Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. Lime Springs 78.2% 31.2% (+47.0)#1 33.4% (+44.8)#15
2. Marengo 77.7% 31.2% (+46.5)#2 33.4% (+44.3)#18
3. Cascade 77.5% 31.2% (+46.3)#3 33.4% (+44.1)#20
4. Janesville 76.1% 31.2% (+44.9)#4 33.4% (+42.7)#36
5. Lester 71.5% 31.2% (+40.3)#5 33.4% (+38.1)#80
6. Villisca 71.1% 31.2% (+39.9)#6 33.4% (+37.7)#93
7. Orient 70.1% 31.2% (+38.9)#7 33.4% (+36.7)#118
8. Delaware 69.5% 31.2% (+38.3)#8 33.4% (+36.1)#123
9. Keota 69.0% 31.2% (+37.8)#9 33.4% (+35.6)#145
10. Goldfield 67.5% 31.2% (+36.3)#10 33.4% (+34.1)#202
11. Whittemore 67.5% 31.2% (+36.3)#11 33.4% (+34.1)#203
12. Rickardsville 67.5% 31.2% (+36.3)#12 33.4% (+34.1)#204
13. Donnellson 67.3% 31.2% (+36.1)#13 33.4% (+33.9)#216
14. Rowley 67.3% 31.2% (+36.1)#14 33.4% (+33.9)#220
15. Tabor 67.1% 31.2% (+35.9)#15 33.4% (+33.7)#232
16. Cumming 66.6% 31.2% (+35.4)#16 33.4% (+33.2)#244
17. Odebolt 66.1% 31.2% (+34.9)#17 33.4% (+32.7)#287
18. Dyersville 65.8% 31.2% (+34.6)#18 33.4% (+32.4)#296
19. Madrid 65.5% 31.2% (+34.3)#19 33.4% (+32.1)#309
20. Wilton 65.4% 31.2% (+34.2)#20 33.4% (+32.0)#319
21. Dow City 65.3% 31.2% (+34.1)#21 33.4% (+31.9)#333
22. Harpers Ferry 65.3% 31.2% (+34.1)#22 33.4% (+31.9)#335
23. Luxemburg 65.0% 31.2% (+33.8)#23 33.4% (+31.6)#356
24. Akron 64.8% 31.2% (+33.6)#24 33.4% (+31.4)#360
25. Bradgate 64.5% 31.2% (+33.3)#25 33.4% (+31.1)#384
26. Solon 63.6% 31.2% (+32.4)#26 33.4% (+30.2)#441
27. Andrew 63.5% 31.2% (+32.3)#27 33.4% (+30.1)#456
28. Mystic 63.5% 31.2% (+32.3)#28 33.4% (+30.1)#457
29. Bellevue 63.3% 31.2% (+32.1)#29 33.4% (+29.9)#475
30. St Donatus 63.0% 31.2% (+31.8)#30 33.4% (+29.6)#514
31. Lynnville 62.8% 31.2% (+31.6)#31 33.4% (+29.4)#520
32. Lehigh 62.7% 31.2% (+31.5)#32 33.4% (+29.3)#531
33. Redfield 62.5% 31.2% (+31.3)#33 33.4% (+29.1)#545
34. Lu Verne 62.4% 31.2% (+31.2)#34 33.4% (+29.0)#566
35. Mallard 62.3% 31.2% (+31.1)#35 33.4% (+28.9)#585
36. Sac City 62.2% 31.2% (+31.0)#36 33.4% (+28.8)#589
37. Dunlap 62.2% 31.2% (+31.0)#37 33.4% (+28.8)#591
38. West Union 62.1% 31.2% (+30.9)#38 33.4% (+28.7)#605
39. West Bend 62.0% 31.2% (+30.8)#39 33.4% (+28.6)#611
40. Tripoli 61.6% 31.2% (+30.4)#40 33.4% (+28.2)#641
41. Irwin 61.5% 31.2% (+30.3)#41 33.4% (+28.1)#658
42. Clive 60.9% 31.2% (+29.7)#42 33.4% (+27.5)#732
43. Delhi 60.7% 31.2% (+29.5)#43 33.4% (+27.3)#752
44. Bettendorf 60.6% 31.2% (+29.4)#44 33.4% (+27.2)#753
45. Harris 60.5% 31.2% (+29.3)#45 33.4% (+27.1)#793
46. Greenfield 60.3% 31.2% (+29.1)#46 33.4% (+26.9)#826
47. Anita 60.3% 31.2% (+29.1)#47 33.4% (+26.9)#830
48. Hubbard 60.3% 31.2% (+29.1)#48 33.4% (+26.9)#831
49. Blairstown 60.3% 31.2% (+29.1)#49 33.4% (+26.9)#833
50. Stratford 60.2% 31.2% (+29.0)#50 33.4% (+26.8)#849
51. Bedford 60.1% 31.2% (+28.9)#51 33.4% (+26.7)#861
52. Lytton 60.1% 31.2% (+28.9)#52 33.4% (+26.7)#865
53. Strawberry Point 59.5% 31.2% (+28.3)#53 33.4% (+26.1)#918
54. Lake Park 59.5% 31.2% (+28.3)#54 33.4% (+26.1)#919
