Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Crystal 100.0% 18.3% (+81.7)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#78
2. Riverdale 100.0% 18.3% (+81.7)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#321
3. Rockland 100.0% 18.3% (+81.7)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#360
4. Mcbride 100.0% 18.3% (+81.7)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#366
5. Arcadia 100.0% 18.3% (+81.7)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#427
6. Lake Gogebic 100.0% 18.3% (+81.7)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#489
7. Naubinway 100.0% 18.3% (+81.7)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#569
8. Reading 89.4% 18.3% (+71.0)#8 17.0% (+72.4)#774
9. Turner 88.9% 18.3% (+70.6)#9 17.0% (+71.9)#791
10. Melvin 88.2% 18.3% (+69.9)#10 17.0% (+71.3)#802
11. Carp Lake 80.7% 18.3% (+62.4)#11 17.0% (+63.7)#1,002
12. Stony Point 78.4% 18.3% (+60.1)#12 17.0% (+61.4)#1,091
13. Millersburg 76.5% 18.3% (+58.2)#13 17.0% (+59.5)#1,155
14. Bendon 73.3% 18.3% (+55.0)#14 17.0% (+56.4)#1,288
15. Merrill 69.9% 18.3% (+51.6)#15 17.0% (+52.9)#1,471
16. Rose City 69.7% 18.3% (+51.4)#16 17.0% (+52.7)#1,480
17. Fountain 69.6% 18.3% (+51.2)#17 17.0% (+52.6)#1,485
18. Lakeview 69.3% 18.3% (+51.0)#18 17.0% (+52.3)#1,494
19. Winn 66.7% 18.3% (+48.3)#19 17.0% (+49.7)#1,631
20. Stanwood 66.7% 18.3% (+48.3)#20 17.0% (+49.7)#1,645
21. Pierson 66.7% 18.3% (+48.3)#21 17.0% (+49.7)#1,650
22. Wakefield 66.3% 18.3% (+48.0)#22 17.0% (+49.4)#1,682
23. Port Sanilac 65.8% 18.3% (+47.5)#23 17.0% (+48.8)#1,710
24. Benton Harbor 65.1% 18.3% (+46.8)#24 17.0% (+48.1)#1,746
25. Amasa 64.3% 18.3% (+46.0)#25 17.0% (+47.3)#1,787
26. Posen 64.3% 18.3% (+46.0)#26 17.0% (+47.3)#1,788
27. Middletown 63.6% 18.3% (+45.3)#27 17.0% (+46.7)#1,834
28. Elm Hall 63.6% 18.3% (+45.3)#28 17.0% (+46.7)#1,841
29. St Helen 62.9% 18.3% (+44.6)#29 17.0% (+45.9)#1,873
30. Benton Heights 62.7% 18.3% (+44.4)#30 17.0% (+45.7)#1,891
31. Skidway Lake 61.0% 18.3% (+42.6)#31 17.0% (+44.0)#2,014
32. Kincheloe 59.8% 18.3% (+41.4)#32 17.0% (+42.8)#2,117
33. Weidman 59.6% 18.3% (+41.3)#33 17.0% (+42.6)#2,129
34. Coleman 59.1% 18.3% (+40.8)#34 17.0% (+42.1)#2,153
35. Lakes Of The North 58.8% 18.3% (+40.5)#35 17.0% (+41.8)#2,184
36. Onaway 58.3% 18.3% (+40.0)#36 17.0% (+41.4)#2,227
37. Calumet 58.3% 18.3% (+40.0)#37 17.0% (+41.4)#2,228
38. Walkerville 58.1% 18.3% (+39.8)#38 17.0% (+41.2)#2,252
39. Bloomingdale 58.1% 18.3% (+39.7)#39 17.0% (+41.1)#2,259
40. Port Austin 57.9% 18.3% (+39.6)#40 17.0% (+40.9)#2,265
41. Michigamme 56.2% 18.3% (+37.9)#41 17.0% (+39.3)#2,396
42. Harrietta 55.6% 18.3% (+37.2)#42 17.0% (+38.6)#2,476
43. Newberry 55.2% 18.3% (+36.9)#43 17.0% (+38.2)#2,507
44. Ontonagon 54.5% 18.3% (+36.2)#44 17.0% (+37.6)#2,553
45. River Rouge 54.3% 18.3% (+36.0)#45 17.0% (+37.4)#2,585
46. Saginaw 54.0% 18.3% (+35.6)#46 17.0% (+37.0)#2,618
47. Melvindale 53.8% 18.3% (+35.5)#47 17.0% (+36.9)#2,645
48. Maple Rapids 53.6% 18.3% (+35.3)#48 17.0% (+36.6)#2,661
49. Millburg 53.3% 18.3% (+35.0)#49 17.0% (+36.4)#2,685
50. Wolverine 53.3% 18.3% (+35.0)#50 17.0% (+36.4)#2,695
