Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA
RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS
Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Los Angeles
Compare Zip Codes
Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles
2.4%
76.7%
Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA
| Zip Code | Child Poverty (Girls) | vs State | vs National | |
| 1. | 90021 | 76.7% | 15.8% (+60.9)#24 | 17.0% (+59.8)#666 |
| 2. | 90017 | 59.2% | 15.8% (+43.4)#48 | 17.0% (+42.2)#1,320 |
| 3. | 90058 | 44.4% | 15.8% (+28.6)#90 | 17.0% (+27.4)#2,682 |
| 4. | 90015 | 44.0% | 15.8% (+28.2)#92 | 17.0% (+27.0)#2,739 |
| 5. | 90005 | 43.4% | 15.8% (+27.6)#95 | 17.0% (+26.4)#2,830 |
| 6. | 90057 | 41.1% | 15.8% (+25.3)#109 | 17.0% (+24.1)#3,182 |
| 7. | 90011 | 39.8% | 15.8% (+23.9)#116 | 17.0% (+22.8)#3,420 |
| 8. | 90033 | 38.8% | 15.8% (+23.0)#123 | 17.0% (+21.8)#3,571 |
| 9. | 90029 | 36.9% | 15.8% (+21.1)#140 | 17.0% (+19.9)#3,955 |
| 10. | 90003 | 36.7% | 15.8% (+20.9)#142 | 17.0% (+19.7)#3,998 |
| 11. | 90001 | 35.5% | 15.8% (+19.7)#151 | 17.0% (+18.5)#4,278 |
| 12. | 90018 | 35.3% | 15.8% (+19.5)#154 | 17.0% (+18.3)#4,327 |
| 13. | 90037 | 35.2% | 15.8% (+19.4)#156 | 17.0% (+18.2)#4,342 |
| 14. | 90023 | 34.6% | 15.8% (+18.8)#163 | 17.0% (+17.6)#4,485 |
| 15. | 90044 | 32.9% | 15.8% (+17.1)#186 | 17.0% (+16.0)#4,917 |
| 16. | 90026 | 32.7% | 15.8% (+16.9)#189 | 17.0% (+15.7)#4,984 |
| 17. | 90006 | 32.6% | 15.8% (+16.8)#190 | 17.0% (+15.7)#5,001 |
| 18. | 90002 | 31.6% | 15.8% (+15.8)#201 | 17.0% (+14.6)#5,299 |
| 19. | 90061 | 30.9% | 15.8% (+15.1)#211 | 17.0% (+13.9)#5,493 |
| 20. | 90047 | 28.1% | 15.8% (+12.3)#251 | 17.0% (+11.1)#6,368 |
| 21. | 90004 | 28.1% | 15.8% (+12.3)#252 | 17.0% (+11.1)#6,375 |
| 22. | 90059 | 27.9% | 15.8% (+12.1)#256 | 17.0% (+10.9)#6,442 |
| 23. | 90031 | 27.6% | 15.8% (+11.8)#260 | 17.0% (+10.7)#6,513 |
| 24. | 90007 | 27.0% | 15.8% (+11.2)#279 | 17.0% (+10.0)#6,752 |
| 25. | 90038 | 25.2% | 15.8% (+9.38)#314 | 17.0% (+8.21)#7,451 |
| 26. | 90032 | 24.9% | 15.8% (+9.08)#325 | 17.0% (+7.92)#7,616 |
| 27. | 90019 | 24.4% | 15.8% (+8.63)#333 | 17.0% (+7.46)#7,777 |
| 28. | 90063 | 24.4% | 15.8% (+8.57)#335 | 17.0% (+7.41)#7,803 |
| 29. | 90022 | 24.2% | 15.8% (+8.35)#342 | 17.0% (+7.18)#7,891 |
| 30. | 90016 | 23.4% | 15.8% (+7.61)#368 | 17.0% (+6.45)#8,192 |
| 31. | 90062 | 21.9% | 15.8% (+6.14)#404 | 17.0% (+4.97)#8,901 |
| 32. | 90008 | 21.5% | 15.8% (+5.69)#417 | 17.0% (+4.52)#9,113 |
| 33. | 90043 | 20.8% | 15.8% (+4.98)#433 | 17.0% (+3.81)#9,459 |
| 34. | 90010 | 19.4% | 15.8% (+3.59)#471 | 17.0% (+2.43)#10,158 |
| 35. | 90065 | 18.8% | 15.8% (+2.94)#491 | 17.0% (+1.78)#10,486 |
| 36. | 90020 | 18.0% | 15.8% (+2.24)#514 | 17.0% (+1.07)#10,913 |
| 37. | 90056 | 17.1% | 15.8% (+1.29)#541 | 17.0% (+0.124)#11,459 |
| 38. | 90027 | 16.1% | 15.8% (+0.311)#577 | 17.0% (-0.857)#12,051 |
| 39. | 90028 | 16.0% | 15.8% (+0.164)#578 | 17.0% (-1.00)#12,131 |
| 40. | 90041 | 15.6% | 15.8% (-0.239)#597 | 17.0% (-1.41)#12,379 |
| 41. | 90042 | 15.5% | 15.8% (-0.301)#599 | 17.0% (-1.47)#12,411 |
| 42. | 90040 | 13.9% | 15.8% (-1.89)#663 | 17.0% (-3.06)#13,475 |
| 43. | 90014 | 12.9% | 15.8% (-2.86)#704 | 17.0% (-4.03)#14,146 |
| 44. | 90012 | 12.7% | 15.8% (-3.07)#716 | 17.0% (-4.24)#14,290 |
| 45. | 90077 | 10.1% | 15.8% (-5.71)#832 | 17.0% (-6.88)#16,173 |
| 46. | 90067 | 9.7% | 15.8% (-6.13)#850 | 17.0% (-7.30)#16,505 |
| 47. | 90039 | 8.6% | 15.8% (-7.22)#912 | 17.0% (-8.39)#17,374 |
| 48. | 90025 | 7.2% | 15.8% (-8.58)#982 | 17.0% (-9.75)#18,529 |
| 49. | 90034 | 7.2% | 15.8% (-8.60)#985 | 17.0% (-9.77)#18,546 |
| 50. | 90064 | 7.0% | 15.8% (-8.81)#998 | 17.0% (-9.98)#18,722 |
| 51. | 90035 | 6.4% | 15.8% (-9.44)#1,035 | 17.0% (-10.6)#19,225 |
| 52. | 90036 | 5.9% | 15.8% (-9.88)#1,059 | 17.0% (-11.0)#19,589 |
| 53. | 90066 | 5.7% | 15.8% (-10.1)#1,068 | 17.0% (-11.3)#19,780 |
| 54. | 90024 | 5.2% | 15.8% (-10.6)#1,099 | 17.0% (-11.8)#20,254 |
| 55. | 90046 | 4.9% | 15.8% (-10.9)#1,118 | 17.0% (-12.1)#20,521 |
| 56. | 90048 | 4.2% | 15.8% (-11.6)#1,148 | 17.0% (-12.8)#21,137 |
| 57. | 90049 | 2.6% | 15.8% (-13.2)#1,230 | 17.0% (-14.3)#22,496 |
| 58. | 90045 | 2.4% | 15.8% (-13.4)#1,242 | 17.0% (-14.5)#22,680 |
1
Common Questions
What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA are:
What zip code has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA?
90021 has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA with 76.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles is 22.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California is 15.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.