 33.4% (+20.9)#1,788
93. Carthage 54.3% 38.1% (+16.2)#93 33.4% (+20.9)#1,789
94. Prattsburgh 54.1% 38.1% (+16.0)#94 33.4% (+20.7)#1,841
95. Farmingdale 54.0% 38.1% (+15.9)#95 33.4% (+20.6)#1,846
96. Bellport 54.0% 38.1% (+15.9)#96 33.4% (+20.6)#1,848
97. Bethpage 53.8% 38.1% (+15.7)#97 33.4% (+20.4)#1,861
98. Bayport 53.7% 38.1% (+15.6)#98 33.4% (+20.3)#1,884
99. Thomaston 53.6% 38.1% (+15.5)#99 33.4% (+20.2)#1,907
100. Boonville 53.6% 38.1% (+15.5)#100 33.4% (+20.2)#1,908

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New York?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New York are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New York?
Skaneateles has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New York with 78.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of New York?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in New York is 38.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.