Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Illinois

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Illinois
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Illinois

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Illinois Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Illinois

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Campbell's Island 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#203
2. Chemung 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#216
3. Goofy Ridge 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#344
4. Hamburg 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#356
5. Ophiem 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#368
6. Sims 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#379
7. Alden 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#389
8. Ferris 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#407
9. Otterville 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#413
10. Nilwood 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#10 17.0% (+83.0)#425
11. Harding 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#11 17.0% (+83.0)#497
12. Sailor Springs 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#12 17.0% (+83.0)#519
13. Vernon 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#13 17.0% (+83.0)#547
14. Camden 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#14 17.0% (+83.0)#555
15. Garrett 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#15 17.0% (+83.0)#560
16. Strawn 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#16 17.0% (+83.0)#564
17. Valley City 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#17 17.0% (+83.0)#653
18. Westervelt 100.0% 16.0% (+84.0)#18 17.0% (+83.0)#668
19. Willow Hill 98.4% 16.0% (+82.4)#19 17.0% (+81.4)#688
20. Venice 90.2% 16.0% (+74.2)#20 17.0% (+73.2)#758
21. Golden Gate 87.5% 16.0% (+71.5)#21 17.0% (+70.5)#821
22. Walnut Hill 86.4% 16.0% (+70.4)#22 17.0% (+69.4)#840
23. Bingham 85.7% 16.0% (+69.7)#23 17.0% (+68.7)#861
24. Wheeler 81.0% 16.0% (+65.0)#24 17.0% (+64.0)#998
25. Smithfield 80.0% 16.0% (+64.0)#25 17.0% (+63.0)#1,031
26. Banner 80.0% 16.0% (+64.0)#26 17.0% (+63.0)#1,032
27. Ford Heights 78.8% 16.0% (+62.8)#27 17.0% (+61.8)#1,081
28. Arrowsmith 78.7% 16.0% (+62.7)#28 17.0% (+61.7)#1,083
29. East Cape Girardeau 78.3% 16.0% (+62.3)#29 17.0% (+61.3)#1,095
30. Old Shawneetown 77.8% 16.0% (+61.8)#30 17.0% (+60.8)#1,111
31. Colp 75.0% 16.0% (+59.0)#31 17.0% (+58.0)#1,215
32. Indianola 75.0% 16.0% (+59.0)#32 17.0% (+58.0)#1,217
33. Como 73.0% 16.0% (+57.0)#33 17.0% (+56.0)#1,305
34. Cahokia Heights 72.8% 16.0% (+56.8)#34 17.0% (+55.8)#1,318
35. Washington Park 72.7% 16.0% (+56.7)#35 17.0% (+55.7)#1,333
36. Dalton City 71.4% 16.0% (+55.4)#36 17.0% (+54.5)#1,386
37. Naplate 71.4% 16.0% (+55.4)#37 17.0% (+54.5)#1,389
38. Junction City 70.4% 16.0% (+54.4)#38 17.0% (+53.5)#1,442
39. Karnak 69.8% 16.0% (+53.8)#39 17.0% (+52.8)#1,477
40. Sun River Terrace 69.4% 16.0% (+53.4)#40 17.0% (+52.4)#1,491
41. Mcclure 69.2% 16.0% (+53.2)#41 17.0% (+52.3)#1,502
42. Lee 68.4% 16.0% (+52.4)#42 17.0% (+51.4)#1,540
43. West City 68.1% 16.0% (+52.1)#43 17.0% (+51.1)#1,556
44. Olive Branch 67.6% 16.0% (+51.6)#44 17.0% (+50.6)#1,576
45. Donnellson 66.7% 16.0% (+50.7)#45 17.0% (+49.7)#1,646
46. Cantrall 66.7% 16.0% (+50.7)#46 17.0% (+49.7)#1,648
47. Kinsman 66.7% 16.0% (+50.7)#47 17.0% (+49.7)#1,662
