Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Epes 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#1 17.0% (+83.0)#153
2. Abanda 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#2 17.0% (+83.0)#237
3. Newbern 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#3 17.0% (+83.0)#252
4. Gainesville 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#4 17.0% (+83.0)#283
5. Fredonia 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#5 17.0% (+83.0)#311
6. Coffee Springs 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#6 17.0% (+83.0)#357
7. Five Points 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#7 17.0% (+83.0)#415
8. Chunchula 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#8 17.0% (+83.0)#420
9. Vredenburgh 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#9 17.0% (+83.0)#448
10. Yellow Bluff 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#10 17.0% (+83.0)#451
11. Fruitdale 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#11 17.0% (+83.0)#475
12. Ethelsville 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#12 17.0% (+83.0)#552
13. Billingsley 100.0% 22.6% (+77.4)#13 17.0% (+83.0)#593
14. Sanford 93.8% 22.6% (+71.2)#14 17.0% (+76.8)#713
15. South Vinemont 90.5% 22.6% (+67.9)#15 17.0% (+73.5)#754
16. Heath 88.9% 22.6% (+66.3)#16 17.0% (+71.9)#784
17. Shorter 86.2% 22.6% (+63.6)#17 17.0% (+69.2)#844
18. Goodwater 84.5% 22.6% (+61.9)#18 17.0% (+67.5)#892
19. Brighton 84.0% 22.6% (+61.4)#19 17.0% (+67.0)#905
20. Fort Deposit 83.7% 22.6% (+61.1)#20 17.0% (+66.7)#913
21. Brent 82.9% 22.6% (+60.3)#21 17.0% (+65.9)#939
22. Selmont West Selmont 82.9% 22.6% (+60.3)#22 17.0% (+65.9)#940
23. Uniontown 80.6% 22.6% (+58.0)#23 17.0% (+63.6)#1,004
24. Boligee 79.3% 22.6% (+56.7)#24 17.0% (+62.3)#1,060
25. Pine Hill 78.9% 22.6% (+56.3)#25 17.0% (+61.9)#1,076
26. Lisman 78.8% 22.6% (+56.2)#26 17.0% (+61.8)#1,080
27. Union Springs 76.7% 22.6% (+54.1)#27 17.0% (+59.7)#1,150
28. Cusseta 75.0% 22.6% (+52.4)#28 17.0% (+58.0)#1,227
29. Delta 74.4% 22.6% (+51.8)#29 17.0% (+57.4)#1,251
30. Lookout Mountain 74.4% 22.6% (+51.8)#30 17.0% (+57.4)#1,254
31. Trafford 72.9% 22.6% (+50.3)#31 17.0% (+55.9)#1,313
32. Clio 72.6% 22.6% (+50.0)#32 17.0% (+55.7)#1,336
33. Flomaton 70.4% 22.6% (+47.8)#33 17.0% (+53.5)#1,441
34. Lester 70.0% 22.6% (+47.4)#34 17.0% (+53.0)#1,462
35. Florala 69.2% 22.6% (+46.6)#35 17.0% (+52.3)#1,497
36. Marion 68.8% 22.6% (+46.2)#36 17.0% (+51.8)#1,518
37. Gaylesville 68.8% 22.6% (+46.2)#37 17.0% (+51.8)#1,527
38. Coats Bend 68.6% 22.6% (+46.0)#38 17.0% (+51.6)#1,532
39. Detroit 68.4% 22.6% (+45.8)#39 17.0% (+51.4)#1,541
40. Louisville 67.6% 22.6% (+45.0)#40 17.0% (+50.6)#1,572
41. Gallant 67.5% 22.6% (+44.9)#41 17.0% (+50.5)#1,583
42. Reeltown 66.7% 22.6% (+44.1)#42 17.0% (+49.7)#1,625
43. Avon 66.7% 22.6% (+44.1)#43 17.0% (+49.7)#1,627
44. Lakeview 66.7% 22.6% (+44.1)#44 17.0% (+49.7)#1,654
45. Evergreen 66.2% 22.6% (+43.6)#45 17.0% (+49.2)#1,691
46. Brundidge 66.0% 22.6% (+43.4)#46 17.0% (+49.0)#1,704
47. La Fayette 65.5% 22.6% (+42.9)#47 17.0% (+48.5)#1,725
48. West Blocton 64.6% 22.6% (+42.0)#48 17.0% (+47.6)#1,763
49. White Hall 64.3% 22.6% (+41.7)#49 17.0% (+47.3)#1,779
