Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Boyd 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#373
2. Ball Club 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#484
3. Wright 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#502
4. Lastrup 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#530
5. Inger 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#534
6. Goodridge 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#556
7. Walters 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#575
8. Kenneth 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#587
9. Essig 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#603
10. Laporte 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#10 17.0% (+83.0)#609
11. Nashua 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#11 17.0% (+83.0)#618
12. Myrtle 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#12 17.0% (+83.0)#619
13. Lengby 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#13 17.0% (+83.0)#639
14. Bruno 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#14 17.0% (+83.0)#641
15. Farwell 100.0% 11.3% (+88.7)#15 17.0% (+83.0)#657
16. Mahnomen 88.9% 11.3% (+77.6)#16 17.0% (+71.9)#789
17. Bena 88.9% 11.3% (+77.6)#17 17.0% (+71.9)#790
18. Halma 88.9% 11.3% (+77.6)#18 17.0% (+71.9)#793
19. Nielsville 88.2% 11.3% (+77.0)#19 17.0% (+71.3)#803
20. Orr 84.2% 11.3% (+73.0)#20 17.0% (+67.2)#897
21. White Earth 81.7% 11.3% (+70.5)#21 17.0% (+64.7)#974
22. Remer 80.0% 11.3% (+68.7)#22 17.0% (+63.0)#1,023
23. Ormsby 80.0% 11.3% (+68.7)#23 17.0% (+63.0)#1,034
24. Squaw Lake 80.0% 11.3% (+68.7)#24 17.0% (+63.0)#1,036
25. Manchester 80.0% 11.3% (+68.7)#25 17.0% (+63.0)#1,040
26. South End 80.0% 11.3% (+68.7)#26 17.0% (+63.0)#1,041
27. Keewatin 79.2% 11.3% (+67.9)#27 17.0% (+62.2)#1,064
28. Marietta 76.2% 11.3% (+64.9)#28 17.0% (+59.2)#1,164
29. Echo 75.0% 11.3% (+63.7)#29 17.0% (+58.0)#1,214
30. Ebro 70.0% 11.3% (+58.7)#30 17.0% (+53.0)#1,468
31. Winger 66.7% 11.3% (+55.4)#31 17.0% (+49.7)#1,644
32. Dundee 66.7% 11.3% (+55.4)#32 17.0% (+49.7)#1,656
33. Pine Bend 66.7% 11.3% (+55.4)#33 17.0% (+49.7)#1,673
34. Riverland 66.2% 11.3% (+54.9)#34 17.0% (+49.2)#1,693
35. Naytahwaush 62.7% 11.3% (+51.5)#35 17.0% (+45.7)#1,888
36. Tamarack 62.5% 11.3% (+51.2)#36 17.0% (+45.5)#1,915
37. Evansville 62.4% 11.3% (+51.1)#37 17.0% (+45.4)#1,923
38. Wendell 61.1% 11.3% (+49.9)#38 17.0% (+44.1)#2,006
39. Freeborn 60.5% 11.3% (+49.2)#39 17.0% (+43.5)#2,052
40. Bluffton 60.5% 11.3% (+49.2)#40 17.0% (+43.5)#2,053
41. Walker 60.3% 11.3% (+49.0)#41 17.0% (+43.3)#2,066
42. Elmore 60.0% 11.3% (+48.7)#42 17.0% (+43.0)#2,085
43. Kelliher 60.0% 11.3% (+48.7)#43 17.0% (+43.0)#2,088
44. Jeffers 60.0% 11.3% (+48.7)#44 17.0% (+43.0)#2,089
45. Mckinley 60.0% 11.3% (+48.7)#45 17.0% (+43.0)#2,102
46. New Trier 60.0% 11.3% (+48.7)#46 17.0% (+43.0)#2,105
47. Delavan 59.1% 11.3% (+47.8)#47 17.0% (+42.1)#2,161
48. Jasper 59.0% 11.3% (+47.7)#48 17.0% (+42.0)#2,174
49. Pelican Rapids 57.3% 11.3% (+46.0)#49 17.0% (+40.3)#2,305
50. Floodwood 57.1% 11.3% (+45.9)#50 17.0% (+40.2)#2,314
51. Garrison 57.1% 11.3% (+45.9)#51 17.0% (+40.2)#2,324