48. Belle Prairie City 66.7% 16.0% (+50.7)#48 17.0% (+49.7)#1,666
49. Deer Grove 66.7% 16.0% (+50.7)#49 17.0% (+49.7)#1,671
50. Buckley 66.1% 16.0% (+50.1)#50 17.0% (+49.1)#1,702
51. Troy Grove 64.3% 16.0% (+48.3)#51 17.0% (+47.3)#1,786
52. Nelson 62.5% 16.0% (+46.5)#52 17.0% (+45.5)#1,912
53. Winslow 60.9% 16.0% (+44.9)#53 17.0% (+43.9)#2,019
54. Bryant 60.9% 16.0% (+44.9)#54 17.0% (+43.9)#2,020
55. Sauk Village 60.6% 16.0% (+44.6)#55 17.0% (+43.6)#2,039
56. Modesto 60.0% 16.0% (+44.0)#56 17.0% (+43.0)#2,094
57. Kempton 59.3% 16.0% (+43.3)#57 17.0% (+42.3)#2,143
58. Chandlerville 59.2% 16.0% (+43.2)#58 17.0% (+42.2)#2,147
59. East Carondelet 59.1% 16.0% (+43.1)#59 17.0% (+42.1)#2,160
60. Rankin 59.0% 16.0% (+43.0)#60 17.0% (+42.0)#2,168
61. Fairmont City 59.0% 16.0% (+43.0)#61 17.0% (+42.0)#2,172
62. Lomax 59.0% 16.0% (+43.0)#62 17.0% (+42.0)#2,176
63. Olmsted 58.8% 16.0% (+42.8)#63 17.0% (+41.8)#2,188
64. Dixmoor 58.6% 16.0% (+42.6)#64 17.0% (+41.6)#2,206
65. Milton 57.9% 16.0% (+41.9)#65 17.0% (+40.9)#2,268
66. Sandoval 57.6% 16.0% (+41.6)#66 17.0% (+40.7)#2,279
67. Walshville 56.9% 16.0% (+40.9)#67 17.0% (+39.9)#2,347
68. West Union 56.0% 16.0% (+40.0)#68 17.0% (+39.0)#2,422
69. Keyesport 55.8% 16.0% (+39.8)#69 17.0% (+38.8)#2,446
70. Bellmont 55.3% 16.0% (+39.3)#70 17.0% (+38.3)#2,502
71. Carbondale 54.9% 16.0% (+38.9)#71 17.0% (+37.9)#2,532
72. Sammons Point 54.5% 16.0% (+38.6)#72 17.0% (+37.6)#2,564
73. Chillicothe 54.3% 16.0% (+38.3)#73 17.0% (+37.3)#2,587
74. Godley 54.3% 16.0% (+38.3)#74 17.0% (+37.3)#2,589
75. Rio 54.2% 16.0% (+38.2)#75 17.0% (+37.2)#2,597
76. Gorham 53.6% 16.0% (+37.6)#76 17.0% (+36.6)#2,668
77. Mason 53.4% 16.0% (+37.4)#77 17.0% (+36.4)#2,677
78. Kampsville 53.3% 16.0% (+37.3)#78 17.0% (+36.4)#2,691
79. Du Quoin 53.2% 16.0% (+37.2)#79 17.0% (+36.2)#2,710
80. Nauvoo 52.9% 16.0% (+37.0)#80 17.0% (+36.0)#2,736
81. East Hazel Crest 52.9% 16.0% (+36.9)#81 17.0% (+35.9)#2,748
82. Odin 52.7% 16.0% (+36.7)#82 17.0% (+35.7)#2,767
83. Beaverville 52.6% 16.0% (+36.6)#83 17.0% (+35.7)#2,774
84. Hoopeston 52.4% 16.0% (+36.4)#84 17.0% (+35.4)#2,796
85. Spring Bay 52.2% 16.0% (+36.2)#85 17.0% (+35.2)#2,814
86. Verona 52.0% 16.0% (+36.0)#86 17.0% (+35.0)#2,836
87. Wood River 51.9% 16.0% (+35.9)#87 17.0% (+34.9)#2,843
88. Ellsworth 51.9% 16.0% (+35.9)#88 17.0% (+34.9)#2,845
89. Dallas City 51.8% 16.0% (+35.8)#89 17.0% (+34.8)#2,852
90. Grayville 51.3% 16.0% (+35.3)#90 17.0% (+34.3)#2,891
91. St Elmo 50.7% 16.0% (+34.8)#91 17.0% (+33.8)#2,940
92. Galva 50.2% 16.0% (+34.2)#92 17.0% (+33.2)#2,982
93. Cuba 50.0% 16.0% (+34.0)#93 17.0% (+33.0)#3,002
94. Sunnyland 50.0% 16.0% (+34.0)#94 17.0% (+33.0)#3,014
95. Pierron 50.0% 16.0% (+34.0)#95 17.0% (+33.0)#3,020
96. Ipava 50.0% 16.0% (+34.0)#96 17.0% (+33.0)#3,023
97. Maquon 50.0% 16.0% (+34.0)#97 17.0% (+33.0)#3,071
98. Claremont 50.0% 16.0% (+34.0)#98 17.0% (+33.0)#3,083
99. Broughton 50.0% 16.0% (+34.0)#99 17.0% (+33.0)#3,085
100. West Frankfort 49.3% 16.0% (+33.4)#100 17.0% (+32.4)#3,164

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Illinois?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Illinois are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Illinois?
Chemung has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Illinois with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Illinois?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Illinois is 16.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.