50. Newville 62.8% 22.6% (+40.2)#50 17.0% (+45.8)#1,882
51. Lynn 62.5% 22.6% (+39.9)#51 17.0% (+45.5)#1,899
52. Gordon 62.5% 22.6% (+39.9)#52 17.0% (+45.5)#1,907
53. Camden 61.9% 22.6% (+39.3)#53 17.0% (+44.9)#1,957
54. Pisgah 61.8% 22.6% (+39.2)#54 17.0% (+44.8)#1,961
55. Ariton 61.5% 22.6% (+38.9)#55 17.0% (+44.6)#1,976
56. River Falls 61.1% 22.6% (+38.5)#56 17.0% (+44.1)#2,004
57. Aliceville 60.7% 22.6% (+38.1)#57 17.0% (+43.7)#2,027
58. Greenville 60.7% 22.6% (+38.1)#58 17.0% (+43.7)#2,033
59. Rockford 60.5% 22.6% (+37.9)#59 17.0% (+43.5)#2,049
60. Hayneville 60.3% 22.6% (+37.7)#60 17.0% (+43.4)#2,063
61. Hanceville 60.2% 22.6% (+37.6)#61 17.0% (+43.2)#2,074
62. Blue Springs 60.0% 22.6% (+37.4)#62 17.0% (+43.0)#2,101
63. Arley 59.6% 22.6% (+37.1)#63 17.0% (+42.7)#2,125
64. Oakman 59.1% 22.6% (+36.5)#64 17.0% (+42.1)#2,154
65. Elkmont 59.1% 22.6% (+36.5)#65 17.0% (+42.1)#2,157
66. Lanett 58.8% 22.6% (+36.2)#66 17.0% (+41.8)#2,189
67. Bessemer 58.7% 22.6% (+36.1)#67 17.0% (+41.7)#2,198
68. Forestdale 57.8% 22.6% (+35.2)#68 17.0% (+40.9)#2,270
69. Lineville 57.6% 22.6% (+35.0)#69 17.0% (+40.6)#2,287
70. Vincent 57.0% 22.6% (+34.4)#70 17.0% (+40.0)#2,340
71. Vernon 56.7% 22.6% (+34.1)#71 17.0% (+39.7)#2,364
72. Gilbertown 56.2% 22.6% (+33.7)#72 17.0% (+39.3)#2,393
73. Coker 56.2% 22.6% (+33.6)#73 17.0% (+39.2)#2,398
74. Red Bay 55.9% 22.6% (+33.3)#74 17.0% (+39.0)#2,430
75. Rock Creek 55.6% 22.6% (+33.0)#75 17.0% (+38.6)#2,461
76. Horn Hill 55.6% 22.6% (+33.0)#76 17.0% (+38.6)#2,475
77. Bakerhill 55.0% 22.6% (+32.4)#77 17.0% (+38.0)#2,523
78. New Brockton 54.9% 22.6% (+32.3)#78 17.0% (+37.9)#2,530
79. Adamsville 54.8% 22.6% (+32.2)#79 17.0% (+37.9)#2,533
80. Colony 54.5% 22.6% (+31.9)#80 17.0% (+37.6)#2,561
81. Steele 54.5% 22.6% (+31.9)#81 17.0% (+37.5)#2,575
82. Cottonwood 53.7% 22.6% (+31.1)#82 17.0% (+36.7)#2,656
83. Fayette 53.6% 22.6% (+31.0)#83 17.0% (+36.7)#2,659
84. Ashland 53.5% 22.6% (+30.9)#84 17.0% (+36.6)#2,672
85. Camp Hill 51.6% 22.6% (+29.0)#85 17.0% (+34.6)#2,864
86. Cherokee 51.6% 22.6% (+29.0)#86 17.0% (+34.6)#2,866
87. Linden 51.1% 22.6% (+28.5)#87 17.0% (+34.2)#2,909
88. Eufaula 51.0% 22.6% (+28.4)#88 17.0% (+34.0)#2,924
89. Hobson City 50.8% 22.6% (+28.2)#89 17.0% (+33.9)#2,934
90. Hackneyville 50.4% 22.6% (+27.8)#90 17.0% (+33.5)#2,961
91. Luverne 50.4% 22.6% (+27.8)#91 17.0% (+33.4)#2,966
92. Ohatchee 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#92 17.0% (+33.0)#3,000
93. Mosses 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#93 17.0% (+33.0)#3,005
94. Mulga 50.0% 22.6% (+27.4)#94 17.0% (+33.0)#3,007
95. Talladega 49.0% 22.6% (+26.4)#95 17.0% (+32.0)#3,178
96. Smoke Rise 47.6% 22.6% (+25.0)#96 17.0% (+30.6)#3,345
97. Rutledge 47.5% 22.6% (+24.9)#97 17.0% (+30.6)#3,347
98. Cordova 47.5% 22.6% (+24.9)#98 17.0% (+30.5)#3,349
99. Hartford 47.4% 22.6% (+24.8)#99 17.0% (+30.4)#3,359
100. Bridgeport 47.3% 22.6% (+24.7)#100 17.0% (+30.3)#3,376

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama?
Epes has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Alabama?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama is 22.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.