51. Oakley 52.6% 18.3% (+34.3)#51 17.0% (+35.7)#2,777
52. Mesick 52.1% 18.3% (+33.8)#52 17.0% (+35.1)#2,824
53. Harrisville 51.9% 18.3% (+33.6)#53 17.0% (+34.9)#2,840
54. Charlevoix 51.8% 18.3% (+33.5)#54 17.0% (+34.9)#2,847
55. Hamtramck 51.8% 18.3% (+33.5)#55 17.0% (+34.8)#2,854
56. Alma 51.5% 18.3% (+33.2)#56 17.0% (+34.6)#2,873
57. Beecher 51.0% 18.3% (+32.7)#57 17.0% (+34.0)#2,920
58. Muskegon Heights 51.0% 18.3% (+32.7)#58 17.0% (+34.0)#2,922
59. Houghton Lake 50.9% 18.3% (+32.6)#59 17.0% (+34.0)#2,926
60. Flint 50.7% 18.3% (+32.3)#60 17.0% (+33.7)#2,946
61. Ubly 50.6% 18.3% (+32.3)#61 17.0% (+33.7)#2,947
62. Lewiston 50.0% 18.3% (+31.7)#62 17.0% (+33.0)#3,003
63. New Lothrop 50.0% 18.3% (+31.7)#63 17.0% (+33.0)#3,008
64. Dowagiac 49.0% 18.3% (+30.7)#64 17.0% (+32.0)#3,179
65. Bessemer 49.0% 18.3% (+30.6)#65 17.0% (+32.0)#3,182
66. Galien 48.5% 18.3% (+30.2)#66 17.0% (+31.5)#3,231
67. Tower 48.5% 18.3% (+30.2)#67 17.0% (+31.5)#3,234
68. Allen 48.4% 18.3% (+30.1)#68 17.0% (+31.4)#3,250
69. St Ignace 48.1% 18.3% (+29.8)#69 17.0% (+31.1)#3,287
70. Jasper 48.0% 18.3% (+29.7)#70 17.0% (+31.0)#3,299
71. Fremont 47.3% 18.3% (+29.0)#71 17.0% (+30.3)#3,382
72. Zeba 46.9% 18.3% (+28.6)#72 17.0% (+30.0)#3,426
73. Cassopolis 46.9% 18.3% (+28.6)#73 17.0% (+29.9)#3,429
74. Imlay City 46.9% 18.3% (+28.6)#74 17.0% (+29.9)#3,434
75. Detroit 46.5% 18.3% (+28.2)#75 17.0% (+29.6)#3,491
76. West Monroe 45.6% 18.3% (+27.3)#76 17.0% (+28.6)#3,610
77. Highland Park 45.6% 18.3% (+27.2)#77 17.0% (+28.6)#3,616
78. Harrison 45.4% 18.3% (+27.1)#78 17.0% (+28.4)#3,651
79. Paw Paw Lake 44.8% 18.3% (+26.5)#79 17.0% (+27.8)#3,711
80. Perry 44.3% 18.3% (+26.0)#80 17.0% (+27.4)#3,792
81. Prescott 44.0% 18.3% (+25.7)#81 17.0% (+27.0)#3,829
82. Inkster 43.3% 18.3% (+25.0)#82 17.0% (+26.3)#3,935
83. Springfield 43.0% 18.3% (+24.6)#83 17.0% (+26.0)#3,980
84. Ludington 42.6% 18.3% (+24.3)#84 17.0% (+25.6)#4,050
85. Vandercook Lake 42.5% 18.3% (+24.2)#85 17.0% (+25.5)#4,067
86. Tustin 42.3% 18.3% (+24.0)#86 17.0% (+25.3)#4,091
87. Lakeport 42.2% 18.3% (+23.9)#87 17.0% (+25.2)#4,106
88. White Pigeon 42.2% 18.3% (+23.8)#88 17.0% (+25.2)#4,110
89. Howard City 42.1% 18.3% (+23.8)#89 17.0% (+25.2)#4,111
90. Gwinn 42.0% 18.3% (+23.7)#90 17.0% (+25.1)#4,126
91. Clio 41.6% 18.3% (+23.3)#91 17.0% (+24.6)#4,192
92. Cheboygan 41.3% 18.3% (+22.9)#92 17.0% (+24.3)#4,237
93. Niles 40.8% 18.3% (+22.5)#93 17.0% (+23.8)#4,311
94. Brown City 40.5% 18.3% (+22.2)#94 17.0% (+23.5)#4,361
95. Mecosta 40.5% 18.3% (+22.2)#95 17.0% (+23.5)#4,364
96. Central Lake 40.2% 18.3% (+21.9)#96 17.0% (+23.3)#4,406
97. Mayville 40.2% 18.3% (+21.9)#97 17.0% (+23.2)#4,409
98. Pontiac 40.1% 18.3% (+21.8)#98 17.0% (+23.1)#4,429
99. Scottville 39.5% 18.3% (+21.2)#99 17.0% (+22.6)#4,560
100. Coldwater 39.1% 18.3% (+20.7)#100 17.0% (+22.1)#4,635

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
89.4%
#4
88.9%
#5
88.2%
#6
80.7%
#7
78.4%
#8
76.5%
#9
73.3%
#10
69.9%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan?
McBride has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan is 18.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.