55. West Point 59.5% 31.2% (+28.3)#55 33.4% (+26.1)#921
56. Portsmouth 59.4% 31.2% (+28.2)#56 33.4% (+26.0)#946
57. Rockwell 59.3% 31.2% (+28.1)#57 33.4% (+25.9)#957
58. Stanhope 59.3% 31.2% (+28.1)#58 33.4% (+25.9)#961
59. Nevada 59.2% 31.2% (+28.0)#59 33.4% (+25.8)#975
60. Sully 59.2% 31.2% (+28.0)#60 33.4% (+25.8)#981
61. Garnavillo 59.2% 31.2% (+28.0)#61 33.4% (+25.8)#982
62. Farmington 59.2% 31.2% (+28.0)#62 33.4% (+25.8)#984
63. Preston 59.0% 31.2% (+27.8)#63 33.4% (+25.6)#1,018
64. Milo 58.8% 31.2% (+27.6)#64 33.4% (+25.4)#1,030
65. Buffalo Center 58.4% 31.2% (+27.2)#65 33.4% (+25.0)#1,111
66. Gilbertville 58.3% 31.2% (+27.1)#66 33.4% (+24.9)#1,126
67. Waukee 57.8% 31.2% (+26.6)#67 33.4% (+24.4)#1,174
68. Orleans 57.8% 31.2% (+26.6)#68 33.4% (+24.4)#1,182
69. Lone Rock 57.7% 31.2% (+26.5)#69 33.4% (+24.3)#1,200
70. Oakland 57.5% 31.2% (+26.3)#70 33.4% (+24.1)#1,227
71. Whiting 57.3% 31.2% (+26.1)#71 33.4% (+23.9)#1,268
72. Gowrie 57.3% 31.2% (+26.1)#72 33.4% (+23.9)#1,269
73. Wellsburg 57.3% 31.2% (+26.1)#73 33.4% (+23.9)#1,271
74. Alleman 57.3% 31.2% (+26.1)#74 33.4% (+23.9)#1,275
75. Laurens 57.2% 31.2% (+26.0)#75 33.4% (+23.8)#1,296
76. Pocahontas 56.7% 31.2% (+25.5)#76 33.4% (+23.3)#1,354
77. Manly 56.7% 31.2% (+25.5)#77 33.4% (+23.3)#1,355
78. Albert City 56.7% 31.2% (+25.5)#78 33.4% (+23.3)#1,358
79. Shenandoah 56.5% 31.2% (+25.3)#79 33.4% (+23.1)#1,386
80. Traer 56.5% 31.2% (+25.3)#80 33.4% (+23.1)#1,396
81. Mapleton 56.5% 31.2% (+25.3)#81 33.4% (+23.1)#1,400
82. Meservey 56.5% 31.2% (+25.3)#82 33.4% (+23.1)#1,415
83. Woden 56.5% 31.2% (+25.3)#83 33.4% (+23.1)#1,418
84. Eldridge 56.4% 31.2% (+25.2)#84 33.4% (+23.0)#1,423
85. Monticello 56.1% 31.2% (+24.9)#85 33.4% (+22.7)#1,485
86. Ventura 56.1% 31.2% (+24.9)#86 33.4% (+22.7)#1,487
87. Onawa 56.0% 31.2% (+24.8)#87 33.4% (+22.6)#1,495
88. Corwith 56.0% 31.2% (+24.8)#88 33.4% (+22.6)#1,501
89. Larrabee 56.0% 31.2% (+24.8)#89 33.4% (+22.6)#1,502
90. Lake City 55.5% 31.2% (+24.3)#90 33.4% (+22.1)#1,562
91. Thornton 55.5% 31.2% (+24.3)#91 33.4% (+22.1)#1,574
92. Lidderdale 55.5% 31.2% (+24.3)#92 33.4% (+22.1)#1,585
93. Rolfe 55.4% 31.2% (+24.2)#93 33.4% (+22.0)#1,604
94. Garwin 55.3% 31.2% (+24.1)#94 33.4% (+21.9)#1,630
95. Sutherland 55.3% 31.2% (+24.1)#95 33.4% (+21.9)#1,632
96. Galva 55.3% 31.2% (+24.1)#96 33.4% (+21.9)#1,633
97. Nashua 54.5% 31.2% (+23.3)#97 33.4% (+21.1)#1,749
98. Montezuma 54.5% 31.2% (+23.3)#98 33.4% (+21.1)#1,752
99. Jewell Junction 54.5% 31.2% (+23.3)#99 33.4% (+21.1)#1,753
100. Allison 54.5% 31.2% (+23.3)#100 33.4% (+21.1)#1,756

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa are:
#1
78.2%
#2
77.7%
#3
77.5%
#4
76.1%
#5
71.5%
#6
71.1%
#7
70.1%
#8
69.5%
#9
69.0%
#10
67.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa?
Lime Springs has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa with 78.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Iowa is 31.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.