52. Hollandale 56.6% 11.3% (+45.3)#52 17.0% (+39.6)#2,372
53. Ponemah 56.5% 11.3% (+45.3)#53 17.0% (+39.5)#2,376
54. Marble 56.5% 11.3% (+45.3)#54 17.0% (+39.5)#2,377
55. Twin Lakes 56.0% 11.3% (+44.7)#55 17.0% (+39.0)#2,420
56. Graceville 55.7% 11.3% (+44.4)#56 17.0% (+38.7)#2,454
57. Walnut Grove 54.5% 11.3% (+43.3)#57 17.0% (+37.6)#2,556
58. Finlayson 53.3% 11.3% (+42.1)#58 17.0% (+36.4)#2,696
59. Granada 52.4% 11.3% (+41.1)#59 17.0% (+35.4)#2,799
60. Northome 52.4% 11.3% (+41.1)#60 17.0% (+35.4)#2,800
61. Vineland 51.7% 11.3% (+40.5)#61 17.0% (+34.8)#2,855
62. Chandler 51.5% 11.3% (+40.3)#62 17.0% (+34.5)#2,877
63. Kiester 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#63 17.0% (+33.0)#3,009
64. Brooten 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#64 17.0% (+33.0)#3,012
65. Calumet 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#65 17.0% (+33.0)#3,047
66. Williams 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#66 17.0% (+33.0)#3,051
67. Kinney 50.0% 11.3% (+38.7)#67 17.0% (+33.0)#3,090
68. Ogema 46.7% 11.3% (+35.4)#68 17.0% (+29.7)#3,476
69. Magnolia 44.8% 11.3% (+33.6)#69 17.0% (+27.9)#3,707
70. Verndale 44.6% 11.3% (+33.4)#70 17.0% (+27.7)#3,737
71. Crosby 43.7% 11.3% (+32.4)#71 17.0% (+26.7)#3,874
72. Waterville 43.5% 11.3% (+32.2)#72 17.0% (+26.5)#3,905
73. Fosston 43.4% 11.3% (+32.2)#73 17.0% (+26.5)#3,919
74. St Joseph 43.3% 11.3% (+32.1)#74 17.0% (+26.3)#3,932
75. Aurora 43.3% 11.3% (+32.1)#75 17.0% (+26.3)#3,933
76. Emmons 42.9% 11.3% (+31.6)#76 17.0% (+25.9)#4,005
77. Murdock 42.3% 11.3% (+31.1)#77 17.0% (+25.3)#4,089
78. Red Lake 41.2% 11.3% (+29.9)#78 17.0% (+24.2)#4,242
79. Ashby 40.8% 11.3% (+29.6)#79 17.0% (+23.8)#4,309
80. Wanamingo 40.7% 11.3% (+29.4)#80 17.0% (+23.7)#4,330
81. Pipestone 40.6% 11.3% (+29.4)#81 17.0% (+23.7)#4,338
82. Claremont 40.0% 11.3% (+28.7)#82 17.0% (+23.0)#4,448
83. Evan 40.0% 11.3% (+28.7)#83 17.0% (+23.0)#4,491
84. Correll 40.0% 11.3% (+28.7)#84 17.0% (+23.0)#4,497
85. St James 39.7% 11.3% (+28.4)#85 17.0% (+22.7)#4,531
86. Redby 39.6% 11.3% (+28.3)#86 17.0% (+22.6)#4,556
87. Pine Point 39.3% 11.3% (+28.0)#87 17.0% (+22.3)#4,610
88. Cosmos 39.1% 11.3% (+27.9)#88 17.0% (+22.2)#4,625
89. Blackduck 39.1% 11.3% (+27.8)#89 17.0% (+22.1)#4,634
90. Villard 38.9% 11.3% (+27.6)#90 17.0% (+21.9)#4,668
91. Rush City 38.6% 11.3% (+27.3)#91 17.0% (+21.6)#4,712
92. Grove City 38.5% 11.3% (+27.3)#92 17.0% (+21.6)#4,723
93. Sherburn 38.3% 11.3% (+27.0)#93 17.0% (+21.3)#4,779
94. Rushmore 37.8% 11.3% (+26.5)#94 17.0% (+20.8)#4,867
95. Waite Park 37.7% 11.3% (+26.4)#95 17.0% (+20.7)#4,880
96. Belview 37.5% 11.3% (+26.2)#96 17.0% (+20.5)#4,920
97. Staples 37.3% 11.3% (+26.0)#97 17.0% (+20.3)#4,969
98. Isle 36.5% 11.3% (+25.3)#98 17.0% (+19.6)#5,131
99. Sunburg 36.4% 11.3% (+25.1)#99 17.0% (+19.4)#5,188
100. Miltona 36.2% 11.3% (+24.9)#100 17.0% (+19.2)#5,220

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota?
Boyd has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Minnesota?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota is 11.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.